RESULTS

1. What is the demographic profile of the respondents in terms of:

a. Age

FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

16 years old 5%
1
17 years old 60%
12
18 years old 25%
5
19 years old 5%
1
21 years old 5%
1
TOTAL 20 100%

b. Strand

FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

ABM 25%
5
HUMSS 25%
5
STEM 25%
5
TVL 25%
5
TOTAL 20 100%

c. Section

FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Benitez 25%
5
De Jesus 25%
5
Dizon 25%
5
Magbanua 3 15%
 Tecson 10%
2
TOTAL 20 100%

2. What is the level of educational achievement of the respondents?

Indicators MEAN RESPONSE DESCRIPTION

1. I do my assignments regularly. 4.15 EXCELLENT
2. I study and prepare for the quizzes and tests. 3.95 ABOVE AVERAGE
3. I submit my outputs on time. 4.20 ABOVE AVERAGE
4. I raise my hand during class recitations. 4.00 ABOVE AVERAGE
5. I exert effort in academic performances. 4.00 ABOVE AVERAGE
WEIGHTED MEAN RESPONSE 4.06 ABOVE AVERAGE

PARAMETERS
(4.21 - 5.00) Excellent
(3.41 - 4.20) Above Average
(2.61 - 3.40) Average
(1.81 - 2.60) Below Average
(1.00 - 1.80) Needs Improvement

3. What is the goodness of the respondents’ values?

Indicators MEAN RESPONSE DESCRIPTION

1. I volunteer in cleaning our room. 3.90
2. I respect my teachers and staffs of the school. 4.70
3. I do not cheat during tests or quizzes. 3.75
4. I help my teachers in carrying their baggage whenever 3.85
possible.
5. I do not curse and speak vulgar language. 3.75
WEIGHTED MEAN RESPONSE 3.99

PARAMETERS
(4.21 - Very Good
5.00)
(3.41 - Good
4.20)
(2.61 - Slightly Good
3.40)
(1.81 - Poor
2.60)
(1.00 - Very Poor
1.80)
 4. Is there a significant relationship between the educational achievement of the
respondents and the goodness of the respondents’ values?

Correlations

EDUCATIONAL
ACHIEVEMENT VALUES

EDUCATIONAL Pearson Correlation 1 .773**

ACHIEVEMENT Sig. (2-tailed) .000

N 20 20
VALUES Pearson Correlation .773** 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .000

N 20 20

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Interpretation:
There is a significant relationship between the educational achievement of the
respondents and the goodness of the respondents’ values
The statistical treatment used is Pearson-r correlation. The tables above shows the correlation coefficient
and the p-value. The strength of the relationship can be determined by the value of the correlation
coefficient presented as r. The significance level is at .05. So if the p-value is less than or equal the
significance level then we consider the relationship significant.

Value of r Strength of relationship

-1.0 to -0.5 or 1.0 to 0.5 Strong
-0.5 to -0.3 or 0.3 to 0.5 Moderate
-0.3 to -0.1 or 0.1 to 0.3 Weak
-0.1 to 0.1 None or very weak