G20-0012 - Research Methodology - Answers

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

STUDENT NUMBER: G20-0012

DOCTOR OF EDUCATION
SEMINAR IN RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

I. Based on the sample unpublished research study write a 200 word reaction paper. Use
the following as your guide•
Does it include the subject matter stated clearly and specifically?
•Are the specific problems adequate for general objectives? Clearly stated/incorporate
variables? Stated in measurable terms/indicators specified?•
Does it fills a gap in knowledge? practical application? Improve professional
practice?
•Does the research paradigm of the study clearly tell you that is the scope of the
study?•Is the review presented systematically, thoroughly and logically?•
Have appropriate tools of measurement been developed?•
Are the results of the analysis and interpretation clearly presented and logically
organized (e.g. according to the research question)•
Is the summary not merely a repetition of the results?•
Are the conclusion logical, that is do they result from the findings?•
Do the recommendations arise from the findings and conclusion?

Answer:
The study given, rising from the sunset: journeying with the retired
administrators engaged to bridge employment included the subject matter
clearly but not specifically. The study did not mention the age bracket of the
retired teachers. Legally, retirement age is different to every schools. The study
did not specifically mention the exact age of the retirees. The problems for
general objectives are also not specific. The researcher has not specifically
execute options and indicators on how to determine the retired teachers’ profile
and retirement plans. The study needs thorough and more specific general
objectives to really describe the life of retired teachers. This is a good platform
to make another study about this and fill on the gap. The study has no clear
research paradigm. The scope is not clear because of the lack of indicators. The
review is not systematically but logically. It seems that the researcher had
predicted the response of the the respondents. The tools of measurement is also
not developed since the scope of the study has not been found. The results of the
study is presented exactly as the questions raised, but very limited answers are
given and they did not fill in the research gap. The summary is merely just a
repetition of the results. The conclusion is logical but not entirely fill in the gap
of research. There are lots of recommendations arise from the findings and
conclusions. The study needs more specific indicators for the variables, thorough
analysis of the responses of the population and more specific objectives and clear
output is also needed.

II. Ethics in Research Based from the Study given above, kindly answer the following
question with a sound judgment.1. What are the ethical principles that have been
violated/ complied in her study? Mention at least three (3).
Answers:
Respect. We identified four key domains for demonstrating respect, first is the personal
study team interactions, with an emphasis on empathy, appreciation and non-judgment;
second is the study communication processes, including following up and sharing results
with participants; and the inclusion, particularly ensuring materials are understandable.
The researcher has not violated the respect to the respondents but violated the respect to
the study. Since the study is sound to be biased in the terms of not asking for the different
sides of the coins such as the programs given by the particular school to its retirees.
Beneficence is a concept in research ethics that states that researchers should have the
welfare of the research participant as a goal of any clinical trial or other research study.
The antonym of this term, maleficence, describes a practice that opposes the welfare of any
research participant. According to the Belmont Report, researchers are required to follow
two moral requirements in line with the principle of beneficence: do not harm and
maximize possible benefits for research while minimizing any potential harm on others.
These four concepts often arise in discussions about beneficence: one should not practice
evil or do harm, often stated in Latin as Primum non nocere; one should prevent evil or
harm; one should remove evil or harm; and one should practice good.
The researcher also violated the beneficence concept since the output is not directly
addressed and plans are not specifically given.
Justice. In research ethics, justice is the fair selection of research participants. Justice is
the ideal distribution of risks and benefits when scientists conducting clinical research are
recruiting volunteer research participants to participate in clinical trials.
The researcher had not lay down the plans of the school for its retirees. The side of the
school has not mentioned even on the review so the justice of both sides are not entirely
met.
III. Data Analysis Qualitative Data Analysis. Below are the transcript of narratives,
kindly draw the eidetic insights of the transcribed field notes of the researcher.  State
also the implication of this study in Educational Management.
Answers:
The study, Managerial skills among selected administrators in public and private
elementary schools in the second district of Bataan: A triangulation by Mr. Ivan Gail R.
Yarra is purposely for the concept of managerial skills. The answers are not filtered and
bias. The responses are both showing positive and negative impact. It reflects realistic view
of the research. The implication of the study shows that there is always the need for
improvement in every aspect of managerial fields. The study specifically demands that the
management needs to be evaluated, reviewed, and assessed at a time.

V. Discuss the importance of RESEARCH in Educational Management (at least 100 words).
Provide a Working Title in this discussion as applied to your discipline

Answer:

The primary goal of educational research is to develop the existing body of knowledge by
providing solutions to different problems in pedagogy while improving teaching and
learning practices. Educational researchers also seek answers to questions bothering on
learner motivation, development, and classroom management. Based on functionality,
educational research can be classified into fundamental research, applied research, and
action research. The primary purpose of fundamental research is to provide insights into
the research variables; that is, to gain more knowledge. Educational research plays a
crucial role in knowledge advancement across different fields of study. 

1. It provides answers to practical educational challenges using scientific methods.


2. Findings from educational research; especially applied research, are instrumental in
policy reformulation. 
3. For the researcher and other parties involved in this research approach, educational
research improves learning, knowledge, skills, and understanding.
4. Educational research improves teaching and learning methods by empowering you
with data to help you teach and lead more strategically and effectively.
5. Educational research helps students apply their knowledge to practical situations.
Provide a Working Title in this discussion as applied to your discipline.
Answer:
Analysis of Financial Well-being of the School Heads in Bataan; A Basis for Retirement
Plan

You might also like