Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 43
1 43
In 1947 when Shibata and Chang (1, 2) were studying the thiamine absorp
tion, a strange phenomenon was observed that 10mg of thiamine, clysterized
into the sigmoidal colon of a patient with habitual constipation combined with
beriberi,
soon became impossibleto detectagain. This led to the discovery
of a thiaminase in the feces of that patient, and this enzyme was proved to
About three per cent of ordinary subjects were proved to have this disease,
with no sex difference (4). It occurred in infants, except those below one
year of age, as well as in old people. It was seen more frequently in patients
suffering from beriberi or gastrointestinal disturbances. Fifteen per cent of
Under the presumption that there will be some bacteria responsible for
producing thiaminase in the feces, efforts were made to isolate them. At last
it was succeeded to discover a new bacterium in 1949 (5), and it was designated
by the Research Committee on Vitamin B as "Bacillus thiaminolyticus
METHODS
of the supernatant was added 1 γ of thiamine and the whole was kept at 37°
and pH 5.6 for 1 to 2 hours.
43
44 MATSUKAWA, CHANG ET AL. 1954
The procedures were as follows: 10ml of the feces extract (1:10) was taken
in a Claisen flask. Ten per cent suspension of Ca(OH)2 was added and the
(3) Amino nitrogen in the feces was mneasured by the formnol titration
method of Sorensen combined with the titration method of Willstatter and
Waldschmidt-Leitz, modified by Matsukawa (7).
RESULTS
nase Disease.
With the purpose to observe the distribution of thiaminase along the whole
length of the intestinum of the patient with thiaminase disease, the thiamine
the intestinal tract was estimated. This was made in two autoptic cases of the
patients who deceased by other illnesses, but were occasionally found to have
been suffering from thiaminase disease. The results are summarized in Table Ⅰ.
Table Ⅰ
by 1ml of the intestinal content extract (1:10) at pH 5.6 and 37° in 2 hours.
The test of thiamine with intestinal contents was made in case 1 of the
patients mentioned in Table I and also in another autoptic case of the subject,
certainly normal from the viewpoint of thiaminase. The results of the
former are shown in Table Ⅱ and those of the latter in Table Ⅲ.
Table Ⅱ.
Table Ⅲ.
In the upper part of the small intestine where no thiaminase could be found
in the patient, there was no marked difference between the two cases with
regard to the content of thiamine. In the distal regions of the intestines,
especially in the colon, the thiamine content was higher in the ordinary subject
(Table Ⅲ). In the colon, the difference between the two was striking espe
cially in the amount of free thiamine.
Observations on the Discharge of Thiamine Ingested.
Ten mg each of thiamine a day was given orally in succcssion for seven
days, and the discharge of thiamine in urine and feces was determined during
this period of time. This was made on five patients suffering from thiami
nase disease and on five norml subjects. The results obtained from these two
less in the patients, while its renal elimination does not differ considerably
Table Ⅳ
10mg of thiamine are given orally for 7 successive days.
Table Ⅴ
10mg of thiamine are given orally for 7 successive days.
Table Ⅵ.
Vol. 1 THIAMINE DEFICIENCY 47
BMM Carriers.
There are subjects in whom thiaminase cannot be found in their feces by
the ordinary way above mentioned, yet its presence can be verified by the
following procedures: A small piece of feces is put in the ordinary broth
natant.
Such subjects are apparently healthy and to be discriminated from the
namely 64.0±16.9mg per 100g in the former and 27.1±8.8mg per 100g
in the latter. Compared with the figures in Table Ⅵ, we can notice that the
content of ammonia-like nitrogen of the carriers is approximately equal to that
of the patients.
for thiaminase. In only two out of the 29 subjects, thiaminase could be detected
in their feces two to three days after the beginning of the administrations of
DISCUSSION
The above observations indicate that, in the patients suffering from thia
depends upon the disposition of the subject. This disposition may be in close
connection with the characteristics of the alimentary juices and/or with the
kinds of prevailing intestinal flora.
In another series of experiments which are not reported in this paper (2),
it was found that thiaminase disease could temporarily be cured by oral admi
Recently Hamada (9) has demonstrated that the disposition of the BMM
carrier is in connection with the rate of secretion of bile acid and that putre
factive bacteria are found far more abundant in the intestinal canal of the
SUMMARY
intestine to the rectum, and thiamine was present less in amount there. A
REFERENCES
1) Shibata,T., and Chang,S., Proc. VitaminB Res. Comm. 21,2 (1948).
2) Chang,S., Vitamins2,174 (1950).
3) Fujita,A., Vitamins7,1 (1954).
4) Fujimiya,M., Chang, S., and Matsukawa, D., Proc. VitaminB Res. Comm. 38, 22
(1950).
5) Matsukawa, D.,and Misawa, H., ibid.31,16 (1949).
6) Kuno, Y., Proc.Japan Acad. 27,362 (1951);ibid.28,235 (1952).
7) Matsukawa, D., SaikingakuZasshi520,342 (1939).
8) Matsukawa, D.,and Fujimiya,M., Proc. Vitamin B Res. Comm. 34, 18 (1949);
ibid.36,14 (1950).
9) Hamada, K., Vitamins 6,951 (1953);ibid. 7,65 (1954).