The document analyzes the appeals to logic, emotion, and ethics used in an assignment about recognizing soldiers who died for their country. It finds appeals to logic in avoiding repeating past mistakes, appeals to emotion in describing fallen soldiers as heroes who struggled and deserve recognition, and appeals to ethics in the fitting and proper nature of honoring what they did. These appeals likely affected the audience by making them reflect on whether further fighting was needed or if it was better to learn from the past and remember ancestors instead of repeating errors.
The document analyzes the appeals to logic, emotion, and ethics used in an assignment about recognizing soldiers who died for their country. It finds appeals to logic in avoiding repeating past mistakes, appeals to emotion in describing fallen soldiers as heroes who struggled and deserve recognition, and appeals to ethics in the fitting and proper nature of honoring what they did. These appeals likely affected the audience by making them reflect on whether further fighting was needed or if it was better to learn from the past and remember ancestors instead of repeating errors.
The document analyzes the appeals to logic, emotion, and ethics used in an assignment about recognizing soldiers who died for their country. It finds appeals to logic in avoiding repeating past mistakes, appeals to emotion in describing fallen soldiers as heroes who struggled and deserve recognition, and appeals to ethics in the fitting and proper nature of honoring what they did. These appeals likely affected the audience by making them reflect on whether further fighting was needed or if it was better to learn from the past and remember ancestors instead of repeating errors.
The document analyzes the appeals to logic, emotion, and ethics used in an assignment about recognizing soldiers who died for their country. It finds appeals to logic in avoiding repeating past mistakes, appeals to emotion in describing fallen soldiers as heroes who struggled and deserve recognition, and appeals to ethics in the fitting and proper nature of honoring what they did. These appeals likely affected the audience by making them reflect on whether further fighting was needed or if it was better to learn from the past and remember ancestors instead of repeating errors.
ASSIGNMENT: APPEALS TO EMOTIONS, LOGIC, AND ETHICS
1. What were the appeals to logic?
It makes an appeal to logic when it talks about the men that die for the country, he is trying to say that we don’t have to repeat that moments.
2. What were the appeals to emotion?
It makes an appeal to emotion when it talks about the men that die in the country deserve to be recognized as heroes, because they struggled there. Anh he also said ‘’The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here’’.
3. What were the appeals to ethics?
It makes an appeal to ethics when he say that is important that it is altogether fitting and proper that they should do that. Refering that ethically we need to do this things.
4. How do you believe these appeals affected the audience?
I think that these appeals affected the audience thinking if they really need to fight for territories or they need to look into the past, remember they ancestors, and don’t make the same mistakes.