Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 10

Home Electrical Courses Download Library Sizing MEP Equipment Inspection Courses

An Endless Assortment on One Easy-


Site. Register for Free Shipping. Shop

How to Select the Best Earthing System

In Article " Types of Earthing System – Part One ", I listed the Different Types of Earthing Systems which can be divided according to the following
factors:

1. Function,
2. System size,
3. Neutral point connection to earth,
4. Neutral point connection to earth + the connection method of the electrical installations exposed conductive parts.

And I explained the first two categories in this Article, showing that the Types of Earthing Systems according to its Function can be divided to Six
types as follows:

1. Static grounding, 
2. Equipment grounding, 
3. System grounding, 
4. Lightning grounding, 
5. Electronic (including computer) grounding, 
6. Maintenance safety grounding. 

And the Types of Earthing Systems according To Its Size can be divided to Two types as follows:

1. simple,
2. complex. 

Also, In Article " Types of Earthing System – Part Two ", I explained the Types of Earthing Systems according To Neutral point connection to earth,
which were:

1. The solidly (or directly) earthed neutral,


2. The unearthed neutral, 
3. High impedance-earthed neutral,
4. Resistance earthing,
5. Reactance earthing,
6. Petersen coil earthing.

And the Types of Earthing Systems according To Neutral point connection to earth + the connection method of the electrical installations exposed
conductive parts, which were:

1. IT (Unearthed transformer neutral, earthed frame),


2. TT (Transformer neutral earthed, and frame earthed),
3. TNC (If the N and PE neutral conductors are one and the same (PEN))
4. TNS (If the N and PE neutral conductors are separate),
5. TNC-S (Use of a TN-S downstream from a TN-C (the opposite is forbidden).

Today I will explain How to select the best earthing system for a new construction from the above types as follows.
You can preview the following Articles for more info:

Ce i ed Organic at iHerb®
Sta Your Day with Bob's Red Mill Non-GMO Old
Fashioned Oats. Stay Healthy with iHerb

iHerb Shop Now

Introduction to Grounding System Design – Part One


Introduction to Grounding System Design – Part Two

How to select the best earthing system for a new construction

Who decide which Type of Earthing Systems to be used?

For any new construction, three parties share in the Choice of earthing system:

1. Electrical power users,


2. Network operators (electrical service),
3. Installation’s design engineering firms.

Experience shows however that the choice is mainly made by the engineering firms
designing the installation.

Criteria For Selection Of The Best Earthing System

the criteria used to make the best choice will be according to:

1. Country Regulations,
2. Country development,
3. Type of building,
4. Type of networks and building Loads,
5. Availability of Electrical Service,
6. Costs,
7. Complexity of design.

1- Country regulations

The regulations or standards applied in the country in some cases impose certain types
of earthing system arrangements (SEA).
The most common systems in most countries are TT and TN; a few countries, in
particular Norway, use the IT system.
The table in below figure#1 lists some examples for LV earting systems for public
distribution (LV consumers) for different countries. This table shows that Anglo-Saxon
countries mainly use the TN-C, whereas the TT is used in the rest of the world.

 Fig.1: examples for LV earting systems for public distribution (LV consumers) for
different countries

2- Country development

The degree of development of the country should also be taken into


consideration, as should be national practices, climate, etc.
If we plot an axis from North to South, as regards public distribution, we
find the IT earthing system in Norway, TN-C in Germany, TT in France and
in most African countries.
In temperate, industrial countries, all three earthing systems are used in
private installations.

3- Type of building

1- In a certain number of countries, for some buildings or parts of a building, the choice is laid
down by legislations or standards, e.g. for hospitals, schools, navy, worksites, mines, etc. In other
cases, certain earthing systems are strictly prohibited, for example the TN-C in premises with
explosion risks.

2- The required level of dependability should determine which earthing system is chosen for a
specific building type.
Dependability means that electrical power should thus always be available and be completely
risk-free, i.e. «out of sight, out of mind». The elements making up installation dependability:

Safety;
Availability;
Reliability;
Maintainability,
Proper operation of low current communicating systems

These elements must therefore be optimised. The table in below figure# 2 reviews the strong and
weak points in each earthing system:

Fig.2: Comparison of system earthing arrangements

Note:

In terms of the protection of persons, the three system earthing arrangements (SEA) are
equivalent if all installation and operating rules are correctly followed. Consequently, selection
does not depend on safety criteria.

4- Type of networks and building Loads

The particular characteristics of the network and the loads will affect the selection
of earthing system arrangements as in below table in figure#3.
Fig.3:  Influence of networks and loads on the selection of system
earthing arrangements

5- Availability of Electrical Service

The decision of the owner if supply is via a private MV/LV transformer


(MV subscription) or the owner has a private energy source (or a
separate-winding transformer).
If the owner effectively has a choice, the decision on the SEA is taken
following discussions with the network designer (design office,
contractor), The discussions must cover:

1.  First of all, the operating requirements (the required level of continuity of


service) and the operating conditions (maintenance ensured by electrical
personnel or not, inhouse personnel or outsourced, etc.)
2. Secondly, the particular characteristics of the network and the loads as in
fig.3.

6- Costs
The TN-S is the least costly to install, for example if the neutral is
neither protected nor switched. But be warned: the cost of curative
maintenance can be high.
The IT is slightly more costly to install (insulation monitoring and
insulation fault tracking devices). Search for maximum availability of
electrical power requires the presence of an electrical engineer, whose
action will minimize curative maintenance.
The TT, if enough discriminating RCDs are installed, is slightly more costly
to install than the IT, but fault tracking is simple and curative
maintenance less costly than in TN.

Note:

In terms of complete cost over 10 to 20 years, all three earthing systems are
equivalent.

7-Complexity Of Design

Designing is simpler in TT, the same for extensions (no calculations).


Designing complexity is equivalent in TN-S and IT.

Steps For Choosing The Best Earthing System

Step#1: Firstly do not forget that the three system earthings can all be included in the same
electrical installation: This guarantees the best possible answer to safety and availability needs
(see below figure#4).
Fig.4: several earthing system included in the same LV installation.

Step#2: check that the choice is not specified or stipulated by standards or legislation (decrees,
ministerial decisions)

Step#3: dialogue with the user to get to know his requirements and resources, and Generally (see
table in figure#5 ):

1- Need for continuity of service and Whether or not there is a maintenance service:

Continuity of service and maintenance service: the IT will be chosen.


Continuity of service and no maintenance service: No fully satisfactory solution: Prefer
the TT whose discrimination on tripping is easier to implement and which minimises
damage with respect to the TN. The installation of additionnal output is easily
achieved without the necessity of further calculations.
Continuity of service not essential and compent maintenance service: prefer the TN-S
(rapid repairs and extensions performed according to rules),
Continuity of service not essential and no maintenance service: Prefer the TT

2- Fire hazard
IT if maintenance service and use of 0.5 A RCD or TT.

3- Safety
The TT is the best.

4- Availability
The IT is the most suitable.

5- Maintenability
Fault tracking is fast in TN (thanks to the SCPD) but repair time is often long.
Conversely, in IT, tracking of the first fault may be more difficult, but repairs are
quicker and less costly.
The TT is a good compromise.
6- Reliability

The protection devices used are reliable, but reliability of the installation and loads may be
affected:

a- In TN-C by the fact that the PEN, not protected, may be damaged by harmonic currents;

b- In TN-C and TN-S:


By insufficient rigour for extensions,
By use of replacement sources with low short-circuit power,
By the effects of electrodynamic forces;

c- In IT, on a double fault, the risks inherent in TN described above also exist. However if tracking
and elimination of the 1st fault are rapid, installation reliability is excellent.

d- in TT, by disruptive breakdown by return of the loads due to a fault in the HV/LV transformers.
However the likelihood of this fault occurring is small and preventive solutions are available, e.g.
use of surge arresters between one of the live conductors and the load earth connection.

7- Disturbance
The TT is to be preferred to the TN-S whose high fault currents may be the source of
disturbance.

Fig.5: Comparison of system earthing arrangements according to its dependability

Step#4: Finally allow for the special features of network and loads as follows:

Very long network or, even more important, leakage current: Prefer the TN-S,
Use of replacement or standby power supplies: Prefer the TT,
Loads sensitive to high fault currents (motors): Prefer the TT or IT,
Loads with low natural insulation (furnaces) or with large HF filter (large computers):
Prefer the TN-S,
Supply of control and monitoring systems: Perfer the IT (continuity of service) or the
TT (enhanced equipotentiality of communicating devices).

In the next Article, I will explain the Construction and Components of Earthing Systems. Please, keep following.
Back To Course EE-5: Grounding System Design Calculations

2 comments:

Unknown September 24, 2013 at 8:21 PM


‫ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺣﺳن‬/ ‫ﺧﺿره اﻷخ اﻟﻌزﯾز ﻣﮭﻧدس‬
‫ﺟزاﻛم ﷲ ﺧﯾرا ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﺎﺗﻘدﻣﮫ ﻟﺻﺎﻟﺢ اﺑﻧﺎء وطﻧك ﻓﻲ ﺟﻣﯾﻊ اﻧﺣﺎء اﻷﻣﮫ اﻟﻌرﺑﯾﺔ‬
‫وﺑﺣﺛت ﻓﻲ اﻷﻛواد ﻟﺗوﺿﯾﺢ ھذه اﻟﻣﺳﺄﻟﺔ ووﺟدت ھذا اﻟﻛود‬، ‫ اﻋﻣل ﻓﻲ ﻣﺷروع واﻟﻣواﺻﻔﺎت ﺗﻧص ﻋﻠﻲ ﻋﻣل ﺷﺑﻛﮫ أرﺿﻲ ﻣﻧﻔﺻل ﻷﻧظﻣﺔ اﻟﺗﯾﺎر اﻟﺧﻔﯾف‬: ‫ وﻟدي ﺳؤال‬tia eia 607‫وﻟﻛن ﻟم اﺟد ﻧص ﺻرﯾﺢ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻋﻣل ارﺿﻲ‬
‫ ﻓﺑرﺟﺎء ﺗزوﯾدي ﺑﺎﻟﻛود اﻟﻣﻧﺎﺳب ﻟﮭذه اﻟﻣﺳﺄﻟﺔ ان أﻣﻛن‬، ‫ﻣﻧﻔﺻل ﻻﻧظﻣﮫ اﻷﺗﺻﺎﻻت او اﻟﺗﯾﺎر اﻟﺧﻔﯾف‬
Reply

Replies

Unknown September 24, 2013 at 8:22 PM


‫ اﻟﻛود ھو‬TIA EIA 607

Reply

Enter your comment...

Comment as: dedeerland.tat Sign out

Publish Preview Notify me

Leave a comment to help all for better understanding

<< Types of Electrical Conduits Home How To Verify Ground Connections and
Fence Ground Installation >>

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)


Pengikut (5430) Berikutnya
Electrical-Knowhow
Sukai Halaman 11 rb suka
Name

Ikuti 1 9 3 1 2 2 5 2 Email *

Message *

Send

CopyRight @ 2013 Electrical Knowhow - Privacy Policy

You might also like