This document discusses different theories of decision-making, including instrumental and rational views, behavioral theories, garbage can decision making, and the distinction between decision rationality and action rationality. It notes that behavioral theories, developed by scholars like Herbert Simon, study how decisions are actually made in practice rather than in theory. Garbage can decision making proposes a non-linear model where solutions may seek problems rather than problems preceding solutions. Theories also differentiate between following prescribed decision processes and accomplishing objectives.
This document discusses different theories of decision-making, including instrumental and rational views, behavioral theories, garbage can decision making, and the distinction between decision rationality and action rationality. It notes that behavioral theories, developed by scholars like Herbert Simon, study how decisions are actually made in practice rather than in theory. Garbage can decision making proposes a non-linear model where solutions may seek problems rather than problems preceding solutions. Theories also differentiate between following prescribed decision processes and accomplishing objectives.
This document discusses different theories of decision-making, including instrumental and rational views, behavioral theories, garbage can decision making, and the distinction between decision rationality and action rationality. It notes that behavioral theories, developed by scholars like Herbert Simon, study how decisions are actually made in practice rather than in theory. Garbage can decision making proposes a non-linear model where solutions may seek problems rather than problems preceding solutions. Theories also differentiate between following prescribed decision processes and accomplishing objectives.
1) Defining the problem 2) analyzing the problems 3) developing alternate solution 4) deciding upon the best solution 5) Converting the decision into effective action.’’ (Drucker, 1955:312). Decision-support systems, ‘’rational models’’ for decision making etc. Behavioral theories of decision Herbert Simon and the Carnegie-Mellon school of research. The ‘’cognitive revolution in psychology’’ in the 1940s and 1950a. Simon was awarded the Nobel Prize in economics in 1976. ‘’how decisions are made in practice rather than in theory?’’ the overarching research question. In a society based on reason, rationality, and a conception of intellectual human control over destiny, decision making is a sacred activity. The world is imagined to be produced by deliberate human action and responsive to human intention’’. (1994:216). ‘’ideas of willful, rational choice are the standard terms of discourse for answering the generic questions: why did it happen? Why did you do it?’’. (March, 1997:97). Garbage-can decision making
Decision are not always preceded by perceived problems but instead
solutions ‘’may look for problems’’; a non-linear model of decision-making. ‘’Tossed into a garbage can is a loosely coupled mix of 1) problems or issues looking for solutions 2) solutions looking for problems to resolve 3) participants with different amounts of time and energy 4) Choice situations waiting to be actualized. (Powell, 1985:96). ‘’Decision rationality’’ vs. ‘’Action rationality’’
Brunson (1982), follow prescribed decision making routines (decision
rationality) or a accomplish objectives (Action rationality). ‘’Much of the behavior in an organization is specified by standard operating procedures, professional standards, cultural norms and institutional structures. The terminology is one of duties and roles rather than anticipatory, consequential choice.’’ (March, 1991:105).