The story follows an unnamed narrator who is confined by her physician husband to an upstairs bedroom in their rented home in order to treat her for a nervous condition. She becomes fixated on the room's yellow wallpaper, seeing patterns emerge that seem to depict a woman trapped behind the paper. Over time, the narrator becomes obsessed with freeing this woman, eventually stripping all the paper from the walls. When her husband returns, she has lost touch with reality and crawls on the floor, believing she has freed herself from her confinement. The ambiguous ending leaves it unclear whether the narrator has achieved liberation or been further trapped by her mental illness.
The story follows an unnamed narrator who is confined by her physician husband to an upstairs bedroom in their rented home in order to treat her for a nervous condition. She becomes fixated on the room's yellow wallpaper, seeing patterns emerge that seem to depict a woman trapped behind the paper. Over time, the narrator becomes obsessed with freeing this woman, eventually stripping all the paper from the walls. When her husband returns, she has lost touch with reality and crawls on the floor, believing she has freed herself from her confinement. The ambiguous ending leaves it unclear whether the narrator has achieved liberation or been further trapped by her mental illness.
The story follows an unnamed narrator who is confined by her physician husband to an upstairs bedroom in their rented home in order to treat her for a nervous condition. She becomes fixated on the room's yellow wallpaper, seeing patterns emerge that seem to depict a woman trapped behind the paper. Over time, the narrator becomes obsessed with freeing this woman, eventually stripping all the paper from the walls. When her husband returns, she has lost touch with reality and crawls on the floor, believing she has freed herself from her confinement. The ambiguous ending leaves it unclear whether the narrator has achieved liberation or been further trapped by her mental illness.
The story follows an unnamed narrator who is confined by her physician husband to an upstairs bedroom in their rented home in order to treat her for a nervous condition. She becomes fixated on the room's yellow wallpaper, seeing patterns emerge that seem to depict a woman trapped behind the paper. Over time, the narrator becomes obsessed with freeing this woman, eventually stripping all the paper from the walls. When her husband returns, she has lost touch with reality and crawls on the floor, believing she has freed herself from her confinement. The ambiguous ending leaves it unclear whether the narrator has achieved liberation or been further trapped by her mental illness.
Comment on the ending of the story ‘ The Yellow Wallpaper ’.
Charlotte Perkins Gilman's short story ‘ The Yellow Wallpaper
’ when first published in 1892 in ‘The New England Magazine ’,underwent a mixed reception ; appreciated because of its near to life portrayal of insanity and criticized heavily because of the same. It has more often been read as a harrowing case study dealing with neurasthenia until the 1970s when it started being estimated as a piece of feminist literature.
The text as understood from its title is about a
wallpaper , a very conventionally feminine subject to deal with. But how this apparently benign topic functions as an outrageous counter – attack to the patriarchal institution together with a host of other conventional notions becomes our point of focus.
The story engaging in a first person narrative begins
when the unnamed narrator comes to reside with her husband in an isolated “ colonial mansion ”for the summer .Despite of being a commodious estate it has remained untenanted for years and has been deserted with nothing growing in the greenhouse. The narrator here fuelling her romantic felicity perceives it a haunted place that has “ something queer about it ”. Almost after this we come to know that she is sick though its aetiology goes unmentioned we are given hints of the kind of sickness troubling her. The narrator confides that John ,her husband happens to be a physician of high standing and being a person crediting only what is observable, scientific or demonstrable through facts and figures, has scientifically diagnosed her of suffering from a “ temporary nervous depression ” with “ slight hysterical tendency ”. But being a man of facts that he is , he is skeptical of her sickness but has brought her to this place for her treatment and recovery. Thus at once we realize it is not just a couple visiting this palatial estate but also a physician with his patient.
Their room is at the top of the house which
most likely would have previously been a children’s nursery as understood from the barred windows and “ rings and things on the wall ” . The room contains nothing more than a mammoth metal bed. But amidst all these the most interesting and disgusting has to be the yellow wallpaper. The narrator exclaims that never in her life did she see a paper more worse than this. The very sight of that non – artistic , vicious paper irritates her and she urges an immediate replacement of it or a change of the room. But none of these are allowed as her physician husband thinks it is absolutely perilous for a nervous patient to give into her wayward fancies as that might lead to increasing irritation and demands. Thus ,left to stay in that “ atrocious nursery ” with the wallpaper she tries to study it. Meanwhile we come to know more about the ways prescribed for her recovery – any work including physical and mental strain is strictly prohibited for her even her very act of keeping a journal is done quite secretively. She also admits that she is unable to speak truthfully “ to a living soul ” and thus she has decided to confide her thoughts to a journal , “ a dead paper” instead, with us being her sole confidantes .
The yellow wallpaper, flamboyant yet dull, irritating
yet provoking study, uncertain and outrageous slowly takes over our narrator's existence until she gets really fond of it. Over the time she notices amidst its patterns a strangled head and two bulbous eyes and then a woman stooping down and creeping behind the patterns . This adds to the gothic nature of the story proving our narrator's estimation of this house as haunted , valid. Following the gothic structure the woman trapped inside the wallpaper could be that quintessential ‘ other ’ woman shunned by the patriarchal authorities. Slowly as the wallpaper enters into her unconscious we find our narrator reluctant of writing the journal , she stays up all night to study the patterns discovering new things about the wallpaper and discloses it is not just a woman but a host of women stuck behind the wallpaper but a particular one crawls around and shakes it. At every opportunity she starts peeling the wallpaper off in order to free the trapped woman. Now that she is obsessed with it she grows secretive about her inclinations towards it. On the last day of their stay in the house she locks herself in the room and peels off yards of it until the bare wall shows through. As John reaches home and somehow unlocks the door he is shocked to see his wife crawling on all fours along the walls of the room. She triumphantly blurts out “ I’ve got out at last … .. and I’ve pulled off most of the paper, so you can’t put me back! ” Perceiving all these he faints and the narrator as she is crawling in circles by the wall creeps over him every time.
This particular ending of ‘ The Yellow Wallpaper ’ renders us
baffled due to its ambiguity . The narrator’s concluding proclamation is both of triumph and defeat, both emancipating and horrifying. The ambiguity arises because of the wallpaper , apparently throughout the story the wallpaper stood for everything that is “ old, foul and bad ” be it the obnoxiously censoring patriarchal institution, John's restrictive and almost crippling treatment of rest- cure or the pre set values, notions and roles a woman is expected to fit in. But at the same time the very “ flamboyant ”, “living ” , “uncertain ” wallpaper has a brighter yellow side to suggest . Apart from writing the journal which eventually she felt reluctant to continue, studying the wallpaper is the only active mental exercise she manages to perform. Left to live in a nursery where she is allowed to change nothing except herself, the wallpaper is the only repulsive as well as engaging object that kept our narrator busy . It is almost a text that she has ventured to decipher . But this act of perceiving passively is substituted for writing actively and soon is transformed into an act of imagination through which she aims at attaining emancipation. That she is the ‘ other ’ woman whom society warns other women against is hinted from the very beginning when she confesses her baby makes her nervous and it is Jennie, the housekeeper who looks after it. Thus she is not the conventional mother who is the epitome of unconditional caregiving and nurturing. Identification with the trapped woman is just eventual ; that she is not the quintessential ‘ Angel in the house ’ is somehow always persistent in her unconscious . The gradual inclination towards the woman could be interpreted as a gradual self – discovery , a slow process of killing the angel altogether who is suffering hard to fit in and thereby ushering the not so angelic, non- conforming entity . But in her attempt of emancipating the captivated woman she herself gets trapped into her own vicious circle .The fact that she is trapped in a nursery and crawling on all fours strikes us as we realize she is no longer a woman who is allegedly infantilised but that very little girl whom John claims her of being . The act of circling again and again along the walls is indicative of the futility of the emancipation. The image is disturbing and full of ironies as it seems she is still trapped in the world she seeks liberation from. John is only unconscious not dead altogether and thus will undoubtedly commit her to more intense restrictions or possibly to the very dreaded Weir Mitchell whom the narrator wants to avoid by every means. The cost of emancipation cannot be a complete loss of the self, that her attempt of liberating the' other ' woman or her newly found alter ego has left her more crippling, dependent and susceptible to more damage is evident. Again on the other hand the peeling of the wallpaper has left the wall bare with all its cracks and flaws which again might indicate towards our narrator’s realisation of the tensions in her marriage and relationship with John, just as she claims she can “ see through ” him almost as she does through the wallpaper. Thus, the wallpaper is off the wall both for good and worse and it is hardly surprising that Gilman's text ends with such ambiguity as the very subject it deals with, the society and norms it upholds is rife with multiple contradictions.
Why is the wallpaper yellow in the ‘‘ Yellow Wallpaper ” ?
What is the central message of “ The Yellow Wallpaper ” ?
What does the baby symbolize in “ The Yellow Wallpaper ” ?
How does the narrator's description of the wallpaper change
over time?
Discuss the circumstances that keep the speaker awake at
night in ‘ The Yellow Wallpaper ’ .
Use of metaphors in ‘ The Yellow Wallpaper ’.
Justification of the title ‘ The Yellow Wallpaper ’ .