Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gary A. Yukl - William L. Gardner - Leadership in Organizations-Pearson (2019)
Gary A. Yukl - William L. Gardner - Leadership in Organizations-Pearson (2019)
7.1. Introduction
Assets are traded in the cash or spot market. It is sometimes advantageous to enter into a
transaction now with the exchange of asset and payment at a future time. The advantages here
include: risk shifting, price formation and investment cost reduction. A derivative instrument is
an instrument whose value depends directly on, or is derived from, the value of another security or
commodity, called the underlying asset. Derivatives include options, as well as forward and futures
contracts. Options offer the buyer the right without obligation to buy or sell at a fixed price up to or
on a specific date. Forward and Futures contracts, on the other hand, are agreements between two
parties whereby the buyer agrees to purchase an asset from the seller at a specific date at a price
agreed to now. Forward contracts are the right and full obligation to conduct a transaction involving
another security or commodity - the underlying asset - at a predetermined date (maturity date) and
at a predetermined price (contract price). Futures contracts are similar, but subject to
‘standardization’ and daily settling-up process.
The intrinsic value is the pay-off of an option. Figure 1 presents an example of a call option’s pay-
off and market price – hence also the time value. In the figure, the horizontal axis represents the
market price of the security at time T (ST) while the vertical axis represents the payoff accruing to
the option holder if it is exercised at the exercise price (X). Note that an option has intrinsic value
only when it is in-the-money and that the presentation of the pay-off does not take into account the
initial premium.
Market value
Time value
Pay-off ST-X
{ Intrinsic Value
} Price of
the asset
Out-of-the Money X In-the-money
Loss
The option profit profile considers both the pay-off and the initial premium (i.e. the amount used
in establishing a long position or derived from a short position). Let’s use an example. Consider an
option on TBX share with an exercise price (X) of shs 500. A call option is selling at a premium of
shs 100 while a put option is selling at a premium of shs 50. For an investor buying a call option,
the premium (price) paid to acquire the option (shs100) is a committed cost and it represents the
loss accruing to the holder if, at expiration, the option is not in-the-money and hence not exercised.
Thus, if at expiration date the stock’s price (ST) is below the exercise price (shs 500) the call option
holder’s loss is equal to the amount paid to acquire the option (shs100) and does not depend on
the extent to which the prevailing price is below the exercise price X. Once the price passes the
shs 500 mark the option is in-the-money giving a net profit to the option holder equal to the intrinsic
value of the option (ST-E) minus the option’s cost. The line in Figure 2(a) (horizontal at negative
shs 100 and sloping upward to the right after shs 500) represents the loss or profit to the holder of
a call option. This line is the option’s profit profile (The options’ profit profiles are often referred to
as “hockey sticks” because they look like the sticks used to play hockey!)
A short position (i.e. selling an option) reverses the situation such that the pay-off for short position
is the negative of the counterpart long position. These are summarized as follows:
To get the profits one needs to deduct the premium from the long position pay-offs or add the
premium to the short position pay-offs.
We saw above that a put option is in-the-money when at expiration the price of the underlying
stock is below the exercise price. Figures 2c and 2d show the profit profiles for long and short put
option positions respectively. Notice that an investor selling a call option with an exercise price of
shs 500 for shs 100 has a profit profile similar to the line in Figure 2b (horizontal at positive shs 100
and sloping down to the right after shs 500).
Profit Profit
Profit or loss from buying a
CALL with an exercise Profit or loss from selling a
price of shs 500 for shs 100 CALL with an exercise
price of 500 for 100
100
0 0
ST ST
100
500
Loss 500 Loss 600
600
Profit Profit
Profit or loss from buying Profit or loss from selling a
a PUT with an exercise PUT with an exercise price
450 price of 500 for 50 of 500 for 50
0 ST 0 ST
50
100
Loss
Loss 450 500 450 500
450
Three things are worth noting in the payoff profile. First, once the security’s price passes the
exercise price, the profit or loss changes one-for-one with change in security’s price. Second, for a
call option and a put option with the same exercise price, the profit line from buying a call option
“mirrors” the profit line from selling a call (with the horizontal axis being the mirror). Third the profit
or loss from a put option is limited while that of a call is not. For example, if you have a long
position in a put option with a strike price, the maximum payoff is X which is when a worthless
security is sold to the put writer for X.
CONCEPT CHECK 1: Draw the option profit profile for selling a put option with an
exercise price of shs 600 for shs 50)
-400
Since at the onset the investor is buying both the stock (at S0) and a put option (at P0) the initial
investment is equal to S0 + P0 (or shs 450 in the above example). If at the expiration date (which is
also the end of the investor’s investment horizon) the prevailing price (ST) is greater than the
exercise price (X) the put option is out of the money: the option expires and the investor sells the
stock at market price and gets ST. The investor’s profit is ST – (S0 + P0) or ST –450. If at the
expiration date ST < X, the put option is in the money: the investor exercises the option giving a
profit of X – (S0 + P0) or 50 (i.e. 500-450). Put differently, X is the lower limit of ST since when the
stock is at any price below X the put option is in the money and exercising it guarantees the price
X. Thus the lowest payoff is 50.
In general, a protective put in effect puts a downside limit (equals to X - S0 - P0) on investor’s
holding but also leaves the upside potential open (as ST – S0 - P0). The upside pay off however,
falls short of the one realizable from holding only the stock by an amount equal to the cost of
acquiring the put option.
300 500
A covered put strategy involves writing a put option with an offsetting short position in the
underlying security. When the put option is exercised against the writer, the security is used to
close the short position. On the other hand, a writer of a naked put does not have an offsetting
short position in the security for hedging purpose.
0
100
150 350 Buy a Put with an
450 600 Exercise price of
500 500 for 50
650
This long straddle only makes money if the stock price moves shs 150 away from shs 500. A short
straddle is often taken by investors who believe that the stock price will not change much before
expiration.
CONCEPT CHECK 2: Graph the profit and payoff diagram for a short straddle with
P0=50, C0=100 and X=500)
Strips and Straps are variations of straddle. A strip is two puts and one call on a security with the
same exercise price and expiration date. A strap is two calls and one put.
7.5.4.2. Strangle
A strangle is like a straddle – consisting of a put and a call option on the same underlying asset
and with the same expiration date – but with different exercise prices. Typically the put option will
have a lower exercise price while the call will have a higher exercise price. . The payoff pattern is
similar to that of a straddle but with a flat bottom (for a long strangle) or a flat top (for a short
strangle)
7.5.4.3. Spreads
Spreads are combinations of two or more call options (or two or more puts) on the same stock with
different exercise prices or maturity dates. A long spread involves combining short and long calls
on the same stock and with the same expiration date – but not necessarily with the same strike
price. Figure 7 shows a long spread position involving buying a call with an exercise price of shs.
500 for shs.100 and simultaneously selling a Call with an Exercise price of shs. 550 for shs 50.
Simply stated, levered equity position involves borrowing to buy a stock. Consider an investor, A,
borrowing an amount, S0, at interest rate, rf , to be repaid at time T such that the total repayment
equals X. The borrowed amount, S0, is then used to buy a stock. At time T investor A’s payoff is
equal to the amount realizable from selling the stock, ST, minus the loan repayment X. (i.e. at any
given price level the payoff is ST-X). With a fully levered position, investor A is able to set up the
position with no cash outlay of his own. This, however, requires that S0= X/(1+ rf)T a condition
which may be difficult to satisfy in real life because, latter on, X is to denote a known quantity
representing a specific strike price. To generalize we relax the fully levered position and assume
that investor A borrowed an amount X/(1+ rf)T, which is different from the price of the stock (S0) but
has repayment amount (at time T) that is equal to the exercise price. Thus, Investor A’s cash outlay
(equity) that is needed to set up a position guaranteeing an amount ST-X at time T is equal to S0-
X/(1+ rf)T
Using options it is possible to create a position with a payoff that is equal to the price of the stock at
expiration, ST, minus the options’ exercise price, X. This is how it is done: Consider an investor B
who buys a call option on a stock and simultaneously writes (sells) a put option on the same stock.
Both options have the same exercise price (X) and expiration date (T). The investor pays C0 to buy
the call option and pockets P0 from the put option sold making the necessary cash outlay needed
to set up the position equal to C0-P0. If at expiration the stock’s price (ST) is above the exercise
price the call option is in-the-money giving a payoff of ST-X while the put option is out of the money
with a zero payoff. If at expiration the stock’s price (ST) is equal or below the exercise price the put
option will be exercised giving the investor a loss (negative payoff) of X-ST while the call option
expires worthless. The payoff pattern for investor B’s position can be summarized as follows:
The payoff pattern for investor B shows that the position from buying a call option and
simultaneously writing (selling) a put option on the same stock with the same exercise price (X)
and expiration date (T) is always equal to ST-X. This is also the payoff pattern for investor A, who
has a levered position.
1
To get a clear picture draw the profit profile diagrams for a portfolio with a long call and a short put. You will get the
same payoff profile as fully levered equity.
Chapter 7: Options and Swaps Page 9 of 14
Box 1: Continuous Compounding
Continuous compounding is generally used when working with option valuation.
Suppose the annual interest rate is r% and it compounds semi annually. The gross
2 2
r r
value of TZS1.00 is 1 and the equivalent annual rate is estimated as 1 1
2 2
Similarly the future value interest factor for T years with semi-annual compounding is
qT
r
2T
r
1 . The latter expression is generalized as 1 if interest is assumed to
2 q
compound q times per annum. With continuous compounding q is a very large value
r
which makes the expression 1 very close to unit (1) and qT a very large number.
q
With some few mathematical assumptions and manipulations our general expression
is now reduced to e rT .
To practice, work on the following concept checks:
What is the present value of shs 100 to be received in three months if the
required return is 8%, with continuous compounding?
What is the future value of shs 500 to be received in nine months if the
required return is 4%, with continuous compounding?
2
Notice that we are using t (and not T) to denote the time remaining until the option contract expires which, assuming
annual interest rate, is expressed as a fraction of a year
Chapter 7: Options and Swaps Page 10 of 14
Figure 8: Put Call Parity
Buy the Stock at 400
Profit
Buy the Stock at 400
financed with some
debt
Sell a put with an
P0 exercise price of 400
400
-[400-Xe-rT] 400+C0
-[400- P0]
-400
CONCEPT CHECK 5:
a) Consider a call option that sells for shs.67.30 written on a stock price whose price
is shs. 500; the strike price is shs 450; the stock pays no dividends; the risk-free
rate is 10%; the volatility is 28%; and the maturity is 3 months. What must the
value of a put option written on the same stock with the same maturity, and
exercise price be?
b) You have found the following information: Share price = shs. 600; Exercise price =
shs. 650; Call price = shs.30; Put price = shs. 70; and expiration is in 6 months.
What is the risk-free rate implied by these prices?
The main types of swaps are Interest rate and the Currency swaps. Others which may fall under
either interest rate or currency swap or combination of both includes amortizing swap, step-up swap,
deferred/forward swap, cross currency swap, extendable swaps, puttable swaps, swaption,
differential swap and equity swaps.
Interest Rate Swap is an arrangement commonly used to alter the exposure to interest rate risk,
caused by fluctuations in interest rates. The most common interest rates swap is plain vanilla
coupon swap, where parties agree to exchange interest payments on a “notional” amount of
principal at regular interest payments dates throughout the life of the swap, usually from fixed to
floating, or from floating to fixed.
Currency Swap in its simplest form, involves exchanging principal and interest payments in one
currency for principal and interest payments in another currency. The principals are exchanged
at the beginning and the end of the swap life, at agreed exchange rates. This arrangement is
useful where the parties have different borrowing opportunities, e.g., one party has an advantage
in borrowing in a particular currency say $, but needs a £ loan, and another is interested in a $
loan, but has advantage in borrowing £. The two parties can enter into a swap agreement, borrow
at advantageous currency and exchange the principals. This usually happens when the parties
need to finance foreign projects/subsidiaries. A currency swap arrangement has advantage that
it fixes (lock-in) the exchange rate, enable investors to access funds in different currencies and
provides a right of set-off of any non-payment between the parties.
Amortizing Swap is a swap arrangement in which the principal reduces in a predetermined way
throughout the term of the swap, usually corresponding to the amortization schedule on a loan.
In a Step-Up Swap the principal increases in a predetermined way that might be designed to
correspond to draw-down on a loan agreement.
Deferred/Forward Swap refers to the arrangement where the parties do not begin to exchange
interest payments until some future date.
Cross Currency Swap is an agreement to exchange a fixed interest in one currency for a floating
interest rate in another currency. It's actually a combination of interest rate swaps and currency
swaps.
Extendable Swap is a swap arrangement whereby one party has an option to extend the life of
the swap beyond the specified period.
In Puttable swap one party to the swap agreement has an option to early termination of the
swap.
Swaption arrangement provides one party with the right at a future time to enter into a swap
where a predetermined fixed rate is exchanged for floating. It is actually an option on swaps.
Interest rate swaps can be designed to suit the market conditions and risk profiles of the swap
counterparts, with or without presence of intermediaries. In many cases, due to difficulty of having
coinciding needs for the counterparts, usually the service of swaps intermediaries is resorted to, for
a payment, which is a cut of the ‘Locked-in saving’.
The simplest of the interest rate swaps is the plain Vanilla swap, where, for example, one party has
an advantage in borrowing fixed rate but would like to borrow at floating rate, mainly as a result of
his/her risk assessment, and simultaneously another party has advantage in borrowing at a floating
rate, but prefers fixed rate loan. In this case, as long as the principal amounts involved coincide,
each party can borrow at the advantageous rate and then swap the interest payments.
It may as well happen that one party has advantage in both fixed and floating rate over the other
party, but still a swap may be beneficial if (s)he borrows at the rate with a greater comparative
advantage and swap the interest obligations. A few examples are given in the concept checks below:
Design a swap that is equally beneficial to both companies, without a presence of any
intermediary if company AAA desires a floating rate debt and company BBB desires a fixed
rate debt.
Solution
In this case, since company AAA has advantage in both floating (0.25%) and fixed (1.25%), the
comparative advantage is greater in fixed rate. By borrowing fixed and swapping the interest
with BBB, there will be a ‘locked-in saving’ of 1% (1.25%-0.25%). Since the desired swap is to
be equally beneficial to both parties, then the ‘locked-in saving’ will be shared at 0.5% each.
The net payoffs will thus be such that each party has transformed the interest obligations
with a saving of 0.5% compared with going straight to the debt market. This can be summarized
in the following table:
CONCEPT CHECK 15: Companies X and Y have been offered the following rates per
annum on loans with the same principal amounts:
Company X requires a floating rate loan, whereas company Y requires a fixed rate loan.
Design a swap that will net a bank acting as an intermediary a 0.1% p.a. and that will
appear equally attractive to both parties.
Solution
In this case, since company X has advantage in both floating (0.5%) and fixed (1.4%), the
comparative advantage is greater in fixed rate. By borrowing fixed and swapping the interest
with Y, there will be a ‘locked-in saving’ of 0.9% (1.4%-0.5%). However, due to the presence of
an intermediary, the amount available to be shared between company X and Y is reduced by the
remuneration to the intermediary, thus the available saving is 0.8% (0.9% - 0.1%). Since the
desired swap is to be equally beneficial to both parties, then the ‘locked-in saving’ will be shared
at 0.4% each. The net payoffs will thus be such that each party has transformed the interest
obligations with a saving of 0.4% compared with going straight to the debt market.