Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hemorhoidectomy Poster
Hemorhoidectomy Poster
Thomas Mazza MD, Scott D. Goldstein MD, Gerald Isenberg MD, James Fitzgerald MD, Andrew Richards MD*, Brian Delong MD*, Larry Sollenberger MD*
Introduction
Hemorrhoids have long been a problem in healthcare affecting more than 1 million Americans per year. It has been estimated that over a 3 year period approximately 4.4% of the US population will have symptoms attributed to hemorrhoids. Treatments for hemorrhoids vary from lifestyle modifications to topical therapy to surgical excision. Recently a new approach to treatment has entered the surgical realm; the so-called procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH).
*
Discussion
Age Distribution
Male
Female
Anatomy Overview
Vascular cushions Help protect anal canal during defecation Blood supplied primarily from superior hemorrhoidal artery Usual bundles located in three distinct areas Increased intraabdominal pressure may cause backflow of venous blood
Extreme: 12.8% (n=10) Moderate: 38.5% (30) Little: 35. 9% (28) None: 12.8% (10)
Pain comparison to expectations
Pitfalls of study Retrospective survey of patient population No comparison group No good long term follow up to assess durability Survey addresses only subjective data Other procedures may have influenced outcomes assessment
Conclusion
Hemorrhoids have been and will continue to be a prominent healthcare issue for the American population. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy is a new innovation in the treatment of prolapsing hemorrhoid disease which provides patients with a less painful means of relief, allows quicker return to normal function, and provides a high degree of post operative satisfaction. Economically, the procedure requires less operative time and infrequently necessitates hospitalization. The stapler, however, is costly and is not reusable. The technique is still relatively new, and reliable randomized, controlled trials to date are small without good long term results for assessing durability.
53%
No ne
Li tt le
at e
Age distribution Males Range: 28-76 yrs 20-29: 1 30-39: 8 40-49: 28 50-59: 21 60-69: 13 70-79: 7 Mean: 52.1 y/o Females Range: 23-86 yrs 20-29: 2 30-39: 8 40-49: 27 50-59: 11 60-69: 10 70-79: 13 >80: 3 Mean: 54.2 y/o
M od er
5 0
Type of anesthesia General: 19 Monitored sedation: 131 Associated procedures during PPH Colonoscopy: 34 Removal of skin tag: 29 External hemorrhoidectomy: 4 Lateral sphincterotomy: 3 Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy: 1
Status of symptoms
Less than expected: 67.9% (53) More than expected: 11.5% (9) As expected: 20.5% (16) Completely resolved: 52.6% (41) Significant improvement: 38.5% (30) Little improvement: 6.4% (5) Recurrent symptoms: 2.6% (2)
Status of Symptoms
6% 3%
38%
Ex
tr e
m e
Review of Literature
Completely resolved Significant Improvement Little Improvement Recurrence
Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy
Initially introduced by Longo in 1998 by modifying EEA stapling technique used in rectal surgery Utilizes a 33mm circular stapler passed via the anal canal Essentially lifts or repositions the anal canal tissue Procedure generally performed in about 30-45 minutes Remaining internal hemorrhoid tissues shrinks within 4 to 6 weeks
Delayed procedures External hemorrhoidectomy: Control of bleeding: 4 Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for recurrence: 3 Removal of skin tag: 2 Type of hospital visit 2 Banding: Out patient: 133 Lateral sphincterotomy: Same day admission: 11 Dilation: 1 Follow up In patient: 8 Complications Bleeding: 33 Unexpected admission: 6 Urinary retention: 5 Impaction: 3 Abscess: 2
Post op visits (13 patients lost to follow up) Range: 0-11 Average: 1.6 visits Mean time to discharge: 10.8 wks Discharge Mode: 1 visit 3 wks post op
Anesthesia
88% 12%
<1 week: 50% (39) 1-2 weeks: 23.1% (18) 2-3 weeks: 15.4% (12) >3 weeks: 11.5% (9)
Degree of satisfaction with procedure Excellent: 64.1% (50) Good: 21.8% (17) Satisfied: 7.7% (6) Unsatisfied: 6.4% (5)
Would recommend procedure to family or friends with similar symptoms. Yes: 89.7% (70) No: 2.6% (2 ) Undecided: 7.7% (6)
European study of 1077 patients concluded that patients who had PPH had less pain, shorter hospital stays, shorter operative time, quicker return to normal activity and no difference in quality of life scores. They did however have a higher recurrence rate.* A similar US study of 117 patients concluded PPH offers benefits of less post operative pain, less analgesic requirements, and less pain at first bowel movement, while providing similar control of symptoms.**
A French study compared stapled hemorrhoidopexy verses Milligan-Morgan with 2 year follow up. A series of 134 patients in 7 centers were evaluated preoperatively and 6 weeks, 1 year and 2 years post treatment. They concluded PPH caused less pain, achieved comparable outcomes and was equally effective in relieving symptoms.
*Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Compared With Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy: Systematic Review of Randomized, Controlled Trials. Pasha J. Nisar1, et.al. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum Vol.47 No. 11 **A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Trial Comparing Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy: Perioperative and One-Year Results. A. J. Senagore, et.al. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum Vol. 47, No. 11 Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Versus Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Trial With 2-Year Postoperative Follow Up. Gravi, Jean Franois MD, et.al. Annals of Surgery. 242(1):29-35, July 2005.
General MAC