Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 5 - Sample Problems (Truss Analysis)
Chapter 5 - Sample Problems (Truss Analysis)
The FBD of the truss is shown in Fig.1, detaching the whole truss from the
pin support at A and the roller support at D.
Note: The positive sign of FAE and FAB agrees with our assumption that the forces in members
AB and AE are compressive.
Note: The positive sign of FBC and FBE agrees with our assumption that the force in member BC
is in compression and in member BE in tension.
Summary:
𝐹𝐴𝐵 = 100 kN ሺCሻ 𝐹𝐵𝐸 = 100 kN ሺTሻ 𝐹𝐶𝐷 = 282.84271 kN ሺTሻ
In the method of joint, we can always start at a joint where there are only
two (2) number of unknowns. For this problem we can compute for the forces
in each member of the truss by starting at joint C.
Next, we have to establish the angles or the slopes defining the lines
(inclination) of the members. Notice that ΔBCD and ΔBED are right triangles
(√ሺ5 ftሻ2 + ሺ12 ftሻ2 = 13 ft).
[Σ𝐹𝑣 = 0 ↑ + ]
12
𝐹𝐶𝐷 cos 𝛼 − 𝐹𝐵𝐶 = 0; ሺ780 lbሻ ቀ ቁ − 𝐹𝐵𝐶 = 0 ; 𝐹𝐵𝐶 = 720 lb ሺTሻ
13
[Σ𝐹𝑦 = 0 +]
𝐹𝐵𝐷 = 0
[Σ𝐹𝑣 = 0 ↑ + ]
119 1
𝐹𝐵𝐶 + 𝐹𝐵𝐸 cos 𝛽 − 𝐹𝐴𝐵 sin 45° = 0; 720 + 𝐹𝐵𝐸 ቀ169ቁ − 𝐹𝐴𝐵 ቀ ቁ = 0 ;
ξ2
119 1
169
𝐹𝐵𝐸 − 𝐹𝐴𝐵 = −720 eqn. 2
ξ2
53
The sign for FBE is negative thus our assumption that the force in member BE
is compressive is not correct. Therefore, FBE must be in tension. The
corrected FBD of the pin at B is shown in the accompanying figure.
Summary:
𝐹𝐴𝐵 = 722.49153 lb ሺTሻ 𝐹𝐵𝐷 = 0 𝐹𝐶𝐷 = 780 lb ሺCሻ
Since the given angles are special angles, we may opt to have the slopes of the inclined members as
reference in determining the components of the forces. But in this case, we will use the angles.
The checking if the computed bar forces are correct can be done by investigating if the pin at E is in
equilibrium. This is left to the student as an exercise.
Summary:
𝐹𝐴𝐵 = 11.86851 kN ሺCሻ 𝐹𝐵𝐷 = 5.65685 kN ሺCሻ 𝐹𝐶𝐸 = 8.78461 kN ሺCሻ
In Fig.1, it can be seen that truss is supported by a hinge at A and a link DE at D. Although link DE is
some kind of a support, it can also be thought as a part of the truss. Anyway, the link is also a two-
force member like all other members of the truss. The FBD of the truss is shown in Fig.2, detaching
the whole truss from the pin support at A and the link DE at D.
Reactions:
[Σ𝑀𝐴 = 0 + ] 𝐹𝐷𝐸 ሺ9 mሻ − 3000 N ሺ4 mሻ − 1000 Nሺ6 mሻ = 0; 𝐹𝐷𝐸 = 2000 N ሺTሻ
[Σ𝐹𝑥 = 0 → + ] 𝐴𝑥 − 𝐹𝐷𝐸 = 0 ; 𝐴𝑥 − 2000 N = 0; 𝐴𝑥 = 2000 N →
[Σ𝐹𝑦 = 0 ↑ + ] 𝐴𝑦 − 3000 N − 1000 N = 0; 𝐴𝑦 = 4000 N ↑
Note: All assumed directions for the unknown reactions are correct.
(a) bar forces in FI, DF and HI. Section 1 is passed as shown cutting though
members DF, FI and HI. This is a great choice since there were only be three
(3) unknowns and members FI, DF and HI are part of the unknown that we are
ask to determine. The right section will be used due to the simplicity of the (a)
section. The FBD of the right section of Section 1 is shown in Fig.3a where
FDF is assumed to be in tension and FIF and FHI are assumed to be in
compression.
1. To solve for FIF independently from the other two unknowns, we can take the
sum of the moment at point G since the lines of action of FDF and FHI will
pass at point G and their moments at this point is zero. It is also wise to use
transmissibility principle for FIF and applying the force at point I – only the
vertical component of FIF will have a moment at point G. See Fig. 3b.
[Σ𝑀𝐺 = 0 +]
3 (b)
−𝐹𝐼𝐹𝑦 ሺ4 mሻ + 3000 N ሺ2 mሻ = 0; − ቀ5 𝐹𝐼𝐹 ቁ ሺ4 mሻ + 6000 N ∙ m = 0
2. To solve for FDF, we can sum up the vertical forces (components). See Fig.
3a.
3 3
[Σ𝐹𝑦 = 0 ↑ + ] 5𝐹𝐷𝐹 + 5𝐹𝐼𝐹 − 3000 N − 1000 N = 0
3 3
𝐹
5 𝐷𝐹
+ 5ሺ2500 Nሻ − 4000 N = 0 ; 𝐹𝐷𝐹 = 4166.66667 N ሺTሻ
3. To solve for FHI, we can sum up the horizontal forces (components). See
Fig. 3d.
[Σ𝐹𝑥 = 0 → + ] 𝐹𝐻𝐼 − 4𝐹𝐷𝐹 + 4𝐹𝐼𝐹 = 0 ;
5 5
4 4
𝐹𝐻𝐼 − 5ሺ4166.66667 Nሻ + 5ሺ2500 Nሻ = 0 𝐹𝐻𝐼 = 1333.33333 N ሺCሻ
(b) bar forces in BC, CJ and IJ. Section 2 is passed as shown cutting though
members BC, CJ and IJ. The lower section will be used due to the simplicity of the
section. The FBD of the lower section of Section 2 is shown in Fig.4a where FBC
and FCJ are assumed to be in tension and FIJ is in compression.
[Σ𝑀𝐽 = 0 + ] 𝐹𝐵𝐶 ሺ2 mሻ + 𝐴𝑦 ሺ2 mሻ − 𝐴𝑥 ሺ3mሻ = 0;
𝐹𝐵𝐶 ሺ2 mሻ + ሺ4000 Nሻሺ2 mሻ − ሺ2000 Nሻሺ3mሻ = 0; 𝐹𝐵𝐶 = −1000 N
𝐹𝐵𝐶 = 1000 N ሺCሻ
2 2
[Σ𝐹𝑥 = 0 → + ] − 𝐹𝐶𝐽 + 𝐴𝑥 = 0 ; − 𝐹𝐶𝐽 + 2000 N = 0 ;
ξ13 ξ13
To solve for FIJ, sum of the forces in the y-direction may be used. For this process
care should be taken since we assumed a wrong direction for FBC. We may retain
the wrong direction of FBC in formulating the equation or we may change its
direction as previously discussed before formulating the equation (Fig.4b). If we
opt to retain the wrong direction of FBC in formulating the equilibrium equation, the
negative value should be substituted in the said equation. This is demonstrated in
the following procedure and using the FBD in Fig.4a:
3
[Σ𝐹𝑦 = 0 ↑ + ] 𝐴𝑦 + 𝐹𝐵𝐶 + 𝐹𝐶𝐽 − 𝐹𝐼𝐽 = 0 ;
ξ13
3
4000 N + ሺ−1000 Nሻ + ൫1000ξ13N൯ − 𝐹𝐼𝐽 = 0 ;
ξ13
The forces FBC, FHI and FIJ can be determined independently. This method would minimize the
probability of having erroneous values by not carrying the errors in the computation of the previously
determined quantities. Determining the forces FBC, FHI and FIJ independently is left for the student
as an exercise.
Summary:
(a) 𝐹𝐼𝐹 = 2500 N ሺCሻ 𝐹𝐷𝐹 = 4166.66667 N ሺTሻ 𝐹𝐻𝐼 = 3605.55128 N ሺTሻ
(b) 𝐹𝐵𝐶 = 1000 N ሺCሻ 𝐹𝐶𝐽 = 3605.55128 N ሺTሻ 𝐹𝐼𝐽 = 6000 N ሺCሻ
Sample Problem 5.5: Truss Analysis – Method of
Sections
Determine the force in members BI, CH and HI for the
loaded truss shown. All angles are 30°, 60° and 90°.
The FBD of the entire truss in shown in Fig.1. As mentioned in the problem that all angles are 30°,
60° and 90°, and base on the given figure, the angles between adjacent members were identified
and reflected in the FBD of the truss in Fig.1. Solving for the reactions Fv and Av and the distances
h1 and h2:
Fig.1. FBD of the truss with angles between adjacent Fig.2. FBD of the truss with sloped defining the inclination
members. of the members.
[Σ𝑀𝐴 = 0 +] 𝐹𝑣 ሺ3𝑎ሻ − 2 kN ሺ1.5𝑎ሻ − 4 kNሺ0.5𝑎ሻ = 0 ሺall 𝑎 cancels outሻ
5
3𝐹𝑣 − 5 = 0; 𝐹𝑣 = 3 kN = 1.66667 kN ↑
13
[Σ𝐹𝑣 = 0 ↑ + ] 𝐴𝑣 − 4 kN − 2 kN + 𝐹𝑣 = 0; 𝐴𝑣 = 3
kN = 4.33333 kN ↑
(a) In solving for member BI, section 1 is passed through members BC,
BI and AI and the FBD of the left portion of the truss will be used. And
to solve the force FBI independently (independent from FBC and FAI),
the intersection of FBC and FAI is located, say point O, and the sum of
the moment will be taken at this point. FBI is then applied at point I
and replaced by its horizontal and vertical components. All unknown
bar forces are assumed accordingly. See Fig.3.
Aside from the procedure presented to solve for FBI, there are still other means on how to determine
the force FBI. You are advised then to compute FBI using other procedure.
(b) Solving for the forces member CH and HI. Section 2 is passed
through members CD, CH and IH and the FBD of the left portion
of the truss will be used. All unknown bar forces are assumed as
shown in Fig.4. FCH can be determined independently by
summing up the vertical forces and FHI can also be determined
independently by taking the sum of moments at point C.
Summary: 𝐹𝐵𝐼 = 2.50185 kN ሺTሻ 𝐹𝐶𝐻 = 0.3849 kN ሺTሻ 𝐹𝐻𝐼 = 2.6943 kN ሺTሻ
Before we determine the reactions at the supports, one way of giving dimensions to trusses is the
use of, in this case, the notation “6 panels @ 15 ft = 90 ft”. This means that the truss has six (6)
panels, each panel is equally dimensioned at 15 ft and the six panels totals to 90 ft. The meaning of
such notation is shown in Fig.1. To determine the support, the FBD of the whole truss is drawn and
shown in Fig.2. Since the three (3) 12 kips load and the reaction at the roller support are all vertical,
then the reaction at the pin at A is also vertical – no reaction component in the horizontal direction.
(a) Forces in bars JM and LO. A section is to made by cutting bars JM, MN,
NO and LO – that is section 4 (see Fig.3). The right portion of section 4 will
used for analysis and its FBD with assume direction (sense) for the forces in
the bars is shown in Fig.4. Though there are four unknowns, notice that FMN
and FNO have the same line of action. Forces FMN, FNO then FLO intersect at
point O and FMN, FNO then FJM intersect at point M. We can therefore
determine FJM when we take moment at point O and we can also determine
FLO when we take moment at point M. Solving for the bar forces FJM and FLO:
[Σ𝑀𝑂 = 0 + ] 𝐹𝐽𝑀 ሺ16 ftሻ − 𝑃𝑣 ሺ15 ftሻ = 0 ; 𝐹𝐽𝑀 ሺ16 ftሻ − ሺ24 kNሻሺ15 ftሻ = 0 Fig.4. FBD of the right portion
of section 4.
𝐹𝐽𝑀 = 22.5 kips ሺCሻ
[Σ𝑀𝑀 = 0 + ] 𝐹𝐿𝑂 ሺ16 ftሻ − 𝑃𝑣 ሺ15 ftሻ = 0 ; 𝐹𝐿𝑂 ሺ16 ftሻ − ሺ24 kNሻሺ15 ftሻ = 0
𝐹𝐿𝑂 = 22.5 kips ሺTሻ
From the same FBD, in case we are ask, we cannot yet determine FMN and FNO.
(b) Forces in bars JN and LN. A section is to be made by cutting bars JM, JN,
LN and LO – that is section 3 (see Fig.3). The right portion of section 3 will
used for analysis and its FBD with assumed direction (sense) for the forces
in the bars is shown in Fig.4. Though there are four bars that were cut, but
we already have the determined the forces FJM and FLO. We can therefore
determine FJN and FLN simultaneously by summing up vertical forces and
summing up horizontal forces or independently by taking moments at point J
or point L. Solving for the bar forces FJN and FLN:
[Σ𝐹𝑣 = 0 ↑ + ] Fig.5. FBD of the right portion
8 8 8 8
−17 𝐹𝐽𝑁 + 17 𝐹𝐿𝑁 − 12 k + 𝑃𝑣 = 0 ; −17 𝐹𝐽𝑁 + 17 𝐹𝐿𝑁 − 12 k + 24 k = 0 of section 3.
8 8
−17 𝐹𝐽𝑁 + 17 𝐹𝐿𝑁 = −12 k ; − 𝐹𝐽𝑁 + 𝐹𝐿𝑁 = −25.5 eqn. 1
[Σ𝐹ℎ = 0 → + ]
15 15 15 15
𝐹 + 17 𝐹𝐿𝑁 + 𝐹𝐽𝑀 − 𝐹𝐿𝑂 = 0 ;
17 𝐽𝑁
𝐹
17 𝐽𝑁
+ 17 𝐹𝐿𝑁 + 22.5 k − 22.5 k = 0
15 15
𝐹
17 𝐽𝑁
+ 17 𝐹𝐿𝑁 = 0 ; 𝐹𝐽𝑁 + 𝐹𝐿𝑁 = 0 eqn. 2
The computed values of the forces seem to have a pattern, but it is just a coincidence. As an
exercise, determine the forces in bars MN, NO, BE, CE, FG and GI using the method of section. NO
joint analysis is allowed.
Sample Problem 5.7: Truss Analysis
Determine the force on members FG, CG, BC, EF and CF for the loaded crane truss shown in Fig.1.
Fig.1. Loaded crane truss. Fig.2. FBD of the truss and Fig.3. FBD of the truss (cable,
FBD of the hook detached)
The FBD of the truss is shown in Fig.2 where portion GFED of the continuous cable is not detached.
To establish the tension in the continuous cable, FBD of the hook is also drawn (see Fig.2) and it
can be found that the tension in the cable is 25 kN. Another way of drawing the FBD of the truss is
shown in Fig.3. If only the reactions are to be determined the FDB of the truss in Fig.2 is already
satisfactory. The FBD in Fig.3, however, gives us an idea on how to draw the free body when we
wish to determine the bar forces by either the method of joint or by method of sections or a
combination of both methods. For this problem, we can actually determine the forces in the bars
without determining the reactions at the supports, but reactions are computed here for
demonstration.
Reactions:
[Σ𝑀𝐴 = 0 +]
𝑇𝐺𝐻ℎ ሺ4 mሻ + 𝑇𝐺𝐻𝑣 ሺ4 mሻ + ሺ25 kNሻሺ0.25 mሻ − ሺ25 kNሻሺ4 mሻ − ሺ25 kNሻሺ4.25 mሻ = 0;
1 1
𝑇𝐺𝐻 ሺ4 mሻ + 𝑇𝐺𝐻 ሺ4 mሻ − 200 kN ∙ m = 0; 𝑇𝐺𝐻 = 25ξ2 kN = 35.35534 kN ሺTሻ
ξ2 ξ2
It can also be seen that TGH is perpendicular to line AG, thus the moment arm of TGH when the sum
of moment is taken at point A is ̅̅̅̅
𝐴𝐺 = 4ξ2 m = 5.68585 m.
[Σ𝑀𝐴 = 0 +]
𝑇𝐺𝐻 ൫4ξ2 m൯ + ሺ25 kNሻሺ0.25 mሻ − ሺ25 kNሻሺ4 mሻ − ሺ25 kNሻሺ4.25 mሻ = 0;
𝑇𝐺𝐻 ൫4ξ2 m൯ − 200 kN ∙ m = 0; 𝑇𝐺𝐻 = 25ξ2 kN = 35.35534 kN ሺTሻ
1 1
[Σ𝐹𝑣 = 0 ↑ + ] 𝐴𝑣 − 𝑇𝐺𝐻 − ሺ25 kNሻ − 2ሺ25 kNሻ = 0;
ξ2 ξ2
1 1
𝐴𝑣 − ൫25ξ2 kN൯ − ሺ25 kNሻ − 2ሺ25 kNሻ = 0; 𝐴𝑣 = 92.67767 kN ↑
ξ2 ξ2
1 1 1 1
[Σ𝐹ℎ = 0 → + ] 𝐴ℎ − 𝑇𝐺𝐻 + ሺ25 kNሻ = 0; 𝐴ℎ − ൫25ξ2 kN൯ + ሺ25 kNሻ = 0;
ξ2 ξ2 ξ2 ξ2
𝐴ℎ = 7.32233 kN →
(a) solving for the forces in bars FG, CG and BC using the top portion of
section 1.
[Σ𝑀𝐶 = 0 +]
𝐹𝐹𝐺 ሺ4 mሻ + ሺ25 kNሻሺ4.25 mሻ − ሺ25 kNሻሺ4 mሻ − ሺ25 kNሻሺ4.25 mሻ = 0;
𝐹𝐹𝐺 = 25 kN ሺTሻ
[Σ𝑀𝐺 = 0 +]
ሺ25 kNሻሺ0.25 mሻ + 𝐹𝐵𝐶 ሺ4 mሻ − ሺ25 kNሻሺ8 mሻ − ሺ25 kNሻሺ8.25 mሻ = 0;
𝐹𝐵𝐶 = 100 kN ሺCሻ
Fig.3. FBD of the top portion of
1 section 1.
[Σ𝐹ℎ = 0 → + ] 𝐹𝐶𝐺 = 0; 𝐹𝐶𝐺 = 0
ξ2
(b) solving for the forces in bar EF and CF from the FBD of the pin and pulley
at F (Fig.4)
1 1
[Σ𝐹𝑣 = 0 ↑ + ] 𝐹𝐸𝐹 + ሺ25 kNሻ − 𝐹𝐹𝐺 − 25 kN = 0;
ξ2 ξ2
1 1
𝐹𝐸𝐹 + ሺ25 kNሻ − 25 kN − 25 kN = 0; 𝐹𝐸𝐹 = 45.71068 kN ሺTሻ
ξ2 ξ2
1 1
[Σ𝐹ℎ = 0 ← + ] 𝐹𝐶𝐹 − 𝐹𝐸𝐹 − ሺ25 kNሻ = 0;
ξ2 ξ2
1 1
𝐹𝐶𝐹 − ሺ45.71068 kNሻ − ሺ25 kNሻ = 0; 𝐹𝐶𝐹 = 63.38835 kN ሺCሻ
ξ2 ξ2
Fig.4. FBD of the pin and pulley
at F.
Summary: 𝐹𝐹𝐺 = 25 kN ሺTሻ 𝐹𝐵𝐶 = 100 kN ሺCሻ 𝐹𝐶𝐺 = 0
𝐹𝐸𝐹 = 45.71068 kN ሺTሻ 𝐹𝐶𝐹 = 63.38835 kN ሺCሻ
Oftentimes, the method of joint and method of sections are used hand-in-hand in handling truss
analysis. It is in our decision as to what method we are going to use. But if the problem itself would
require a specific method, then we really have to solve the problem in accordance with the required
method of analysis.
Sample Problem 5.8: Truss Analysis
Determine the force on members EF, KL and GL for the
loaded crane truss shown in Fig.1.
Reactions:
[Σ𝑀𝐼 = 0 + ] 𝐴𝑣 ሺ30 mሻ − 𝑅ሺ2ሻ൫2.5ξ3 m൯ = 0; 𝐴𝑣 ሺ30 mሻ − ሺ80 kNሻ൫5ξ3 m൯ = 0
𝐴𝑣 = 23.09401 kN ↑
[Σ𝐹𝑣 = 0 ↑ + ] ξ3 ξ3
𝐴𝑣 + 𝐼𝑣 − 𝑅 = 0; 23.09401 kN + 𝐼𝑣 − ሺ80 kNሻ = 0 ; 𝐼𝑣 = 46.18802 kN ↑
2 2
1 1
[Σ𝐹ℎ = 0 → + ] 𝐼ℎ − 𝑅 = 0; 𝐼𝑣 − ሺ80 kNሻ = 0 ; 𝐼ℎ = 40 kN →
2 2
To determine the forces in the bars, the following procedure will be carried
out:
1. Section 1 is passed through the truss cutting bars EF, EL and KM.
The FBD of the right portion of section 1 is drawn as in Fig.2. FEF will
be determined independently by taking the sum of moments at point
K. Moment arm of FEF from K is the length ̅̅̅̅
𝐺𝐾 = 5 m.
2. From the FBD of the right portion of section 1 (Fig.2), the force in
member EL, which is FEL, will be determined by taking moment at
point I. The moment arm of FEL from point I is found by determining
the perpendicular distance of point I from the line of action of FEL. By
dimensional analysis, the moment arm of FEL from point I is 5ξ3 m.
3. At joint F, the force in member FL, which is FFL will be determined.
(see Fig.3)
4. Forces in members KL and GL, FKL and FGL respectively, by Fig.2. FBD of the right portion
of section 2
analyzing joint L. (see Fig.4)
(a) bar force in member EF, FEF: (FBD of the right portion of section 1, Fig.2)
[Σ𝑀𝐼 = 0 +] 𝐹𝐸𝐹 ሺ5 mሻ + 10 kN൫2.5ξ3 m൯ − 𝐼𝑣 ሺ10 mሻ = 0;
𝐹𝐸𝐹 ሺ5 mሻ + 10 kN൫2.5ξ3 m൯ − ሺ46.18802 kNሻሺ10 mሻ = 0;
𝐹𝐸𝐹 = 83.71579 kN ሺCሻ
(b) bar force in member EL, FEL: (FBD of the right portion of section 1, Fig.2)
[Σ𝑀𝐼 = 0 + ] 𝐹𝐸𝐿 ൫5ξ3 m൯ − 60 kN൫5ξ3 m൯ = 0; 𝐹𝐸𝐿 = 60 kN ሺTሻ
(c) bar force in member FL, FFL: (FBD of the pin or joint F, Fig.3)
[Σ𝐹𝑦 = 0 + ] 𝐹𝐹𝐿 − 20 kN = 0; 𝐹𝐹𝐿 = 20 kN ሺCሻ Fig.3. FBD of the pin at F
(joint F)
(c) bar force in members KL and GL, FKL and FGL: (FBD of the pin or joint L,
Fig.4)
ξ3 ξ3 ξ3
[Σ𝐹𝑣 = 0 ↓ + ] 𝐹 + 𝐹 − 𝐹 = 0; 𝐹𝐾𝐿 + 𝐹𝐹𝐿 − 𝐹𝐸𝐿 = 0
2 𝐾𝐿 2 𝐹𝐿 2 𝐸𝐿