Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ch.8 Membrane Separation Processes... DR - Farah Talib
ch.8 Membrane Separation Processes... DR - Farah Talib
Chapter Eight
Membrane Separation
- Sea water type membranes for 99.9% rejection of all salts even from 3 to 4%
salts with high osmotic pressures, and high separation of organics of low
molecular weight such as chlorobenzenes, etc., Brackish water type
membranes (low to moderate osmotic pressures, salt < 5000 ppm and high
separation of organics of low molecular weight); Ultra low pressure (Ozaki
and Li 2002) reverse osmosis (purification of water from low ppm to ppb
range).
……………………………..8.1
where J is the membrane flux*, expressed as volumetric rate per unit area, |ΔP| is the
pressure difference applied across the membrane, the transmembrane pressure, ΔΠ
is the difference in osmotic pressure across the membrane, Rm is the resistance of
the membrane, and Rc is the resistance of layers deposited on the membrane, the
Chapter Eight- Membrane Separation…………………………………………Dr.Farah Taliib Al-Sudani………3
filter cake and gel foulants. If the membrane is only exposed to pure solvent, say
water, then equation 8.1 reduces to
J =|ΔP|/R m µ……………………………8.2
For microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes where solvent flow is most often
essentially laminar through an arrangement of tortuous channels, this is analogous
to the Carman–Kozeny equation. Knowledge of such water fluxes is useful for
characterising new membranes and also for assessing the effectiveness of membrane
cleaning procedures. In the processing of solutes, equation 8.1 shows that the
transmembrane pressure must exceed the osmotic pressure for flow to occur. It is
generally assumed that the osmotic pressure of most retained solutes is likely to be
negligible in the cases of microfiltration. The resistance R c is due to the formation
of a filter cake, the formation of a gel when the concentration of macromolecules at
the membrane surface exceeds their solubility giving rise to a precipitation, or due
to materials in the process feed that adsorb on the membrane surface producing an
additional barrier to solvent flow. The separation of a solute by a membrane gives
rise to an increased concentration of that solute at the membrane surface, an effect
known as concentration polarisation. This may be described in terms of an increase
in ΔΠ.
8.4.Membrane Processes
Several processes have been developed for separation of liquids using both porous
and polymeric membranes. In dialysis, porous membranes are used and separation
generally depends on diffusivity difference between the solutes of different
molecular weights. In liquid-liquid extraction, which also employs porous
membranes, the raffinate and extract phases are separated by the membrane.
Differences in equilibrium solute distribution and diffusivity determine the extract
composition. In permeation of liquids, dense polymeric membranes are used for
separation of components of liquids.
8.4.1.1. Dialysis
In this case the small solutes in one liquid phase diffuse through a porous membrane
to the second liquid phase where the permeants are diluted by means of a so-called
sweeping solvent. The driving force is a concentration gradient so the flux rates are
low. If the boiling point of the permeants is much lower than that of the sweeping
Chapter Eight- Membrane Separation…………………………………………Dr.Farah Taliib Al-Sudani………4
liquid, the permeants can be separated by flashing from the sweeping liquid, the
dialysis process is called pertraction.
In practice dialysis is used to separate species that differ appreciably in size, which
have a large difference in diffusion rates.
Applications include recovery of sodium hydroxide in cellulose processing, recovery
of acids from metallurgical liquors, removal of products from a culture solution in
fermentation.
Pressure difference across the membrane being negligible, the flux of each
component is proportional to the concentration difference at the two ends of the
membrane, which acts as the driving force. Solutes of high molecular weight are
mostly retained by the feed solution because of their low diffusivities and the high
resistance encountered by them during diffusion through pores of almost their own
size. At equilibrium, the chemical potentials of the diffusing component on both
sides of the membrane are equal.
………….8.3
Chapter Eight- Membrane Separation…………………………………………Dr.Farah Taliib Al-Sudani………5
Figure1
The flux equations through each phase are all equal to each other at steady state:
……..8.4
……………………..8.5
…………8.6
where pM is the permeability in the solid in m/s, L is the thickness in m, and DAB
is the diffusivity of A in the solid in m2/s. Instead of determining DAB and K’ in two
separate experiments, it is more convenient to determine p M in one experiment.
The concentration differences can be obtained from Eq. (8.5):
………………8.6
Chapter Eight- Membrane Separation…………………………………………Dr.Farah Taliib Al-Sudani………6
By adding three equations, the internal concentrations drop out, the final equation
is
………8.7
The denominator can be considered as the inverse of overall mass transfer
coefficient. In some cases, the resistances in the two liquid films are quite small
compared to that of the membrane resistance, which controls the permeation rate.
2- Separation of Gases
Similar equations to dialysis can be written for gas permeation. The equilibrium
relation between the solid and gas phases is given by
……..8.8
Chapter Eight- Membrane Separation…………………………………………Dr.Farah Taliib Al-Sudani………7
…….8.9
…….……………8.10
…………8.11
If the gas film resistance at the gas-polymer interface is neglected, then the
partial pressures of the diffusing components at the gas-polymer interface are
same as those in the bulk gas.The flux for gas A is given by :-
………………………………………….…………………8.12
……………………….……………………………………………….8.13
(DA/HA) is the flux of component A per unit pressure gradient and is called
the permeability coefficient (qA). Since the actual membrane thickness is not
always known, it is customary to express flux per unit pressure difference,
which is called permeability (QA).
…………………8.14
…………………………………………….8.15
polymer. For most gases, permeability increases with temperature since the
increase in diffusivity caused by temperature rise, outweighs any decrease in
solubility. The change in permeability may be correlated by Eq. (15.10):
………………………………….8.16
3. Reverse Osmosis
In osmosis, miscible solutions of different compositions are separated by a
membrane, which allows the solvent but not the solutes to pass through its
pores. Thus, the spontaneous passage of a liquid from a dilute to a more
concentrated solution across an ideal semipermeable membrane takes place by
diffusion, where the activity of the solvent is relatively low. Osmotic transfer
of water occurs in many plants and animal cells. If an external force is executed
on the more concentrated solution, the equilibrium is disturbed and the activity
of the solvent at this end increases. As a result, the flow of solvent is reversed.
Thus, the process selectively restricts flow of solute while permitting flow of
solvent only.
The chemical potentials of the solvent on both sides of the membrane are
equal. The osmotic pressure depends on the property of the solution, but
not the membrane provided it is truly semipermeable. To reverse the
flow of water so that it flows from the salt solution to the fresh solvent,
the pressure is increased above the osmotic pressure on the solution side.
Chapter Eight- Membrane Separation…………………………………………Dr.Farah Taliib Al-
Sudani………10
…………………….8.17
where n is the number of kg mol of solute, V m the volume of pure solvent water in m3
associated with n kg mol of solute, R is the gas constant, and T is temperature in K. If a
solute exists as two or more ions in solution, n represents the total number of ions. For
more concentrated solutions, Eq. (1) is modified using an osmotic coefficient , which is
the ratio of the actual osmotic pressure to the ideal calculated from the equation.
the solute molecules small enough to pass through the pores are carried out by convection
with the solvent.
For diffusion-type membranes, the solvent and solute are given below: steady-state
equations governing the transport of
Chapter Eight- Membrane Separation…………………………………………Dr.Farah Taliib Al-
Sudani………12
The chemical potentials of the solvent on both sides of the membrane are
equal. The osmotic pressure depends on the property of the solution, but
not the membrane provided it is truly semipermeable. To reverse the
Chapter Eight- Membrane Separation…………………………………………Dr.Farah Taliib Al-
Sudani………13
flow of water so that it flows from the salt solution to the fresh solvent,
the pressure is increased above the osmotic pressure on the solution side
4. CROSS-FLOW MICROFILTRATION
flow liquid, then a description analogous to that of generalised cake filtration theory , the
The general membrane equation become :
where Rc now represents the resistance of the cake, which if all filtered particles remain
where r is the specific resistance of the deposit, V the total volume filtered, Vs the volume
of particles deposited, Cb the bulk concentration of particles in the feed (particle
volume/feed volume) and Am the membrane area. The specific resistance may theoretically
be related to the particle properties for spherical particles by the Carman relationship
where e is the void volume of the cake and ds the mean particle diameter. And combined
above equations:
5. ULTRAFILTRATION
Ultrafiltration is one of the most widely used of the pressure-driven membrane separation
processes. The solutes retained or rejected by ultrafiltration membranes are those with
molecular weights of 103 or greater, depending mostly on the MWCO of the membrane
chosen. The process liquid, dissolved salts and low molecular weight organic molecules
(500–1000 kg/kmol) generally pass through the membrane. The pressure difference
applied across the membrane is usually in the range 0.1–0.7 MN/m 2 and membrane
permeation rates are typically 0.01–0.2 m3/m2 h. In industry, ultrafiltration is always
operated in the cross-flow mode.The separation of process liquid and solute that takes place
at the membrane during ultrafiltration gives rise to an increase in solute concentration close
to the membrane surface, as shown in Figure below. This is termed concentration
polarization and takes place within the boundary film generated by the applied cross-flow.
With a greater concentration at the membrane, there will be a tendency for solute to diffuse
back into the bulk feed according to Fick’s Law,. At steady state, the rate of back-diffusion
will be equal to the rate of removal of solute at the membrane, minus the rate of solute
leakage through the membrane:
Chapter Eight- Membrane Separation…………………………………………Dr.Farah Taliib Al-
Sudani………17
Chapter Eight- Membrane Separation…………………………………………Dr.Farah Taliib Al-
Sudani………18