Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2016 HPAIR Deloitte Case Va
2016 HPAIR Deloitte Case Va
International Relations
Deloitte Case
Competition
This case and its solution guideline are intended to be used only as part of Deloitte’s National
Case Competition and should not be used for client and/or industry research. In some cases,
the information herein has been modified for the purposes of the competition.
This case is completely fictional, and the situation discussed is completely hypothetical
and meant for the educational purpose of the case competition only.
The names and logos of companies are trademarked by their respective legal entities, and
their use in this document does not imply any sponsorship herein.
Case Introduction
The Situation
Team,
I just had an interesting call with Vanessa Kirsch, Founder and CEO of New Profit Incorporated, a Boston-based nonprofit venture philanthropy
fund founded in 1998 with a mission to break down the barriers that stand between people and opportunity in America. Their original
“Innovation Fund” was launched to help “catalyze systemic change” in education, early childhood development, economic empowerment, and
public health. Entrepreneurial leaders and organizations in this fund receive $1M over four years in addition to strategic support.
In 2015, New Profit introduced an innovative approach to venture philanthropy with the launch of Focus Funds. Whereas the Innovation Fund
invests in individual organizations across a broad range of social issues, Focus Funds invest in organizations and a network of support around
a particular issue area (e.g., Early Childhood Learning). By bringing together social entrepreneurs, thought leaders, academics, and funders to
affect change on a specific issue, New Profit hopes to break through intractable challenges and develop significant breakthroughs for large-
scale, systemic social issues.
As New Profit looks to expand its footprint and maximize impact, Vanessa has asked Deloitte to help New Profit develop a growth strategy that
addresses the following questions:
• In its next phase of growth, how should New Profit allocate investments between Focus Funds and its Innovation Fund? What
is the optimal portfolio mix to maximize impact while balancing risk? Consider developing a framework to compare each type of
fund that incorporates market trends, investment considerations, and New Profit’s mission and capabilities.
• How should New Profit position each type of fund to attract new investment and align with New Profit’s mission? Consider
developing a brand positioning for each type of fund that highlights the advantages and unique characteristics of New Profit’s investment
model and the proposed investment strategy.
I would like your team to develop a discussion document to answer Vanessa’s questions. Attached is a data pack to support your research
efforts. As always, please specify any assumptions you make in your analysis. Thanks for your help.
Kim
5 National Case Competition Copyright © 2015 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
Contents
Philanthropy Overview 7
Organization Background 13
6 National Case Competition Copyright © 2015 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
Philanthropy Overview
Philanthropy Overview
Philanthropy is typically characterized by donation of money or time to a cause, largely driven by the desire to
promote or support social good. It can be defined in many ways and there are multiple forms, including volunteering,
donating money to nonprofit organizations, grant making, and individual charitable donations
Corporations
Bequests 12%
5% 15%
• Year founded: 1936
8% 12% • Endowment: $12.3B (2015)
Found-
ations • Key Program Areas: Challenging
15% Religion Education Inequality
Human Services Gifts to Foundations
Health Public Society Benefit
Arts, Culture, and Humanities Internal Affairs
Environment/ Animals Individuals
72% • Year founded: 1953
• Although small in total, contributions to • Endowment: $11.1B (2015)
Individuals
arts, culture, and humanities grew the • Program Areas: Art Institution
fastest, with a 9.2% increase 2013- 2014
Source: 1 Giving USA 2015 Annual Report; 2 Foundation Center and Foundation Websites
8 National Case Competition Copyright
Copyright ©©2016
2015Deloitte
DeloitteDevelopment LLC.
Development All rights
LLC. reserved.
All rights reserved.
Innovation in Philanthropy
Philanthropic ambitions are growing, and organizations are exploring new ways of
achieving larger impacts
• In 2014, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation redefined • The Rockefeller Foundation drives program impact by
its work around the goal of improving health by improving creating networks that allow members to work together and
healthcare and building a “Culture of Health” learn from each other. The Foundation’s networks include:
− 100 Resilient Cities
• Major philanthropists (e.g., Warren Buffet, Mark
Zuckerberg) have pledged to give most of their fortunes to − Global Resilience Partnership
philanthropic causes, with many adopting a “spend it now”
− Asian Climate Change Resilience Network
mentality to disburse significant investments during
their lifetimes
• Good Ventures, which disbursed $45M in its first three • Funders are expanding their use of debt financing, equity
years, publishes a database of all its grants investments, and nonfinancial support to drive impact
• Goldman Sachs and Bloomberg Philanthropies backed
• Good Ventures collaborates with GiveWell – a nonprofit that
the first social impact bond (SIB) in the US; it was canceled in
evaluates nonprofits – to create the Open Philanthropy
2015 for failing to meet goals. A bond backed by Goldman
Project, which identifies the best ways to improve the world
and the J.B. and M.K. Pritzker Family Foundation was the
through philanthropy with transparency and analysis
first US SIB to pay out
Sources: “100 Resilient Cities”, The Rockefeller Foundation. “Asian Cities Climate Change Resilience Network”, The Rockefeller Foundation. “Cari Tuna and Dustin Moskovitz: Young Silicon Valley Billionaires
Pioneer New Approach to Philanthropy”, The New York Times. “Criteria and Summary of Process”, GiveWell. ”Global Resilience Partnership”, The Rockefeller Foundation. “New Money, Big Bets: Three Takeaways
from a Massive Tech Grant to Fight Global Poverty”, Inside Philanthropy. “No Success Like Failure: N.Y. Sees Social Impact Bond Pluses”, The Bond Buyer. “Sean Parker: Philanthropy for Hackers”, The Wall
Street Journal. “Success Metrics Questions in School Program Funded by Goldman”, The New York Times. “The World’s 10 Most Innovative Companies of 2015 in Not-for-Profit”, Fast Company.
9 National Case Competition Copyright © 2015 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
The Landscape of Philanthropy
Primary Goal: Primary Goal:
Create Societal Value Create Financial Value
Socially
Revenue Generating
Charities Driven Traditional Business
Social Enterprises
Business
Profit CSR or
Trading Breakeven; Profitable
Grants only, Potentially distributing, company Traditional
revenues & All income surplus
no trading Sustainable socially allocating % Company
grants from trading reinvested
driven to charity
Venture Philanthropy
(e.g., New Profit)
Venture philanthropy creates social value through a combination of grant making and
social investment (financial and strategic support). In general, this model is best suited to
help impact-based organizations achieve a “step-change” in their operations.
Source: “A guide to venture philanthropy for venture capital and private equity investors,” EVPA.
10 National Case Competition Copyright
Copyright ©©2016
2015Deloitte
DeloitteDevelopment LLC.
Development All rights
LLC. reserved.
All rights reserved.
Venture Philanthropy Overview
“Venture philanthropy” was coined by John D. Rockefeller in 1969 but began
gaining widespread traction after a Harvard Business Review article in 1997
Defining Characteristics
“Venture philanthropy” can describe a wide variety of funder organization types, goals, and investment approaches, but is generally
characterized by the following traits:
Current Trends
Sources: “European Venture Philanthropy and Social Investment 2013/2014: The EVPA Survey”, European Venture Philanthropy Association. “Virtuous Capital: What
Foundations Can Learn from Venture Capitalists”, Harvard Business Review.
11 National Case Competition Copyright
Copyright ©©2016
2015Deloitte
DeloitteDevelopment LLC.
Development All rights
LLC. reserved.
All rights reserved.
Venture Philanthropy Examples
Beyond sharing some basic characteristics, venture philanthropy organizations can
employ varying approaches to fundraising, collaboration, and advocacy
Sources: New Profit; organization websites. “EBay Founder's Philanthropic Firm to Donate More”, The Wall Street Journal. “The Robin Hood Foundation Appoints
Reynold Levy As Its President”, PR Newswire.
12 National Case Competition Copyright
Copyright ©©2016
2015Deloitte
DeloitteDevelopment LLC.
Development All rights
LLC. reserved.
All rights reserved.
Organization Background
New Profit Inc. Overview
New Profit is a national nonprofit venture philanthropy fund with the mission to break down the barriers
that stand between people and opportunity in America. It works with entrepreneurs, philanthropists,
and other partners to upend the status quo and transform the way America educates its children,
propels people towards social and financial stability, and creates healthy communities.
Founded in 1998 by CEO Vanessa Kirsch • New Profit believes that entrenched systems in United States limit
opportunities for low-income individuals; the opportunity gap can
• Headquartered in Boston, MA with 50+ employees
be closed by social entrepreneurs and their innovative solutions
• ~$150M given to organizations and 10M+ lives impacted
since 2007 • Organizational goals fall across three areas:
New Phase for New Profit Pathways Fund Reimagine Learning Fund
Founding Expands investment and adds new
New Profit’s Pathways Fund is New Profit’s Reimagine Learning
New Profit was co- tools to drive large-scale change,
chosen for the first cohort of grantees Fund is launched as the first in a
founded in early 1998 including policy advocacy
of new Social Innovation Fund new category of “Focus Funds”
1997 1998 1999 - 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Revenue Expenses
$ in millions $ in millions
Total Funding and Contributions Total Grants and Expenses
$50 $45.6 $50
$0.9
$2.7
$40 $4.6 $40
$5.0 $31.7
$30.5
$30 $26.5 $30 $1.8
$2.7 $2.4
$1.8 $0.4 $2.7 4.2
5.0 $4.6
$20 $20 $7.2
$4.6
$32.4 $8.1
$10 $10
$15.9 $16.1
$11.2
$0 $0
2013 2014 2013 2014
Other In-Kind Services Deloitte In-Kind Services
Deloitte In-Kind Services Field Leadership
Federal Government - Social Innovation Fund Administration, Communication, Fundraising
Corporations and Foundations Portfolio Management
Individuals and Family Foundations Grantmaking
+
Relationship History
Provide social entrepreneurs advice on a range of Allows Deloitte to develop new capabilities that can be
topics, from day-to-day operations to long-term strategy applied to for-profit clients
Receive pro bono consulting services from top-tier Gives consultants an opportunity to help innovative
experts to help social ventures grow social service organizations
Deliver greater social impact by combining skills of Exposes consultants to integration challenges faced
consultants with social entrepreneurs by general senior managers
Note: 1Unrestricted: Funds are free from any external restrictions and available for general use. 2Restricted: Funds are restricted by the donor for a designated
purpose or have set conditions applied.
Source: New Profit
Funding
Organizations Organizations Due Diligence
Applications
Contacted Screened Conducted
Received
• New Profit connects with • Letter of Inquiry (LOI) • ~15 candidates selected • New Profit conducts a
~250 organizations every process is opened and using a defined deep analysis of an
year, through its Investment organizations provide measurement criteria organization’s program
Referral Network requested information and economic model,
• An analysis is conducted on
strategy, leadership and
• Discovery conversations • LOIs are scored across each to assess strengths,
overall fit with New Profit
conducted with high more than 10 dimensions risks, and fit within the within
potential social of New Profit’s Investment the ecosystem
entrepreneurs Selection Criteria
• Focus Funds Only: Organizations must align with fund
mission and core principals (see ‘Focus Fund
Selection Criteria’)
Source: New Profit
20 National Case Competition Copyright © 2015 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
Types of Fund Investments
New Profit uses two types of investments to help organizations scale their business
and impact
Innovation Fund
Scope
Focus Funds
Early
Seek a world where all children have a start in their earliest years of life that
Learning 2 • 5 Foundations
sets them on a course to fulfill their potential
Fund
Reimagine Transform the way learning happens in America so all students, including
Learning those who may be marginalized or disengaged because of learning and 6 • 3 Foundations
Fund attention or social emotional issues, can achieve academic and life success
Focus Funds
Reimagine
Significantly and rapidly increase the number of high performing schools
School
serving low income students by changing conditions in school districts and 2 • 5 HNWI
Systems their relationships with nonprofit school operators
Fund
• 8 Foundations
Strengthen the bridge between education and workforce development, so
Pathways • 1 Government
that more low-income youth have opportunities to build sustainable 6
Fund Organization
livelihoods
• 1 Merchant Bank
2 • Organization addresses an urgent problem of significant scale and breadth with a focus on
improving social mobility in the United States
Direct • Organization has a program model that can be scaled to serve significantly more direct
Impact beneficiaries in a cost-effective way
• Organization shows promising outputs and outcomes and is committed to collecting data that
drives program improvement
3 Systemic • Organization has a compelling and plausible strategy that leverages the direct program model
Impact to change the system driving the core problem
4 Organization • Leadership team, staff, and board of directors are aligned around organization’s mission,
Capacity for strategy, desire for national scale, and need for long-term sustainability
Growth • Organization has a track record of growth and healthy financial management
5 • New Profit’s strategic support capabilities and partnership have the potential to accelerate
New Profit Fit impact and sustainability of the organization
& Value Add • Social Entrepreneur desires a candid, collaborative relationship based on a rigorous exchange
of ideas
Source: New Profit
24 National Case Competition Copyright © 2015 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
Innovation Fund Metrics
Each investee’s performance is monitored using 12 metrics in 4 categories
and evaluated against New Profit’s investment hypothesis
Metrics Description
Financial Support Cumulative financial investment
Investment
Technical / Management Support Average level of nonfinancial support over last 4 months
Leadership
Sustainability
Impact Model
Maturity of organizational capabilities
Economic Model
Organization
Financial Health Strength and stability of financial position
Financial Scalability Degree of demonstrated consistent scalability
Direct Direct impact relative to investee goals
Impact
Systemic Degree of brand recognition or external adoption
Expenses
Growth Run rate and 3-year CAGR
Lives Touched
Heavy: 12+ hrs 1 – Absent / Nascent Stable/strong financial 1 - Initial 0 – No brand recognition 1,000 – 9,999
position
Health
or external momentum
Moderate: 5-12 hrs 2 – Moderately Developed Some challenges in 2 – Preliminary 10,000 – 24,999
financial position 1 – Brand recognition or
Light: < 4hrs 3 – Strongly Developed Weak/risky financial 3 – Moderate external momentum 25,000+
position
4 – Fully Developed 4 – Strong 2 – Brand recognition &
external momentum
Risk Indicator
* Risk may be due to challenge 3 – Modest adoption
or uncertainty due to transition
Source: New Profit (as of within a capability area 4 – Widespread adoption
December 2015)
26 National Case Competition Copyright © 2015 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
Innovation Fund Grantee Profiles (Sample)
LIFT Health Leads
• Mission: Help families achieve economic stability and • Mission: Connect patients with needed resources,
lift them out of poverty for good beyond medications, to lead healthy lives
• Social Challenge: 50% of Americans will experience • Social Challenge: Low-income patients are often forced
poverty and 66% of Americans who climb out of to choose between paying medical care or paying for food
poverty will fall back within 5 years and rent
• Solution: Network of Members, Advocates, and • Solution: Health Leads connects these patients to
Advisors who work together to help people find jobs, a needed resources via their healthcare provider and Health
safe home, and a good education Lead Advocates
• New Profit Support: Unrestricted multi-year grant • New Profit Support: Unrestricted, multi-year grant
funding of $1.0M; Provided business model strategy funding of $3M+; Provided strategic and financial support
and design support to build compelling business case, leading to 13 of 20
Health Leads hospitals paying for services
Early
Seek a world where all children have a start in their earliest years of life that
Learning 2 • 5 Foundations
sets them on a course to fulfill their potential
Fund
Reimagine Transform the way learning happens in America so all students, including
Learning those who may be marginalized or disengaged because of learning and 6 • 3 Foundations
Fund attention or social emotional issues, can achieve academic and life success
Focus Funds
Reimagine
Significantly and rapidly increase the number of high performing schools
School
serving low income students by changing conditions in school districts and 2 • 5 HNWI
Systems their relationships with nonprofit school operators
Fund
• 8 Foundations
Strengthen the bridge between education and workforce development, so
Pathways • 1 Government
that more low-income youth have opportunities to build sustainable 6
Fund Organization
livelihoods
• 1 Merchant Bank
FUND B
Org 1 1.0 3 3 3 3 2 3 71.4 11% 6%
Org 2 1.0 2 2 1 2 2 1 4.8 -7% 4%
Heavy: 12+ hrs 1 – Absent / Nascent Stable/strong financial 1 - Initial 0 – No brand recognition 1,000 – 9,999
position
Health
or external momentum
Moderate: 5-12 hrs 2 – Moderately Developed Some challenges in 2 – Preliminary 10,000 – 24,999
financial position 1 – Brand recognition or
Light: < 4hrs 3 – Strongly Developed Weak/risky financial 3 – Moderate external momentum 25,000 – 99,999
position
4 – Fully Developed 4 – Strong 2 – Brand recognition & 100,000+
external momentum
Risk Indicator
* Risk may be due to challenge 3 – Modest adoption
or uncertainty due to transition
within a capability area 4 – Widespread adoption
New Profit