Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Existentialism 2
Existentialism 2
"regards reason as the chief source and test of knowledge or "any view appealing to reason
the view that all concepts originate in experience, that all concepts are about or applicable
to things that can be experienced, or that all rationally acceptable beliefs or propositions
are justifiable or knowable only through experience) “existentialism” is a term that belongs to
intellectual history. Its definition is thus to some extent one of historical convenience. The term
was explicitly adopted as a self-description by Jean-Paul Sartre, and through the wide
dissemination of the postwar literary and philosophical output of Sartre and his associates—
became identified with a cultural movement that flourished in Europe in the 1940s and 1950s.
Among the major philosophers identified as existentialists (many of whom—for instance Camus
and Heidegger—repudiated the label) were Karl Jaspers, Martin Heidegger, and Martin Buber in
Germany, Jean Wahl and Gabriel Marcel in France, the Spaniards José Ortega y Gasset and
Miguel de Unamuno, and the Russians Nikolai Berdyaev and Lev Shestov. The nineteenth
century philosophers, Søren Kierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche came to be seen as precursors
Sartre’s own ideas were and are better known through his fictional works (such
as Nausea and No Exit) than through his more purely philosophical ones (such as Being and
Nothingness and Critique of Dialectical Reason), and the postwar years found a very diverse
coterie of writers and artists linked under the term: retrospectively, Dostoevsky, Ibsen, and Kafka
were conscripted; in Paris there were Jean Genet, André Gide, André Malraux, and the expatriate
Samuel Beckett; the Norwegian Knut Hamsun and the Romanian Eugene Ionesco belong to the
club; artists such as Alberto Giacometti and even Abstract Expressionists such as Jackson
Pollock, Arshile Gorky, and Willem de Kooning, and filmmakers such as Jean-Luc Godard and
Ingmar Bergman were understood in existential terms. By the mid-1970s the cultural image of
existentialism had become a cliché, parodized in countless books and films by Woody Allen.
the view that humans define their own meaning in life and try to make rational
existence, and the feeling that there is no purpose or explanation at the core of existence. It
holds that, as there is no God or any other transcendent force, the only way to counter this
the only way to rise above the essentially absurd condition of humanity (which is characterized
event, decision and action is causally determined by an unbroken chain of prior occurrences)).
Main belief
Unlike René Descartes, who believed in the primacy of consciousness, Existentialists assert that
a human being is "thrown into" into a concrete, inveterate universe that cannot be "thought
and political activist, and one of the central figures in 20th Century French philosophy) put it:
"At first [Man] is nothing. Only afterward will he be something, and he himself will have made
If you’ve ever pondered the meaning of existence or questioned your purpose in life, you’ve
Essentialism
• This idea seems to imply, whether you are aware of it or not, your purpose in life has been
• If you agreed with this thinking then you really didn't have to challenge the meaning of life or
• While philosophers including Søren Kierkegaard, Fyodor Dostoyevsky and Friedrich Nietzsche
questioned essentialism in the 19th century, existentialism was popularised by Jean-Paul Sartre
in the mid-20th century following the horrific events of World War II.
• You were created as a blank slate, and it is up to you to discover your life's purpose or
meaning.
• While not necessarily atheist, existentialists believed there is no divine intervention, fate or
If you’re now thinking like an existentialist, then the answer to this question is both elementary
and infinitely complex. You have the answer, you just have to own it
• If you're now thinking like an existentialist, then the answer to this question is both elementary
Søren Kierkegaard
HIS LIFE
pursue a course of studies in Theology and Philosophy. He finished his formal studies in 1840
HIS WORKS
Christian Discourses
Works of Love
HUMAN NATURE FOR KIERKEGAARD
human beings stand out as responsible individuals who must make free choices. According to
him the deepest "inwardness" of the human being is the place of passionate choice wherein one
must take a "leap of faith" despite one's finitude, the fact that we can never know with certainly
ethical = involves intense commitment to one's duty in faith and social obligations
"Christianity is therefore not a doctrine, but the fact that God has existed."
"...the thing is to find a truth which is true for me, to find the idea for which can live and die"
HIS LIFE
born on 15 October 1844 in the small town of Röcken bei Lützen, near Leipzig in the Prussian
province of Saxony. He was born with severe myopia and was always a delicate and sickly child.
HIS WORKS
Master/Slave Morality
Nihilism
Ubermensch
Will to Power
Eternal Reccurance
human beings constitute a transitional, not a final, stage of development. Consequently, human
beings cannot become too complacent about, or satisfied with, their achievements without
endangering their claim to be human. “Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the
process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will
HIS LIFE
Sartre was born in Paris, France on 21 June 1905. He is best known as the main figurehead of the
Existentialism movement. Along with his French contemporaries Albert Camus and Simone de
Beauvoir. He was a confirmed Atheist and a committed Communist and Marxist, and took a
prominent role in many leftist political causes throughout his adult life.
HIS WORKS
His major works include "No Exit," "Nausea," "The Wall," "The Age of Reason,"
"Critique of Dialectical Reason," "Being and Nothingness," and "Roads to Freedom," an allegory
of man's search for commitment, and not, as the man at the off-licence says, an everyday story of
existence precedes our essence; we have to create our own essence. Nothing, not god or
evolution, created us for any purpose other than the purposes we choose. “Every existing thing is
born without reason, prolongs itself out of weakness, and dies by chance. Life is a useless
passion. Politics is a science. You can demonstrate that you are right and that others are wrong”
Is there a God?
According to Sartre, “Existence precedes essence”, that in all the actions of human, they are
solely responsible for their actions because we choose what we are. It just like the tabula rasa; we
are a blank space that we are the one who will fill that blank space. “Essence precedes existence”
it means that a certain phenomenon, event or element can only when there is a purpose for it. We
can say that in order for you to exist, you must know your nature of being and also if you have a
purpose and nature of being, therefore you are existing. It also connotes that there is no God or
any transcendent force. The only matter is that what we see, what we smell, what we feel, what
we hear is what the existence means. The man is defined in negative terms for Sartre, as opposed
to what he is not: thus, an ashtray has been designed for a specific function, predetermined. The
essence of the ashtray lives before its existence. The same thing happens if we consider God as
the creator of the universe. If the concept of man is in the mind of God, man becomes an ashtray,
that is to say an object, not a subject. That’s why, for Sartre, God does not exist, God cannot
exist because it would ruin the human life. Because the existence would mean that man has an
essence, so is not free, nor responsible for his actions: “The man first exists, occurs, arises in the
world, and it is defined after […] The man is nothing, he will then, and he will be such that it
will be done. So, there is not likely, since there is no God to conceive”.
Subjective arguments
Similar to the subjective arguments for the existence of God, subjective arguments against the
• The witness argument gives credibility to personal witnesses, contemporary and from the
• The conflicted religions argument notes that many religions give differing accounts as to
what God is and what God wants; since all the contradictory accounts cannot be correct, many if
• The disappointment argument claims that if, when asked for, there is no visible help from