Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ch13e SecurityValuation
Ch13e SecurityValuation
Security Valuation
Lecture Presentation Software
to accompany
Chapter 13
Version 1.2
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc.
All rights reserved. Requests for permission to make
copies of any part of the work should be mailed to:
Permissions Department
Harcourt, Inc.
6277 Sea Harbor Drive
Orlando, Florida 32887-6777
The Investment Decision Process
• Determine the required rate of return
• Evaluate the investment to determine if its
market price is consistent with your
required rate of return
– Estimate the value of the security based on its
expected cash flows and your required rate of
return
– Compare this intrinsic value to the market price
to decide if you want to buy it
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved
Valuation Process
• Two approaches
– 1. Top-down, three-step approach
– 2. Bottom-up, stock valuation, stock picking
approach
• The difference between the two approaches
is the perceived importance of economic
and industry influence on individual firms
and stocks
Where:
Vj = value of stock j
n = life of the asset
CFt = cash flow in period t
k = the discount rate that is equal to the investor’s required rate
of return for asset j, which is determined by the uncertainty
(risk) of the stock’s cash flows
Where:
D1 = 0
D2 = 0
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved
The Dividend Discount Model
(DDM)
Infinite period model assumes a constant
growth rate for estimating future dividends
Vj = value of stock j
D0 = dividend payment in the current period
g = the constant growth rate of dividends
k = required rate of return on stock j
n = the number of periods, which we assume to be infinite
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved
The Dividend Discount Model
(DDM)
Infinite period model assumes a constant
growth rate for estimating future dividends
D0 (1 + g ) D0 (1 + g ) D0 (1 + g )2 n
Vj = + + ... +
(1 + k ) (1 + k ) 2
(1 + k ) n
D1
This can be reduced to: Vj =
k−g
Where:
Vj = value of firm j
n = number of periods; assumed to be infinite
OCFt = the firms operating cash flow in period t
WACC = firm j’s weighted average cost of capital
(OCF and WACC to be discussed in Chapter 20)
Pi D1 / E1
=
E1 k−g
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved
Earnings Multiplier Model
As an example, assume:
– Dividend payout = 50%
– Required return = 12%
– Expected growth = 8%
– D/E = .50; k = .12; g=.08
Pi D1 / E1
=
E1 k−g
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved
Earnings Multiplier Model
A small change in either or both k or g can
have a large impact on the multiplier
D/E = .50; k=.13; g=.08
Pi D1 / E1
=
E1 k−g
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved
Earnings Multiplier Model
A small change in either or both k or g can
have a large impact on the multiplier
D/E = .50; k=.13; g=.08
P/E = .50/(.13-/.08) = .50/.05 = 10
Pi D1 / E1
=
E1 k−g
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved
Earnings Multiplier Model
A small change in either or both k or g can
have a large impact on the multiplier
D/E = .50; k=.13; g=.08 P/E = 10
Pi D1 / E1
=
E1 k−g
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved
Earnings Multiplier Model
A small change in either or both k or g can
have a large impact on the multiplier
D/E = .50; k=.13; g=.08 P/E = 10
D/E = .50; k=.12; g=.09
Pi D1 / E1
=
E1 k−g
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved
Earnings Multiplier Model
A small change in either or both k or g can
have a large impact on the multiplier
D/E = .50; k=.13; g=.08 P/E = 10
D/E = .50; k=.12; g=.09
P/E = .50/(.12-/.09) = .50/.03 = 16.7
Pi D1 / E1
=
E1 k−g
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved
Earnings Multiplier Model
A small change in either or both k or g can
have a large impact on the multiplier
D/E = .50; k=.13; g=.08 P/E = 10
D/E = .50; k=.12; g=.09 P/E = 16.7
Pi D1 / E1
=
E1 k−g
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved
Earnings Multiplier Model
A small change in either or both k or g can
have a large impact on the multiplier
D/E = .50; k=.13; g=.08 P/E = 10
D/E = .50; k=.12; g=.09 P/E = 16.7
D/E = .50; k=.11; g=.09
Pi D1 / E1
=
E1 k−g
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved
Earnings Multiplier Model
A small change in either or both k or g can
have a large impact on the multiplier
D/E = .50; k=.13; g=.08 P/E = 10
D/E = .50; k=.12; g=.09 P/E = 16.7
D/E = .50; k=.11; g=.09
P/E = .50/(.11-/.09) = .50/.02 = 25
Pi D1 / E1
=
E1 k−g
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved
Earnings Multiplier Model
A small change in either or both k or g can
have a large impact on the multiplier
D/E = .50; k=.13; g=.08 P/E = 10
D/E = .50; k=.12; g=.09 P/E = 16.7
D/E = .50; k=.11; g=.09 P/E = 25
Pi D1 / E1
=
E1 k−g
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved
Earnings Multiplier Model
small change in either or both k or g can
have a large impact on the multiplier
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
-
1966 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998
Source: "World Investment Strategy Highlights" (Longdon: Goldman Sachs International Ltd., Jan. 1999).
Reprinted by permission of Goldman, Sachs & Co.
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved
Consumer or Retail Price
(Percentage Changes From Previous Year)
Period United States Japan Germany France United Kingdom Italy
1987 3.7 % 0.1 % 0.3 % 3.3 % 4.1 % 4.6 %
1988 4.1 0.7 1.3 2.7 4.9 5.0
1989 4.8 2.3 2.8 3.4 7.8 6.6
1990 5.4 3.0 2.7 3.4 9.5 6.1
1991 4.7 3.2 3.5 3.1 6.0 6.0
1992 3.0 1.7 4.0 2.8 3.7 5.2
1993 3.0 1.3 4.2 2.1 1.6 4.2
1994 2.6 0.7 2.7 2.1 2.4 3.9
1995 2.8 0.0 1.8 1.6 2.8 5.4
1996 2.9 0.1 1.5 2.0 3.0 3.9
1997 2.3 1.7 1.8 1.2 2.8 1.7
1998 1.6 0.7 0.9 0.7 2.7 1.7
(e)
1999 2.0 -0.9 0.9 0.5 2.3 1.3
Source: "World Investment Strategy Highlights" (Longdon: Goldman Sachs International Ltd., Jan. 1999).
Reprinted by permission of Goldman, Sachs & Co.
ROE =