INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III, SPET I-IV, Special Science Teacher

I-II
Name of Employee: RAVEN C. CABARABAN Name of Rater: MARIA VENA N. NIERVO
Position: Teacher 1 Position: Head Teacher VI
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: GSAT Date of Review:
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge of Quality Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of No acceptable evidence
Education Knowledge content w/in & across content & its integration w/in content & its integration w/in content & its integration w/in content & its integration w/in was shown
Services and curriculum teaching areas & across subject areas as & across subject areas as & across subject areas as & across subject areas as
Pedagogy shown in the Main MOV w/ shown in the Main MOV w/ shown in the Main MOV w/ shown in the Main MOV w/
a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted 4 Main MOV, Submitted 3 Main MOV, Submitted 2 Main MOV, Submitted 1 Main MOV, No acceptable evidence
each with any 1 of the each with any 1 of the each with any 1 of the each with any 1 of the was shown
Supporting MOV Supporting MOV Supporting MOV Supporting MOV
Timeliness
2. Used a range of Quality Facilitated using different Facilitated using different Facilitated using different Facilitated using different No acceptable evidence
teaching strategies teaching strategies that teaching strategies that teaching strategies that teaching strategies that was shown
that enhance learner promote reading, writing promote reading, writing promote reading, writing promote reading, writing
achievement in literacy and/or numeracy skills as and/or numeracy skills as and/or numeracy skills as and/or numeracy skills as
and numberacy skills shown in the Main MOV w/ shown in the Main MOV w/ shown in the Main MOV w/ shown in the Main MOV w/
a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted 4 Main MOV, Submitted 3 Main MOV, Submitted 2 Main MOV, Submitted 1 Main MOV, No acceptable evidence
each with any 1 of the each with any 1 of the each with any 1 of the each with any 1 of the was shown
Supporting MOV Supporting MOV Supporting MOV Supporting MOV
Timeliness
3. Applied a range of Quality Used different learning Used different learning Used different learning Used different learning No acceptable evidence
teaching strategies to strategies that develop strategies that develop strategies that develop strategies that develop was shown
develop critical and critical and/or creative crotocal and/or creative crotocal and/or creative crotocal and/or creative
creative thinking, as well thinking, as well as other thinking, as well as other thinking, as well as other thinking, as well as other
as other higher-order HOTS as shown in the HOTS as shown in the HOTS as shown in the HOTS as shown in the
thinking skills. Main MOV with a rating of 7 Main MOV with a rating of 6 Main MOV with a rating of 5 Main MOV with a rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted 4 Main MOV, Submitted 3 Main MOV, Submitted 2 Main MOV, Submitted 1 Main MOV, No acceptable evidence
each with any 1 of the each with any 1 of the each with any 1 of the each with any 1 of the was shown
Supporting MOV Supporting MOV Supporting MOV Supporting MOV
Timeliness
 TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
2. Learning 4. Managed classroom Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable evidence
Environment structure to engage management strategies management strategies management strategies management strategies was shown
& Diversity learners. Individually that engage learners in that engage learners in that engage learners in that engage learners in
of Learners or in groups, in activitiess tasks as shown in activitiess tasks as shown in activitiess tasks as shown in activitiess tasks as shown in
meaningful exploration the Main MOV w/a rating of 7 the Main MOV w/a rating of 6 the Main MOV w/a rating of 5 the Main MOV w/a rating of 4
discovery & hands-on Efficiency Submitted 4 Main MOV, Submitted 3 Main MOV, Submitted 2 Main MOV, Submitted 1 Main MOV, No acceptable evidence
activities within a each with any 1 of the each with any 1 of the each with any 1 of the each with any 1 of the was shown
range of physical Supporting MOV Supporting MOV Supporting MOV Supporting MOV
learning environments Timeliness
5. Managed learner Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable evidence
behavior constructively management strategies of management strategies of management strategies of management strategies of was shown
by applying positive and learner behavior and learner behavior and learner behavior and learner behavior and
non-violent discipline to promote positive and non- promote positive and non- promote positive and non- promote positive and non-
ensure learning-focused violent discipline as shown violent discipline as shown violent discipline as shown violent discipline as shown
environments. in the MOV w/ a rating of 7 in the MOV w/ a rating of 6 in the MOV w/ a rating of 5 in the MOV w/ a rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted 4 COT rating Submitted 3 COT rating Submitted 2 COT rating Submitted 1 COT rating No acceptable evidence
sheets/rater-observer sheets/rater-observer sheets/rater-observer sheets/rater-observer was shown
agreement forms, each with agreement forms, each with agreement forms, each with agreement forms, each with
4 strategies as noted in the 4 strategies as noted in the 4 strategies as noted in the 4 strategies as noted in the
comment section comment section comment section comment section
Timeliness
6. Used differentiated, Quality Appled differentiated Appled differentiated Appled differentiated Appled differentiated No acceptable evidence
developmentally teaching strategies to teaching strategies to teaching strategies to teaching strategies to was shown
appropriate learning address learner diversity address learner diversity address learner diversity address learner diversity
experience to address as shown in the Main MOV as shown in the Main MOV as shown in the Main MOV as shown in the Main MOV
learners' gender, needs, with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
strengths, interests Efficiency Submitted 2 Main MOV with Submitted 2 Main MOV with Submitted 2 Main MOV with Submitted 2 Main MOV with No acceptable evidence
4 differentiated teaching 3 differentiated teaching 2 differentiated teaching 1 differentiated teaching was shown
strategies as observed in 2 strategies as observed in 2 strategies as observed in 2 strategies as observed in 2
lessons, each with any 1 of lessons, each with any 1 of lessons, each with any 1 of lessons, each with any 1 of
the Supporting MOV the Supporting MOV the Supporting MOV the Supporting MOV
Timeliness

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


MFOs KRAs Objectives
3. Curriculum 7. Planned., managed
and Planning and implemented
developmentally
sequenced teaching and
learning processes to
meet curriculum
requirements and varied
teaching contexts
8. Participated in collegial
discussions that use
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice.
9. Selected, developed,
organized and used
appropriarte teaching &
learning resources,
including ICT, to address
learning goals.
MFOs KRAs Objectives
Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Quality Planned and implemented Planned and implemented Planned and implemented Planned and implemented No acceptable evidence
developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced was shown
teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning
process as shown in the process as shown in the process as shown in the process as shown in the
Main MOV with a rating of 7 Main MOV with a rating of 6 Main MOV with a rating of 5 Main MOV with a rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted 4 Main MOV, Submitted 3 Main MOV, Submitted 2 Main MOV, Submitted 1 Main MOV, No acceptable evidence
each w/ any of the each w/ any of the each w/ any of the each w/ any of the was shown
Supporting MOV Supporting MOV Supporting MOV Supporting MOV
Timeliness
Quality Consistently participated in Frequently participated in Occasionally participated in Rarely participated in No acceptable evidence
LAC sessions/FGDs/ LAC sessions/FGDs/ LAC sessions/FGDs/ LAC sessions/FGDs/ was shown
meetings to discuss teacher/ meetings to discuss teacher/ meetings to discuss teacher/ meetings to discuss teacher/
learner feedback to enrich learner feedback to enrich learner feedback to enrich learner feedback to enrich
instruction as shown in the instruction as shown in the instruction as shown in the instruction as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Efficiency Participated in 4 LAC sessions Participated in 3 LAC sessions Participated in 2 LAC sessions Participated in 1 LAC sessions No acceptable evidence
FGDs/meetings on teacher/ FGDs/meetings on teacher/ FGDs/meetings on teacher/ FGDs/meetings on teacher/ was shown
learner feedback as evidently learner feedback as evidently learner feedback as evidently learner feedback as evidently
shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted
Timeliness
Quality Developed and used varied Developed and used varied Developed and used varied Developed and used varied No acceptable evidence
teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning was shown
resources, including ICT, to resources, including ICT, to resources, including ICT, to resources, including ICT, to
address learning goals as address learning goals as address learning goals as address learning goals as
shown in the Main MOV with shown in the Main MOV with shown in the Main MOV with shown in the Main MOV with
a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted 1 Main MOV with 4 Submitted 1 Main MOV with 3 Submitted 1 Main MOV with 2 Submitted 1 Main MOV with 1 No acceptable evidence
varied teaching and learning varied teaching and learning varied teaching and learning varied teaching and learning was shown
resources, including ICT, as resources, including ICT, as resources, including ICT, as resources, including ICT, as
shown in 1 Supporting MOV shown in 1 Supporting MOV shown in 1 Supporting MOV shown in 1 Supporting MOV
Timeliness
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET

MFOs KRAs Objectives
4. Assessment 10. Designed, selected,
and Reporting organized and used
diagnostic, formative and
summative assessment
strategies consistent with
curriculum requirements
11. Monitored and
evaluated learner progress
and achievement using
learner attainment data
Target for:
1. MPS
2. GPA
Weight
Timeline
per KRA QET
5 4
Quality Designed, selected,
organized and used
diagnostic, formative and
summative assessment as
strategies consistent with
curriculum requirements as
shown in the Main MOV with
a rating of 7
Efficiency Submitted 1 Main MOV with
4 varied assessment
strategies as shown in any
Supporting MOV
Timeliness
Quality Consistently monitored and
evaluated learner progress
and achievement using
learner attainment data as
shown in the Main MOV
submitted
Efficiency Submitted 4 different kinds
of acceptable MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV were
distributed across 4 quarters
Designed, selected,
organized and used
diagnostic, formative and
summative assessment as
strategies consistent with
curriculum requirements as
shown in the Main MOV with
a rating of 6
Submitted 1 Main MOV with
3 varied assessment
strategies as shown in any
Supporting MOV
Frequently monitored and
evaluated learner progress
and achievement using
learner attainment data as
shown in the Main MOV
submitted
Submitted 3 different kinds
of acceptable MOV
Submitted MOV were
distributed across 3 quarters
3 2
Designed, selected,
organized and used
diagnostic, formative and
summative assessment as
strategies consistent with
curriculum requirements as
shown in the Main MOV with
a rating of 5
Submitted 1 Main MOV with
2 varied assessment
strategies as shown in any
Supporting MOV
Occasionally monitored and
evaluated learner progress
and achievement using
learner attainment data as
shown in the Main MOV
submitted
Submitted 2 different kinds
of acceptable MOV
Submitted MOV were
distributed across 2 quarters
Actual Results Score
1 Q E T Ave
Designed, selected, No acceptable evidence
organized and used shown
diagnostic, formative and
summative assessment as
strategies consistent with
curriculum requirements as
shown in the Main MOV with
a rating of 4
Submitted 1 Main MOV with No acceptable evidence
1 varied assessment shown
strategies as shown in any
Supporting MOV
Rarely monitored and No acceptable evidence
evaluated learner progress shown
and achievement using
learner attainment data as
shown in the Main MOV
submitted
Submitted 1 different kinds No acceptable evidence
of acceptable MOV shown
Submitted MOV were No acceptable evidence
distributed across 1 quarter shown

12. Communicated Quality Consistently showed prompt
promptly and clearly the and clear communication of
learners' needs, progress the learners' needs progress
and achievement to key and achievement to key
stakeholders, including stakeholders including
parents/guardians parents/guardians as shown
in the MOV submitted
Efficiency Submitted 4 different kinds
of acceptable MOV
Frequently showed prompt
and clear communication of
the learners' needs progress
and achievement to key
stakeholders including
parents/guardians as shown
in the MOV submitted
Submitted 3 different kinds
of acceptable MOV
Occasionally showed prompt Rarely showed prompt No acceptable evidence
and clear communication of and clear communication of shown
the learners' needs progress the learners' needs progress
and achievement to key and achievement to key
stakeholders including stakeholders including
parents/guardians as shown parents/guardians as shown
in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted
Submitted 2 different kinds Submitted 1 different kinds No acceptable evidence
of acceptable MOV of acceptable MOV shown

Timeliness Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were No acceptable evidence
distributed across 4 quarters distributed across 3 quarters distributed across 2 quarters distributed across 1 quarter shown

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various Quality Consistently performed Frequently performed Occasionally performed Rarely performed No acceptable evidence
related works/activities that various related work/activities various related work/activities various related work/activities various related work/activities was shown
contribute to the teaching- that contribute to the teaching that contribute to the teaching that contribute to the teaching that contribute to the teaching
learning process. learning process as shown learning process as shown learning process as shown learning process as shown
in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted
Efficiency Submitted 4 different kinds Submitted 3 different kinds Submitted 2 different kinds Submitted 1 different kinds No acceptable evidence
of acceptable MOV of acceptable MOV of acceptable MOV of acceptable MOV shown

Timeliness

RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHEMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500 - 5.000 Outstanding Commitment Statement:
3.500 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory I hereby commit myself to attain the targets indicated in my IPCRF for School Year 2022-2023.
1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
below 1.499 Poor

RAVEN C. CABARABAN, T-I MARIA VENA N. NIERVO, HT-VI JOSIE TEOFILA N. QUIJANO, PhD
Ratee Rater Approving Authority