Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2 ENG Submitter Approver Course September 2021
2 ENG Submitter Approver Course September 2021
Remote Learning
September 2021
INDEX
1
EURIBOR
€STR
LIBOR TRANSITION
PART III
EURO RISK-FREE RATES WORKING GROUP
2
PART II
ISP AS CONTRIBUTOR
EURIBOR
€STR
Gianfranco Marin
Fabrizio Tallei
Group Treasury – Euro Money Market
3
❑ Governance
❑ Internal Oversight and Verification Procedures (Internal and External)
❑ Roles and Responsibilities
❑ Conflict of Interest Policies, Individuation and Mitigation
❑ Contribution Methodology
❑ Input Data Policy
❑ Transmission Data Policy
❑ Record-Keeping Policy
❑ Ethical Standards & Whistleblowing Policy
❑ Complaint Procedures
7
Intesa Sanpaolo As Contributor
Code of Obligations of Panel Banks
Product Control shall:
• on a quarterly basis, produce a report with the analysis of the final Intesa Sanpaolo contributions to the
Euribor (therefore including the level 1 and 2 rates calculated by EMMI and the level 3 rates);
• on a quarterly basis, produce a graph of the final Intesa Sanpaolo contributions (including the level 1 and 2
rates calculated by EMMI) and the final Euribor fixings, putting evidence on the trends of the two curves;
• on a quarterly basis, perform a trend analysis with focus on the coherence between the transactions’ rates
and the internal short-term cost of funds pricing used for level 3 contribution.
• produce quarterly monitoring reports on the correlation between Euribor floating interest rates positions and
Euribor contributions at group level for both banking and trading books;
On a quarterly basis, the Department makes an ex-post control report to identify the correlation (if any)
between the trend of the contribution and the positions of the desk whose portfolios are linked to Euribor;
• annually report to the Group Risk Financial Risk Committee on the outcomes of the control activities;
• analyze and approve – at least annually – the Level 3 methodology, based on statistical investigations, back-
testing and comparisons related to Intesa Sanpaolo own transactional data, submitted rates, other panel
bank available data, available current market data (both cash and derivatives) and official fixing quotes.
• conduct an internal review of the security certification of the IT systems supporting the Euribor rate
submission process with the purpose to obtain the self-certification ISO 27001 .
8
Intesa Sanpaolo As Contributor
Code of Obligations of Panel Banks
• Report to the Management Board annually on the outcomes of the review activities
• Report to the Management Board in case of complaints and anonymous reporting on suspicious
contributions/behaviors
• On a timely basis, report to EMMI any material issues arising from the reviews, including material findings from
the internal and external audits.
External Audit shall:
The European Money Markets Institute is an international non-for-profit association under Belgian law,
founded in 1999 – along with the introduction of the euro. Based in Brussels, its members are national banking
associations in the Member States of the European Union.
10
With the aim of better aligning the benchmark and its substance to the developments of the
financial markets and following the consequent regulatory requests, in 2019 EMMI has
finalized some important improvements.
Particular importance was given to the strengthening of the Euribor definition that now
includes two fundamental components:
CURRENT DEFINITION: EMMI states the Underlying Interest for EURIBOR as “the
rate at which wholesale funds in euro could be obtained by credit institutions in
the EU and EFTA countries in the unsecured money market”.
Euribor – «Hybrid» Methodology
12
The Euribor must be anchored to the actual transactions of the Panel Banks as
much as possible. Actual transactions’ rates are used directly and indirectly by the
Calculation Agent to obtain all panel banks’ single contribution strings.
! Only five tenors are currently published: 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year !
Euribor – «Hybrid» Methodology
13
Trimming: for each tenor the Calculation Agent discards the 15% higher and 15%
lower rates obtained from each single Panel banks. The arithmetic mean is
calculated on the remaining 70%, rounded to the third decimal with the «half away
from zero» convention.
Some contingency provisions could be applied on the single tenors in case of:
RE-FIXING POLICY: if relevant errors (>2BP) are detected in time, the Calculation
Agent has the right to modify the published rates, but no later than 3 pm CET.
Euribor – «Hybrid» Methodology
14
! Starting from 19 April 2021, EMMI has lowered the minimum threshold to consider a transaction
eligible for level 1 from 20€/mln to 10€/mln. Moreover, in addition to the T,T+1,T+2 start value date
conventions, also the transactions with start value date T+3 are now eligible !
15
Euribor – «Hybrid» Methodology
Level 2.1 Methodology (EMMI)
16
Euribor – «Hybrid» Methodology
Level 2.2 Methodology (EMMI)
Euribor – «Hybrid» Methodology
17
1W no application
1m-6m up to T-4
12m up to T-6
18
Euribor – «Hybrid» Methodology
EMMI Waterfall Methodology
Euribor – «Hybrid» Methodology
19
Other data:
• Non-Financial Corporation Deals
• ISP Ratings
• Repo Market
• Fx Swaps
Euribor – «Hybrid» Methodology
27
- (on day T) the front-office concludes and validates all the transactions in FCHUB’s blotter level 1-2. ISP Ireland and
Luxembourg send a recap of their short-term paper activity;
- (on day T+1before 08.30 CET) the transactions included in the MMSR unsecured package are sent to the
Calculation Agent. The Submitter receives a fully automatic flow (excel format) including all the details and verifies
that the transactions package corresponds to that one received by the Calculation Agent (activity performed
accessing EBASS site). The submitter must also check the transactions concluded via short-term paper issuances by
our Ireland and Luxembourg subsidiaries;
- (on day T+1 before 09.45 CET) the authorized Submitter sends the proposal of level 3 contribution;
- (on day T+1 before 09.45 CET) the Approver checks the proposal and authorizes the dispatch;
- (on day T+1 before 09.45 CET) the Submitter upload the contribution on FCHUB and, after having selected the
name of the Approver, sends the rates to the Calculation Agent;
- (on day T+1 before 11.00 CET) the Checker verifies that the rates sent are exactly those internally authorized.
31
Euribor – «Hybrid» Methodology
The Contribution Process
OPERATIONS
- (on day T) check any single eligible deal with the details agreed with the counterparties;
- (on day T) check the payment matching and investigate in case of modified or cancelled deals;
- (on day T) check the success of automatic on-line quality checks active on each single deal;
- (on day T+1) check the coherence of Euribor eligible transactions and MMSR reporting.
PRODUCT CONTROL
FC HUB Mapping
Euribor – «Hybrid» Methodology
34
FC HUB Filters
Euribor – «Hybrid» Methodology
35
Starting from October 2019, the ECB publishes the rate every TARGET2 calendar
working day. The rate is based on individual transactions concluded at market
rates the day before (reporting date T) with maturity date T+1 (therefore overnight
transactions).
PART III
LIBOR TRANSITION
M. Cristina Lege
Group Treasury – Money Market & Settlement
44
Background on Libor
What is LIBOR and how is it calculated?
LIBOR is a series of interest rates intended to reflect banks’ average cost of short-term, wholesale unsecured borrowing and it is
used in many financial products.
Rates are determined daily by the LIBOR administrator, the ICE Benchmark Administration (IBA), for various currencies (USD, EUR,
GBP, CHF, JPY) and tenors (Overnight, 1w, 1m, 2m, 3m, 6m and 12m).
The underlying market that LIBOR is derived from is no longer used in any significant volume. Therefore, the submissions made by
banks to sustain the LIBOR rate are often based (at least in part) on expert judgement rather than actual transactions.
LIBOR funding market changes and new structural risks have caught the eye of regulators around the globe:
Basel III (NSFR): binding liquidity metrics limit the banks’ ability to use short-term unsecured funding
Manipulation: scandals have shaken the confidence in the process
Legal Risk: panel banks are concerned about legal scrutiny
Stability: IBORs spiked during the financial crisis as banks stopped lending
45
Loss of representativeness
The FCA will consult in Q2-2021 on whether to continue the following fixings on a synthetic basis and on which legacy
contracts they will be permitted to be used:
1-month, 3-month and 6-month GBP Libor for a further (not specified) period after end-2021
1-month, 3-month and 6-month JPY Libor after end-2021 for one additional year
Synthetic Libors are expected to be calculated as term Risk Free Rate (e.g. 3-month SONIA) plus a credit adjustment
Synthetic Libors are reserved for existing transactions and are expected to be allowed on tough legacy contracts only (e.g.
retail bonds with widespread distribution, complex structured products)
For 1-month, 3-month and 6-month synthetic USD Libor after the end of June 2023, the FCA will assess the case for a synthetic
USD Libor
LIBOR Transition 46
Cessation Timeline
ISDA From 31/12/2021 to From 31/12/2022 to From 30/06/2023 to
Spread* Until 31/12/2021 31/12/2022 30/06/2023 Date TBD** After Date TBD**
O/N 0.64
1M 11.45
3M 26.16
6M 42.83
12M 71.51
O/N -0.24
1W 1.68
1M 3.26
3M 11.93
6M 27.66
12M 46.44
O/N -1.84
1W -1.98
1M -2.92
3M 0.84
6M 5.51
12M 16.60
Cessation Timeline
ISDA Until From 31/12/2021 From 31/12/2022 to From 30/06/2023 to
Spread* 31/12/2021 to 31/12/2022 30/06/2023 Date TBD** After Date TBD**
O/N -5.51
1W -7.05
1M -5.71
3M 0.31
6M 7.41
12M 20.48
O/N 0.17
1W 2.43
1M 4.56
3M 9.62
6M 15.37
12M 29.93
Main Risk-Free Rates (RFRs) That Will Take Over the LIBOR
Risk-Free Rates peculiarity is the fact that those rates are based only on actual transactions with maturity overnight, concluded
over the money markets of different jurisdictions.
Recent developments have shown that the only liquid money market sector with sufficient volumes is the one represented by
very short-term maturities.
Being overnight transactions, the credit risk premium is considered almost non-existent (“Risk-Free”).
49
LIBOR Transition
Fallback Mechanisms
LIBOR Transition
CAS Credit Adjustment Spread
The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) on March 5th 2021 announced the official dates of the
LIBOR dismission.
Shortly after, ISDA officially defined the Credit Adjustment Spread “fixing procedure” under rules
and mechanisms already identified after various consultations (historical median over a 5-year
period).
LIBOR Transition 51
American Interbank Offered Rate US Dollar ICE Bank Yield Index (BYI)
(AMERIBOR)
Calculation based on wholesale and primary
Calculation based on O/N unsecured loans on unsecured transactions (funds exchanged
the AFX exchange between big international banks)
The second and even more UPDATE OF THE WORKING GROUP STRUCTURE
challenging phase started
after the first €STR official
publication (2nd october
2019) to elaborate all the
consultations and
recommendations on
Euribor fallback. With this
aim the WG structure had
to be updated.
Working Group on Euro Risk Free Rates – Main Activities 1/2
Among the main activities of the working group is worth to mention:
DONE!
Recommendation of €STR as the european risk free rate
➢ Request to the European Commission in 2018 to postpone the go live of the BMR for the critical benchmarks until the end of
2021with 2 years of transitory period from 2019
➢ Lunch of public consultations in order to receive input from the industry on the choice of the new risk-free rate and the
related transition from Eonia to €STR – 2018/beginning 2019
➢ Publication of a Report on the Transition for cash and derivatives products – Aug 2019
➢ Letter to IASB on accountancy and hedging issues- Jun 2019 and other contacts in 2020
➢ Two workshops hosted by ECB to inform the industry (Nov 2018 and Sept 2019)
➢ Designation of the National Ambassadors to facilitate the communication in each single European Country
Working Group on Euro Risk Free Rates – Main Activities 2/2
➢ Support to the creation of a liquid €STR market for cash and derivatives products– starting from Oct 2019
➢ Elaboration of the principles for a new term structure €STR based (forward looking and/or backward looking
methodologies) – Oct-Dec 2019
➢ Impact assessment on credit spread to be used to elaborate a new risk-free curve €STR based to be used as
Euribor – Dec 2019/Beginning 2020
➢ Launch of a request for interest for administrators of the €STR based term structure - Jun 2019 and proposal
received in the following months
➢ Publication of two public consultations to receive further input from the industry on legal and technical detail for
the definition of Euribor fallback (e.g. trigger events) for cash and derivatives products - Nov 2020
➢ New organization of the WG following the change of the Secretariat from ECB to ESMA from May 2021 (first
meeting Jul 2021) and enlargement of the WG in the next few months (starting from Oct 2021)
Working Group on Euro Risk Free Rates – Publications 1/3
https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/pr/date/2021/ht
ml/ecb.pr210511~7cce4a1370.en.html
Slides prepared for the AMBASSADORS and PARTICIPANTS in the WORKING GROUP ON EURO RISK FREE RATES
by Workstream n.7 - Communication and Education | May 2021
For working group on euro risk-free rates ambassadors to engage with internal and external stakeholders
on the working group’s recommendations regarding EURIBOR fallback provisions
Use
To explain the key elements of recommendations on EURIBOR fallback trigger events and EURIBOR fallback
measures for cash products published by the working group on euro risk-free rates
Purpose
62
Background
Why does the market need EURIBOR fallback provisions?
63
Recommendations on EURIBOR fallback provisions
• However, EURIBOR fallback provisions are required in order to (1) cover for a scenario in which the
benchmark will permanently cease; and (2) comply with IOSCO principles and BMR article 28 (2).
• As part of its mandate, with the aim of ensuring a smooth transition in case EURIBOR permanently ceases to
exist, the working group on euro risk-free rates published recommendations regarding:
2. EURIBOR fallback measures for cash products, i.e. €STR-based term structures and spread adjustment,
and market conventions
64
The need for a EURIBOR fallback provision
Robust fallback provisions reduce contract uncertainty and the risk of legal disputes in the event that the initially
agreed upon benchmark rate is no longer available
* ESMA has published a Q&A that provides guidance on the implementation of BMR article 28.2
65
Fallback provisions and their main elements
Fallback provisions are defined by three key elements which determine the application of, and the conditions applicable to, the provision:
Trigger event: defines events and the Fallback rate: identifies the Spread adjustment: if the new
future date the fallback will be applied alternative reference rate fallback rate provides an
on. Include events related to under a term structure economically different outcome to
• permanent cessation methodology the original rate, a spread is
• temporary non-availability • Forward-looking included to avoid or minimise the
• non-representativeness (pre-cessation). • Backward-looking transfer of value.
The WFG euro RFR released a set of recommendations covering these key elements of the fallback provisions:
1. The working group acknowledges the EURIBOR fallback measures for derivatives products that ISDA included in (1) the 2006 ISDA Definitions for new
transactions, and (2) the IBOR Fallbacks Protocol for legacy contracts, if market participants choose to adhere to it. Therefore, the working group’s
recommendations only include specific use cases for cash products.
66
Recommendations on
EURIBOR fallback
trigger events
67
Recommendations on EURIBOR fallback Trigger event
trigger events
financial instruments
referencing
EURIBOR.
68
Recommendations on EURIBOR fallback Trigger event
trigger events
Permanent and pre cessation EURIBOR trigger event recommendations
Market participants are recommended to include as a trigger event…
• … an official public statement or publication of information by or on behalf of the regulatory supervisor of the EURIBOR administrator or the EURIBOR
administrator stating that said administrator has ceased or will cease to provide EURIBOR permanently or indefinitely provided that, at the time
of the statement or publication, there is no successor administrator that will continue to provide EURIBOR.
• … an official public statement by or on behalf of the supervisor of the EURIBOR administrator that, in its view, (i) EURIBOR is no longer
representative, or will no longer be representative of the underlying market it purports to measure as of a certain date, and (ii) such
representativeness will not be restored (as determined by such supervisor).
Market participants could consider whether it would be appropriate to include as a trigger an event…
• … in which use of EURIBOR has become, for any reason, unlawful for relevant parties to the agreement or in which such parties have otherwise become
prohibited from using EURIBOR.
• … in which EURIBOR is permanently no longer published, i.e. without any previous official announcement by the competent authority or the
administrator.
69
Recommendations on
EURIBOR fallback
measures for cash products
70
Recommendations on EURIBOR fallback Fallback rate
71
Recommendations on EURIBOR fallback Fallback rate
* For retail mortgages and consumer/SME loans, these comments specifically refer to the second level of the waterfall
** For securitizations, market participants could also consider consistency with other debt securities
72
Recommendations on EURIBOR fallback Spread adjustment
Recommendations for a credit spread Recommendations for conventions when using a €STR-
adjustment based backward-looking term structure methodology
In order to ensure economic equivalence between Euribor and 1. For those cash products for which the working group suggests using a
the corresponding €STR term structures (forward-looking or backward-looking term structure, the working group recommends market
backward-looking), the working group recommends to calculate participants to use the compounded €STR average rates, as will be
and apply a spread adjustment that reflects the value of a bank’s published by the ECB as of 15 April 2021.
credit risk and other premia embedded in EURIBOR.
2. The working group recommends the publication of the spread adjustment
1. The five-year historical median spread adjustment and/or an all-in rate that consists of (i) compounded €STR average rates
methodology should be the preferred approach for cash with an observation shift, and (ii) the historical median spread adjustment.
products. 3. In case a floor is applied in a contract, the working group recommends to
2. It´s highly desirable that the above approach should be apply the floor to the compounded €STR rate plus the five-year historical
applied across Euribor and other IBOR-linked cash products. median spread adjustment.
3. The spread adjustment value for each individual tenor should 4. Based on the simpler calculation methodology and consistency with the
be the same irrespective of the term structure methodology derivative market, the working group recommends the compounding the
chosen (e.g. forward-looking and backward-looking). rate methodology.
4. Should the historical €STR market data be insufficient to 5. For those cash products for which the working group suggests a
compute an adjustment spread, data can be obtained by backward-looking lookback period methodology, the working group
using historical EONIA market data with a fixed spread of 8.5 recommends market participants to use the observational shift calculation
bps between the two indices, given that EONIA has been methodology, with the use of the lag approach as a robust alternative to
recalibrated to €STR + 8.5 bps. the observational shift approach.
5. No one-year transition period is required.
73
Recap on Short-Term Rate Benchmarks Transition
o Will EURIBOR become even more reliable thanks to the enlargement of the contributing panel (the
OPEN administrator is working on this issue) and /or due to a more liquid money market in the next future?