Is411 8

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

The raw material (0% cement) represented in Fig.

7 has a classified by the AASHTO system as an A-2-4, primarily a fine


CBR of only 10 due to the excessive clay content, which upon sand with an appreciable quantity of silt and clay making it
saturation during the test, significantly weakens the material. somewhat marginal in stability. The R-Value of 65 for the
As shown in the figure, a small amount of cement increases the untreated sand increased to 89 with the addition of 3%
CBR to a level that is adequate for base and subbase courses. cement—a stability level suitable for a base or subbase layer.
Table 6 shows the permanence of the CBR increase. After Triaxial Compression. The triaxial compression test18 is used
many cycles of laboratory freeze-thaw tests, the CBR values did by a few state highway agencies for pavement design or to
not decrease; in fact, the value at 4% cement increased classify an aggregate’s suitability for use in pavement construc-
substantially due to additional cement hydration during the tion. The test is used to determine the shearing resistance of a
thaw cycles. material, which is the sum of two components—internal
Sand Equivalent (SE). Some agency specifications for granular friction and cohesion.
base and subbase courses include a requirement for a mini- A clean granular material derives most of its strength from
mum Sand Equivalent value.15 This is determined by a test internal friction, (particle to particle contact resists shearing
developed to detect the presence of undesirable clay-like movement) while the cohesion component of strength is very
materials in soils and aggregates. The method tends to magnify low or zero. Dirty granular materials have some cohesion but
the volume of clay in a sample somewhat in proportion to its have lower total strength because the fine silt and clay
detrimental effects. Clean crushed stones and sands have SE particles, when wet, act as a lubricant decreasing the internal
values of about 80; very expansive clays have SE values of 0 to friction.
5. A western state highway agency specifies a minimum SE of When cement is added, both cohesion and internal friction
30 for base course materials. are substantially increased. An example for a dirty bank-run
The sand equivalent of a material can be increased by the gravel is shown in Fig. 8,19 where the vertical scale represents
addition of a small quantity of cement. Data from tests made cohesion and the angle f is the internal friction. This increase
by the Utah Department of Transportation on a soil having a PI in stability due to the addition of cement would modify the
of 11 and having 33% passing the No. 200 sieve are shown in substandard or marginal material to one of acceptable quality.
Table 7.16 This material containing 2% cement would meet the Field Load Tests. Data on the load-carrying capacity of
SE requirement. Incidentally, the PI was correspondingly cement-modified granular soils have been determined by tests20
reduced from 11 to 0 for the material containing 3% cement. of outdoor test panels. Fig. 9 shows the increase in plate
Resistance R-Value. Some agencies make use of the Resistance bearing value of a 7-in.-thick base with increasing cement
R-Value test,17 also called the Hveem Stabilometer test, to contents. At 1.5% cement the load bearing capacity was
determine the stability of a material used as a roadway base, approximately doubled. Panels were tested each spring for a
subbase, or subgrade. An R-Value of about 78 is considered period of five years. Data from these tests also show the
equivalent to a good crushed stone. Some agencies specify an substantial increase in load-carrying capacity obtained even at
R-Value of 72 for base course materials. the very low cement contents. Some loss in load-carrying
An example of how the addition of cement increases the R- capacity occurred at the lower cement contents after exposure
Value is shown in Table 8. The data are for a Colorado sand to freezing and thawing. However, after five years of exposure,

Table 6. Permanence of Bearing Value of Cement-Modified Granular Soil 1


CBR CBR
(percent)

Raw soil 43

2 percent cement by weight, age 7 days 255


2 percent cement by weight after 60 cycles of freeze-thaw 258

4 percent cement by weight, age 7 days 485


4 percent cement by weight after 60 cycles of freeze-thaw 574

1
A-1-b(0) disintegrated granite from Riverside County, Calif.

Table 7. Sand Equivalent Values of Cement-Modified Soil

Percent Cement by Weight Sand Equivalent

0 11
1 18
2 36
3 59

You might also like