Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Line Sizing
Line Sizing
Line Sizing
/conversion/tmp/activity_task_scratch/636230584.doc
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Flow of fluids at the desired rate and within the design parameters is very important for proper
operation of any process plant. Plant designer has to ensure that the prime movers installed
such as pumps, blowers and compressors should be able to move the fluids at the desired
flow rate. In today’s industry pipelines are used for flow of almost every type of fluid or their
mixtures. Hence it has become essential for any engineer to understand the principles of fluid
flow and pressure drop in pipelines.
Size of pipeline for transport of a fluid is ideally based on economic calculations. The capital
investment (fixed cost) for installation of a pipeline system increases as the size of the pipe is
increased. At the same time, the pressure drop in the system reduces as the size of pipe is
increased. This results in decreased power or variable cost for bigger pipe sizes. Thus the
optimum pipe size can be calculated for which the total cost of operation would be minimum.
Pipe having smaller than required diameter may not be able to transport the fluid at the
desired flow rate. An “oversized” pipe may be suitable for the desired fluid flow – however this
may not be economic. Hence ideally sizing of pipelines should be done by economic
calculations. However in practice, most companies have developed standards or economic
criteria for sizing of pipe lines. These standards are developed using a given set of cost
information and calculations done. Yet these standards can be used for optimum sizing of
pipelines without much error.
Piping is an important element which can be optimized during execution of a project. For a
given process technology, the sizes of equipment and instrumentation depend largely on the
plant capacity. Thus the cost of these elements is “fixed” by the plant capacity. However the
length of piping required to interconnect these equipments can be minimized by deciding an
appropriate equipment layout. Lower length of piping leads to lower pressure drops and
allows selection of lower diameter of piping. Thus while carrying out engineering design of a
plant, the designer is able to minimize the cost of piping. This explains the importance of
piping systems in the total project cost. In most process plants, cost of piping is about 15% of
the total project cost. This is why the equipment layout is developed by piping group during
project execution. The process group provides only the conceptual layout for the process
equipment.
Process engineers need to specify line sizes during basic engineering phase of the project.
However at this stage, all the inputs required to calculate pressure drops and to specify the
line sizes are not available at. Therefore using the conceptual equipment layout, the line
lengths and number of fittings are estimated. Based on these inputs, line sizing calculations
are done during BEP phase. Appropriate over design margins need to be considered so that
major changes are not required at a later stage.
During detailed engineering, the final equipment layouts and piping drawings such as
isometrics / general arrangement drawings are available. At this stage the line sizes specified
in the BEP are verified using the inputs such as actual line lengths and number of fittings
installed.
Properties of Pipes
For deciding size of a pipeline for flow of fluids, allowable pressure drop per 100 m of piping is
used as the design basis or criteria.
When preparing process flow sheets, process engineer allocates suitable pressure drop
allowances for piping. Ideally these should be “economic”. But a full fledged economic
evaluation is generally impracticable. Therefore the method of allowable ∆P/100 m followed
for line sizing is a reasonable approximation to a generalised economic basis. In addition,
certain overriding factors such as velocity limitations, total pressure drop available, design
pressure of the system need to be considered.
3.1. Design basis for deciding size of most common piping systems is summarized below:
Steam Lines
NOMINAL Max. ΔP
PRESSURE (bar/100m)
> 25 Barg
Short Lines 0.33
Long Lines 0.22
3.5 – 7 Barg
Short Lines 0.22
Long Lines 0.11
<1 Barg
Short Lines 0.06
Long Lines 0.022
For droplet and grit free gases and vapours the following limits are recommended:
Erosion is most severe in two phase flow services. This is caused by flow of liquid droplets
having higher density at high velocities caused by high gas velocity. Special precautions are
needed while sizing and deciding routing two phase lines.
Sch.5,10, 20, 30
Std. 40, 60, Extra strong
80,100,120,160, Double extra strong
For all schedule designated pipes, thickness increases with size for a particular schedule.
Irrespective of the Schedule, for a given size, pipe OD is fixed.
Up to 12” pipe, OD is > Nominal size
Beyond 12” pipe OD matches with Nominal size
Non standard sizes such as 5”, 14”, 22” are not used expect for special cases (slurry/velocity
requirements)
All dimensions are given in inches and are in accordance with ASME B36.10 or ANSI/ASME B36.19 as applicable.
The decimal thickness listed for the pipe sizes represent their nominal or average wall dimensions.
*For nominal sizes through 10", Standard Weight thicknesses are identical to Schedule 40 thicknesses.
For nominal sizes through 8", Extra Strong thicknesses are identical to Schedule 80 thicknesses.
Different equations are required for determination of friction factor f, for different flow regions.
Reynolds number provides an indication of the flow region.
For Turbulent Flow, Re>4000, Churchill equation provides a reasonably accurate direct
calculation method.
∆Hf = k V2/2g
Table below gives k values for some of the pipe fittings. These values are considered to be
most applicable for industrial piping systems:
Pipe fitting k
Swing check valve – open 2.3
Gate valve – 100% open 0.21
Angle valve - open 4.5
Globe valve – open 9.4
45º Elbow R/d = 1.0 (short radius) 0.29
45º Elbow R/d = 1.5 (standard) 0.21
90º Elbow R/d = 1.0 (short radius) 0.45
90º Elbow R/d = 1.5 (standard) 0.31
90º Elbow R/d = 3.0 (long radius) 0.23
Sudden change in pipe diameter (enlanging) 1.0
Expander d/d1 = 0.25 0.9
Expander d/d1 = 0.50 0.56
Sudden change in pipe diameter (reducing) 0.5
Reducer d/d1 = 0.25 0.43
Reducer d/d1 = 0.50 0.33
Non Newtonian fluids offer high resistance to flow initially. However once flow is established, the flow
parameters become steady. Due to high viscosity, flow of non Newtonian fluids remains mostly within
the laminar flow region.
For calculation of pressure drop due to flow of non Newtonian fluids, the fluid’s viscosity is determined
at the average velocity. Then using this viscosity, pressure drop is calculated using method same as
for Newtonian fluids.
For pressure drop calculation and to determine the flow region, various methods are available.
Lockhart Martinelli method is described below:
Calculate pressure drop per unit length (dP G, dPL), that would result if the two phases were
flowing separately in two lines of the same size as the specified line size.
Calculate X using equation
X = (dPL / dPG)1/2
Common design guidelines for sizing two phase flow lines are given below:
For short lines within a unit
Vm : 10 to 25 m/s
ρm Vm2 : 5000 to 10,000 kg.m/s2
Avoid slug flow and mist flow regimes