Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Harris Et Al SESI - 06 Improving Schools in Challenging Contexts
Harris Et Al SESI - 06 Improving Schools in Challenging Contexts
To cite this Article Harris, Alma , Chapman, Christopher , Muijs, Daniel , Russ, Jennifer andStoll, Louise(2006) 'Improving
schools in challenging contexts: Exploring the possible', School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17: 4, 409 — 424
To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/09243450600743483
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09243450600743483
This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or
systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or
distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents
will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses
should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss,
actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly
or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
School Effectiveness and School Improvement
Vol. 17, No. 4, December 2006, pp. 409 – 424
This article outlines the findings from a small-scale research study that explored how a group of
secondary schools in challenging contexts had improved and raised attainment successively over a
5-year period. The study points to the importance of external factors and how they influence
a school’s ability to improve and to sustain improvement. The study also identified certain strategies
for improvement that schools found to be successful in securing improved performance. The article
argues that more highly differentiated improvement approaches to school improvement are needed
for schools in such circumstances. It concludes by suggesting that while schools in challenging
contexts can raise attainment and performance through their own efforts, the external environment
remains an important influence upon a school’s ability to improve.
Introduction
The educational reform agenda in many countries reflects a renewed interest in
improving schools in the most difficult or disadvantaged circumstances. The issue of
‘‘underachievement’’ has a high political profile and considerable attention plus
resources have been directed towards addressing the problem (West & Pennell,
2003). However it remains the case that certain groups of pupils consistently fail to
reach their potential while other groups of pupils consistently succeed. Research has
shown that children from low-income families do not on average overcome the hurdle
of lower initial attainment (Piontek, Dwyer, Seager, & Orsburn, 1998). It also
highlights that class differences affect children long before they start school and have a
growing influence as they get older. The odds, it would seem, are ‘‘still stacked
against schools in poorer areas’’ and the social class differential remains a powerful
indicator of subsequent educational achievement (Gray, 2001, p. 23).
*Corresponding author. Institute of Education, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Email: Alma.Harris@warwick.ac.uk
ISSN 0924-3453 (print)/ISSN 1744-5124 (online)/06/040409–16
Ó 2006 Taylor & Francis
DOI: 10.1080/09243450600743483
410 A. Harris et al.
Part of the reason for this persistently stubborn social class barrier resides in the
market-orientated reforms that have created a greater divergence between schools in
their socioeconomic mix of pupils (Bradley, Crouchely, Millington, & Taylor, 2000).
The net result of these reforms has been to exacerbate problems of selection and to
radically alter pupil composition to the detriment of schools in the most
disadvantaged areas (West & Ingram, 2001). In addition, schools in disadvantaged
areas face a myriad of problems in simply getting to the starting line for improvement
(e.g., Harris & Chapman, 2002; Stoll & Myers, 1998). High staff turnover, poor
facilities, lack of resources, falling pupil numbers, and a constant stream of supply
teachers are pressures that schools in more prosperous areas simply do not face
(Reynolds, Harris, & Clarke, 2004). Research has also shown that factors such as
geographical isolation—particularly of rural schools, selective local educational
systems, weak support from some Local Education Authorities (LEAs), low levels
of formal qualifications in the local adult population, and poor employment
Downloaded By: [Universidad de Sevilla] At: 16:55 19 April 2010
opportunities—further compound the problem and make the extent of the educa-
tional challenge facing these schools significantly greater than schools in more
favourable settings (Reynolds, Hopkins, Potter, & Chapman, 2001).
The net result of this amalgam of social and economic problems means it is
inevitably more difficult to improve schools in challenging contexts because of the
complex set of variables affecting each one. Study after study has reinforced the fact
that social background factors (SES) explain more than half the variation in pupil
achievement (e.g., Rutter, Maughan, Mortimore, & Ouston, 1979) and illustrate how
SES is related to other important factors such as staying on rates, adult employment,
and crime. Yet improving schools and raising standards of achievement in
disadvantaged areas remains both an aspiration and expectation. It is clear that
‘‘improving against the odds is now the name of the game’’ irrespective of
socioeconomic context or degrees of disadvantage (Gray, 2001, p. 24).
Although there are some studies of improving schools in disadvantaged areas (e.g.,
Louis & Miles, 1990; Mortimore et al., 2000; Rosenholtz, 1991; Teddlie &
Stringfield, 1993), the contemporary empirical base is limited. Gray (2001, p. 33)
argues:
We don’t really know how much more difficult it is for schools serving disadvantaged
communities to improve because much of the improvement research has ignored this
dimension—that it is more difficult, however, seems unquestionable.
The reason for this lack of attention, it is suggested, resides predominantly in the
inherent complexity and volatility of the terrain along with the difficulty of dis-
aggregating the causal effects upon school performance and improvement.
This article draws upon the broad theoretical tradition of school improvement to
explore the processes and practices by which schools in the most difficult contexts
improve performance (Hopkins, 2001; Reynolds et al., 2001). It outlines the findings
from a small-scale study of improving schools in challenging contexts, that is, they
were schools in disadvantaged areas that had successively improved their academic
performance over a 5-year period. This research study, undertaken for the
Improving Schools in Challenging Contexts 411
Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (Harris, Muijs, Chapman, Stoll, &
Russ, 2003), focused upon a group of improving schools in the former coalfield areas
in England. All the schools, with the exception of one school in one academic year,
had improved their external examination at 16 (GCSE A – C) steadily over a
5-year period (see Appendix A). All had an ‘‘upward trajectory of improvement’’
and could be considered to be in ‘‘challenging contexts’’ because of the extent of
socio-economic problems they faced.
Before outlining the design and findings from the study, there are three important
points to make. Firstly, while schools in the former coalfield areas suffer a wide range
of socioeconomic problems and share many of the characteristics of schools in other
disadvantaged areas, they differ insofar as they are more likely to be located in isolated
semi-rural communities, rather than inner-city areas, and tend to have a
predominantly white population. Secondly, the findings point tentatively towards
the way in which certain factors were associated with raised attainment, a direct
Downloaded By: [Universidad de Sevilla] At: 16:55 19 April 2010
correlation is not being claimed. Whether and to what extent the factors identified by
the schools actually led to improved levels of attainment is beyond the scope of the
study. Thirdly, as a small-scale study, generalisability of findings is not claimed,
instead the study offers some insights into the strategies for raising attainment that
schools in challenging contexts are adopting and believe contribute to school
improvement.
The research study1 consisted of three phases. Phase one involved the literature
review and generation of research questions and propositions. Phase two involved the
data collection, within-case analysis, and initial reporting. Phase three incorporated
412 A. Harris et al.
secondary (high) schools and two primary (elementary) schools located in the former
coalfield areas.
A cross-case thematic analysis (Yin, 1993) of the qualitative data was undertaken.
An initial categorisation emerged that was tested and refined in the second-level
analysis. Common patterns across the data were found and these were further
interrogated and refined to provide the final thematic framework. A number of key
themes concerning school improvement and strategies for raising attainment emerged
across the eight case study schools.
With a small-scale study of six secondary and two primary schools, the possibilities
for generalisation are inevitably limited. However, the volume of data collected,
together with the perceptions of numerous stakeholders, that is headteachers,
members of the leadership teams, middle-level leaders, support staff, teachers, and
pupils at each of the eight schools, allows some insights into the internal strategies
schools were using to raise attainment. In all of the cases, the schools had employed
improvement strategies both deliberately and exclusively to raise pupil attainment.
The literature review highlighted that improving schools in challenging contexts is
often dependent on situational factors that can be both internal and external to the
organisation (Muijs et al., 2003). It revealed that these factors can be quite varied,
and can include: the complexity of the environment; the age of the organisation; and
external conditions (Creemers, Scheerens, & Reynolds, 2000). The review showed
that one of the factors that may be most crucial to a school’s ability to improve is
the socio-economic context or the interplay of external factors. Drawing upon
contingency theory, it is suggested that improving schools need to find a best fit
between their internal conditions and the external contingency factors they are
confronted with. This led us to hypothesise that improving schools in socio-
economically disadvantaged areas would be characterised by a particular configura-
tion of external and internal factors. The analysis of the data largely confirmed this
hypothesis by showing that there were a set of prevailing external conditions and a set
of internal conditions across all the schools that were associated with raising
attainment. First, we consider the external conditions associated with improvement
Improving Schools in Challenging Contexts 413
and then we look at the internal improvement strategies identified by the schools for
raising achievement.
You can’t get away from the fact that, generally speaking, with one or two exceptions,
schools that come out towards the bottom of the Government league tables are in relatively
disadvantaged areas and the ones that come out at the top often get a more middle-class
intake. (School C Deputy Head)
In schools like this aspirations can be low as there are several generations of families who
simply have not benefited from education and therefore do not see the point. (School B
Support Assistant)
Staff within each of the eight schools shared a view that the external environment of
the school was both instrumental and powerful in influencing their ability to improve or
raise attainment. In a number of cases, changes in employment opportunities or the
provision of better housing had literally changed the social mix of parents in the locality
of the school. In short, it had brought more middle-class parents into the locality and
had effectively altered the social composition of the catchment area. As a result of this
change, a new influx of pupils with higher expectations and aspirations to achieve
entered the school. Essentially where the student composition of the school had altered
to include more children from advantaged backgrounds this was felt to contribute
positively to the school’s potential to raise pupil performance and attainment:
There’s been a lot of private house building recently and it tends to provide for more
middle class type families. Consequently we’re getting an increasing number of those kind
of kids to school. So, as that happens, we have got, putting it bluntly, better material to
work with, therefore we should sustain better results. (School E Teacher)
The new science park has attracted more families into the area with good salaries and clear
expectations of schools. This shift has singularly changed the makeup of students and
414 A. Harris et al.
raised expectations of achievement. With a critical mass of students who want to achieve
we can do so much more. (School F Head)
The literature review highlighted the importance of pupil composition and its
relationship to improvement and achievement. This was clearly demonstrated in the
research study as there was evidence that the compositional mix of students had
changed for the better in the past 2 to 3 years in four out of the eight schools. In the
other two schools, such favourable changes had not taken place, yet they were
demonstrating equally high levels of improvement. This would suggest that changes
in composition are not the only factor that can influence improvement. Negative
shifts can occur through the selection or school admissions processes that allow
schools to ‘‘cream skim’’ in order to maximise their league table position (West &
Pennell, 2003, p. 129). In three or four of the schools in the study, such a selection
process had, at some time, negatively affected their student population. These
Downloaded By: [Universidad de Sevilla] At: 16:55 19 April 2010
schools had lost pupils to other schools considered to be ‘‘better’’ and this had
affected the schools’ compositional mix and had adversely impacted upon
subsequent performance levels. It was the case however that all schools in the
study were making every effort to regain their position and to retain pupils. As one
head put it:
We were losing 40% of our catchment to neighbouring schools because of the power of
parental choice and selection. Over the past few years we’ve not only been pulling some of
the pupils back but pulling pupils from neighbouring schools because the reputation is that
this is a school where people can learn. (School F Headteacher)
Schools felt that one way of redressing this trend and changing any negative
perceptions was to secure external endorsement or funding, for example gaining
specialist school status or becoming a faith school. This was viewed as being a very
positive way of re-establishing the school within the community and providing the
school with a new identity. Three schools in the study had achieved specialist status
and agreed that it provided a good platform for school improvement because of the
kudos and additional resource:
The fact we’re going to be teaching as a Sports College next year I think that will definitely
help. I mean I’ve heard that if we did become a Specialist School we might get a good
amount of money to be able to improve the structure of the school. So, I think there will be
money coming into the school next year and that’s exciting I’m looking forward to see how
we can use that funding to improve the school a bit more. (School D Teacher)
Four of the schools were in receipt of additional funding through the Educational
Action Zones (EAZs) and felt that the EAZ initiative had contributed positively in
their drive to raise attainment. While the additional resource was uniformly
welcomed, the provision of particular expertise and external support (joint meetings,
collaborative planning, etc.) was identified as being most helpful in their school
improvement work. All four schools agreed that the EAZ offered them a very
Improving Schools in Challenging Contexts 415
important source of assistance, very practical forms of help and support, as well as
important increases in resources:
The school was positive about EAZ because that was the mechanism which moved us from
a position of substantial under-resourcing to being adequately resourced. It also provided
the external expertise and support to help us move our improvement plans forward.
(School E Headteacher)
50% – 75% of the intake may be behind the chronological age (Harris et al., 2005).
Schools in the study revealed a similar pattern insofar that literacy levels were
persistently low. As a result, in both the primary and secondary schools a significant
amount of time was allocated to both literacy and numeracy development. In both the
primary and secondary schools, attention was given to raising levels of numeracy and
literacy through additional time and extra support, particularly from learning
mentors. Close links with the primary schools were viewed as instrumental in
assisting secondary schools to develop their literacy programmes, particularly in the
first 2 years of secondary schooling.
Teachers are keen to focus on raising attainment. They recognise the importance of
developing literacy and numeracy levels of their pupils, often from a very low level. Targets
are set and reviewed regularly in order to support and monitor the improvement process.
(Teacher School B)
Downloaded By: [Universidad de Sevilla] At: 16:55 19 April 2010
If pupils can’t read how do we expect them to access the curriculum? Literacy is key.
(School B Teacher)
There was general support among teachers at all schools for the emphasis on
literacy and numeracy. They felt it had contributed to improved attainment and
higher expectations among their pupils. It was also felt that closer links between the
primary and secondary schools had been secured by having a common focus for
development.
Focusing on teaching and learning. The literature review highlighted that improving
schools pay relentless attention to teaching and learning. A clear focus on teaching
has been identified as a key characteristic of effective and improving schools
(Hopkins, 2001; Reynolds et al., 2001), and an academic orientation has long been
identified as a vital component of effective schools. Across all the schools in the study,
there was consistent and relentless attention to improving the quality of teaching and
learning. This was identified as the singularly most important factor in raising
achievement. In all of the schools teachers felt that the focus or refocusing on teaching
and learning had been the turning point for the school as it provided the impetus for
classroom-related change and development:
I think the most important thing that the school has done has focused every, all the staff,
focused everybody on this issue of teaching and learning. (School C Teacher)
It seems an obvious thing to say focus on teaching but we simply didn’t pay enough
attention to teaching before. We were more concerned with behaviour. (School C
Learning mentor)
Training days had been used in two or three schools to explore different teaching
and learning issues and to engage teachers in dialogue about teaching. For example,
as a result of specific training events on accelerated learning, three of the schools had
incorporated associated learning strategies into their teaching. In these schools there
Improving Schools in Challenging Contexts 417
was general support for accelerated learning techniques as a lever for classroom-level
change and possible means to improve pupil learning outcomes:
I think the introduction of accelerated learning has significantly altered teaching practices.
I think that giving staff a structure to use in their classroom, and giving them time to think
about how that structure can be placed over your subject content has helped us to be able
to kind of give us that consistency. And I also think the lesson observation has enabled the
Heads of Departments to be able to see that within their own departments things are being
done consistently, and properly. (School B Teacher)
The data would suggest that accelerated learning influenced teaching practices in
several of the schools because it became the focus for departmental and whole-
school planning and generated new resources and ways of working within the
classroom.
Downloaded By: [Universidad de Sevilla] At: 16:55 19 April 2010
Using data, tracking, and target setting. The literature review showed that data richness
has long been an important component of effective and improving schools in studies
in the UK, the US, and Canada. Being data rich means that data can be turned into
information used as a basis for school and classroom decision-making (Henchey,
2001; Hopkins, 2001; Joyce, Calhoun, & Hopkins, 1999; Reynolds et al., 2001).
Data-rich schools collect and centralise a wide variety of data, including exam results,
standardised and teacher-made test results, questionnaires, and qualitative data. All
of the schools in the study were involved in comprehensive data collection and
analysis about pupil performance, progress and potential. Four of the schools used
the Advanced Level Information System (ALIS) and the Year 11 Information System
(YELIS) as the cornerstone of their data collection processes. The prime purpose of
this activity was to highlight potential and to diagnose pupil learning needs so that
specific and targeted help to individuals could be offered.
By using data in this way, schools suggested that they were able to identify potential
underachievement and to address issues of inadequate progression on an individual
pupil basis. This form of formative monitoring ensured that pupil learning was
continually scrutinised and that any problems could be addressed immediately. It was
advocated that this monitoring ensured pupils were assisted to meet their potential to
achieve.
In English we have these booklets which we fill in every term and you write down what
work you’ve done that term and which bits you enjoyed, which bits you didn’t, what you
think you’ve done well and then you say what targets you’ve got for the next term and
that’s helpful. Then you reflect back on it the term after and see if you’ve achieved your
target, which is very helpful because then you realise what you’re doing. (School E
Pupil)
different sets in every subject. The prime purpose of the express group was to
encourage pupils to work hard to achieve.
It’s not just the brightest in the year, it’s the hardest working so they have a choice to make.
(School E Head)
It’s now cool to be intelligent. Pupils want to get into express groups. (School E Teacher)
Professional development. An increasing body of research has pointed to the need for
schools to become learning communities, engaged in continuous improvement efforts
and enquiring into both within-school conditions and out-of-school developments,
rather than being merely reactive to inspection or government initiatives. Such schools
are open to change and experiment, and engaged in continuous improvement through
enquiry into existing practices and evidence-based adoption and adaption of
innovation (Joyce et al., 1999). The literature review highlighted that improving
schools are characterised by the presence of reflective dialogue, in which staff conduct
conversations about students and teaching and learning, identifying related issues and
problems (Louis & Kruse, 1995; Louis & Miles, 1990).
In all of the schools in the study, the absolute focus on teaching and learning
translated itself into ongoing review of teaching approaches and teachers’ classroom
practice. This review process was generally viewed to be a helpful tool in assisting
teachers to evaluate and to improve their own teaching performance. In addition,
professional development was considered to be a particularly influential lever in securing
change in classroom teaching. Schools in the study had moved away from traditional in-
service training (INSET) as the dominant form of professional development towards
alternative approaches to professional development such as mentoring, coaching, and
peer review. In over half of the schools, peer observation systems had been set up to
allow teachers to share good practice and to systematically reflect upon their teaching.
However, while there was no systematic evidence to confirm that this system had
improved teaching practices, it was viewed very positively by teachers:
We’ve introduced a fairly comprehensive system of senior staff observations of lessons and
self-evaluation for the school. We want to share good practice and move teaching forward.
I think the biggest thing we’ve done is to try and make sure staff are involved in improving
each others teaching. (School D Teacher)
Unilaterally, all the heads set high standards for teaching and teacher perform-
ance. Time was provided for teachers to meet and to observe each other teaching.
Improving Schools in Challenging Contexts 419
Teaching performance was monitored and individual assessments made through the
performance management system. Teachers were encouraged to see professional
development as an entitlement and a means of ensuring that their teaching was of the
highest quality. In summary, high-quality teaching was reported to be a consistent
focus and hallmark of each school.
Commentary
It remains the case that schools located in contexts of multiple disadvantage have
levels of performance that, in most cases, fall short of national averages. This not only
presents them with a range of practical difficulties, but asks a great deal of those
working within these schools to reverse this particular trend. While there are no
‘‘quick fixes’’ for improving schools facing challenging circumstances (Stoll & Myers,
1998), this study suggests that there are certain strategies that can contribute to
Downloaded By: [Universidad de Sevilla] At: 16:55 19 April 2010
et al., 2000; Whitty & Mortimore, 1997). Researchers in both the school effectiveness
and school improvement fields have argued that a highly effective school can reduce
the effects of disadvantage and can ‘‘jack up the performance of all pupils, irrespective
of social class’’ (Mortimore et al., 1988/1996, pp. 208 – 209). However the evidence
from this study and others shows that such schools have to exceed ‘‘normal’’ efforts to
secure this improvement. In short, they have to work much harder at maintaining and
sustaining performance levels than schools in more privileged areas and they have to
maintain that effort in order to sustain improvement, ‘‘as success can be short-lived
and fragile in difficult or challenging circumstances’’ (Whitty, 2001, p. 9).
As the long-term pattern of inequality looks set to remain, it is suggested that
reversing the long-established patterns of disadvantage will require policies to be
more ‘‘effectively targeted towards disadvantaged groups’’ and will necessitate
measures to ensure the ‘‘rate of improvement at the bottom is greater than the rate of
improvement at the top’’ (Whitty, 2002, p. 112). The powerful grip that the
Downloaded By: [Universidad de Sevilla] At: 16:55 19 April 2010
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the DfES for funding this project and for granting permission for
the work to be reproduced as an article. We would also like to extend our thanks to
the schools who participated in this project and to acknowledge all teachers who work
in schools in challenging circumstances.
Note
1. For a full account of the methodology see section 3 in Harris et al. (2003).
References
Bradley, S., Crouchely, R., Millington, J., & Taylor, J. (2000). Testing for quasi market forces in
secondary education. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 62(3), 357 – 390.
Improving Schools in Challenging Contexts 421
Creemers, B., Scheerens, J., & Reynolds, D. (2000). Theory development in school effectiveness
research. In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness
research (pp. 283 – 298). London: Falmer Press.
Gray, J. (2001). Building for improvement and sustaining change in schools serving disadvantaged
communities. In M. Maden (Ed.), Success against the odds—Five years on (pp. 23 – 37).
London/New York: Routledge Falmer.
Harris, A., & Chapman, C. (2002). Leadership in schools facing challenging circumstances. London:
National College for School Leadership.
Harris, A., & Chapman, C. (2005). Towards differentiated improvement for schools in challenging
circumstances. British Journal of Educational Studies, 52(4), 45 – 67.
Harris, A., Gunraj, J., Janes, S., Clarke, P., & Harris, B. (2005). Improving schools in exceptionally
challenging circumstances: Tales from the frontline. London: Continuum Press.
Harris, A. Muijs, D., Chapman, C., Stoll, L., & Russ, J. (2003). Raising attainment in the former
coalfield areas. Moorfoot, UK: Department for Education and Skills.
Henchey, N. (2001). Schools that make a difference: Final report. Twelve Canadian secondary schools in
low-income settings. Kelowna, BC, Canada: Society for the Advancement of Excellence in
Downloaded By: [Universidad de Sevilla] At: 16:55 19 April 2010
Education.
Hopkins, D. (2001). Meeting the challenge. An improvement guide for schools facing challenging
circumstances. London: Department for Education and Skills.
Joyce, B., Calhoun, E., & Hopkins, D. (1999). The new structure of school improvement. Ballmoor,
UK: Open University Press.
Louis, K. S., & Kruse, S. D. (1995). Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban
schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Louis, K. S., & Miles, M. B. (1990). Improving the urban high school: What works and why.
New York: Teachers College Press.
Mortimore, P., Gopinathan, S., Leo, E., Myers, K., Sharpe, L., Stoll, L., & Mortimore, J. (2000).
The culture of change: Case studies of improving schools in Singapore and London (Bedford Way
Papers). London: Institute of Education.
Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Lewis, D., & Ecob, R. (1996). School matters: The junior
years. London: Paul Chapman: London. (Original work published 1988 by Somerset, UK:
Open Books).
Muijs, D., Harris, A., Chapman, C., Stoll, L., & Russ, J. (2003). Improving schools in socio-
economically disadvantaged areas—A review of research evidence. In A. Harris, D. Muijs,
C. Chapman, L. Stoll, & J. Russ (Eds.), Raising attainment in the former coalfield areas:
A research report (2003). (pp. 149 – 175). Moorfoot, UK: Department for Education and
Skills.
Piontek, M. E., Dwyer, M. C., Seager, A., & Orsburn, C. (1998). Capacity for reform: Lessons from
high poverty urban elementary schools. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation.
Reynolds, D., Harris, A., & Clarke, P. (2004, April). Challenging the challenged improving schools in
extremely challenging circumstances. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American
Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
Reynolds, D., Hopkins, D., Potter, D., & Chapman, C. (2001). School improvement for schools facing
challenging circumstances: A review of research and practice. London: Department for Education
and Skills.
Rosenholtz, S. J. (1991). Teachers’ workplace: The social organisation of school. New York: Teachers
College Press.
Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., & Ouston, J. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours. London: Paul
Chapman.
Sammons, P. (1999). School effectiveness: Coming of age in the twenty first century. Lisse, The
Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Stoll, L., & Myers, K. (1998). No quick fixes. Perspectives on schools in difficulty. London: Falmer
Press.
422 A. Harris et al.
Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1993). School matters: Lessons learned from a 10-year study of school
effects. New York: Teachers College Press.
Thrupp, M. (1999). Schools making a difference: Let’s be realistic! School mix, school effectiveness and the
social limits of reform. Ballmoor, UK: Open University Press.
West, A., & Ingram, D. (2001). Making school admissions fairer? Quasi-regulation under New
Labour. Educational Management and Administration, 29(4), 459 – 473.
West, A., & Pennell, H. (2003). Underachievement in schools. London: Falmer.
Whitty, G. (2001). Education, social class and social exclusion. Education and Social Justice, 1(1),
2 – 8.
Whitty, G. (2002). School improvement and social inclusion: Limits and possibilities. In G. Whitty
(Ed.), Making sense of education policy (pp. 67 – 82). London: Sage.
Whitty, G., & Mortimore, P. (1997). Can school improvement overcome the effects of social
disadvantage. London: Institute of Education.
Yin, R. (1993). Case study research design and methods applied. Applied Social Research Methods Series
(Vol. 5). London: Sage.
Downloaded By: [Universidad de Sevilla] At: 16:55 19 April 2010
Downloaded By: [Universidad de Sevilla] At: 16:55 19 April 2010
Note: FSM was used as a proxy indicator for assessing levels of socioeconomic disadvantage. In the majority of cases the school figures are well above
the national average of 15%.
Improving Schools in Challenging Contexts
423
Downloaded By: [Universidad de Sevilla] At: 16:55 19 April 2010
424
A. Harris et al.
Change in
external factors In an Improving Focusing on Data Observation
resulting in changed Education literacy teaching Accelerated tracking—ALIS coaching Learning
School composition Action Zone and numeracy and learning learning and YELIS peer review mentors
A X X X X X X
B X X X X X X
C X X X X X X
D X X X X
E X X X X X
F X X X X X X