Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.2 V BiCMOS Sinh-Domain Filters
1.2 V BiCMOS Sinh-Domain Filters
DOI 10.1007/s00034-011-9379-5
Received: 9 August 2011 / Revised: 28 November 2011 / Published online: 21 December 2011
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011
1 Introduction
Companding systems are externally linear, internally nonlinear processors. They offer
the advantage of employing the large-signal I -V characteristics of bipolar or MOS
transistors for realizing the required transfer functions. As a result, more complicated
structures than those of conventional linear filters are required. This is the price paid
for the absence of any extra linearization technique for realizing the employed active
cells. The concept of companding signal processing has been successfully applied in
logarithmic-domain (log-domain) and hyperbolic sine-domain (sinh-domain) filters.
A positive nonlinear transconductor cell (denoted E+ cell) that has already been used
for realizing low-voltage log-domain filters is depicted in Fig. 1a [14, 15], while its
associated symbol is given in Fig. 1b. The expression of the output current is given
by (1) as
υ̂ IN1 −υ̂ IN2
iOUT = I0 · e VT , (1)
where I0 is a dc current, and VT is the well-known thermal voltage. Note that vari-
ables with a circumflex in (1) represent compressed voltages, and this notation will
also be followed in the next section. The corresponding negative nonlinear transcon-
ductor cell (E− cell) could be easily derived by adding a current mirror at the output
of the cell in Fig. 1a.
Combining these cells, as is shown in Fig. 2a, where both components i1 and i2
are given by (1), the following input–output relationship is realized:
υ̂ IN1 − υ̂ IN2
iOUT = 2I0 · sinh . (2)
VT
1260 Circuits Syst Signal Process (2012) 31:1257–1277
That is, according to (2) the realization of a nonlinear transconductor in the sinh
domain, which will be denoted in the next section as the S cell, is obtained. In a
similar way, the derivation of a cell which realizes the hyperbolic cosine expression
in (3)
υ̂ IN1 − υ̂ IN2
iOUT = 2I0 · cosh (3)
VT
is demonstrated in Fig. 2b, and this will be denoted as the C cell.
The transistor level realization of a sinh-domain nonlinear transconductor which
realizes a hyperbolic sine/cosine function is given in Fig. 3. The minimum power
Circuits Syst Signal Process (2012) 31:1257–1277 1261
Fig. 4 Realization of sinh-domain signal processing blocks. (a) Two-quadrant divider: FBD and as-
sociated symbol. (b) SINH−1 and SINH operators. (c) Sinh-domain two-input lossless integrator.
(d) Current-mode two-input lossless integrator. (e) Two-input lossy integrator. (f) Summation topology
supply voltage requirement is equal to |VTHP | + VCE,sat + VDS,sat , where VTHP is the
threshold voltage of a PMOS transistor, and VDS,sat and VCE,sat are the corresponding
saturation voltages of MOS and bipolar transistors.
Fig. 4 (Continued)
Circuits Syst Signal Process (2012) 31:1257–1277 1263
given in Fig. 4a, where the label 2Q depicts the two-quadrant operation capability of
the cell. This originates from the fact that both currents Ibias and i2 are dc bias currents
and, consequently, they must be strictly positive. In addition, due to the employment
of the proposed S cell, the benefit for low-voltage operation capability is preserved.
According to (2) and the fact that the cell S1 is biased at a current i2 , the interme-
diate voltage (υ̂) is given by (4) as
i1
υ̂ = VDC + VT · sinh−1 , (4)
2i2
where VDC is a dc voltage.
The configuration of the cell S2 establishes that its output current could be written,
using (2) and (4), as in (5),
i1
iOUT = Ibias · , (5)
i2
3 Sinh-Domain Integrators
According to conventional linear filter theory, one way to design high-order filters is
the operational emulation of the corresponding passive prototype filters. For this pur-
pose, the main building blocks are lossy and lossless integrators. In order to facilitate
the derivation of these blocks, a set of complementary operators, denoted as SINH−1
and SINH, is introduced at this point. Their definitions are slightly modified in com-
parison with those introduced in [7], and they are given by (6) and (7), respectively,
as
−1 −1 i
υ̂ = SINH (i) ≡ VDC + VT · sinh , (6)
2I0
υ̂ − VDC
i = SINH(υ̂) ≡ 2I0 · sinh . (7)
VT
This set of operators could be realized by appropriately configured S cells, as demon-
strated on the left and right sides of Fig. 4b, respectively.
A conventional current-mode two-input lossless integrator is described by the ex-
pression in (8),
d
τ · iout = iin1 − iin2 , (8)
dt
where τ is the integrator’s time constant. Using (7)–(8), the expression that corre-
sponds to an integrator realized by following the concept of sinh-domain filtering is
given by (9),
d
τ· SINH(υ̂OUT ) = SINH(υ̂IN1 ) − SINH(υ̂IN2 ). (9)
dt
Substituting (7) into (9) and considering that the time constant is given by the formula
τ = (ĈVT /2I0 ), it is obtained after some algebraic manipulation that the current that
flows through the integration capacitor Ĉ is expressed as
sinh( υ̂IN1V−V DC
) − sinh( υ̂IN2V−V DC
)
iC = 2I0 · T T
. (10)
cosh( υ̂OUTV−V
T
DC
)
1264 Circuits Syst Signal Process (2012) 31:1257–1277
mapped through a nonlinear function. In order to fulfill the aforementioned rules, the
operators in (6)–(7) must be slightly modified. Thus, a suitable set of complementary
operators is given in (14) and (15),
−1 −1 υ
υ̂ = SINH (υ) ≡ VDC + VT · sinh , (14)
VT
υ̂ − VDC
υ = SINH(υ̂) ≡ VT · sinh . (15)
VT
In the case of a grounded resistor the well-known current voltage relationship
i = υ/R is expressed, using (15), as
VT υ̂ − VDC
i= · sinh . (16)
R VT
According to (2) and (16) it is concluded that a grounded resistor with value R =
VT /2I0 can be realized by an appropriately configured S cell biased at current I0 =
VT /2R, and this is demonstrated in the first row of Table 1.
For a grounded inductor the current–voltage relationship in the linear domain is
given by
1
i = · υ · dt. (17)
L
Using (14) the expression in (17) is transposed into the sinh domain as
1
i= · SINH(υ̂) · dt, (18)
L
which can be realized by a topology that simultaneously offers integration and con-
version of the resulting intermediate compressed voltage into a linear current. These
operations can be performed by the topology given in the second row of Table 1.
The operation of integration is performed by the S2 and C cells, and the resulting
capacitor voltage is given by (19) as
d
τ· SINH(υ̂C ) = SINH(υ̂), (19)
dt
where τ = (ĈVT /2I0 ) is the integrator’s time constant. The S1 cell transforms this
compressed voltage into a linear current, in order to preserve the linearity of currents
between the linear domain and the sinh domain. Its output current can be written
using (15) and (19) as
4I 2
i= 0 · SINH(υ̂) · dt. (20)
ĈVT 2
Comparing (18) and (20), it is readily demonstrated that the topology emulates a
grounded inductor with a value given by the formula: L = ĈVT2 /4I02 . The sinh-
domain equivalent of a floating inductor is given in the third row of Table 1.
A grounded capacitor is described in the linear domain by the following expres-
sion:
dυ
i=C· . (21)
dt
1266 Circuits Syst Signal Process (2012) 31:1257–1277
Table 1 (Continued)
4 Grounded capacitor C = Ĉ
5 Floating capacitor C = Ĉ
into a current; the expression for that current derived after some algebraic manipula-
tion is
d
i = Ĉ · SINH(υ̂). (23)
dt
1268 Circuits Syst Signal Process (2012) 31:1257–1277
Comparing (21) and (23), it is derived that an emulation of a grounded capacitor with
a value C = Ĉ is performed. In a similar way, the sinh-domain equivalent of a floating
capacitor is given by the fifth row of Table 1.
Let us consider, for example, the third-order passive prototype given in Fig. 5, where
the circumflex in brackets will be used for the representation of the corresponding
nonlinear passive elements and voltages in the sinh-domain component substitution
method.
Following the systematic method introduced in log-domain filters [17], the result-
ing functional block diagram (FBD) in the sinh domain, assuming equal terminations,
is demonstrated in Fig. 6. The values of capacitors C1,eq and C2,eq could be calcu-
lated as C1,eq = C1 + C2 and C3,eq = C2 + C3 [17]. The realization of the FBD in
Fig. 6 will be achieved by employing lossless integration and weighted summation
blocks.
The equivalent of the passive filter in Fig. 5, derived according to the component sub-
stitution concept, is easily obtained by employing the sinh-domain equivalents given
in Table 1 for the passive elements denoted with a circumflex in Fig. 5. Inspecting
the topology in Fig. 5, it is easily concluded that the currents in both linear-domain
and sinh-domain filters are the same, while a one-to-one correspondence between the
linear and compressed voltages in Fig. 5 will be established. This mapping is per-
formed through the formula given by (14). In addition, the conversion of the input
current into a compressed voltage is achieved by a nonlinear resistor at the input of
the filter, while the inverse procedure is realized by a nonlinear resistor at the output
of the filter.
The validity of the proposed methods will be verified through simulation results. For
this purpose, MOS and bipolar transistor models provided by the AMS 0.35 µm S35
BiCMOS process will be employed in simulations. The sinh-domain filter topology
that emulates the operation of the prototype filter in Fig. 5 is demonstrated in Fig. 7.
The corresponding sinh-domain filter that emulates the topology of the filter in Fig. 5
could be easily constructed by employing the equivalents given in Table 1. It should
be mentioned at this point that both realizations have been performed by employing
only S and C cells and, consequently, they are attractive from the modularity point of
view.
In order to achieve a frequency response with 0.5 MHz cutoff frequency and
0.5 dB passband ripple, the values of passive elements of the prototype filter will be
R ≡ RS = RL = 5.136 k, C1 = C3 = 72.88 pF, C2 = 46.30 pF, and L2 = 267.4 µH.
Taking into account that the value of an emulated resistor is related with the bias cur-
rent according to the formula R = VT /2I0 , and considering that VT = 25.68 mV
at 27°C, the calculated value of the bias current of nonlinear transconductors is
I0 = 2.5 µA. The dc power supply voltage VDD and the reference voltage VDC have
been chosen as 1.2 V and 1 V, respectively. The dc power dissipation of the leapfrog
filter in Fig. 13 was 603 µW; for the filter obtained through the topological emulation
method it was 885 µW.
The aspect ratio of NMOS transistors used in the nonlinear transconductor cells
was 4.5 µm/1 µm, while for PMOS transistors it was 80 µm/1.3 µm. The bias
scheme was realized by employing NMOS and PMOS transistors with aspect ratio
1.3 µm/1 µm and 80 µm/1.3 µm, respectively.
The values of the capacitors of the filter in Fig. 4d have been calculated by equating
the expressions of the time constants of the integrators in Fig. 4c with the general ex-
pression of the time constant of an integrator in the sinh domain, i.e.: τ = (ĈVT /2I0 ).
Thus, the derived values were Ĉ1 = Ĉ3 = 119.18 pF, Ĉ2 = 40.55 pF, while the
weight factors K13 and K31 have a value of 0.388. The values of the capacitors of
1270 Circuits Syst Signal Process (2012) 31:1257–1277
Thus the total capacitor area was 278.9 pF for the leapfrog filter and 232.6 pF for the
component substitution filter.
Employing the Analog Design Environment of the Cadence software, the derived
frequency responses of the sinh-domain filters have been simultaneously depicted in
Fig. 8. The cutoff frequencies were 459 kHz for the leapfrog filter and about 458 kHz
for the component substitution filter. The observed deviations are mainly caused by
the transistors’ imperfections and could be compensated through an appropriate ad-
justment of the dc bias current I0 .
The capability for electronically tuning the cutoff frequency of both filters has
been verified by varying the dc current I0 within the range from 70 nA to 5 µA.
The corresponding plots are given in Fig. 9; the cutoff frequencies were 14.1 kHz
and 0.9 MHz for the leapfrog filter, 14.3 kHz and 0.88 MHz for the topologically
emulated filter.
The linear performance of both filters has been simulated by employing the well-
known Periodic State Space (PSS) analysis offered by the Cadence software. For
this purpose, a 1 kHz tone with variable amplitude has been applied at the inputs
1272 Circuits Syst Signal Process (2012) 31:1257–1277
of both filters. The simulated total harmonic distortion (THD) plots as a function
of the amplitude of the input signal are simultaneously given in Fig. 10. A THD
level 2% is observed for an input signal of 14.7 µA [i.e., modulation index (M.I.)
factor = iampl /I0 ∼= 5.9] in the filter in Fig. 7, while for the component substitution
filter the level was 8 µA (M.I. = 3.2). The noise was integrated over the passband
of the filter, and the simulated rms values of the input referred noise were 16.8 nA
and 18.6 nA, for the leapfrog and component substitution filters, respectively. Thus,
the predicted values of the dynamic range were 55.8 dB and 49.7 dB, respectively.
It should be mentioned at this point that the dynamic range could be maximized by
employing the concept introduced in [11].
The sensitivity behavior of the proposed filters has been evaluated through sta-
tistical analysis results by utilizing the well known Monte Carlo analysis, offered by
the Analog Design Environment. The derived values of standard deviation of the low-
frequency gain and cutoff frequency were 0.3% and 41 kHz for the leapfrog filter. The
corresponding values for the component substitution filter were 0.8% and 30 kHz.
From the results it is obvious that the sinh-domain leapfrog filter has superior
performance in terms of power dissipation, linearity, noise, and dynamic range, com-
pared with the component substitution filter. On the other hand, the component sub-
stitution filter offers reduced total capacitor area and the benefit of synthesizing any
sinh-domain filter of arbitrary type and order through a one-step procedure, due to
the availability of the substitution scheme given in Table 1.
An FBD of a class-AB log-domain filter is depicted in Fig. 11 [1, 14, 15]. The class-
AB operation is established by splitting the input current (iin ) into two strictly positive
components denoted as iIN1 and iIN2 , respectively, that feed the corresponding inputs
of the two class-A paths. A low-voltage current splitter is depicted in Fig. 12. The
translinear loop formed by transistors Q1 –Q4 establishes the relationship iIN1· iIN2 =
I02 ; also considering that iin = iIN1 − iIN2 , the derived expressions for iIN1 and iIN2
are given by (24) and (25), respectively, as
Circuits Syst Signal Process (2012) 31:1257–1277 1273
iin + 2 + 4I 2
iin 0
iIN1 = (24)
2
−iin + 2 + 4I 2
iin 0
iIN2 = . (25)
2
Each of these components will be converted into a compressed voltage by the corre-
sponding block that realizes the LOG operator defined by (26) as [18]
I0 + iIN(i)
υ IN(i) = LOG(iIN(i) ) = VDC + VT · ln , i = 1, 2. (26)
I0
The produced voltages will be processed by the corresponding class-A log-domain
core constructed from the cell in Fig. 1a and its inverting version. The resulting output
voltages υ OUT1 and υ OUT2 will be converted into linear currents according to the
EXP operator described by (27) as
υ̂OUT(i) −VDC
iOUT(i) = EXP( υ OUT(i) ) = I0 · e VT − I0 , i = 1, 2. (27)
1274 Circuits Syst Signal Process (2012) 31:1257–1277
The derivation of the corresponding lossless and lossy linear integrators could be
performed through (10) and (12) and the well-known approximations sinh(x) ∼ =x
and cosh(x) ∼= 1 for x → 0. The resulting topologies are given in Figs. 14a and 14b,
respectively. Upon inspection, one easily sees that they are the well-known linear
domain OTA-C lossless and lossy integrators. In addition, the achieved simplification
is obvious, in comparison with Figs. 4c and 4e, where companding signal processing
has been employed. The required summation for realizing the transmission zeros in
the linear domain is also performed by the topology in Fig. 4f, which acts a summer
in both large- and small-signal operations.
Table 2 Performance results for class-AB sinh-domain, log-domain, and OTA-C filters
The calculated values for leapfrog sinh-domain, log-domain, and OTA-C filters
were 0.65 pJ, 0.98 pJ, and 0.81 pJ, respectively. Thus, it is easily concluded that
the sinh-domain leapfrog filter offers more power-efficient realization than the corre-
sponding log-domain and OTA-C filters.
7 Conclusion
Two systematic ways of designing sinh-domain filters have been introduced in this
paper. The derivation of the filter topologies is achieved by employing novel nonlinear
transconductors with capability for operation under a single 1.2 V dc power supply.
The derived comparison results show that the sinh-domain technique offers the most
power-efficient realization in comparison with log-domain and OTA-C filters. Thus,
the proposed blocks have potential for employment in modern high-performance,
low-voltage analog processing systems.
Acknowledgements This research has been co-financed by the European Union (European Social
Fund—ESF) and Greek national funds through the Operational Program “Education and Lifelong Learn-
ing” of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF)—Research Funding Program: Heracleitus II.
Investing in knowledge society through the European Social Fund.
References
6. E. Kardoulaki, K. Glaros, A. Katsiamis, An 8 Hz, 0.1 µW, 110+ dBs Sinh CMOS Bessel filter for ECG
signals, in Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Microelectronics (ICM) (2009), pp. 14–17
7. C. Kasimis, C. Psychalinos, Design of Sinh-domain filters using complementary operators. Int. J.
Circ. Theory Appl. doi:10.1002/cta.769
8. A. Katsiamis, K. Glaros, E. Drakakis, Insights and advances on the design of CMOS Sinh companding
filters. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I 55(9), 2539–2550 (2008)
9. A. Katsiamis, E. Drakakis, Sinh filters in weak inversion CMOS technology, in Proceedings of 48th
Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS) (2005), pp. 1637–1640
10. A. Katsiamis, H. Ip, E. Drakakis, A practical CMOS companding sinh lossy integrator, in Proceedings
IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) (2007), pp. 3303–3306
11. V. Kolios, C. Psychalinos, Design of low-voltage log-domain filters with maximized dynamic range,
in Proceedings of 17th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems (ICECS)
(2010), pp. 454–457
12. N. Kontogiannopoulos, C. Psychalinos, Log-domain filtering by simulating the topology of passive
prototypes. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I 52(10), 2043–2054 (2005)
13. A. Lopez-Martin, A. Carlosena, Systematic design of companding systems by component substitu-
tion. Analog Integr. Circuits Signal Process. 28(1), 91–106 (2001)
14. M. Punzenberger, C. Enz, A 1.2-V low-power BiCMOS class AB log-domain filter. IEEE J. Solid-
State Circuits 32(12), 1968–1978 (1997)
15. D. Python, C. Enz, A micropower class-AB CMOS log-domain filter for DECT applications. IEEE J.
Solid-State Circuits 36(7), 1067–1075 (1997)
16. P. Poort, W. Serdijn, J. Mulder, A.V.D. Woerd, A 1-V class AB translinear integrator for filter appli-
cations. Analog Integr. Circuits Signal Process. 21(1), 79–90 (1999)
17. C. Psychalinos, S. Vlassis, On the exact realization of log-domain elliptic filters using the signal flow
graph approach. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II 49(12), 770–774 (2002)
18. C. Psychalinos, Low-voltage complex log-domain filters. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I 55(11), 3404–
3412 (2008)
19. C. Sawigun, W. Serdijn, Ultra-low power, class-AB, CMOS four quadrant current multiplier. Electron.
Lett. 45(10), 483–484 (2009)
20. W. Serdijn, M. Kouwenhoven, J. Mulder, A.V. Roermund, Design of high dynamic range fully inte-
gratable translinear filters. Analog Integr. Circuits Signal Process. 19(3), 223–239 (1999)
21. Y. Tsividis, On linear integrators and differentiators using instantaneous companding. IEEE Trans.
Circuits Syst. II 42(8), 561–564 (1995)
22. Y. Tsividis, V. Gopinathan, L. Toth, Companding in signal processing. Electron. Lett. 26(17), 1331–
1332 (1996)