Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Session New Product Development Process
Session New Product Development Process
Yes
Idea Feasibility Preliminary Process Cost
Feasible?
Generation Study Design Planning Planning
No
No
Final Design Yes Prototype Yes
Commercial
Manufacturing Prototype OK? Development & Design OK?
Production
Specifications Testing
No
Production Development
In the first stage we think of an idea for a new product but we all know that
all ideas are not practically feasible so they need to be discussed, though out
and finalized after which the few final ideas are moved into the design stage
where designs are being created to understand the technical nitty gritties and
reduce faults which are than tested, studied and evaluated after which
prototypes are being developed that are again tested for feasibility and other
stuff of quality checks which then moves into the final production stage
Product Development Funnel
Stage-Gates
0 7 12 20 24
Time (Months)
Product Development Process
Possible outcomes/benefits
Dimensions Customer Dimensions: New product
Sustained P: If organisation innovates than it
stays in the market for example: Kodak could
Customer Dimensions not sustain in marketplace
Strategic Advantages
Strategic advantages: Customers and consumers feel that this organisation is able to understand
the customers needs, requirements and so it brings loyalty. Example of Milton (Plastic bottles but
they realized that plastic is not good and they made steel thermos which keep hot and cold for
more than 24 hours giving them strategic advantage over other competitors)
Video Insight
Maruti Suzuki Limited – The R & D Process
Right click on the URL below to open the hyperlink in the web browser…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sN-ZN6MMFek
Organization for Product Development Process:
Traditional Approach
Customers Suppliers
Planning
Concurrent Engineering
Team Structure
Suppliers
Tools for efficient product development
Understanding customers needs
Quantitative Analysis
Market Research • Statistical analysis
• Hypothesis Testing
Focus Groups
Qualitative Analysis
•Reproduce customers
In-depth qualitative own words
interviews
Translate
• GKN designed a shaft of smaller diameter, which made it lighter and saved on material
costs
• Tata Nano was having ambitious cost target to bring to the market Rs 1 L car.
Expectedly, suppliers have to make use of value engineering efforts. The
components in the Nano had been studied from the view points of
functionality, cost and performance.
• Tata worked with Bosch to take the ECU down to an unprecedented price by
reducing the sensors used by the ECU to govern the engine down to half the usual
number
Value Engineering
Agenda for brainstorming
• Tata Swatch
Application of Decision Trees to Product Design
(.4)
High sales
(.6)
Low sales
Do nothing
Decision Tree Example
$2,500,000 Revenue
(.4) – 1,000,000 Mfg cost ($40 x 25,000)
Purchase CAD – 500,000 CAD cost
High sales
$1,000,000 Net
$800,000 Revenue
(.6) Low sales – 320,000 Mfg cost ($40 x 8,000)
– 500,000 CAD cost
Hire and train engineers – $20,000 Net loss
(.4)
(.6)
Low sales
Do nothing
Decision Tree Example
$2,500,000 Revenue
(.4) – 1,000,000 Mfg cost ($40 x 25,000)
Purchase CAD – 500,000 CAD cost
$388,000 High sales
$1,000,000 Net
$800,000 Revenue
(.6) Low sales – 320,000 Mfg cost ($40 x 8,000)
– 500,000 CAD cost
Hire and train engineers – $20,000 Net loss
(.4)
$800,000 Revenue
(.6) Low sales – 320,000 Mfg cost ($40 x 8,000)
– 500,000 CAD cost
Hire and train engineers – $20,000 Net loss
$365,000
$2,500,000 Revenue
(.4) – 1,250,000 Mfg cost ($50 x 25,000)
High sales – 375,000 Hire and train cost
$875,000 Net
$800,000 Revenue
(.6) – 400,000 Mfg cost ($50 x 8,000)
Low sales – 375,000 Hire and train cost
Do nothing $0 $25,000 Net
$0 Net
Example 1 - Extension
If in the above problem the probabilities of both conditions in both scenarios
become .5 each, what will be the effect on your decision
Example 2
King electronics wants to launch new line of monitors. It has two design options
Design A: Probability to yield 60 good monitors per 100 is .9
Probability to yield 65 good monitors per 100 is .1
Cost for Design A is Rs. 1000,000