Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 3 - Urban Morphology
Chapter 3 - Urban Morphology
Urban Morphology
Urbanization is the process of landscape change from rural agrarian to
industrial commercial and from village ecology to urban ecology.
Urban Morphology refers to the study of internal structure, the arrangement of
residential houses, layout plan of roads and streets, internal physical
structure of city consisting entertainment space, community land, marketing
area, etc.
Urban Morphology develops with the urban sprawl and expansion of the city. It is
the consequence of long historical and social processes.
Simply state, Urban Morphology is the physical plan map of a city with
identification of various land use.
Urban Morphology is a part of the study of urban ecology where the urban
system with various elements and their interrelationship is studied.
The urban land use can be studied under the following heads:
w
o
r
k
e
r
s
a
l
s
o
2. Sector Model
This model was proposed by Hoyt and Davis. This model takes into account the
development of urban centers along major transportation lines.
Here urban morphology is determined by the network of routes that develop
within the city.
The city in this model is never concentric rather divided into sectors.
Central Business District (CBD)- Zone 1
It is the central core of city with circular geometric shape.
It has no residential usage, only wholesale marketing, headquarters, government
building etc are located.
It is also called blighted part of city because during the night darkness prevails in
the building and it becomes no man‟s land.
It is the costly part of the city.
Such CBD are the product of industrial revolution and they generally have a
planned development model. E.g. Connaught Place New Delhi.
Thus, in Sectoral Model the concentric pattern gets distorted because of the presence
of major roads that encourage agglomeration and expansion of certain categories of
land uses.
Light manufacturing and supporting labor and worker class expand along a
transportation corridor. E.g. Mathura Road (Delhi-Faridabad-Mathura-Agra Highway),
NH2 has this type of expansion, whereas, along a well-planned corridor that develops
into an expressway or “Boulevard”, the affluent population may prefer to agglomerate.
E.g. Jaipur Highway (through Gurgaon-Manesar).
Critical Evaluation
Even in the Sectoral model the metropolis and megacities can‟t be projected and it
is more suitable for the district level town.
The million-plus cities have more than one CBD because the economic functions
are highly diversified and all populations can‟t be accommodated with all economic
functions at a single center.
Post-industrial revolution cities of Europe which are semi-planned more correspond
to this model.
In India, this model is applicable for some state capitals and larger district towns.
In order to address the problems in Sectoral Model Harris and Edward Ullman came
with the “Multiple Nuclei Model”.
Z
o
n
e
Application
This model is applicable to all mega cities with large urban industrial growth
occupying considerable geographical area and is further in phase of expansion
and transition.
This is more applicable to modern cities and planned cities of US and Europe.
It reflects better urban policy; more than one CBD will divert urban population to
other CBDs and prevent the concentration of population.
All metropolis of India resemble Multiple Nuclei Theory.
In most of modern urban centers high end retail and large malls repel wholesale
and grain trading. Similarly electronic and computer peripherals generally
agglomerate in different commercial centers. Example- in Delhi- NCR original
CBD is walled city at Chandani Chowk whereas South-Ex is centre of high end
retail while Nehru Place specializes in electronic and computer peripherals.
The commercial and residential suburbs of Gurgaon and Noida have their own
CBD.