Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bioethics Session 4 SAS
Bioethics Session 4 SAS
(Bioethics)
Lesson Title: Decision Making in Value Issues and Private Law Materials:
Learning Targets: Pen, paper, index card, book, and class List
At the end of the module, students will be able to:
1. List the theorist who are considered the fathers of
contemporary duty-oriented, consequence oriented, and References:
virtue ethics;
2. Outline the theoretical positions known as duty-oriented, Ethics of Health Care: A Guide for Clinical
consequence oriented, divine mandate and virtue ethics Practice Fourth Edition, Raymond S. Edge, J.
reasoning; Randall Groves
3. Differentiate between act and rule utilitarianism; and,
4. List the major criticisms of duty-oriented, consequence
oriented, divine mandate and virtue ethics systems.
A. LESSON PREVIEW/REVIEW
Brain Teaser: You will be asked by your instructor some questions about the previous
topic.
B. MAIN LESSON
Value Confrontation
Values
– Tell us what is right and wrong, good, and evil
– Imply a preference to correct human behavior
– Attempt to be constructive, not destructive, over issues involving personal values
As professionals, it is necessary, even in our opposition, to attempt to be constructive, not destructive, in the methods we
use when we come to disagreements over issues involving personal values. When trying to come to mutual
understanding regarding value disagreements it is wise to follow J.M Barrie’s admonition “Never ascribe to an opponent
motive meaner than your own.”
Utilitarianism
– Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806–1873) – Fathers of utilitarianism
– The good resides in promotion of happiness or greatest net increase of pleasure over pain
– Happiness as higher-order pleasures: intellectual, aesthetic, and social enjoyments as defined by Stuart Mill
There are criticisms that this kind of reasoning might lead to situations in which group derives pleasure from the pain of
others:
– To overcome this objective or this criticism some consequentialist have required the principles of equal
consideration of interest
– Utilitarian theory uses when they seek to divide scarce resources such as health care.
Act Utilitarianism
– Decision based on possible alternatives for action
– Weighing each to amount of pleasure or utility it provides
– Selecting course of action that maximizes pleasure
Consequence-Oriented Reasoning
Criticisms of Utilitarianism
– Calculation of all possible consequences of our actions, or inactions, appears impossible
– May be used to sanction unfairness and violation of rights
– Not sensitive to agent-relativity of duty
– Does not seem to give enough respect to persons
– Justifiable to prevent others from doing what we believe to be harmful acts to themselves
– Does not provide basis for our own moral attitudes and presuppositions
Rule Utilitarianism
– Action deemed to be right if it conforms to a rule validated by the principle of utility
– Principle of utility: rule brings about positive results when generalized to variety of situations
Duty-oriented Theories
– Basic rightness or wrongness of act depends on its intrinsic nature rather than on situation or consequences
– Act right or wrong; it could not be both
– Based his moral philosophy on the crucial fact that we are rational beings, and a central feature of this rationality
was that principles derived from reason are universal.
– Obligation grounded in pure reason
Imperative
– Command derived from a principle
– Maxim understood as universal law
3 elements
– Universal application (i.e., binding on every individual)
– Unconditionality
– Demanding an action
Categorical imperative - an action is known to be right when it was in accordance with rule that satisfied a principle.
Duty-Oriented Reasoning
Criticisms of Kant
– Too rigid for real life
– Morality cannot be derived from pure reason
– Disregard of consequences of our actions can lead to disastrous results
– Even though nonhuman animals feel pain and pleasure, they do not have independent moral standing since
they are not rational beings
– Possible to be faced with a conflict between two duties equally supported by an imperative
You will answer and rationalize this by yourself. This will be recorded as your quiz. One (1) point will be given to correct
answer and another one (1) point for the correct ratio. Superimpositions or erasures in you answer/ratio is not allowed.
2. Held that morality Is derived from rationality, not from experience, and obligation is grounded in pure reason.
A. Jeremy Bentham
B. Immanuel Kant
C. John Stuart Mill
D. Aristotle
Answer: B.
Rationale: It was Immanuel Kant who believes that morality is derived from rationality, not from experience, and obligation is
grounded in pure reason.
4. For the ethicist, the basic wrongness of an act depends on the intrinsic nature of the act itself?
A. Consequence-oriented
B. Duty oriented
C. Virtue ethics
D. Divine mandate
Answer: B.
Rationale: Duty oriented theory believed that the basic wrongness of an act depends on the intrinsic nature of the act itself.
5. Is a form of utilitarianism that holds that an action can be deemed to be right if it conforms to a rule that has been
validated by the principle of utility.
A. Act of utilitarianism
B. Rule of utilitarianism
C. Kantian ethics
D. Ethics of care
Answer: B.
Rationale: The rule of utilitarianism holds that an action can be deemed to be right if it conforms to a rule that has been validated by
the principle of utility.
8. In the principle of categorical imperative, the imperatives seem to have three elements, which of the following is NOT
part of the elements?
A. Demanding action
B. Unconditionality
C. Golden Rule
D. Universal application
Answer: C.
Rationale: In the principle of categorical imperative, the imperatives seem to have three elements that includes universal application,
unconditionally, and demanding an action.
9. A Scottish author that quoted “Never ascribe to an opponent motive meaner than your own.”
A. Immanuel Kant
B. J.M Barrie
C. John Rawls
D. Morris Massey
Answer: B.
Rationale: It was J.M Barrie, a Scottish author who quoted “Never ascribe to an opponent motive meaner than your own.”
Rationale: Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are considered the Fathers of Utilitarianism.
C. LESSON WRAP-UP
This strategy focuses on the assessment of your learnings after a lesson. You must answer the following questions, as
honest as possible, based on your own understanding.
1. What specific part of the Main Lesson for this session do you find the most confusing?
The topic that I found most confusing is about the difference between the act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism.
2. What makes your answer in #1 confusing? What is the question in your mind?
I find it a bit confusing since I cannot differentiate the difference between them. Also, I think I can understand the topic more if
there are examples related to act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism.
3. Since that is your most confusing lesson, what are the interventions that you must do to understand the topic?
Maybe I can use the internet to browse some examples or watch the related topic on YouTube.