Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HowtoSpeakWiththeDead 10127697
HowtoSpeakWiththeDead 10127697
W IT H T HE DEA D
A PRA C TI CA L HA N D B O OK
w
as? met
N EW YORK
E . P DU TTON
.
-
CO .
6 8 1 FIFT H A VENU E
PUB LI SHE D 19 1 8
BY E . P D U TTO N
. CO .
I . D O TH E D E AD S T I LL L I VE ?
S OU L A ND LI FE
T E LE PA THY A ND T E LE MN E MO N I KY
-
D I S CAR NA T E S PI R I T S
V ME D I U MS
.
C O MMU NI CA T I NG
PRA C T I CA L I N S T R U CT I ONS FO R S PE A K ~
IN G W I TH THE DE A D
S PI RI TU ALI SM AND RA T I O NA L I S M
P RE F A C E
, ev er as rational m e n and w
, o
'
’
personal I t sets aside th e writer s own occult
.
—
words which many persons will re a d
with amazement must be added here on th e
—
s ubj e ct of CM b ono ? Mul titudinou s vials of
scorn h ave been p ou red out on the inanit ies of
ordinary spiritu alistic séances; and all resear ch
into such matters is rigidly boycotte d in scien
tifi c circles as ng u nworthy of any i ntelli
natural wealth .
craft ,
th anks to th e inve stigators who have
P R EFAC E xi
“ ”
tion 13 well founded if by knowledge is
meant merely that which is p o sse se sd by liv
mg hum an beings and derived solely from nor
mal sources B ut if there be in reality cer
.
, ,
-
pl ed needl essly by its non r ecognition of Mo
tion as being in itself an entity distinc t from
Mass They hold that Matter is j u st as mu ch
.
“ ”
Mr E dison In h is spook factory where th e
.
ScIEN s
.
HO W T O SPE A K W IT H
T HE D E A D
C HA P T E R I
DO T H E DE A D STI LL L IVE ?
—
of the subj ec t i s D o the D ead still l ive Th is
?
kno wledge that all rel igi ons teach the doctrine
2 H OW TO S PEAK W I TH TH E DEAD
of survival ; that is to say they teach that in
,
—
to the question D o the D ead still l ive ?
p .
—
i st or non survivalist can dispute , .
o ff
, our nails cut our teeth extracted and our
, ,
“ ”
souls are none the worse for the operations .
“ ”
hum an being may be apparently drowned
or may become ent ranced H is breath ing may .
w
ordinary bodi ly mechani sm by means of which
“ ”
the soul makes its presence kno n may
—
cease to be operative and as actually hap ,
—
p ens now and again the indivi dual may be so
”
de ad in the judgment of physicians that he
or sh e is lai d out for buri al aye and is some , ,
g
freshly from a l au ghtere d calf the brain finds
i tself once more able to send its messages to
the muscles and the man finds he can move his
,
, ,
“ ”
—
has a stroke as it is termed an apoplecti c
,
DO T HE DEAD ST ILL LIVE ? 7
—
presses upon some of the b r aIn cells and i nt er
feres wi th the normality of th e n act ion I n .
the wil l .
as dist i n c t an d s e
p ar a t e ent it i es i s a d mi t ted
8 H O W T O S PEAK WI TH TH E DEAD
b y S cience and demonstrated by the everyday
e xper i ence of manki nd .
“
phras e is that thought may poss ibly be a se
”
cretion of the brain The idea is that althou gh
.
“ ”
d etached do es not mean necessarily separ a
10 HO W T O S PEAK WI TH TH E DEAD
tion by any considerable interval of space or ,
. es fo r the time
,
”
grees .A n d with regard to dreaming th e
, ,
“
explanation g iven is that the gradual passing
- —
of the h igher nerve centres a fi th e highest
'
—
centres of the cerebral matter from normal to
subnormal activity or rest removes from the
, ,
variations of these .
”
of a certain inh ibition from the lo er centres
comes in is by way of explaining that owi ng
to temporary physi cal condit ions attending
-
sleep var ious brain cells are out of gear as
, ,
g u m e n t wh i
, ch mos t scient i fic men regard as
conclusive there ex i sts a sol i d basis of scien
,
’
D r C rawford s observations and ex p eri
.
“
regarded as proving the exist ence of the i n
”
vi sible intelligent beings mentioned by S ir
W illiam C rookes in 1 8 7 4 and as also proving ,
own words
A d rawin g -b o a r d w pl c
as pl at fo rm
a e d on th e
of a w e i gh i n g m a ch i ne a nd a ch a i r w
-
a s pl a c e d o n
th e top o f th e b o a r d T h e m e d i u m ( M i ss Go li gh e r )
.
sat o n th e ch ai r w i th h e r fe t r e st i ng o n th e b o a r d
, e .
E xp e rime n t 1 — I sa i d t th e o p e r at o r s
. o to
th e sp i r i t s' Y o u say th l e vi t a tin g c an t il eve r c o n
,
‘
e
t ai n s ma t t e r f r om th e b o d y o f th e med i u m Iw ant .
18 H O W T O S PEAK W I TH THE D EAD
y ou to ta ke ou t fr o m h e r b o d y th e m att er y o u u se
i n th e c onst ru c t i on o f th e c a n t il e v e r
y o u empl o y to
—
t h i s m a tt e r l o o sely o n th e flo o r n o t to b uil d u p
th e c an t i l e ve r b u t s1 mp ly to pl a c e th e m a tt e r r e
qu i r e d fo r i t o n th e fl o o r Gi ve t h r ee r a p s w . he n
o u h av e d o n e t h i s
’
y .
“
T h e med i um s w e i gh t b e g an to d e c re a se a nd i n
’
th e th ree r ap s si gni fy i n g t h a t th e o pe r a t i o n w
, as
c omplete .
RE S U LT
Wei gh t o f m ed i u m ch ai r
b o ar d , b e fo r e th e e x p e ri m e n t st. lb s.
F a i rly st e ad y w ei ght o f m d i u m e
ch ai r b o ard a ft er th r ap s , e
’
wre gi ven
e 8 st lb s . .
D e c r e a se i n W i gh t o f m d i u m
e st e 16 .
I t i s no t w o r thy th a t w
“
e h en I c a rri e d o u t the
sa m e t e st a b o u t i gh t ee n m nth s p r evi o u sly I oh
e o ,
tai n d th e sam e r e su lt w
e i thi n a p o u n d o r tw o
( S ee .
‘
R ali ty o f P sychi c P henomena E xp erimen t 63 p
e ,
’
, .
E xp e rime n t 2 —I a sk ed th e o p e r a t o r s to p u t th e
.
m a t t e r th e y sai d th ey ab st r a ct e d i n E x p e ri men t 1 ,
not on th e flo o r b u t on th e d r a wng b
1 oar d un d e r th e
me d i u m ’
s ch ai r ( th e d r aw —
m g bo a r d was re st i ng o n
20 HOW TO S PE A K WI TH TH E DEAD
the machine or to report them correctly Y et .
“
r eJect much of what he observed as being non
22 H OW T O S PEAK WI TH TH E DEAD
sense , and a good deal more he describes as
“ ”
u nv e ri fi ab le and doubtful But he also .
—
be genuine and convincing a conclu smn fully
accepted by serious readers who are not ‘
question as follows
H ow
e ve r it b e cc o mpli sh ed and w
a h a t ever re
,
c e ti o n th e
p p r e -
d a
y sc i e n t i fic w o r l d m a
y g i v e t o
th e a sser t a re m a n y n o ww h o kn o w b y ,
a c r o ss th e b o u n d a r y — i f th er e i s a b o u nd a r y b e m ~
t w n th e w
e e o r l d a pp r e h e n d e d b
y o u r fe wan i mal d e -
riv d se n se s a n d th e l a r ge r e x i st e n c e c o n c e r ni ng
‘
mu ni c a ti o n i s n o t e a sy b u t i t o cc u r s
, Th e
.
m r e r e c e n t d e vel o p m e n t o f a n el ab o r a t e sch em e o f
o
c ro ss c o r r e sp o n d en c e en t er ed u p on si n ce the d eath o f
-
sp e c i ally ex p e r i e n c e d a n d c r i t i c a l i nv e st i g a t o r s o f
th e S o c i e ty f o r P sy c h i c al R e se a r ch w ho w e re fa
,
st r o n g a n d m o st i n gen o u s m e a n s t o o v er c o me th m
l e ,
h a s m a d e th e p r o o f al r e a d y v er y st r o n g n o wa l
, ,
e
mo st c r u c i al . T h e chi e f th i n g t h a t th e e p so d e i
e st ab l i sh e s t o m m i n d and a thi ng th a t w as w o r th
, y ,
DO TH E DEAD STILL LIVE ? 23
c a si o n all
y h eld b
y th e f ami ly c i r cl e a t M a r i em o n t .
Fo r i t i s th r o u gh th se ch i efly th at R aym o n d r e
e
m ai ns a s mu ch a m mb e r o f th e f ami ly gr o u p as
e
ev e r . I n t h e o ld d ay s i f I sa t w ,i th a me d i u m ,
Iw a s n ev e r t o l d o f an
y se r i o u s i m a
g m a
y b e r e av e r
me n t w —
hi ch h a d b e falle n my self b e y o nd th e n a t u r al
a n d in evi t ab l e l o sse s f r m a n o l d er ge n er a t i n w
o hi h o c
f all to th e l o t o f eve ry so n o f m an B u t n wi f I . o ,
o r an
y m emb e r o f m
y f ami ly g o e s a n o ny m o u sly t o
,
a gen u i n m d i u m gl vm g n o t th e sl i ght st n o r m al
e e , e
t im s o nt en ti n g himself w
e c i th fr i en dly f ami ly ch aff
a nd r emi ni sc e n c es b u t al w
, a y s a t i n g i n a m an n e r
c .
c on si st en t w i t h h i s p e r so n ali ty a n d mem o ri e s a nd
v a ry in g m o o ds . I n e ver y w a
y h e h a s sh o w n
o ve r h e w
, a n t s m e t o sp e a k o u t ; a n d I sh a ll I am .
a s c o nvi n c e d o f c o nt i n u e d e x i st n c e o n th e o th e r
e ,
si d e o f d e a th a s I am o f e x i st e n c e h e r e
, .
y
.
“ ”
to which he gives the name human beings
are non moral just as much as his table or h is
-
“
a mann er which he calls wrong .N or is the
case bettered by conceding that good con
“ ”
du ct may be beneficial and bad condu ct
harmful to the mass of matter in action and ,
—
will both be ann ihilated and he wil l also know ?
“ “ ”
word live merely means exist ; in the latter
“ ”
the word liv s connotes together with the ,
“ ”
The life that is found in human bodie s
and throu ghout the organi c world is imper
sonal I t is materi al or r ather physical in
.
, , , ,
28
S OUL AND LIFE 9
“ ”
destitution is asserted with respect to dead ,
“ ”
inanimate organi c matter L ife is met with .
“ “ ”
onl y in liv m g , animate organi c matter ;
j ust as crystalli s at ion is found only in crystal
” “ ”
line and not i n amorphous matter ; and to —
—
p ursu e the simile it may be pointed out that
the s ame matter which i s crystalline under some
conditions becomes amorphous under others ,
30 H OW T O SPE A K WI TH T HE DEAD
as i n the case of carbon which is sometime s
,
“ ” “
of there being any specific vital force vital ,
—
, . .
“
why of the Si mplest u nicellul ar organi sm We .
” “
are forc ed says a leading authority to the
, ,
”
means of course th at the quantity of life
, ,
“
of explanati on i s to hold th at life is one of
the protean modes of energy in the same way
that heat i s understood ( by those persons who
are content to accept the B aco ni an and mod ,
“
fusion solution : it never dies
, To speak of
.
as
“
j ust as much as the ph agocytes ( the blood
”
scavengers ) and other defensive organi sms
are in li ke manner protected and caused to
l
and L or d K elvi n have found thems elves re
i di r i
osync as es . t i es and e a h
c h as i ts o wn d i s
ti ngu i sh i n g c h ar act e r .
2 . Is h omo ge ne ou s I t i s . 2 ° Is h et e r o ge ne ou s Sou ls .
th at th e sam e is t ru e of h eat,
S OUL AND LIFE
LIFE ( con ti nu ed ) . S OU L ( c onti nu ed ) .
l i ght , e ecl t
ri i t y c , and o ther
f rms
o of
‘
ph y si c a l e ne r gy .
Th e se vari oii
s p ar l s ce coa
l wh
e sce i t n
en b fo u gh t n o co
t a t wi th a h th r
c d f rm e c
‘
o e an o
a wh l th at i s u i f rm with
o e n o
ou t y d i ff
anr nt i t i e e a on .
3 . I s th e o r ga ni se r of m at 3 . I s th e e m lop y r of e
fl u e nc e th at r
d e t e m i n e s th e
mo rp h l gy p hy i l gy
o o , so o , e m
b ry l gy p al t l gy
o o , aeo n o o an d
aeti l gy f th
o o r gani o e o sm s
pr d d o u ce .
4 . Is -
non consc i s ou , non 4 . Is consc o i us; p r e cep tive ,
5 . I s non mo
- ral . It i s co n 5 .h aract e ri se d by
Is c vo li
sci e nc el e ss with ut o a n y t i on a ccomp ani e d by a
, f ll
u
kno wl d g e e of g oo d an d evi l .
und e r st andi n g o f good and
I ts fun c t i on s ar e p r f rm
e o e d ev il .ap abl f ting It i s c e o ac
su e .
i t a ti
s c on s .
6 . bl o f i nd fi nit
Is c ap a e e e 6 . Is r pr i nca p bl a e of e o
in r as by r p r du ti
c e e It e o c on .
d u t i n E a h indi i d al s l
c o . c v u ou
m y p ssi bly b
a ri gi at d by
o e o n e i s a s lf- nt a i n d s lf-s f
e co e , e u
a p arti ul ar gr up i ng f m fi i n g s lf- nt i n u i n g nt i ty
‘
c o o a c , e co e
t i l
er a t ms in m b i n at i n
a o co o th at h s n t ri gi n at d fr m
a o o e o
wi th p arti ul ar p hysi al c c a ny th r s ul fr m ny
o e o or o a
f r s nd und p arti ul r
o ce a er c a matt r o f p hysi l f r c
e ca o e.
p hysi al ndi ti ns c co o .
42 H OW TO S PE A K WI TH T H E DEAD
These contrasts necessitate a duality of sig
“ ”
n ifi c ati o n of the word death When the death
.
TE LE PAT H Y A N D -
TE LE M N E M ON I K Y
“ ”
mingled with he sub j ects of s u rvivals and
“ ”
—
commu nications and as regards telepathy
,
—
at least appears so frequently in psych ical
literature that it is desirable fo r those who
,
—
Many people are aware and indeed have , ,
—
themselves tried the experiment that mind
can in flu ence mind without the intervention of
matter s u ch as the organs of speech and hear
,
44
TELEPA THY AND T ELE MN E MON IKY -
persons impressed .
—
F acts such as these wh ich are positive and
—
undi sputed have led to experimental tests ,
ma t e r i a l m an s e Th o u ght d o s n o t b elo n g to th e
. e
m a t e ri al r e gi o n a lth o u gh i t i s a b l e to ex e r t a n i n
,
flu en c e o n th a t r gi o n th r o u gh m e ch ani sm p r o vi d d
e e
b y vi t ali ty . Y e t th e m e a n s w h r eb y i t a c c o m e
l i h e s th e f e a t a r e e ss n t i a lly u n k n o w n n d t h
p s e a e ,
fa c t th a t su ch i n t e r a cti o n i s p o ssib l e w
) o u ld be
st r an ge a nd su r p r i si n g i f w w e r e n o t t o o m u ch a c
e
c u st o me d to i t I t i s r e a so n ab l e t o su pp o se th a t
.
th e mi n d c an b e m o r e a t h o m e an d m o r e d i r e ctly an d ,
mo r e e x u b e r an tly a ct iv e w h e n th e n ee d f o r su ch i n
,
ter a c ti on b e t w e e n p sy hi a l an d phy s c a l
c c — o r le t u s i
mo r e sa fely an d sp e c i fic ally sa y b e t w e e n m n t a l a nd e
—
m a t e ri a l n o l o n ge r ex i st s w h en th e r e st r ai ni n g in
,
flu e n c e o f b r ai n a n d n e r v e m e chan i sm i s r em o v e d an d ,
wh en some o f th e li mit a ti o ns c o nn e ct e d wi t h b o di ly
l o c a t i o n i n sp a c e a r e e n d e d .
“
E x p eri en c e mu st b e ou r gui de T o shu t th e .
d o o r o n a ct u al o b ser v a t i o n an d x p e r me n t i n thi s e i
p ar t i c u l a r r e g on b e a u se f p c o n c ived i de a s an d
i , c o re e
o b st i n a t e p r e u di c e i an a ttitu d c mm o n e n o u gh
j s , e o ,
e v en a m o n g sc i en ti fi m en ; b u t i t i s a n a tt i t u d m a r k
c e
w i s ly d i st r u st i n g th i r o w
e n p wr s sh r i n k f r o m e u
e o e ,
t r in g o n su h a n i nqu i r y B u t i f th r e a r e any
e c . e
fa ct s to be a sc e r t ain d i t mu st b e th e d u ty o f some e ,
v lu n t e e r s t o a sc e t a i n th m : an d f o r p o pl e h avi n g
o r e e
an a qu a i n t a n e w i th c i n t i fic hi t r y t o sh u t th ei r
y c s c s o e
b i d i n ve st i ga t i n o r r ep o r t c o n c r ni n g th em o n p ai n
o e
o f o st a ci sm r — i s t o i mi t a t e a b y go n e th e o l o gi c al
, e
a tt i t u d e in a sp i r i t —
f u ni n t e n d e d fl a tte r y a fl a tt e r y
o
M a tt r i s an in di r e c t med iu m o f c ommuni c a
e
t i o n b e twe n m i n d a n d m i nd
e Th a t di re c t t ele .
p a thi i n t r u se h u l d b ab l e to o cc u r b e twen
c e co r S o e e
i al m e h a ni sm i s th r e f r n t r ally su rp ri sm g
c c , e o e o e .
I t h as to b e p r o ve d n o d o b t b u t th e f a ct i s i n , u ,
t i n si ally l ss p
r c li ng th an man y o f th o se o the r
e uz z
fa ct s to w hi ch w h av e gr ow n h a r d ne d b y u sage
e
”
e .
admiss ible .
“
S i mple enough u ntil the charact er of the vi
” “ ”
b r ation s and flu ctuations is looke d into .
-
well be a case of thought reading T h e sitter s
.
’
tu rb s th e ' accordingly
’
The medium s soul
.
,
—
soul whether still invested with a hum an body
—
or di scarnate is thinking it is a ff ecting the
,
“
ond s ight dreams p resentiments
-
, , inspira
,
”
tion and such mental impulses as are com
,
—
it may be added with every attribute of mat
ter T h e old saying remains as true as ever
.
“
A child can ask questi ons whi ch a wise man
”
cannot answer .
—
chester respect ively are able to exchange
thoughts without any appreci able delay .
57
58 HOW T O SPEA K WIT H TH E DEAD
cases of what is called an u nverifi ab le char
,
y
certain thus aris ing that great num
“
“ ”
fi ab le kin d is often nonsense
, as S ir O liver
,
-
The idea of su ch post mortem exist enc e b e
ing als o limited in time arises naturally an d ,
”
is metempsychosis which in more popular
,
“ ”
langu age is known as transmigration It .
.
DI S CA R NATE S PI RIT S 3
—
other the temporary abodes of souls the ten
,
?
mu ch th e same kind S o far from this cou rs e
of action being fantastic an d improbable it i s ,
p e ct e d that i e r e is a lways a gr e at e r or l e s s
-
th e air occu pie d spac e surrounding th e earth ;
an d this expectation i s b orne o u t by act u al
“ ”
places are u ndoubte dly haunted ; and it is
equally c ertain that some persons are haunte d
also ; for it would otherwis e b e irnp o ssib l e to
DI S CAR NATE S PI R ITS 65
-
a far fetched suppos ition to hold that in the ,
’
person s features and di sturb the func ti oning
of v ariou s organs We also know that bodily
.
70 H OW TO S PEAK W I TH TH E DEAD
peculiarities warp the mind and infl u ence the
thoughts The phrenological mapp i ng of th e
.
t
becomes separated from the body it cannot
logically be expected to have exactly the same
character that it appar ently posses sed in life .
they profess to be .
’
s i de . The eminent au thority her e quoted
goes on inde ed to say
, ,
The se are w
h t wc a e all th e
‘
v l
u n e ri fi ab e
’
co m
mu ni c ati ons ; f
or w e c an no t b ri ng them to b o o k by
su b se qu ent t er rest ri al inqui ry i n th e same Way as we
c an te st i n fo rmat i on c o n c e rn i n g p e r son al o r mu n
d an e aff ai rs . I nformu -
ti on o f the h ighe r kind h a
s
o f ten b e en re c ei ved b u t h as seld o m b een p u b li sh ed ;
a nd i t i s di ffic u l t to kn owWh a t valu e to p u t u p on
wf re ally t ru stw
i t, or ho ar it i s or t hy
” .
D IS CAR NAT E S P I R I TS 73
animals .
M E DI UM S
77
78 H OW T O S P EAK WI TH TH E DEAD
tim es when these smg ularly constituted beings
,
-
“ ”
are called mediums their nu mbers still r e ,
“ ”
T hu s S ir O liver L odge says in Raymond
, ,
Do w
e un d e r st and ho w [ a mi n d
l ' 2 c an so u
No . Do w e kn o w f o r a f a c t t h a t i t d o e s? A y e th a t ,
—
i s th e qu e st i o n a qu e st i on o f evi d en c e I my self .
a n sw e r th e q u e ti o n a ffi rm a t i v ely ; n o t o n t h e o re t i c a l
— ? —
gr o u nd s fa r f o m th a t b u t o n a b asi s o f strai ght
f o r w a rd e x p e r i e n c e O
. th e r s i f th e y , a ll o w t h m e
selv e s to t a k e th e t ro u b l e t o e t th e e x p e r i e n c e w i ll
g ,
c o me to th e same c on cl u sio ns Le t u s b e as c a u
.
ti o n s an d c r i t i c al aye a nd a s sc e pt i c al a s w
, , e li k e ,
x
gr ad u ally th e t ru th w ill p e rm e a t e o u r u n d e r st a n d
i n g and m ak e fo r i t self a pl a c e in o u r mi n d s a s se
c u r e a s i n an
y o t h e r b r an ch o f ob se rv at i o n al sc i
”
en c e .
a s i n t r m e di a r i e s
e all o wt h e m se lv e s to b e u se d fo r
,
thi s p u rp o se ”
.
“ ”
cate d person s heard of pious frauds p erp e
tr ate d by th e holders of high religi ous o ffice ?
A r e there not many instances of ignorant ,
”
d iu m s ; and there are also many other indi
vi du al s who are co n scmu s of p o sse ssm g what
“ ”
are spoken of as psych i c powers and yet ,
“
ments in the hands of the powe rs from the
”
other side ; much as was the c ase we read , ,
“ ”
follow that t e common practice of testing
the mediums nd putting constraint upon them
is a mere waste o f time and attention I f they
,
.
-
ery is not p acticab le with d arning needles .
—
Many medium s the great maj ority in fact ,
-
assert an d are genuinely convinced that
, ,
“
sometimes advanced that a control is a se c
”
ond personality of the medium a supposi -
'
b e a n d h a s b ee n w ri tt en o n thi s sub j e c t a nd w
, h at
eve r d i ff er en t o p i ni o ns m ay b e h el d i t i s u ni ve r sally
,
—
d imm ' a pe r son a sse r t e d to b e p e rm anently ex
i sti ng o n th e o th er si d e a nd to b e o cc u p i e d o n th a t
si d e i n mu c h th e same fu n c t i o n s a s th e m e d iu m i s o n
me ssa ge s seems to b e l ai d u p on su ch a o ne i t i s hi s —
sp e c i a l w ork
. T h e d r ama t i c ch a r a c t e r o f m ost o f
—
th e c o n t r o l s i s so vi vi d a nd self c o n si sten t , t h at
w h at e ve r any ven si tte r o r e xp e rimen te r may fee l
i s th e p r o b ab l e t r u th c o n c e r ni ng thei r r e al n at u r e ,
th e si mpl e st w a
y i s t o h u m o u r th em b
y t a k i n g t h em
a t t h e i r f a c e v a l u e an d t r e a t i ng the m a s se p a r a t e
an d r e sp o n si b l e a n d r e al i nd i vi d u al s
. I t i s t ru e t ha t
i n th e c a se o f so me me d i u ms e sp e c i ally w
, hen o ver
d one o r t i re d t h e re a re e vane sc en t and ab su r d i n
,
ow n a nd th e y a pp e a r t o c a r r y o n a s c o n t inu o u s an
,
1
1
There is not anyth ing in this weighty ex
p ression of Opinion that really clashes with
“ ”
th e p ossess i on theory except indeed the
, , ,
“
suggestion that the controls are persons per
”
manen tly existi ng on the other s i de a sug
-
“
O liver means b y evanescent and absurd in
” “ ”
tru si ons that cannot be seri ously regarded
”
or treated as real people is also not clear ,
“
but probably refers to some form of soph isti
”
cation resulti ng from a derangement of the
transmitting mechani sm I n any case the con
.
C O M M U N I C ATI N G
l . E ' PE C TAN CY
90
92 HOW TO S P EAK WI TH T HE DEAD
that as explai ned in a previou s p art of thi s
,
2 . AU TO M ATI C WRITIN G
i nd voce com
ments and questions and thu s a regular verbal
,
“
s itters supply magnetism whi ch is gathered
CO MM UNICA TING 97
5 . D IRE C T ME SSAGE S
—
be guide d by the sim u lacrum of a hand a phe
n ome non that takes place mor e frequ ently
to be recei ved .
w
.
”
The term development as here used means
an increased sensitiveness of th e per cept ive
fac ul ty by wh ich the me di um becomes aware
of an d influenced by the proximity of di scar
nate spir its I t means also an intensified
.
1 02 HOW T O SPEA K WIT H TH E DEAD
’
ing of a larger proport ion of the medium s sub
stance and physical powers at the disposal of
the controlling beings thereby enabling th ese
,
in
g i s preferable S i lence
. i s then more su
“
This acc ounts for the traditional not ion of the
”
Witching hour , which is not based as is su p ,
’
To ask in one s mind whether there are any
spirits present is not as e ff ective as actual
speech There is a greater psy chical coneen
.
telepathy .
—
fi rm e d as in an ordinary scientifi c laboratory
—b the test of repet ition F or the friends
y .
'
dence availab e is the latter s personal and u m
’
~
B '
.
—
The next step after solitary E xp e ctancy
’
has been tried i s to arrange wi th one s friends
for E xpe ctancy Ci rcles ; th at is to say for ,
“ ”
in
g as scepti c al as they please
. A Sitter may
“ ”
b e of opinion that all occult i sm is tomfoolery
“ ”
and p iffie . O p i nions do not alter facts . If
psychical phenomena do really occu r all the
scepticism in the world is of no moment ; and
no good evi d u ce h as ever been brought for
ward to sh o that sp i rits are in any way em
h arrassed by the presence of doubters and re
si sters ; though it i s true enough that passivity
“
S i ngi ng of hymns praying and other relig
,
”
ious features are to be deprecat ed They do .
1 1 4i H OW T O S PEAK WI TH TH E DEAD
not aff ect the actual phenomena ; but th eir ten
deney i s to produce a morbid and emoti onal
frame of mind wh ich in its turn facilitates self
deception and the im aginary perception of
happeni ngs that do not really occur C onver .
tions on a -
continually developing
scale I n .
“ ”
has had h i s or her alleged controls who in an ,
—
des i gn of so d om g brought di sembodied souls
f
.
—
to the sé a nces And Sittings especially of th e
“ ”
—
table kind have taken place i n private
homes where the enqu i rers have usually been
restricted to a fewmembers of a Single family ,
, ,
“ ”
as keen and interested in p sychical ph enom
e n a a n d the extens i on of communicat i o n across
—
the border line as are the Cr ooke se s Lodges , ,
~ -
—
l y employed it l s desirable for the hands of
the sitters to be placed on the table ( though
the reason for this is not yet clear ) b ut it i s not
,
—
contact with those of his neighbours there not
P RAC T ICAL I N S TR UC T I ON S 1 21
’
.
-
dow blind s and using a lamp with red glass .
“ ”
classed under the head of communications ,
“
open and above board as is the case with
-
,
“
the analogous proceed ings of ordinary table
”
turning i privat e circles where very
fh
,
.
—
light F or some reason or ano ther good bad ,
—
or indi ff erent but never on account of any
real necess ity materi alising mediums in the
,
“ ”
cabinets and screens in the shelter of wh ich
.
mu tatzs mu tand zs to
' ’
”
many of the normal explanations in them
selves I t i s for example sai d sometimes that
.
, ,
”
mal theory does not fare any better in su g
g e stin g that the medi u m manages to vacate his
chair in the darkness and to pick up the trum
pet or the tambourine etc from which he
, .
,
d
and should b e gu i d e d by facts quite irre sPe c
tiv ely of whether the facts b e normal or sup er
1 32 H O W T O S PEA K WI TH TH E DE A D
of the rationalists and w hen they at the same
,
ver
y
d ents of the matters in disp u te to arrive at a
settled j udgment A ccordingly the following
.
,
“
1 9 1 7 under the titl e of I S Sir O liver L od ge
,
,
’
. .
‘
,
’
”
by E dward Clo dd .
S u rsu m cord a
. L et us s p e ak to the dead
and let u s add their knowledge and counsel to
common store .
De ac rd med us mg th e Boo kk ee pe r proc e ss
e
Ne utrallz mg ag nt Magne srum O xrd e
e e e
Tr atm nt Dat Nov 2004
Pre servationTechnoIogies
A WO R LD LE A D E R IN PA PE R PR E S E RVA T IO M
1 1 1 Th omson Park Dnve
w
C ranb e rry To nsh ip PA 1 6 06 6
,
-
( 724 ) 7 79 21 1 1