Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AllIance For The Family Foundation Phil., Inc., V Garin, Resolution On Partial M.R., GR 217872 GR 221866, 26 Apr 2017
AllIance For The Family Foundation Phil., Inc., V Garin, Resolution On Partial M.R., GR 217872 GR 221866, 26 Apr 2017
AllIance For The Family Foundation Phil., Inc., V Garin, Resolution On Partial M.R., GR 217872 GR 221866, 26 Apr 2017
FACTS:
Petitioners opposed the unilateral act of the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) on
re-certifying the contraceptive drugs named Implanon and Implanon NXT; the basis
of their opposition hinges on the fact that these drugs are abortifacients. Thus,
according to them, they should have been given notice of the certification
proceedings, and a chance to present evidence that indeed such drugs are
abortifacients.
Respondents, on the other hand, alleged that petitioners are not entitled to notice and
hearing because the said proceedings are done in the exercise of its regulatory power,
not quasi-judicial power; also, they alleged that the Honorable Supreme Court is
incompetent to rule on the instant controversy due to the same reason.
Issues:
(a) Whether or not said controversy is outside the scope of Judicial Review;
(b) Whether or not petitioners were deprived of substantial and procedural due process
of law;
Held/Doctrines:
It is quite fascinating that the Supreme Court again reminded us the two fundamental
powers of an administrative body, in the words of the Honorable Court: