Hipotesis

1) Tidak dapat perbezaan di antara ketagihan sosial media dan pengurusan impresi dalam talian

Gender

Social Media Addiction Scale Presentation of Online Self Scale

Sub Dimension Virtual Virtual Virtual Virtual Ideal Multiple Consistent Online
Tolerance Communi- Problem Information Self Selves Self Presentation
cation References
Gender N df 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62
Male 20 t -2.026 -0.495 -0.512 -0.941 -1.648 -0.143 -0.433 -0.162
Female 44 p 0.047 0.622 0.610 0.351 0.104 0.887 0.667 0.872

Based on the table (number) showed the results of the independent t-test on all the
dependent variables of the study. There was a significant difference in mean between gender
for the variable virtual tolerance t (62) = -2.026, p = 0.047. There was no significant
difference in mean between gender for the variable virtual communication t (62) = -0.495, p
= 0.622. There was no significant in mean difference between gender for the variable virtual
problem t (62) = -0.512, p = 0.610. There was no significant difference in mean between
gender for the variable virtual information t (62) = -0.941, p = 0.351. There was no
significant difference in mean between gender for the variable ideal self t (62) = -1.648, p =
0.104. There was no significant difference in mean between gender for the variable multiple
selves t (62) = -1.648, p = 0.104. There was no significant difference in mean between
gender for the variable consistent self t (62) = -0.433, p = 0.667. There was no significant
difference in mean between gender for the variable online presentation references t (52) = -
0.162, p = 0.872.
The results of this analysis show that there is no significant difference in mean between
genders for all the dependent variables of the study except for the variable virtual tolerance
where there was a significant difference in mean between gender. This shows that the results
of the analysis between genders for the virtual tolerance variable are not homogeneous.
Meanwhile, the results of the analysis between genders for other dependent variables are
equivalent or homogeneous.
Age

Social Media Addiction Scale Presentation of Online Self Scale

Sub Dimension Virtual Virtual Virtual Virtual Ideal Multiple Consistent Online
Tolerance Communi Problem Information Self Selves Self Presentation
-cation References
Age N df 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62
18-20 50 t 0.475 1.061 -0.158 -0.696 -0.944 -0.810 -0.048 0.030
21-23 14 p 0.636 0.293 0.875 0.489 0.349 0.421 0.962 0.976

Ethnicity
 - Anova

Social Media Addiction Scale Presentation of Online Self Scale

Sub Virtual Virtual Virtual Virtual Ideal Multiple Consistent Online
Dimension Toleranc Communication Proble Information Self Selves Self Presentation
e m References
Between d 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Group f
F 0.137 0.098 2.138 0.538 0.711 2.504 0.830 3.531
p 0.872 0.907 0.127 0.587 0.495 0.090 0.441 0.035
Within d 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61
Group f

Table showed the result

The table above shows the results of the one-way Anova test on all the dependent variables
of the study. There was no significant difference between groups for variable virtual
tolerance (F (2,61) = 0.137, p = 0.872.

- Hochberg post hoc tests

Social Media Addiction Scale Presentation of Online Self Scale

Sub Dimension Virtual Virtual Virtual Virtual Ideal Multipl Consisten Online
Toleranc Communi Proble Informatio Self e Selves t Self Presentatio
e -cation m n n
References
(I) (J) Sig. Sig. Sig. Sig. Sig. Sig. Sig. Sig.
Ethnicit Ethnicit
y y
Malay Indian 0.940 0.933 0.153 0.666 0.65 0.157 0.668 0.057
3
Others 1.000 0.972 0.822 0.995 0.89 0.532 0.781 0.690
1
Indian Malay 0.940 0.993 0.153 0.666 0.65 0.157 0.668 0.057
3
Others 0.972 0.998 0.897 0.950 0.99 0.992 1.000 0.066
8
Others Malay 1.000 0.972 0.822 0.995 0.89 0.532 0.781 0.690
1
Indian 0.972 0.998 0.897 0.950 0.99 0.992 1.000 0.066
8

Table (number) showed the result of the Hochberg post hot test on all the dependent
variables of the study. There was no statistically significant difference between Malay and
 Indian people (p = 0.940), Malay and others (p = 1.000), Indian and others (p = 0.972) for
variable virtual tolerance.

Faculty

- ANOVA

Social Media Addiction Scale Presentation of Online Self Scale

Sub Virtual Virtual Virtual Virtual Ideal Multiple Consistent Online
Dimension Toleranc Communication Proble Information Self Selves Self Presentation
e m References
Between d 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Group f
F 3.241 1.245 1.524 4.156 2.130 0.979 0.668 1.895
p 0.012 0.300 0.197 0.003 0.075 0.438 0.649 0.109
Within d 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58
Group f

The table above shows the results of the one-way Anova test on all the dependent variables
of the study. There was a statistically significant between groups for variable virtual
tolerance (F (5,58) = 03.241, p = 0.012).

- Hochberg post hoc tests

Social Media Addiction Scale Presentation of Online Self Scale

Sub Dimension Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Online
Virtual Virtual Virtual Virtual Ideal Multiple Consistent Presentation
Toleranc Communi- Problem Information Self Selves Self References
e cation
(I) (J) Sig. Sig. Sig. Sig. Sig. Sig. Sig. Sig.
Faculty Faculty
FSSK FST 0.991 0.964 0.917 1.000 0.860 0.999 1.000 1.000
FTSM 0.711 0.909 0.730 1.000 0.991 0.899 1.000 0.993
FUU 1.000 1.000 0.909 0.272 0.680 0.693 1.000 0.835
FPI 0.009 0.960 0.426 0.002 0.798 1.000 0.855 1.000
Others 0.365 0.417 0.956 1.000 0.097 1.000 1.000 0.083
FST FSSK 0.991 0.964 0.917 1.000 0.860 0.999 1.000 1.000
FTSM 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
FUU 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.668 1.000 0.994 1.000 0.998
FPI 0.173 1.000 0.996 0.020 1.000 1.000 0.999 1.000
 Others 0.990 0.999 1.000 1.000 0.966 1.000 1.000 0.586
FTSM FSSK 0.711 0.909 0.730 1.000 0.991 0.899 1.000 0.993
FST 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
FUU 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.822 1.000 1.000 0.999 1.000
FPI 0.628 1.000 1.000 0.046 1.000 0.999 0.881 1.000
Others 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.926 0.984 1.000 0.893
FUU FSSK 1.000 1.000 0.909 0.272 0.680 0.693 1.000 0.835
FST 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.668 1.000 0.994 1.000 0.998
FTSM 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.822 1.000 1.000 0.999 1.000
FPI 0.356 1.000 1.000 0.943 1.000 0.978 1.000 0.998
Others 0.998 0.997 1.000 0.655 1.000 0.877 1.000 1.000
FPI FSSK 0.009 0.960 0.426 0.002 0.798 1.000 0.855 1.000
FST 0.173 1.000 0.996 0.020 1.000 1.000 0.999 1.000
FTSM 0.628 1.000 1.000 0.046 1.000 0.999 0.881 1.000
FUU 0.356 1.000 1.000 0.943 1.000 0.978 1.000 0.998
Others 0.854 1.000 0.999 0.024 1.000 1.000 0.990 0.746
Others FSSK 0.365 0.417 0.956 1.000 0.097 1.000 1.000 0.083
FST 0.990 0.999 1.000 1.000 0.966 1.000 1.000 0.586
FTSM 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.926 0.984 1.000 0.893
FUU 0.998 0.997 1.000 0.655 1.000 0.877 1.000 1.000
FPI 0.854 1.000 0.999 0.024 1.000 1.000 0.990 0.746

Jadual menunjukkan keputusan ujian post hoc Hochberg ke atas kesemua pemboleh ubah
bersandar kajian. Tiada perbezaan yang signifikan antara FSSK dan FST (p = 0.991), FSSK
dan FTSM (p = 0.711), FSSK dan FUU (p = 1.000), FSSK dan lain-lain (p = 0.365), FST
dan FTSM (p = 1.000), FST dan FUU (p = 1.000), FST dan FPI (p = 0.173), FST dan lain-
lain (p = 0.990), FTSM dan FUU (p = 1.000), FTSM dan FPI (p = 0.628), FTSM dan lain-
lain (p = 1.000), FUU dan FPI (p = 0.356), FUU dan lain-lain (p = 0.998), FPI dan lain-lain
(p = 0.854) bagi pemboleh ubah toleransi maya. Terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan antara
FSSK dan FPI (p = 0.009) bagi pemboleh ubah toleransi maya.

Social Media
 Pecahan Sampel Mengikut Sosial Media
7% 3%
7%
32%

30%

21%

Instagram Twitter TikTok Facebook Snapchat Whatssap

Rajah di atas menunjukkan pecahan sampel kajian mengikut sosial media. Seramai 56 orang
(32%) menggunakan Instagram, 37 orang (21%) menggunakan Twitter, 53 orang (30%)
menggunakan TikTok, 13 orang (7%) menggunakan Facebook, 12 orang (7%)
menggunakan Snapchat dan 5 orang (3%) menggunakan Whatssap.

Correlations

Sub Dimension Ideal Self Multiple Selves Consistent Self Online

Presentation
references
N Pearson Sig. (2- Pearson Sig. (2- Pearson Sig. (2- Pearson Sig.
Correlation tailed) Correlation tailed) Correlation tailed) Correlation (2-
tailed)
Virtual 64 0.624 <.001 0.223 0.076 0.022 0.861 0.415 <.001
Tolerance
Virtual 64 0.659 <.001 0.421 <.001 -.084 0.511 0.630 <.001
Communication
Virtual Problem 64 0.503 <.001 0.468 <.001 -.038 0.767 0.395 0.001
Virtual 64 0.605 <.001 0.374 0.002 0.122 0.337 0.215 0.088
Information

Pearson product-moment correlation was run to determine the relationship between sub-
dimensions social media addiction scale and sub-dimensions presentation of online self-
scale. Table (number) showed that there was a positive correlation between the variable
virtual tolerance and variable ideal self at 0.624 which was significant at 0.00l level. There
was a negative correlation between the variable virtual tolerance and variable multiple
selves at 0.233 which was significant at 0.076.