Big City Phone Company

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Big City Phone Company

The Norm

Today was a different day in the ABP class. Unlike the usual crack the
case approach, it was a role-play approach. The typical day in class
included: understand the problem statement, identify the decision options
then the objective and the criteria that will help achieve the objective. The
faculty requested every executive to select a role out of five to crack the
case and make a recommendation to senior management. The roles were:
vice president business development, vice president of finance, vice
president of marketing, senior project director of information systems,
director of operations management and director of human resources.

Problem Statement

The company, Big City Phone Company is into telecommunication


services which include: local telephone service, access to long distance
carriers and people-intensive services (value added services). The key
market differentiator for BCPC is its customer experience service and
satisfaction. The company invest time and resource to attaining the best
customer service team in the market. BCPC has attained the status of a
major player in the wireless technology market with a customer base size
of 10 million. Now, the company wants to tap into latest opportunity
presented by a new technology called high-speed Internet-access. The
biggest concern of the company is it readiness for launch of the new
product and the possible impact on the brand image.

The key pre-launch issue for BCPC to consider include:

 outdated infrastructure which could not support the new technology


without challenges
 too many types of equipment vendors at the customer premises
requiring technical support for effective installation and use
 lack of trained technical and customer service agents to support new
technology
 short time to market required to retain market lead
 overall cost required to launch a the a very good product
The dynamics

Unfortunately, within the strategic team saddled with the responsibility of


recommending launch (how? Wholesale or retail model) or no launch of
the new product, there were biases and influences. The CEO had an
interest in launching the new product using the retail model and had
offered the VP of finance and marketing a bonus should the team
recommend his preferred position. Also, the VP, business development
also wants to be in the good books of the CEO and hence is biased to
achieve the expectation of the CEO. However, the director of operations
management is a new hire, who is weary of accepting project with a lot of
technical challenges. The director of human resources is responsible for
training of staff, both technical and non-technical and is insistence of
maintain the company standard.

This became the battle of the wits as every member of the strategic team
had an agenda and a goal to achieve, irrespective of the best decision for
the company. Negotiations were tough as each block of parties dug in to
achieve their goal. It became an uphill task for the VP. business
development, as the leader of the team to rally the dissenting views and
position to move the company forward. Eventually, my group reached a
compromised decision to launch the new technology as soon as possible
with the wholesaler business model.  

You might also like