Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hate 00
Hate 00
S
terilized from emotion, hate crime, also called bias crime, is those offenses motivated in part or
singularly by personal prejudice against others because of a diversity—race, sexual orientation,
religion, ethnicity/national origin, or disability. The FBI Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR)
Program’s responsibility regarding hate crime is to provide a reliable set of statistics through the Hate
Crime Data Collection Program. Through this program, law enforcement agencies nationwide voluntar-
ily submit data about hate crimes within their jurisdictions (i.e., the number of incidents, offenses,
victims, and offenders) for publication in the annual report, Hate Crime Statistics. Though law enforce-
ment agencies need only report data for one month of a year to be included in this publication, most
agencies that participate in the Program submit four quarters of data. In 2000, a total of 91.9 percent of
all contributing agencies submitted four quarters of data. All data reported by law enforcement agencies
are presented in this publication, free of the nuances that many factions of society impose upon the
subject.
The uses for hate crime data vary widely among the different sectors of society. The statistics
may assist law enforcement agencies in addressing potentially problematic issues for their particular
locales or provide lawmakers with justification for certain legislation. The data may supply the media
with credible information or simply show hate crime victims that they are not alone. Analyses of these
data can also aid researchers in determining trends in hate crimes. Whatever the use of the statistics may
be, the goal of this publication is to enable these data users to create an awareness about hate crime and
advance the study of this complex facet of crime.
The national Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR)
Program would like to hear from you.
Background
W
ith the passage of the Hate Crime Statistics developmental phase of the Hate Crime Data Collec-
Act of 1990, Congress mandated the collec- tion Program recognized that hate crimes are not
tion of information about crimes motivated separate, distinct crimes; instead, they are traditional
by a bias against a person’s race, religion, sexual offenses motivated by the offender’s bias. An of-
orientation, and/or ethnicity/national origin. Under the fender, for example, may damage or vandalize prop-
commission of the Attorney General and with the aid erty because of his/her bias against the owner’s
of several local and state law enforcement agencies (victim’s) race, religion, sexual orientation, ethnicity/
already investigating and collecting information about national origin, or disability. Therefore, rather than
hate crimes, the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting create new crime categories, Program developers felt
(UCR) Program developed a data collection system for that collecting additional information about crimes
that purpose. Hate Crime Statistics, 1990: A Re- currently being reported to the UCR Program would
source Book was the first publication that made avail- fulfill the directives addressed in the Hate Crime
able the hate crime data collected in 1990 by 11 Statistics Act as amended.
individual states. Once the national UCR Program Because motivation is subjective, it is difficult to
implemented a uniform data collection method, the know with certainty whether a crime was the result of
1992 edition of Hate Crime Statistics premiered the the offender’s bias. Law enforcement investigation is
data reported by law enforcement agencies across the imperative in that it must reveal sufficient evidence as
Nation. to whether or not the offender’s actions were moti-
Bias against persons with disabilities became an vated, in whole or in part, by bias. For this reason, the
element of hate crime data collection with the enact- success of the Program rests with the law enforcement
ment of the Violent Crime and Law Enforcement Act officers who determine that a bias motivation does
of 1994, which amended the Hate Crime Statistics indeed exist and forward this information to the
Act. (Actual collection of data from disability bias- national Program so that the law enforcement commu-
motivated crimes began on January 1, 1997.) Another nity and others may learn from it.
amendment followed in July 1996 when the Church The International Association of Chiefs of Police,
Arson Prevention Act was signed into law, removing the National Sheriffs’ Association, the former UCR
the sunset clause from the original statute and perma- Data Providers’ Advisory Policy Board (now part of
nently extending the data collection mandate. The FBI the Criminal Justice Information Services Advisory
shares with each law enforcement agency that is a Policy Board), the International Association of Direc-
voluntary participant of the Program its commitment tors of Law Enforcement Standards and Training, and
to make hate crime data collection a permanent part of the Association of State Uniform Crime Reporting
the UCR Program. Programs have all endorsed the Hate Crime Data
Collection Program. Without their support and law
Collection Design enforcement’s voluntary data collection, any effort
toward the successful implementation of the Program
The goal of the Hate Crime Statistics Act and its would be futile.
subsequent amendments is to capture information
about the type of bias serving as the motivating factor Participation
of a hate crime, the nature of the offense, and the
number and types of the victim(s) and offender(s). In 2000, nearly 17,000 law enforcement agencies
While identifying the criteria that distinguish hate nationwide reported data to the UCR Program. A total
crimes from other offenses, the parties involved in the of 11,690 law enforcement agencies in 48 states and
1
the District of Columbia submitted summary or inci- agencies are insufficient to allow a valid national or
dent-based reports to the Hate Crime Data Collection regional measure of the volume and types of crimes
Program. The table below shows the number of motivated by hate, they offer perspectives on the
agencies represented within each population group and general nature of hate crime occurrence.
the extent of the population covered. Of the agencies The law enforcement community has long recog-
participating in this Program, most sent their data to nized that valid information is central to developing
their respective state UCR Programs (see Appendix) effective measures to deal with crime; the same is true
that, in turn, forwarded the state’s information to the for bias-motivated crime. Through the collection of
national Program. Participating agencies in states local hate crime statistics, law enforcement agencies
without state UCR Programs sent their data directly to have the ability to heighten the awareness and the
the FBI. Collectively, these agencies represented understanding of bias-motivated crimes both locally
236.9 million people in the United States, 84.2 percent and nationwide.
of the population. Though the reports from these
2
METHODOLOGY
Data Reporting
I
n accordance with the Hate Crime Statistics Act In NIBRS, the hate crime data element applies to
and its subsequent amendments, the Uniform all 46 Group “A” Offenses, which include the previ-
Crime Reporting (UCR) Program compiles data ously mentioned 11 offense categories. The remaining
regarding crimes motivated by racial, religious, dis- 35 Group “A” Offenses not listed are reported in this
ability, sexual-orientation, and ethnicity/national origin publication as other or as crimes against society,
biases. Law enforcement agencies report hate crime whichever is appropriate.
occurences to the UCR Program using the Quarterly
Hate Crime Report form or the hate crime data ele- Data Compilation
ment for the National Incident-Based Reporting
System (NIBRS). The Quarterly Hate Crime Report Once the national UCR Program receives the
form consists of a quarterly summary report and an data, the Program staff compile these data in tables
incident report for each bias-motivated incident. The and discuss them in narrative comments that address
form is typically used by agencies that report their data the volume and types of bias-motivated criminal
by using summary guidelines. Agencies participating incidents. In particular, Section I provides various
in NIBRS are able to report via magnetic tape an tabular presentations of the incidents reported to the
offender’s bias motivation using the hate crime data FBI. It also addresses the specific offenses, types of
element in their NIBRS submissions. Individual victims, and known offenders’ races. The first line of
agencies and state UCR Programs that use personal the title of each table presents in boldface type that
computers for data collection and storage may submit table’s unit of count, i.e., incident, offense, victim,
hate crime data on disks. known offender. Section II furnishes individual state
and agency information, including the number of
Data Collection quarters the agency reported data to the national
Program.
Criminal incidents can involve more than one
offense, victim, and/or offender. For counting pur- Data Publication
poses, one offense is counted for each victim of a
crime against the person. One offense is counted for To be included in this publication, law enforce-
each occurence of crime against property and crime ment agencies must have submitted data for at least
against society, regardless of the number of victims. one month of the calendar year. The published data,
The total number of victims in a given incident is the therefore, do not necessarily represent complete 12
sum of victims associated with each offense that took months, or four quarters, of reporting for every agency
place within the incident. listed. In 2000, 91.9 percent of the reporting agencies
Hate crime data are collected for 11 offense contributed data for all four quarters. Data users
categories. Murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, should exercise caution in attempting direct compari-
forcible rape, aggravated assault, simple assault, and sons of hate crime totals among agencies because
intimidation are classified as crimes against persons. many variables not mentioned in this publication
Robbery, burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, affect the volume and type of crime from place to
arson, and destruction/damage/vandalism of property place.
are classified as crimes against property.
3
4
SECTION I
Hate Crime Statistics, 2000
A
total of 11,690 law enforcement agencies in
48 states and the District of Columbia reported damage/vandalism was the most frequently reported
8,063 bias-motivated criminal incidents (8,055 offense; 57.2 percent of destruction/damage/vandalism
single-bias and 8 multiple-bias incidents) to the FBI in of property with a known offender were committed by
2000. The incidents consisted of 9,430 separate white offenders and 8.9 percent by black offenders.
offenses, 9,924 victims, and 7,530 known distinguish- Race was unknown for 30.0 percent of the known
able offenders. According to the data collected, offenders involved in destruction/damage/vandalism.
53.8 percent of the 8,055 single-bias incidents were (See Table 3.)
motivated by racial bias, 18.3 percent by religious In 2000, 19 hate-motivated murders were reported
bias, 16.1 percent by sexual-orientation bias, 11.3 to the national UCR Program by participating law
percent by ethnicity/national origin bias, and 0.5 enforcement agencies. Of this total, 10 of the murders
percent by disability and multiple biases. (See Table were motivated by racial bias, 6 by ethnicity/national-
1.) origin bias, 2 by sexual-orientation bias, and 1 by
religious bias. (See Table 4.)
Incidents and Offenses According to the data received for racially-moti-
vated single-bias incidents, there were 3,409 anti-
For Hate Crime Data Collection Program pur- black offenses committed; 2,346 of these were com-
poses, the term single-bias incident refers to any hate mitted by known offenders. Of the 2,346 anti-black
crime incident in which all offenses involved in the offenses where the offender was known, 1,981offenses
incident were perpetrated as a result of the same bias involved white offenders. Of the 1,050 anti-white
motivation. A multiple-bias incident is any hate crime offenses, 888 offenses were committed by known
incident in which two or more of the offenses were offenders. Of these 888 offenses, 527 offenses in-
committed as a result of two or more bias motivations. volved black offenders. (See Table 5.)
In 2000, 65.0 percent of the 9,430 hate crime
offenses reported were attributed to crimes against Victims
persons. Crimes against property made up 34.4
percent of the total, and crimes against society com- The term victim throughout this publication refers
posed 0.6 percent. (See Tables 2 and 11.) to a person, business, institution, or society as a whole,
As in previous years, intimidation was the most unless otherwise specified.
frequently reported hate crime, accounting for 34.9 Data reported to the national UCR Program in
percent of the total hate crime offenses reported. 2000 showed that victims of racial bias accounted for
Destruction/damage/vandalism of property made up 54.5 percent of all single-bias hate crime victims in
29.3 percent of the total; simple assault, 17.1 percent; 2000. Victims of religious bias comprised 17.2 per-
and aggravated assault, 12.6 percent. The remaining cent of the single-bias victim total; victims of sexual-
offenses accounted for 6.1 percent. (See Table 2.) orientation bias, 15.7 percent; victims of ethnicity/
Within the offense type crimes against persons, national origin bias, 12.3 percent; and victims of
intimidation was the most frequently reported offense; disability bias, less than one-half of 1 percent. By
73.5 percent of intimidation offenses with a known specific bias motivation, anti-black accounted for 65.5
offender were committed by white offenders, and 11.2 percent of the victims of racial bias, anti-Jewish bias
percent were committed by black offenders. Addition- represented 74.7 percent of victims of religious bias,
ally for intimidation offenses, race was unknown for anti-male homosexual bias composed 68.0 percent of
11.4 percent of the known offenders. Further, within those who were victims of sexual-orientation bias,
5
anti-Hispanic bias made up 62.7 percent of the victim were American Indian/Alaskan Native. Further, 5.1
total for ethnicity/national-origin bias, and anti- percent were multiracial, and the race of 9.7 percent
physical disability accounted for 55.6 percent of was unknown. (See Tables 1 and 9.)
victims of disability-bias crimes. (See Tables 1 and The column in Table 2 titled Known Offenders
7.) shows that the total number of offenders is 7,530.
Of the total 9,924 victims, 61.8 percent fell The sum of the entries under the same column is
victim to crimes against persons; 37.6 percent, crimes 7,872. Since some individuals committed more than
against property; and 0.6 percent, crimes against one offense, 7,872 is actually the number of offenses
society. (See Table 2.) committed by known offenders. The number of
By victim type, 79.4 percent of the victims of the offenses that is committed by individuals who com-
8,055 single-bias incidents were persons; 3.7 percent, mitted more than one offense is 342. The number of
society/public; 3.4 percent, religious organizations; offenders who committed more than one offense is
3.3 percent, business/financial institutions; and 2.7 326 (see footnote). The percentage of offenses
percent, government. The remaining 7.5 percent of committed by an individual more than once and the
the victim types were other/unknown/multiple. percent of offenders that committed more than one
(See Table 8.) offense is the same, 4.3.
A breakdown of the 9,430 offenses by victim type Out of the total 9,430 offenses, 83.5 percent were
showed that 82.1 percent were committed against committed by known offenders; the remaining 16.5
individuals, 3.3 percent were against society/public, percent of offenders are unknown. Known offenders
3.1 percent against business/financial institutions, 3.0 who were involved in more than one offense commit-
percent against religious organizations, and 2.4 ted 4.3 percent of the total offenses. Within the
percent against government. The remaining 6.1 offense type of crime against person, intimidation
percent were committed against other/known/mul- accounted for 39.3 percent of the offenses in this
tiple. (See Table 6.) category that were committed by known offenders.
Further, destruction/damage/vandalism accounted for
Offenders 65.9 percent of the crimes against property committed
by known offenders. (See Table 2).
For the purposes of the Hate Crime Data Collec-
tion Program, the term known offender does not imply Locations
that the identity of the suspect is known, but only that
an attribute of the suspect is identified which distin- Data contributed in 2000 show that the highest
guishes him/her from an unknown offender. The percent of reported hate crime incidents, 32.1 percent,
attribute referred to in this publication is the occurred in/on residential properties. Incidents
offender’s suspected race. committed on highways/roads/alleys/streets accounted
Law enforcement agencies in 2000 reported a for 17.9 percent of the total, 11.4 percent took place in
total of 7,530 known offenders were associated with schools and colleges, and 10.4 percent occurred at
the 8,063 incidents. By known offender’s race, 64.4 other/unknown locations. The remaining 28.2 percent
percent were white, 18.7 percent were black, 1.4 of incidents were widely distributed among various
percent were Asian/Pacific Islander, and 0.6 percent locations. (See Table 10.)
6
Table 1
Incidents, Offenses, Victims, and Known Offenders
by Bias Motivation, 20001
Known
Bias motivation Incidents Offenses Victims2 offenders3
Disability: 36 36 36 36
Anti-Physical 20 20 20 22
Anti-Mental 16 16 16 14
Multiple-Bias Incidents4 8 17 18 10
1
Because hate crime submissions have been updated, data in this table may differ from those published in Crime in the United States, 2000.
2
The term victim may refer to a person, business, institution, or society as a whole.
3
The term known offender does not imply that the identity of the suspect is known, but only that the race of the suspect is identified which distinguishes him/her from
an unknown offender.
4
A multiple-bias incident is a hate crime in which two or more offense types were committed as a result of two or more bias motivations.
7
Table 2
Incidents, Offenses, Victims, and Known Offenders
by Offense Type, 20001
Known
Offense type Incidents Offenses Victims2 offenders3
8
Table 3
Offenses
Known Offender’s Race
by Offense Type, 2000
Known offender’s race Unknown
American Asian/ Multi- offender
Total Indian/Alaskan Pacific racial Unknown
Offense type offenses White Black Native Islander group race
9
Table 4
Offenses
Offense Type
by Bias Motivation, 2000
Crimes against persons
Murder and
Total nonnegligent Forcible Aggravated Simple Intimi-
Bias motivation offenses manslaughter rape assault assault dation Other1
Disability: 36 0 0 1 11 6 2
Anti-Physical 20 0 0 0 6 5 2
Anti-Mental 16 0 0 1 5 1 0
Multiple-Bias Incidents2 17 0 0 0 3 7 0
10
Table 4
Offenses
Offense Type
by Bias Motivation, 2000—Continued
Crimes against property Crimes
against
Motor Destruction/ society1
Larceny- vehicle damage/
Bias motivation Robbery Burglary theft theft Arson vandalism Other1
Race: 66 74 65 9 22 1,223 15 36
Anti-White 37 13 39 3 5 140 11 17
Anti-Black 27 46 15 3 15 853 1 14
Anti-American Indian/Alaskan Native 0 6 4 2 0 10 0 1
Anti-Asian/Pacific Islander 1 4 4 1 2 104 1 1
Anti-Multiracial Group 1 5 3 0 0 116 2 3
Religion: 6 30 24 0 17 959 3 3
Anti-Jewish 5 16 9 0 5 713 0 0
Anti-Catholic 0 3 5 0 3 37 1 1
Anti-Protestant 0 3 2 0 0 49 0 0
Anti-Islamic 0 0 2 0 0 12 1 0
Anti-Other Religious Group 1 5 3 0 7 114 0 2
Anti-Multireligious Group 0 2 1 0 1 32 1 0
Anti-Atheism/Agnosticism/etc. 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 0
Disability: 1 1 1 0 1 11 0 1
Anti-Physical 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0
Anti-Mental 1 1 1 0 0 5 0 1
Multiple-Bias Incidents2 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0
1
Includes additional offenses collected in NIBRS.
2
A multiple-bias incident is a hate crime in which two or more offense types were committed as a result of two or more bias motivations.
11
Table 5
Offenses
Known Offender’s Race
by Bias Motivation, 2000
Known offender’s race Unknown
American Asian/ Multi- offender
Total Indian/Alaskan Pacific racial Unknown
Bias motivation offenses White Black Native Islander group race
Disability: 36 12 11 0 0 1 8 4
Anti-Physical 20 6 6 0 0 1 5 2
Anti-Mental 16 6 5 0 0 0 3 2
Multiple-Bias Incidents1 17 4 0 0 0 3 2 8
1
A multiple-bias incident is a hate crime in which two or more offense types were committed as a result of two or more bias motivations.
12
Table 6
Offenses
Victim Type
by Offense Type, 2000
Victim type
Business/ Other/
financial Religious Society/ unknown/
Offense type Total Individual institution Government organization public multiple
Crimes against property: 3,241 1,615 289 222 285 254 576
13
Table 7
Victims
Offense Type
by Bias Motivation, 2000
Crimes against persons
Murder and
Total nonnegligent Forcible Aggravated Simple Intimi-
Bias motivation offenses manslaughter rape assault assault dation Other1
Disability: 36 0 0 1 11 6 2
Anti-Physical 20 0 0 0 6 5 2
Anti-Mental 16 0 0 1 5 1 0
Multiple-Bias Incidents2 18 0 0 0 3 7 0
14
Table 7
Victims
Offense Type
by Bias Motivation, 2000—Continued
Crimes against property Crimes
against
Motor Destruction/ society1
Larceny- vehicle damage/
Bias motivation Robbery Burglary theft theft Arson vandalism Other1
Race: 74 85 70 10 27 1,417 17 36
Anti-White 42 13 42 4 5 160 12 17
Anti-Black 28 54 16 3 19 965 1 14
Anti-American Indian/Alaskan Native 0 6 4 2 0 12 0 1
Anti-Asian/Pacific Islander 3 5 5 1 3 121 1 1
Anti-Multiracial Group 1 7 3 0 0 159 3 3
Religion: 6 34 25 0 22 1,092 3 3
Anti-Jewish 5 18 9 0 7 817 0 0
Anti-Catholic 0 3 5 0 3 39 1 1
Anti-Protestant 0 3 2 0 0 49 0 0
Anti-Islamic 0 0 2 0 0 15 1 0
Anti-Other Religious Group 1 7 4 0 9 132 0 2
Anti-Multireligious Group 0 2 1 0 1 38 1 0
Anti-Atheism/Agnosticism/etc. 0 1 2 0 2 2 0 0
Disability: 1 1 1 0 1 11 0 1
Anti-Physical 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0
Anti-Mental 1 1 1 0 0 5 0 1
Multiple-Bias Incidents2 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0
1
Includes additional offenses collected in NIBRS.
2
A multiple-bias incident is a hate crime in which two or more offense types were committed as a result of two or more bias motivations.
15
Table 8
Incidents
Victim Type
by Bias Motivation, 2000
Victim type
Business/ Other/
financial Religious Society/ unknown/
Bias motivation Total Individual institution Government organization public multiple
Multiple-Bias Incidents1 8 7 0 0 0 0 1
1
A multiple-bias incident is a hate crime in which two or more offense types were committed as a result of two or more bias motivations.
Table 9
Race of Known Offenders, 2000 1,2
Known offender’s race
Total 7,530
White 4,847
Black 1,411
American Indian/Alaskan Native 48
Asian/Pacific Islander 109
Multiracial Group3 386
Unknown Race 729
1
The term known offender does not imply that the identity of the suspect is known, but only that
the race of the suspect is identified which distinguishes him/her from an unknown offender.
2
Because hate crime submissions have been updated, data in this table may differ from those
published in Crime in the United States, 2000.
3
The term multiracial group is used to describe a group of offenders comprised of persons of more
than one race.
16
Table 10
Incidents
Bias Motivation
by Location, 2000
Bias motivation
Ethnicity/
Total Sexual national
Location incidents Race Religion orientation origin Disability Multiple
Air/bus/train terminal 85 50 11 14 10 0 0
Bank/savings and loan 12 7 2 2 1 0 0
Bar/night club 147 66 2 63 16 0 0
Church/synagogue/temple 336 40 276 13 7 0 0
Liquor store 8 6 0 1 1 0 0
Parking lot/garage 485 286 51 76 67 5 0
Rental storage facility 4 2 0 2 0 0 0
Residence/home 2,590 1,373 445 451 301 17 3
Multiple locations 8 6 0 1 1 0 0
17
Table 11
Offenses
Offense Type
by Participating State, 2000
Crimes against persons
Murder and
Total nonnegligent Forcible Aggravated Simple Intimi-
Participating state offenses manslaughter rape assault assault dation Other1
Alaska 5 0 0 1 0 2 0
Arizona 338 0 0 46 54 146 0
Arkansas 4 0 0 2 0 1 0
California 2,264 5 1 450 426 641 0
Colorado 136 0 0 8 20 78 1
Connecticut 204 0 0 20 10 98 0
Delaware 37 0 0 1 3 12 0
District of Columbia 5 0 0 1 3 1 0
Florida 268 0 0 71 59 41 0
Georgia 36 0 0 4 6 9 0
Idaho 59 0 0 10 25 7 0
Illinois 213 0 2 47 57 41 0
Indiana 131 1 0 9 28 54 0
Iowa 38 0 0 5 8 11 0
Kansas 50 0 0 3 10 31 0
Kentucky 89 0 0 16 16 36 0
Louisiana 13 0 0 0 4 3 0
Maine 29 0 0 1 9 12 0
Maryland 225 0 0 17 45 2 0
Massachusetts 526 0 0 62 86 210 0
Michigan 500 0 0 61 116 174 2
Minnesota 198 0 0 21 37 78 0
Mississippi 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Missouri 93 0 0 23 14 35 0
Montana 24 0 0 2 1 13 0
Nebraska 19 0 0 3 3 6 0
Nevada 115 1 0 18 23 35 0
New Hampshire 39 0 0 6 8 17 0
New Jersey 702 0 0 21 54 305 0
New Mexico 24 0 0 8 6 4 0
New York 617 0 0 0 7 329 0
North Carolina 42 1 0 5 2 21 0
North Dakota 5 0 0 0 2 3 0
Ohio 261 0 0 5 60 140 0
Oklahoma 96 0 0 23 6 24 0
Oregon 166 0 0 12 19 88 0
Pennsylvania 171 8 0 17 45 44 0
Rhode Island 50 0 0 4 7 23 0
South Carolina 39 1 0 6 9 13 0
South Dakota 7 0 0 2 4 0 0
Tennessee 260 0 1 41 42 76 7
Texas 340 2 0 56 57 98 0
Utah 92 0 0 13 20 21 1
Vermont 20 0 0 1 5 2 0
Virginia 383 0 0 31 102 57 4
Washington 348 0 0 15 57 204 0
West Virginia 75 0 0 8 21 11 1
Wisconsin 60 0 0 8 18 28 0
Wyoming 12 0 0 0 1 7 0
18
Table 11
Offenses
OffenseType
by Participating State, 2000—Continued
Crimes against property Crimes
against
Motor Destruction/ society1
Larceny- vehicle damage/
Participating state Robbery Burglary theft theft Arson vandalism Other1
Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
Arizona 3 2 0 0 1 86 0 0
Arkansas 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
California 54 34 14 1 10 628 0 0
Colorado 1 1 2 0 2 22 1 0
Connecticut 2 1 0 0 2 70 1 0
Delaware 0 0 1 0 0 20 0 0
District of Columbia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Florida 2 10 2 0 1 82 0 0
Georgia 2 0 0 0 1 14 0 0
Idaho 0 2 1 0 0 14 0 0
Illinois 7 5 0 0 2 52 0 0
Indiana 4 3 0 1 2 29 0 0
Iowa 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0
Kansas 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0
Kentucky 0 0 0 0 2 19 0 0
Louisiana 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0
Maine 2 0 0 0 0 5 0 0
Maryland 3 1 2 0 1 154 0 0
Massachusetts 3 5 1 0 0 156 0 3
Michigan 4 17 26 0 2 72 5 21
Minnesota 1 2 1 0 1 57 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
Missouri 1 1 0 0 0 19 0 0
Montana 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0
Nebraska 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0
Nevada 2 3 3 0 1 29 0 0
New Hampshire 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0
New Jersey 2 5 2 0 0 313 0 0
New Mexico 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 0
New York 15 9 2 0 5 250 0 0
North Carolina 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0
North Dakota 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ohio 1 2 2 0 1 49 1 0
Oklahoma 1 0 0 0 2 40 0 0
Oregon 1 2 0 0 0 44 0 0
Pennsylvania 4 2 0 0 1 50 0 0
Rhode Island 0 1 0 0 0 15 0 0
South Carolina 0 0 1 0 0 9 0 0
South Dakota 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Tennessee 5 7 17 5 0 46 8 5
Texas 4 8 0 1 5 107 0 2
Utah 1 2 8 0 1 21 1 3
Vermont 0 0 1 0 0 11 0 0
Virginia 9 4 22 2 4 120 5 23
Washington 3 2 1 0 0 66 0 0
West Virginia 2 5 4 1 3 17 0 2
Wisconsin 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0
Wyoming 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0
1
Includes additional offenses collected in NIBRS.
19
SECTION II
Jurisdictional Hate Crime Statistics, 2000
O
f the 11,690 law enforcement agencies that submitted reports indicating no instances of hate crime
provided 1 to 12 months of data to the FBI’s occurred. Both Tables 13 and 14 present data by state,
Hate Crime Data Collection Program, 16.2 with each state subdivided by agencies within cities,
percent reported that at least one hate crime occurred universities and colleges, suburban counties, rural
in their jurisdiction during 2000. The remaining 83.8 counties, state police agencies, and other agencies
percent of participating agencies reported that no when applicable. In an effort to provide data users
instances of hate crime occurred. with more complete information, Tables 13 and 14
The data presented in Section II provide a state also provide the number of quarters each agency
and agency breakdown of bias-motivated offenses. contributed data to the national hate crime program.
Table 12 supplies individual state totals for the number As stated earlier, many variables not considered in
of participating agencies, the populations represented, this publication can affect the volume and type of
the number of agencies submitting incident reports, crime from place to place. For this reason and because
and the number of incidents reported. Table 13 in- these figures do not represent 12-month totals for
cludes those agencies that submitted one or more hate every agency listed, data users are cautioned against
crime incidents, and Table 14 lists those agencies that making direct comparisons among agencies.
21
Table 12
Profile of States Participating in Hate Crime Reporting, 20001
Number of Agencies Total number
Participating participating Population submitting of incidents
states agencies covered incident reports reported
Alaska 1 260,900 1 4
Arizona 88 4,606,625 22 240
Arkansas 4 77,190 3 3
California 722 33,869,172 259 1,943
Colorado 234 4,300,597 34 101
Connecticut 97 3,316,062 58 151
Delaware 52 783,600 9 34
District of Columbia 1 572,059 1 5
Florida 491 15,955,498 107 240
Georgia 80 1,077,028 4 35
Idaho 118 1,278,863 26 45
Illinois 46 4,463,308 45 183
Indiana 166 4,415,055 31 106
Iowa 220 2,809,355 15 33
Kansas 1 339,907 1 42
Kentucky 317 3,351,405 38 73
Louisiana 174 3,827,857 8 12
Maine 181 1,273,365 9 28
Maryland 146 5,294,196 33 217
Massachusetts 341 6,282,763 97 458
Michigan 620 9,818,683 156 425
Minnesota 313 4,917,158 55 169
Mississippi 78 1,219,754 1 2
Missouri 186 3,843,304 26 70
Montana 102 902,195 8 19
Nebraska 202 1,360,827 6 17
Nevada 37 1,998,257 8 85
New Hampshire 110 678,452 20 32
New Jersey 564 8,414,350 241 652
New Mexico 43 1,076,413 3 15
New York 539 18,973,360 36 608
North Carolina 205 4,485,728 14 31
North Dakota 80 580,299 5 5
Ohio 348 7,469,352 49 240
Oklahoma 301 3,448,945 24 80
Oregon 171 3,411,457 29 142
Pennsylvania 933 11,464,718 32 141
Rhode Island 48 1,048,319 10 48
South Carolina 352 4,009,034 17 33
South Dakota 121 754,844 4 7
Tennessee 422 5,685,152 72 230
Texas 942 20,613,237 72 286
Utah 127 2,233,169 28 71
Vermont 43 507,533 14 19
Virginia 384 6,981,101 59 325
Washington 236 5,352,495 57 242
West Virginia 268 1,669,624 21 60
Wisconsin 368 5,363,675 22 47
Wyoming 67 493,272 2 9
1
Because hate crime submissions have been updated, data in this table may differ from those published in Crime in the United States, 2000.
22
Table 13
Hate Crime Incidents
Bias Motivation
by State, Agency Type, and Number of Quarters Reported, 2000
Bias motivation Bias motivation
Number of Sexual Eth- Number of Sexual Eth-
quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil- quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil-
Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity
m
ALASKA 4 0 0 0 0 CALIFORNIA—Continued
Cities Cities—Continued
Anchorage 4 4 0 0 0 0 Avalon 4 0 0 1 0 0
Azusa 4 15 0 0 1 0
ARIZONA 129 30 44 36 1 Bakersfield 4 0 0 1 1 0
Baldwin Park 4 2 1 0 1 0
Cities Bellflower 4 2 0 0 2 0
Berkeley 4 4 2 3 0 0
Bisbee 3 0 0 0 1 0 Beverly Hills 4 1 0 0 1 0
Bullhead City 4 1 0 0 2 0 Big Bear Lake 4 0 0 0 1 0
Chandler1 4 5 0 0 1 0 Brea 4 0 0 1 1 0
Eagar 4 0 1 0 1 0 Brentwood 4 0 1 0 0 0
Flagstaff 4 2 0 0 0 0 Buena Park 4 1 0 0 2 0
Gilbert 4 7 2 1 1 0 Burbank 4 1 1 0 4 0
Glendale1 4 15 2 1 5 0 Burlingame 4 2 0 0 0 0
Goodyear 4 0 1 0 0 0 Calabasas 4 0 1 0 0 0
Kingman 4 3 1 1 1 0 Camarillo 4 2 1 0 0 0
Lake Havasu City 4 0 0 0 1 0 Canyon Lake 4 0 1 0 0 0
Mesa 3 6 0 0 0 0 Carlsbad 4 0 0 1 0 0
Nogales 4 0 1 0 0 0 Carson 4 4 0 0 0 0
Phoenix 4 79 14 30 23 1 Cathedral City 4 0 0 1 0 0
Prescott 4 1 1 0 0 0 Cerritos 4 1 0 0 0 0
Scottsdale 4 1 0 0 0 0 Chico 4 3 1 0 0 0
Sierra Vista 4 0 0 0 1 0 Chino 4 3 0 0 0 0
Tempe 4 0 1 0 0 0 Chowchilla 4 1 0 0 0 0
Tucson 4 7 3 9 0 0 Chula Vista 4 3 1 1 0 0
Claremont 4 2 2 1 0 0
Universities and Colleges Clearlake 4 0 0 1 0 0
Cloverdale 4 1 0 0 0 0
Central Arizona College 3 2 0 0 0 0 Coachella 4 0 0 1 0 0
University of Arizona 4 0 0 1 0 0 Colton 4 3 0 2 0 0
Commerce 4 0 0 0 1 0
Suburban Counties Concord 4 1 2 1 0 0
Corona 4 2 0 1 0 0
Maricopa 4 0 3 0 1 0 Coronado 4 0 1 0 0 0
Mohave 4 0 0 1 0 0 Costa Mesa 4 1 1 0 0 0
Covina 4 6 0 2 0 0
ARKANSAS 2 0 0 1 0 Cudahy 4 1 0 0 0 0
Cypress 4 1 0 0 0 0
Cities Daly City 4 0 0 1 0 0
Dana Point 4 0 0 1 0 0
Green Forest 1 0 0 0 1 0 Davis 4 1 0 0 0 0
Russellville 4 1 0 0 0 0 Delano 4 0 0 1 0 0
Texarkana 1 1 0 0 0 0 Downey 4 0 0 0 1 0
Dublin 4 1 1 0 0 0
CALIFORNIA 939 301 405 295 3 El Cajon 4 6 1 0 0 0
El Cerrito 4 1 0 0 1 0
Cities El Monte 4 5 0 0 1 0
El Segundo 4 1 0 0 0 0
Alameda 4 7 2 4 0 0 Escondido 4 6 3 1 2 0
Alhambra 4 2 0 2 0 0 Eureka 4 1 0 1 0 0
Anderson 4 2 0 0 0 0 Fairfax 4 0 0 1 0 0
Antioch 4 3 0 0 0 0 Fairfield 4 3 0 0 0 0
Arcadia 4 2 2 0 0 0 Fillmore 4 0 0 0 1 0
Arcata 4 1 0 0 0 0 Folsom 4 2 0 4 0 0
Artesia 4 1 0 0 0 0 Fontana 4 0 0 0 1 0
23
Table 13
Hate Crime Incidents
Bias Motivation
by State, Agency Type, and Number of Quarters Reported, 2000—Continued
Bias motivation Bias motivation
Number of Sexual Eth- Number of Sexual Eth-
quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil- quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil-
Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity
m
CALIFORNIA—Continued CALIFORNIA—Continued
Cities—Continued Cities—Continued
24
Table 13
Hate Crime Incidents
Bias Motivation
by State, Agency Type, and Number of Quarters Reported, 2000—Continued
Bias motivation Bias motivation
Number of Sexual Eth- Number of Sexual Eth-
quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil- quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil-
Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity
m
CALIFORNIA—Continued CALIFORNIA—Continued
25
Table 13
Hate Crime Incidents
Bias Motivation
by State, Agency Type, and Number of Quarters Reported, 2000—Continued
Bias motivation Bias motivation
Number of Sexual Eth- Number of Sexual Eth-
quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil- quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil-
Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity
m
CALIFORNIA—Continued COLORADO—Continued
COLORADO 51 12 15 23 0 Ansonia 4 0 0 0 1 0
Avon 4 0 1 0 0 0
Cities Berlin 4 0 1 0 1 0
Bethel 4 1 0 0 0 0
Aurora 4 3 0 1 2 0 Branford 4 1 0 0 0 0
Black Hawk 4 1 0 0 0 0 Bridgeport 4 19 1 0 5 0
Boulder 4 0 1 1 2 0 Cheshire 4 1 1 0 1 0
Buena Vista 4 1 0 0 0 0 Clinton 1 1 0 0 0 0
Colorado Springs 4 18 4 3 1 0 Coventry 4 1 0 0 0 0
Cripple Creek 4 1 0 0 0 0 Cromwell 4 0 1 0 0 0
Denver 4 2 3 2 0 0 Danbury 1 0 1 1 0 0
Durango 4 2 1 3 0 0 Derby 4 1 0 0 0 0
Eaton 4 0 0 0 1 0 East Hampton 4 1 0 0 0 0
Fort Collins 4 1 0 2 0 0 East Hartford 4 1 0 0 0 2
Fountain 4 1 0 0 0 0 East Haven Town 4 0 1 1 0 0
Glendale 4 1 0 0 0 0 East Windsor 4 0 0 1 0 0
Grand Junction 4 1 0 1 1 0 Enfield 4 1 0 0 1 0
Greeley 4 2 0 0 0 0 Fairfield 4 0 1 0 0 0
Greenwood Village 4 0 0 0 1 0 Greenwich 4 1 0 0 0 0
Gunnison 4 2 0 0 0 0 Groton 4 0 2 0 0 0
Lakewood 4 4 0 1 5 0 Guilford 4 5 0 0 0 0
Littleton 4 0 1 0 0 0 Hartford 3 1 0 2 0 0
Longmont 4 1 0 0 1 0 Manchester 4 2 1 0 0 0
Loveland 4 1 0 0 1 0 Meriden 2 5 0 0 0 0
Montrose 4 0 0 0 1 0 Middletown 1 1 0 0 0 0
Northglenn 4 1 0 0 1 0 Milford 4 3 0 0 0 0
Pueblo 4 1 0 0 0 0 New Haven 4 3 3 0 0 0
Rangely 4 1 0 0 0 0 New London 4 2 0 0 0 0
Sheridan 4 1 0 0 0 0 Newtown 1 1 0 0 0 0
North Haven 4 2 1 0 0 0
Universities and Colleges Norwalk 4 3 0 0 2 0
Norwich 1 1 2 0 1 0
Auraria Higher Education Old Saybrook 1 1 0 0 0 0
Center 4 0 1 0 0 0 Orange 4 2 0 0 0 0
Colorado State University 4 0 0 1 1 0 Plainfield 4 0 1 0 0 0
Pikes Peak Community Plainville 4 1 0 0 0 0
College 4 1 0 0 0 0 Plymouth 1 1 0 0 0 0
Shelton 4 0 0 0 1 0
Suburban Counties Simsbury 1 0 1 1 0 0
South Windsor 4 1 2 0 0 0
Adams 4 1 1 0 0 0 Stratford 2 2 0 0 0 0
Arapahoe 4 0 0 0 4 0 Thomaston 1 0 0 0 1 0
Douglas 4 1 0 0 0 0 Torrington 3 1 2 1 0 0
Larimer 4 1 0 0 0 0 Waterbury 1 1 0 0 0 0
Weld 4 1 0 0 0 0 Waterford 4 2 0 0 0 0
West Hartford 1 0 0 1 0 0
Wethersfield 1 1 0 0 0 0
Wilton 1 0 1 0 0 0
26
Table 13
Hate Crime Incidents
Bias Motivation
by State, Agency Type, and Number of Quarters Reported, 2000—Continued
Bias motivation Bias motivation
Number of Sexual Eth- Number of Sexual Eth-
quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil- quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil-
Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity
m
CONNECTICUT—Continued FLORIDA 136 44 36 24 0
Cities—Continued Cities
Winchester 1 0 0 0 0 1 Alachua 4 0 0 0 1 0
Windsor 4 1 0 0 0 0 Aventura 4 2 2 0 0 0
Windsor Locks 1 1 1 0 0 0 Boca Raton 4 1 0 0 0 0
Woodbridge 4 0 1 0 0 0 Boynton Beach 4 0 1 0 0 0
Chiefland 4 2 0 0 0 0
Universities and Colleges Clearwater 4 0 0 2 0 0
Coral Gables 4 1 0 0 0 0
Central Connecticut State Coral Springs 4 1 0 0 0 0
University 4 1 2 1 0 0 Davie 4 0 2 0 0 0
Eastern Connecticut State Deerfield Beach 4 1 0 0 1 0
University 2 2 0 0 0 0 De Funiak Springs 4 1 0 0 0 0
University of Connecticut: Deland 4 1 0 0 0 0
Health Center 4 12 0 0 0 0 Dunedin 4 0 0 2 0 0
Storrs, Avery Point, Flagler Beach 4 0 1 0 0 0
and Hartford 4 1 1 3 0 0 Fort Lauderdale 4 1 2 2 0 0
Western Connecticut State Gainesville 4 8 1 1 0 0
University 4 1 0 1 0 0 Gulfport 4 0 0 1 0 0
Haines City 4 1 0 0 0 0
State Police Agencies Hallandale 4 0 1 0 0 0
Hollywood 4 1 2 1 0 0
Connecticut State Police 4 2 0 0 0 0 Indialantic 4 0 0 0 1 0
Indian Shores 4 0 0 1 0 0
Jacksonville 4 8 1 0 1 0
DELAWARE 18 6 9 0 1 Jupiter 4 0 0 0 1 0
Key West 4 0 0 1 0 0
Cities Lakeland 4 4 2 0 0 0
Lake Worth 4 0 0 1 0 0
Milford 4 1 0 0 0 0 Lauderhill 4 1 0 0 0 0
Newark 4 3 1 0 0 0 Madeira Beach 4 1 0 0 0 0
New Castle 4 0 1 2 0 0 Maitland 4 0 1 0 0 0
Smyrna 4 2 0 0 0 0 Marco Island 4 0 0 1 0 0
Wilmington 4 2 0 0 0 0 Margate 4 3 0 0 1 0
Melbourne 4 1 0 0 0 0
Universities and Colleges Miami 4 2 0 0 0 0
Miami Beach 4 1 3 3 0 0
University of Delaware 4 3 2 5 0 0 New Port Richey 4 1 0 0 0 0
New Smyrna Beach 4 1 0 0 0 0
Suburban Counties North Miami Beach 4 0 1 0 0 0
North Port 4 2 0 0 0 0
New Castle County Ocala 4 1 0 0 0 0
Police Department 4 1 1 0 0 1 Ocoee 4 6 0 0 0 0
Oldsmar 4 0 0 0 1 0
State Police Agencies Orange City 4 1 0 0 0 0
Orlando 4 7 0 0 0 0
New Castle State Police 4 6 1 1 0 0 Oviedo 4 1 0 0 0 0
Sussex State Police 4 0 0 1 0 0 Palatka 4 1 0 0 0 0
Palm Bay 4 1 0 0 0 0
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 2 0 2 1 0 Palm Beach Gardens 4 1 0 0 0 0
Pembroke Park 4 1 0 0 0 0
Cities Pembroke Pines 4 1 0 0 0 0
Pensacola 4 0 0 1 0 0
Washington 4 2 0 2 1 0 Plant City 4 3 0 0 0 0
Pompano Beach 4 1 0 0 0 0
Port St. Lucie 4 2 0 2 1 0
27
Table 13
Hate Crime Incidents
Bias Motivation
by State, Agency Type, and Number of Quarters Reported, 2000—Continued
Bias motivation Bias motivation
Number of Sexual Eth- Number of Sexual Eth-
quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil- quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil-
Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity
m
FLORIDA—Continued FLORIDA—Continued
28
Table 13
Hate Crime Incidents
Bias Motivation
by State, Agency Type, and Number of Quarters Reported, 2000—Continued
Bias motivation Bias motivation
Number of Sexual Eth- Number of Sexual Eth-
quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil- quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil-
Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity
m
IDAHO—Continued ILLINOIS—Continued
29
Table 13
Hate Crime Incidents
Bias Motivation
by State, Agency Type, and Number of Quarters Reported, 2000—Continued
Bias motivation Bias motivation
Number of Sexual Eth- Number of Sexual Eth-
quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil- quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil-
Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity
m
INDIANA—Continued KENTUCKY 56 2 9 6 0
30
Table 13
Hate Crime Incidents
Bias Motivation
by State, Agency Type, and Number of Quarters Reported, 2000—Continued
Bias motivation Bias motivation
Number of Sexual Eth- Number of Sexual Eth-
quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil- quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil-
Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity
m
LOUISIANA 8 2 2 0 0 MARYLAND—Continued
31
Table 13
Hate Crime Incidents
Bias Motivation
by State, Agency Type, and Number of Quarters Reported, 2000—Continued
Bias motivation Bias motivation
Number of Sexual Eth- Number of Sexual Eth-
quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil- quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil-
Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity
m
MASSACHUSETTS—Continued MASSACHUSETTS—Continued
Cities—Continued Cities—Continued
32
Table 13
Hate Crime Incidents
Bias Motivation
by State, Agency Type, and Number of Quarters Reported, 2000—Continued
Bias motivation Bias motivation
Number of Sexual Eth- Number of Sexual Eth-
quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil- quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil-
Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity
m
MICHIGAN—Continued MICHIGAN—Continued
Cities—Continued Cities—Continued
33
Table 13
Hate Crime Incidents
Bias Motivation
by State, Agency Type, and Number of Quarters Reported, 2000—Continued
Bias motivation Bias motivation
Number of Sexual Eth- Number of Sexual Eth-
quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil- quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil-
Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity
m
MICHIGAN—Continued MICHIGAN—Continued
34
Table 13
Hate Crime Incidents
Bias Motivation
by State, Agency Type, and Number of Quarters Reported, 2000—Continued
Bias motivation Bias motivation
Number of Sexual Eth- Number of Sexual Eth-
quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil- quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil-
Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity
m
MINNESOTA—Continued MISSOURI—Continued
Cities—Continued Cities—Continued
Owatonna 4 1 0 0 0 0 Crestwood 4 1 0 0 0 0
Plymouth 4 1 0 0 0 0 Independence 4 2 0 0 0 0
Prior Lake 4 1 0 0 0 0 Joplin 3 1 0 0 0 0
Red Wing 4 3 0 0 0 0 Kansas City 3 11 2 1 2 0
Richfield 4 1 0 0 0 0 Lee’s Summit 4 0 0 0 1 0
Robbinsdale 4 0 0 1 0 0 Liberty 2 1 0 0 0 0
Rochester 4 4 0 0 0 0 Manchester 3 1 0 0 0 0
Roseville 4 1 0 0 0 0 Moberly 4 2 0 0 0 0
Springfield 4 1 0 0 0 0 Raytown 4 1 0 0 0 0
St. Francis 4 1 0 0 0 0 Sikeston 4 1 0 0 0 0
Stillwater 4 2 0 0 0 0 Springfield 2 1 0 0 1 0
St. Louis Park 4 1 8 0 0 0 St. Charles 4 2 0 0 1 0
St. Paul 4 2 0 0 0 0
St. Paul Park 4 1 0 0 0 0 Universities and Colleges
Waite Park 4 2 0 0 0 0
West St. Paul 4 1 0 0 0 0 Truman State University 4 1 0 0 0 0
White Bear Lake 4 2 0 0 0 0 University of Missouri,
Woodbury 4 3 0 0 0 0 Columbia 2 0 0 1 0 0
Worthington 4 1 0 0 0 0 Washington University 1 0 1 0 0 0
35
Table 13
Hate Crime Incidents
Bias Motivation
by State, Agency Type, and Number of Quarters Reported, 2000—Continued
Bias motivation Bias motivation
Number of Sexual Eth- Number of Sexual Eth-
quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil- quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil-
Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity
m
NEBRASKA 10 2 3 2 0 NEW HAMPSHIRE—Continued
Buffalo 4 1 0 0 0 0 Cities
36
Table 13
Hate Crime Incidents
Bias Motivation
by State, Agency Type, and Number of Quarters Reported, 2000—Continued
Bias motivation Bias motivation
Number of Sexual Eth- Number of Sexual Eth-
quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil- quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil-
Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity
m
NEW JERSEY—Continued NEW JERSEY—Continued
Cities—Continued Cities—Continued
Dunellen 4 1 0 1 0 0 Kearny 4 0 1 0 0 0
East Brunswick Township 4 4 3 0 0 0 Kinnelon 4 1 2 0 0 0
East Greenwich Township 4 1 0 0 0 0 Lacey Township 4 4 1 0 0 0
East Hanover Township 4 1 0 0 0 0 Lakehurst 4 0 0 0 1 0
East Newark 4 1 0 0 0 0 Lakewood Township 4 6 17 0 1 0
East Windsor Township 4 1 2 0 1 0 Lambertville 4 2 0 0 0 0
Eatontown 4 2 0 0 0 0 Lawnside 4 1 0 0 0 0
Edison Township 4 5 2 1 6 0 Lawrence Township 4 5 1 1 0 0
Elizabeth 4 1 0 0 0 0 Lebanon Township 4 1 0 0 0 0
Emerson 4 1 0 1 0 0 Lindenwold 4 2 0 0 0 0
Englewood 4 3 0 0 0 0 Linwood 4 0 2 0 0 0
Englewood Cliffs 4 1 0 0 0 0 Little Falls Township 4 3 0 0 0 0
Ewing Township 4 10 9 0 1 0 Little Ferry 4 1 1 1 1 0
Fair Lawn 4 2 0 0 1 0 Lodi 4 2 0 0 2 0
Florence Township 4 2 0 0 0 0 Logan Township 4 2 0 0 0 0
Florham Park 4 0 1 0 0 0 Long Hill Township 4 0 1 0 1 0
Fort Lee 4 2 0 0 0 0 Lower Township 4 1 0 0 0 0
Franklin Township, Lumberton Township 4 1 0 0 0 0
Somerset County 4 2 0 1 1 0 Madison 4 0 0 0 1 0
Freehold Township 4 3 6 0 1 0 Mahwah Township 4 1 2 2 0 0
Galloway Township 4 0 1 1 2 0 Manalapan Township 4 2 1 1 0 0
Garfield 4 0 1 0 0 0 Manasquan 4 0 0 0 1 0
Glassboro 4 2 1 0 0 0 Manchester Township 4 3 0 0 0 0
Glen Ridge 4 0 1 0 0 0 Mansfield Township,
Glen Rock 4 1 0 0 0 0 Warren County 4 3 0 0 0 0
Gloucester Township 4 4 0 0 0 0 Manville 4 0 0 0 2 0
Green Brook Township 4 0 1 0 0 0 Maple Shade Township 4 4 1 1 0 0
Guttenberg 4 0 0 0 1 0 Maplewood Township 4 2 0 0 0 0
Hackensack 4 1 0 0 0 0 Maywood 4 0 1 0 0 0
Hackettstown 4 0 2 0 0 0 Medford Lakes 4 0 1 0 0 0
Haddonfield 4 5 0 0 0 0 Medford Township 4 2 1 0 1 0
Haddon Township 4 1 0 0 0 0 Metuchen 4 0 0 1 0 0
Hamburg 4 1 0 0 0 1 Middlesex 4 0 1 0 0 0
Hamilton Township, Middle Township 4 4 0 0 0 0
Atlantic County 4 1 0 1 0 0 Millburn Township 4 1 2 0 0 0
Hamilton Township, Millville 4 2 1 0 1 0
Mercer County 4 3 0 1 0 0 Monroe Township,
Hanover Township 4 2 1 0 0 0 Gloucester County 4 5 0 0 1 0
Harrison 4 2 0 0 0 0 Montclair 4 1 0 0 0 0
Highland Park 4 0 1 1 0 0 Montgomery Township 4 2 0 1 0 0
Hightstown 4 1 2 0 0 0 Montville Township 4 0 2 0 1 0
Hillsborough Township 4 4 2 0 1 0 Moonachie 4 0 0 1 0 0
Hillsdale 4 0 1 0 0 0 Moorestown Township 4 1 0 0 0 0
Holmdel Township 4 0 1 0 0 0 Morristown 4 2 0 1 1 0
Hopatcong 4 0 0 1 0 0 Morris Township 4 0 1 0 0 0
Howell Township 4 0 2 1 1 0 Mount Ephraim 4 0 0 0 1 0
Irvington 4 0 1 0 0 0 Mount Holly Township 4 3 0 0 0 0
Jackson Township 4 1 1 0 0 0 Mount Laurel Township 4 0 1 0 0 0
Jamesburg 4 1 0 0 0 0 Mount Olive Township 4 1 3 0 0 0
Jefferson Township 4 0 1 0 0 0 Neptune Township 4 0 5 0 1 0
Jersey City 4 0 1 0 0 0 Newark 4 0 1 0 1 0
Keansburg 4 0 0 2 0 0 New Brunswick 4 1 2 0 1 0
37
Table 13
Hate Crime Incidents
Bias Motivation
by State, Agency Type, and Number of Quarters Reported, 2000—Continued
Bias motivation Bias motivation
Number of Sexual Eth- Number of Sexual Eth-
quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil- quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil-
Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity
m
NEW JERSEY—Continued NEW JERSEY—Continued
Cities—Continued Cities—Continued
38
Table 13
Hate Crime Incidents
Bias Motivation
by State, Agency Type, and Number of Quarters Reported, 2000—Continued
Bias motivation Bias motivation
Number of Sexual Eth- Number of Sexual Eth-
quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil- quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil-
Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity
m
NEW JERSEY—Continued NEW YORK—Continued
Broome 4 0 0 1 0 0 Forsyth 4 2 0 0 0 0
Monroe 4 0 1 0 0 0 Orange 4 1 0 0 0 0
Nassau 4 8 50 2 5 0
Onondaga 4 1 0 0 0 0
39
Table 13
Hate Crime Incidents
Bias Motivation
by State, Agency Type, and Number of Quarters Reported, 2000—Continued
Bias motivation Bias motivation
Number of Sexual Eth- Number of Sexual Eth-
quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil- quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil-
Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity
m
NORTH CAROLINA—Continued OHIO—Continued
40
Table 13
Hate Crime Incidents
Bias Motivation
by State, Agency Type, and Number of Quarters Reported, 2000—Continued
Bias motivation Bias motivation
Number of Sexual Eth- Number of Sexual Eth-
quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil- quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil-
Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity
m
OKLAHOMA—Continued OREGON—Continued
Seiling 4 0 0 0 1 0 Douglas 4 0 0 1 0 0
Tulsa 4 7 2 1 0 0 Tillamook 4 1 0 0 0 0
Wynnewood 4 2 0 0 0 0
State Police Agencies
Universities and Colleges
Clatsop State Police 1 1 0 0 0 0
Tulsa Community College 4 0 1 1 0 0
Other Agencies
Suburban Counties
Port of Portland 4 2 0 0 0 0
Osage 4 1 0 0 0 0
PENNSYLVANIA 100 27 5 9 0
Rural Counties
Cities
Grady 4 1 0 0 0 0
Kingfisher 4 1 0 0 0 0 Abington Township 4 2 1 0 0 0
Bethlehem 4 1 1 0 0 0
OREGON 66 17 30 27 2 Carbondale 4 0 0 0 1 0
Center Township 4 1 0 0 0 0
Cities Columbia 4 0 0 0 1 0
Findlay Township 4 1 0 0 0 0
Ashland 4 0 0 1 0 0 Harrisburg 4 6 1 0 1 0
Beaverton 4 1 0 0 0 0 Irwin 4 1 0 0 0 0
Bend 4 0 0 0 4 0 Johnstown 4 4 0 0 0 0
Canby 4 1 0 0 1 0 Lancaster 4 6 1 1 1 0
Corvallis 4 4 1 0 2 0 Lehighton 4 1 0 0 0 0
Eugene 4 15 11 14 4 0 Lower Paxton Township 4 1 0 0 0 0
Gold Beach 4 0 0 0 1 0 Mount Lebanon 4 0 1 0 0 0
Gresham 4 0 0 0 2 0 Northern York Regional 4 0 0 0 1 0
La Grande 4 1 0 0 0 0 Philadelphia 4 36 13 4 0 0
Lake Oswego 4 1 0 1 0 1 Pittsburgh 4 20 4 0 1 0
Medford 4 1 0 1 0 0 Pocono Mountain
Milwaukie 4 2 0 1 0 0 Regional 4 4 0 0 1 0
North Bend 4 1 0 0 0 0 Robinson Township,
Oregon City 4 0 0 0 1 0 Allegheny County 4 1 0 0 0 0
Portland 1 16 2 9 5 0 Ross Township 4 3 0 0 0 0
Redmond 4 1 0 0 0 0 Scott Township,
Salem 4 6 0 1 1 1 Allegheny County 4 0 1 0 1 0
Sandy 4 2 0 0 1 0 Upper Gwynedd Township 3 1 0 0 0 0
Sutherlin 4 1 1 0 1 0 Wilkinsburg 4 1 0 0 0 0
Tigard 4 3 0 0 1 0 York Area Regional 4 2 0 0 0 0
West Linn 4 0 0 0 1 0
Woodburn 4 0 0 1 1 0 Universities and Colleges
41
Table 13
Hate Crime Incidents
Bias Motivation
by State, Agency Type, and Number of Quarters Reported, 2000—Continued
Bias motivation Bias motivation
Number of Sexual Eth- Number of Sexual Eth-
quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil- quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil-
Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity
m
PENNSYLVANIA—Continued SOUTH CAROLINA—Continued
42
Table 13
Hate Crime Incidents
Bias Motivation
by State, Agency Type, and Number of Quarters Reported, 2000—Continued
Bias motivation Bias motivation
Number of Sexual Eth- Number of Sexual Eth-
quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil- quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil-
Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity
m
TENNESSEE—Continued TENNESSEE—Continued
Knoxville 4 3 0 0 0 0 Marshall 4 1 0 0 0 0
Lawrenceburg 4 2 1 1 0 0 Maury 4 4 1 0 0 0
Loudon 4 2 0 0 0 0 McNairy 4 1 0 0 0 0
Maryville 4 0 1 0 0 0 Monroe 4 0 0 0 1 0
McMinnville 4 0 0 0 1 0 Pickett 4 0 0 0 1 0
Memphis 2 10 0 6 0 0
Millington 4 1 0 0 0 0 Other Agencies
Morristown 4 0 0 1 0 0
Mount Carmel 4 0 1 0 0 0 Bicentennial Mall State
Munford 4 1 0 0 0 0 Park 2 1 0 0 0 0
Murfreesboro 4 1 0 0 0 0 Tennessee Bureau of
Oakland 4 32 0 0 0 0 Investigation 4 0 0 0 0 8
Oak Ridge 4 1 0 0 1 0
Paris 4 1 0 0 0 0 TEXAS 159 45 50 30 2
Pulaski 3 3 0 0 0 0
Red Boiling Springs 4 0 0 1 0 0 Cities
Rossville 4 1 0 0 0 0
Sevierville 4 1 0 0 0 0 Alvin 4 0 0 0 1 0
Shelbyville 4 2 0 0 2 0 Amarillo 4 1 0 0 0 0
South Carthage 4 0 0 5 0 0 Arlington 4 3 3 1 1 0
Springfield 4 1 0 0 0 0 Austin 4 11 2 8 4 1
Tullahoma 4 1 0 0 0 0 Azle 4 1 0 0 0 0
Winchester 4 1 0 0 0 0 Bay City 4 1 0 0 0 0
Beaumont 4 0 0 0 1 0
Universities and Colleges Bedford 4 1 1 2 0 0
Carrollton 4 3 3 0 0 0
East Tennessee State Clute 4 1 0 0 0 0
University 4 0 0 1 0 0 Corpus Christi 4 7 0 4 1 0
University of Memphis 4 1 0 0 0 0 Dallas 4 15 4 5 2 0
Vanderbilt University 4 1 0 1 1 0 Denton 4 1 1 1 0 0
DeSoto 4 2 0 0 0 0
Suburban Counties El Paso 4 6 0 0 3 0
Euless 4 1 0 0 0 0
Cheatham 4 1 0 0 0 0 Farmers Branch 4 1 0 0 0 0
Dickson 4 21 1 4 0 0 Fort Worth 4 16 0 2 3 0
Hamilton 4 6 0 0 0 0 Friendswood 4 1 0 0 0 0
Knox 4 5 1 0 0 0 Garland 4 4 0 0 1 0
Montgomery 4 1 0 0 0 0 Graham 4 1 0 0 0 0
Rutherford 4 3 1 0 0 0 Greenville 3 2 0 0 0 0
Shelby 1 2 0 1 0 0 Houston 4 5 7 5 4 0
Sullivan 4 3 2 4 0 0 Huntsville 4 1 0 0 0 0
Washington 4 1 0 1 0 0 Irving 4 2 0 0 1 0
Kirby 4 1 0 0 0 0
Rural Counties Lancaster 4 1 0 0 0 0
Leander 4 0 0 1 0 0
Bradley 4 1 1 0 0 0 Leon Valley 4 0 0 1 0 0
Fentress 4 1 0 0 0 0 Longview 4 0 1 0 1 0
Gibson 4 0 1 0 0 0 Lubbock 4 2 0 0 0 0
Hardeman 4 0 0 1 0 0 Mansfield 4 1 0 0 0 0
Henry 4 1 0 0 0 0 McAllen 4 0 0 1 0 0
Jefferson 4 0 0 1 0 0 Missouri City 4 0 0 1 0 0
Lauderdale 4 0 0 1 0 0 Nolanville 4 1 0 0 0 0
43
Table 13
Hate Crime Incidents
Bias Motivation
by State, Agency Type, and Number of Quarters Reported, 2000—Continued
Bias motivation Bias motivation
Number of Sexual Eth- Number of Sexual Eth-
quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil- quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil-
Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity
m
TEXAS—Continued TEXAS—Continued
44
Table 13
Hate Crime Incidents
Bias Motivation
by State, Agency Type, and Number of Quarters Reported, 2000—Continued
Bias motivation Bias motivation
Number of Sexual Eth- Number of Sexual Eth-
quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil- quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil-
Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity
m
VERMONT 6 3 9 1 0 VIRGINIA—Continued
Cities Cities—Continued
Bennington 4 0 0 1 0 0 Vinton 4 1 0 0 0 0
Brattleboro 4 0 1 0 0 0 Virginia Beach 4 42 1 4 1 1
Burlington 4 1 0 2 0 0 Warrenton 4 1 0 0 0 0
Colchester 4 0 0 1 0 0 Waynesboro 2 1 0 0 0 0
Manchester 4 2 0 0 0 0
Northfield 4 1 0 0 0 0 Universities and Colleges
Rutland 4 0 0 1 0 0
Springfield 4 2 0 0 0 0 George Mason University 4 1 1 3 0 0
St. Albans 4 0 0 2 0 0 James Madison University 4 1 0 0 0 0
Windsor 4 0 1 0 0 0 Northern Virginia
Community College 4 1 1 0 0 0
Rural Counties University of Virginia 4 1 0 0 1 0
45
Table 13
Hate Crime Incidents
Bias Motivation
by State, Agency Type, and Number of Quarters Reported, 2000—Continued
Bias motivation Bias motivation
Number of Sexual Eth- Number of Sexual Eth-
quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil- quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil-
Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity
m
VIRGINIA—Continued WASHINGTON—Continued
Cities Benton 4 1 0 0 0 0
Clark 4 0 0 0 1 0
Auburn 3 2 0 1 1 0 King 4 17 2 1 1 0
Battle Ground 4 3 1 0 0 0 Kitsap 4 8 1 1 0 0
Bellingham 3 1 1 1 0 0 Snohomish 2 3 0 0 3 0
Bonney Lake 4 1 0 0 0 0 Spokane 4 4 0 0 0 0
Bremerton 4 3 0 0 0 0 Thurston 4 4 0 0 0 1
Burien 4 2 0 0 2 0 Whatcom 4 3 0 0 0 0
Centralia 4 0 1 0 1 0 Yakima 4 1 0 0 0 0
Covington 4 1 0 0 0 0
Ellensburg 4 1 0 0 0 0 Rural Counties
Everett 4 4 0 0 1 0
Federal Way 4 6 0 0 0 0 Grays Harbor 4 2 0 0 0 0
Ferndale 4 4 0 1 1 0 Okanogan 4 1 0 0 0 0
Kelso 4 3 0 0 0 0
Kent 4 1 0 0 1 0 Other Agencies
Maple Valley 4 2 0 0 0 0
Mercer Island 4 2 1 0 0 0 Port of Seattle 4 2 0 0 1 0
Moses Lake 4 0 0 0 1 0
Mount Vernon 4 0 0 0 3 0 WEST VIRGINIA 37 4 19 0 0
North Bend 4 1 0 0 0 0
Ocean Shores 4 1 0 0 0 0 Cities
Olympia 4 2 0 3 1 0
Omak 4 1 0 0 1 0 Beckley 4 2 0 0 0 0
Port Orchard 4 3 1 1 0 0 Bluefield 4 0 0 1 0 0
Poulsbo 4 0 0 1 0 0 Charleston 4 7 2 3 0 0
Pullman 4 0 1 0 0 0 Charles Town 4 3 0 0 0 0
Redmond 4 1 0 0 0 0 Elkins 4 2 0 0 0 0
Renton 4 2 0 0 0 0 Fairmont 4 0 0 1 0 0
Sammamish 4 9 0 0 0 0 Huntington 4 12 1 7 0 0
Seatac 4 1 0 0 0 0 South Charleston 4 1 0 0 0 0
Seattle 4 7 5 7 2 0 Westover 4 0 0 1 0 0
Shelton 4 0 1 0 0 0
Shoreline 4 2 0 1 0 0 Universities and Colleges
Spokane 4 14 4 3 5 0
Sultan 4 0 0 0 1 0 West Virginia State College 4 2 0 0 0 0
Tacoma 4 15 2 2 1 1
Tukwila 4 2 0 0 0 0 Suburban Counties
Tumwater 4 0 0 0 1 0
Vancouver 4 7 1 0 2 0 Berkeley 4 1 0 0 0 0
Walla Walla 4 0 0 0 1 0 Wood 4 1 0 3 0 0
Wenatchee 4 0 0 1 0 0
White Salmon 4 1 0 0 0 0
Woodinville 4 0 0 1 0 0
Yakima 4 2 0 0 4 0
46
Table 13
Hate Crime Incidents
Bias Motivation
by State, Agency Type, and Number of Quarters Reported, 2000—Continued
Bias motivation Bias motivation
Number of Sexual Eth- Number of Sexual Eth-
quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil- quarters Reli- orien- nic- Disabil-
Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity Agency name reported Race gion tation ity ity
m
WEST VIRGINIA—Continued WISCONSIN—Continued
1
Includes one incident reported with more than one bias motivation.
47
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000
Number of Number of Number of
Quarters Quarters Quarters
Agency Name Reported Agency Name Reported Agency Name Reported
48
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
49
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
50
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
San Benito Highway Patrol 4 Department of Parks and Recreation— Union Pacific Railroad—Continued:
San Bernardino Highway Patrol 4 Continued: Lassen County 4
San Diego Highway Patrol 4 Russian River-Mendocino 4 Los Angeles County 4
San Francisco Highway Patrol 4 San Diego Coast 4 Madera County 4
San Joaquin Highway Patrol 4 San Joaquin 4 Marin County 4
San Luis Obispo Highway Patrol 4 San Luis Obispo Coast 4 Mendocino County 4
San Mateo Highway Patrol 4 San Simeon 4 Merced County 4
Santa Barbara Highway Patrol 4 Santa Cruz Mountains 4 Modoc County 4
Santa Clara Highway Patrol 4 Sierra 4 Monterey County 4
Santa Cruz Highway Patrol 4 Silverado 4 Napa County 4
Shasta Highway Patrol 4 Twin Cities 4 Nevada County 4
Sierra Highway Patrol 4 East Bay Municipal Utility 4 Orange County 4
Siskiyou Highway Patrol 4 East Bay Regional Parks: Placer County 4
Solano Highway Patrol 4 Alameda County 4 Plumas County 4
Sonoma Highway Patrol 4 Contra Costa County 4 Riverside County 4
Stanislaus Highway Patrol 4 Fairview Developmental Center 4 Sacramento County 4
Sutter Highway Patrol 4 Fontana Unified School District 4 San Benito County 4
Tehama Highway Patrol 4 Los Angeles County Metropolitan San Bernardino County 4
Trinity Highway Patrol 4 Transportation Authority 4 San Francisco County 4
Tulare Highway Patrol 4 Los Angeles Transportation Services San Joaquin County 4
Tuolumne Highway Patrol 4 Bureau 4 San Luis Obispo County 4
Ventura Highway Patrol 4 Lanterman State Hospital 4 San Mateo County 4
Yolo Highway Patrol 4 Monterey Peninsula Airport 4 Santa Barbara County 4
Yuba Highway Patrol 4 Napa State Hospital, Napa County 4 Santa Clara County 4
Orange County Marshal 4 Santa Cruz County 4
Other Agencies Porterville Developmental Center 4 Shasta County 4
San Bernardino Unified School Sierra County 4
Agnews Developmental Center 4 District 4 Siskiyou County 4
Atascadero State Hospital 4 San Diego Unified Port District 4 Solano County 4
California State Fair 4 San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit: Sonoma County 4
Department of Parks and Recreation: Contra Costa County 4 Stanislaus County 4
American River 4 San Francisco County 4 Sutter County 4
Angeles 4 San Mateo County 4 Tehama County 4
Bay Area 4 Santa Clara Transit District 4 Trinity County 4
Calaveras County 4 Sonoma Developmental Center 4 Tulare County 4
Channel Coast 4 Union Pacific Railroad: Ventura County 4
Colorado 4 Alameda County 4 Yolo County 4
Four Rivers District 4 Amador County 4 Yuba County 4
Gold Rush 4 Butte County 4
Hollister Hills 4 Calaveras County 4 COLORADO
Hungry Valley 4 Colusa County 4
Los Lagos 4 Contra Costa County 4 Cities
Marin County 4 El Dorado County 4
Monterey County 4 Fresno County 4 Alamosa 4
North Coast Redwoods 4 Glenn County 4 Alma 4
Northern Buttes 4 Humboldt County 4 Antonito 4
Oceano Dunes 4 Imperial County 4 Arvada 4
Ocotillo Wells 4 Inyo County 4 Aspen 4
Orange Coast 4 Kern County 4 Ault 4
Kings County 4 Avon 4
51
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
52
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
53
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
54
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
55
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
56
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
57
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
58
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
59
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
60
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
61
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
62
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
63
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
64
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
65
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
66
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
67
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
68
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
69
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
70
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
71
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
72
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
73
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
74
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
75
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
76
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
77
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
78
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
79
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
80
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
81
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
82
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
83
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
84
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
85
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
86
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
87
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
88
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
89
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
90
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
91
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
92
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
93
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
94
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
95
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
96
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
97
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
98
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
99
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
100
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
101
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
102
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
103
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
104
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
105
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
106
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
107
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
108
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
109
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
110
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
111
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
112
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
113
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
114
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
115
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
116
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
117
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
118
Table 14
Zero Hate Crime Data Submitted
Number of Quarters Reported by State and Agency Type, 2000—Continued
Number of Number of Number of
quarters quarters quarters
Agency name reported Agency name reported Agency name reported
119
APPENDIX
Directory of State Uniform Crime Reporting Programs
Alabama Connecticut
Alabama Criminal Justice Information Center Uniform Crime Reporting Program
Suite 350 Post Office Box 2794
770 Washington Avenue Middletown, Connecticut 06457-9294
Montgomery, Alabama 36104 860-685-8030
334-242-4900
Delaware
Alaska Delaware State Bureau of Identification
Uniform Crime Reporting Section Post Office Box 430
Department of Public Safety Information System Dover, Delaware 19903
5700 East Tudor Road 302-739-5875
Fairbanks, Alaska 99507
907-451-5166 District of Columbia
Information Services Division
American Samoa Metropolitan Police Department
Department of Public Safety Room 5054
Post Office Box 1086 300 Indiana Avenue, Northwest
Pago Pago Washington, D.C. 20001
American Samoa 96799 202-727-4138
684-633-1111
Florida
Arizona Uniform Crime Reports
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Florida Crime Information Bureau
Access Integrity Unit Post Office Box 1489
Arizona Department of Public Safety Tallahassee, Florida 32302-1489
Post Office Box 6638 850-410-7121
Phoenix, Arizona 85005-6638
602-223-2263 Georgia
Georgia Crime Information Center
Arkansas Georgia Bureau of Investigation
Arkansas Crime Information Center Post Office Box 370748
One Capitol Mall, 4D-200 Decatur, Georgia 30037-0748
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 404-244-2840
501-682-2222
Guam
California Guam Police Department
Criminal Justice Statistics Center Planning, Research and Development
Department of Justice Building #3
Post Office Box 903427 Central Avenue
Sacramento, California 94203-4270 Tiyan, Guam 96913
916-227-3282 671-472-8911 x 418
Colorado Hawaii
Uniform Crime Reporting Crime Prevention and Justice Assistance Division
Colorado Bureau of Investigation Department of the Attorney General
Suite 3000 Suite 401
690 Kipling Street 235 South Beretania Street
Denver, Colorado 80215 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
303-239-4300 808-586-1416
121
APPENDIX
Directory of State Uniform Crime Reporting ProgramsContinued
Idaho Maryland
Criminal Identification Bureau Central Records Division
Idaho Department of Law Enforcement Maryland State Police
Post Office Box 700 1711 Belmont Avenue
Meridian, Idaho 83680 Baltimore, Maryland 21244
208-884-7156 410-298-3883
Illinois Massachusetts
Uniform Crime Reporting Crime Reporting Unit
Illinois State Police Uniform Crime Reports
Firearms Services and Crime Statistics Bureau Massachusetts State Police
Post Office Box 3677 470 Worcester Road
Springfield, Illinois 62708 Framingham, Massachusetts 01702
217-782-5794 508-820-2111
Iowa Michigan
Iowa Department of Public Safety Statistical Information Section
Wallace State Office Building Central Records Division
East Ninth and Grand Department of State Police
Des Moines, Iowa 50319 7150 Harris Drive
515-281-8494 Lansing, Michigan 48913
517-322-1424
Kansas
Criminal Justice System Minnesota
Kansas Bureau of Investigation Criminal Justice Information Systems
Crime Data Information Center Bureau of Criminal Apprehension
1620 Southwest Tyler Street Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Topeka, Kansas 66612 1246 University Avenue
785-296-8200 St. Paul, Minnesota 55104
651-642-0670
Kentucky
Information Services Branch Montana
Kentucky State Police Montana Board of Crime Control
1250 Louisville Road Post Office Box 201408
Frankfort, Kentucky 40601 Helena, Montana 59620-1408
502-227-8790 406-444-4298
Louisiana Nebraska
Louisiana Commission on Law Enforcement Uniform Crime Reporting Section
Office of the Governor The Nebraska Commission on Law
Room 708 Enforcement and Criminal Justice
1885 Wooddale Boulevard Post Office Box 94946
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70802 Lincoln, Nebraska 68508
225-925-4420 402-471-3982
Maine Nevada
Records Management Services Criminal Information Services
Uniform Crime Reporting Division Nevada Highway Patrol
Maine Department of Public Safety 808 West Nye Lane
Maine State Police Carson City, Nevada 89703
36 Hospital Street, Station 42 775-687-1600
Augusta, Maine 04333
207-624-7003
122
APPENDIX
Directory of State Uniform Crime Reporting ProgramsContinued
Oklahoma
Uniform Crime Reporting Section
Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation
Suite 300
6600 North Harvey
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73116
405-879-2533 *National Incident-Based Reporting System only
123
APPENDIX
Directory of State Uniform Crime Reporting ProgramsContinued
Texas Washington
Uniform Crime Reporting Uniform Crime Reporting Program
Crime Information Bureau Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs
Texas Department of Public Safety Post Office Box 826
Post Office Box 4143 Olympia, Washington 98507
Austin, Texas 78765-9968 360-586-3221
512-424-2734
West Virginia
Utah Uniform Crime Reporting Program
Data Collection and Analysis West Virginia State Police
Uniform Crime Reporting 725 Jefferson Road
Bureau of Criminal Identification South Charleston, West Virginia 25309
Utah Department of Public Safety 304-746-2159
Post Office Box 148280
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-8280 Wisconsin
801-965-4566 Office of Justice Assistance
Suite 202
Vermont 131 West Wilson Street
Vermont Crime Information Center Madison, Wisconsin 53702-0001
103 South Main Street 608-266-3323
Waterbury, Vermont 05671-2101
802-241-5220 Wyoming
Uniform Crime Reporting
Virginia Criminal Records Section
Criminal Justice Information Services Division Division of Criminal Investigation
Virginia State Police 316 West 22nd Street
Post Office Box 27472 Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002
Richmond, Virginia 23261-7472 307-777-7625
804-674-2023
Virgin Islands
Virgin Islands Police Department
Criminal Justice Complex
Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands 00802
809-774-2211
124
Evaluation Form For
Hate Crime Statistics, 2000
1. For what purpose did you use this issue of Hate Crime Statistics?
3. Are there presentations not included that you would find particularly useful?
5. Can you point out specific table notes or presentations which are not clear or additional
terms which need to be defined?
Fold Here
Fold Here