Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assignment 2 PREPARATION OF RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Assignment 2 PREPARATION OF RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Title page
Abstract
Acknowledgment
Table of contents, list of tables, list of figures
Chapter one: Introduction
1.1 Background of the Study
1.2 Statement of the Problem
1.3 Basic Research Questions
1.4 Objectives of the Study
1.5 Significance of the Study
1.6 Scope of the Study
1.7 Limitation of the Study
1.8 Background of the Organization/case area (optional)
1.9 Operational definition of new terms
1.10 Organization of the Paper
Chapter Two: Literature Review
2.1Theoreticval Review of Literature
----------------------
----------------------
----------------------
2.2 Theoretical Review of Literature
----------------------
----------------------
2.3 Development of Conceptual framework
The explanations for each of the above research proposal components are provided here under:
I. Title page
The title should be explicit and transparent
The title should be clear and short
The title should capture and reflect the content of the proposal. It should enable the readers to
understand the concepts of the study.
II. Abstract
Abstract is a summary, which reflects the whole content of the proposal (most of the time less than 300 words).
Abstract should be concise, informative and should provide brief information about the whole problem to be
investigated. The abstract of a proposal should contain the following points:
III. Acknowledgment
In scientific research, an acknowledgement is an expression of gratitude for assistance in the research work. It
is written on a separate page after the abstract. It must not be too long; in fact, a maxim of half a page should be
enough. Receiving credit of acknowledgment rather than authorship indicates that the person or organization
did not have a direct hand in producing the work in question, but may have contributed funding, criticism, or
encouragement to the researcher.
2
1.3 Statement of the problem (the rationale)
The rational provides some of the reasons for doing the study and its importance. Citations from past research
may be relevant here; likewise recent political and economic events, previous efforts to solve the problem that
did not succeed can be mentioned. Statement of the problem clearly states the overall plan for obtaining an
answer to the research question or for testing the research hypothesis. The statement of the problem is the first
part of the paper to be read [The title and the abstract are usually ignored]. The problem statement should attract
the interest of the reader and establish a persuasive context for what follows. The primary purpose is to
persuade the reader that the research project is a valid one. It is at this stage that many good research ideas have
the potential to fail and have series difficulties. One of the mistakes most often made by the new researcher is
that the problem they wish to investigate is not stated clearly enough. A lot of research problems start out as too
‘bit’.
The researcher must identify the problem and state it accurately, objectively and clearly. This step often can be
the toughest in the entire research process, because sometimes symptoms can be mistaken for problem. For
instance, let’s assume overdue receivables. This is just an indication for the existence of a problem – it is a
symptom. So, what is the real problem? The finance manager might say, “The problem is inefficient credit
policy”. That may be the conclusion after reviewing the situation. However, the real problem may be poor
follow up of credit customers, Bankruptcy of credit customers, Negligence of Credit customers, and Not using
the appropriate technology where the number of credit customers is extensive (Not maintaining credit
customers’ Data Base) or a dozen other factors. Do you see why a problem must be identified and stated?
Statement of the problem, therefore, puts a verbal fence around the situation and ensures, to some degree, that
the planning, researching, conclusions, recommendations, and decisions will remain within the fenced area. In
many situations, the problem can be stated in a paragraph or two. However, when investigating more complex
problems with which the reader of the report is unfamiliar, it may be necessary to provide more information in
stating the problem. The researchers need to be able to clearly answer the question: “what is the problem”? And
“why is this problem worth my attention”? At the same time, the problem statement limits scope by focusing on
some variables and not others. It also provides an opportunity for the researcher to demonstrate why these
variables are important.
Statement of the problem should close with a question or a hypothesis. The research questions or hypotheses
expand on the problem statement by providing detail. This is a crucial stage in the research undertakings. If the
researcher does not ask the appropriate questions, he/she will not be able to collect suitable data and arrive at
sensible conclusions. Research question does not mean the detailed question that might be included in
questionnaires or interviews, but question that identify the nature of the research problem or the issue the
researcher wishes to focus on. Once the problem is stated, the researcher should formulate specific questions or
hypothesis. In quantitative research, the research questions are followed by a number of hypotheses. To set the
appropriate research questions, there should be a proper and sufficient literature search. The purpose of the
literature search that follows is to answer the research problem question, if the literature cannot answer the
question; the research is needed to do so. An example question might be: “What is the relationship between the
credit policy and average default amount and number of days a receivable is overdue”? The information needed
is 1) some measure of credit policy and 2) average default amount and number of days overdue. But sometimes
bad question may be raised. For example “what is the relationship between the credit policies and average
default amount and number days a receivable is overdue”? The title of this research project would be something
like this. “credit policy and Average amount of default and number of days a receivable is overdue”.
3
In this section, the proposal can indicate what is expected to occur and why, suggest the variable that determine
relationship, or provide an explanation for a phenomenon that has been observed, which strengthens the
proposal and research agenda. Generally this section should focus on the point.
What is to be achieved by the proposed investigation has to be stated plainly and concisely.
Objective/s should be to the point and logically arranged
Objective/s should be stated in a form which shows the relations between variables
Objective/s must clearly state the target of the research activity and the kind of results expected or
sought from conducting research.
While formulating objectives or statement of purposes for your study, the objectives should start with words
such as ‘to find out’, ‘to determine’, ‘to ascertain’, to measure, and ‘to explore’. The researcher should think
about these objectives and decide the feasibility of attaining them before starting the major research activities.
Statement of the purpose is a very specific statement what major thing to achieve in the research. This specific
purpose does not have to be a complete paragraph; it can be a single simple statement. The purpose statement
should be exact, precise, and narrow. One representative purpose statement in accounting could be:
“To determine why the receivables are many days over due in commercial Bank of Ethiopia”
1.5 Significance of the study
In this section you will write about the effect of your study, and how it will change the things. Talk about the
benefits it will bring, how it will be helpful, to whom and why it is helpful.
Methodology should give full details to show how the research activity is going to be carried out. Since this
section is the largest and the most important part of the research proposal, researchers are advised to split in into
4
sub – sections. Such effort makes the proposal transparent and clear to the readers as well as to the reviewing
committee and therefore, minimizes the risk of being rejected by a research committee. The suggested sub-
sections can be:
5
3.3. Target Population & Method of Sampling: From which elements are the data collected? The researcher
has to specify the elements from which the desired information is collected (target population) and how these
elements are selected. There are different sampling techniques. The researcher is expected to consider all of
them and select the one, which is appropriate for the current study. Justification of his choice of a particular
sampling technique is relevant here. The sample size should also be specified with its method of sample size
determination.
3.4. Method of data Analysis and Presenting the Outcome: Once the information is collected how it will be
processed and analyzed will also be explained, particularly if the researcher uses mathematical models, he has
to show their mathematical derivations and relations briefly to demonstrate their relevance for the current study.
The data is edited, coded and classified to complete the data processing tasks. Then the data analysis will
continue. The researcher can use the following data analysis techniques: Tabulation, Percentage, Measurement
of Central Tendency (Mean, mode and median), and Measurement of Dispersion Variance, Standard Deviation,
Coefficient of Variation and Data Transformation. In accounting, Ratio analysis (Profitability Ratio, Liquidity
ratios, Activity Management Ratios, Debt or Leverage Management Ratios and market Value Ratios) is the
most powerful and useful techniques in Descriptive Analysis. Common size and Trend Analysis can also be
used as part of Descriptive analysis. Sometimes it is worth to mention how the outcome of the research will be
presented to consumers (general public).
Work Plan
Work plane is timetable explaining how the researcher expects to carry out his project. It is a plan in terms of
number of week or months and expected completion dates. Commonly researchers present it in a table form or
Gannet chart. The length of time required for postgraduate study is determined by the budget of the time
presented by students. Thus, researcher should be realist in budgeting his time.
Cost Budget
Most proposals put together with the expectation that funding will be necessary and an itemized list of the items
needed to carry out the methodology is listed in some detail. A carefully developed budget reflects the
seriousness of the proposal and the degree to which it is a realistic assessment of what is needed. These costs
may be:
Expenses for data collection,
Payment for consultants where they are necessary
Traveling and all such items needed to be detailed
A sum of money for contingencies
6
In text citation and Referencing using Harvard System
1. In text citation in Harvard system uses author’s name, date, and page of the reference material. Example
of some of the common types of literature citation using Harvard system are given below
Brigham (1995, P. 123) claimed that Ratio analysis is more useful for small, narrowly focused firms than for
large multidivisional ones.
Or
Ratio analysis is more useful for small, narrowly focused firms than for large multidivisional ones (Brigham,
1995, P. 123).
2. Referring or Listing the Cited works: The reference list must include all published works referred to in the
text. Each reference to a periodical publication must include, in order, the name (names) of the author (s), the
year of publication, the full titles of the article, the publication in which it appears, and the volume and inclusive
page number. Reference to a book must give the author or authors’ name (s), the year, the title, the edition, if
other than the first; the publishes, the city of publication and the number of the volume (if two or more) in
Harvard System of referencing
Appendix (annex): It is not mandatory to have this section. If the researcher thinks that having this section will
increase the quality of the research proposal he is free to do so. Information types provided in this section are
those additional details, which are difficult to accommodate within the standard headings, items to be included
in appendix:
Details questionnaires and interview schedules
Detailed experimental design
Detailed statistical procedures
Samples of research materials
Survey and other geographic maps