Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

S238 Proceedings of the 21st World Meeting on Sexual Medicine

Greece; 21st Department of Urology and Center for Sexual and University (Moscow, Russia); 3Central Military Clinical Hospital
Reproductive Health, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, (Moscow, Russia)
Thessaloniki, Greece Objective: Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) are the
Objective: There is lack of evidence-based protocol for Low- leading drugs for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED),
intensity Shockwave Therapy (LiST) for erectile dysfunction being recommended as a first line treatment by urological
(ED). Furthermore, safety and efficacy of repeating shockwave guidelines. However, some patients do not respond to drug
therapy has not been explored. This 2-phase study a) compares therapies. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been suggested to be
the efficacy and safety of 6 and 12 treatment sessions within a effective in the management of ED. The aim of this study was to
6-week treatment period and b) investigates the effect of re- assess the efficacy of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for
treatment after 6 months period. the treatment of ED.
Material and Methods: Patients with vasculogenic ED, Methods: 60 patients aged 43.7 (SD¼13.7) with ED (mean
responders to PDE5 inhibitors, were randomized into 2 groups: duration of ED was 7.7±1.7 months) were randomly sepa-
LiST sessions once (Group A) or twice (Group B) per week for rated into 2 groups. Group A received 4 ml activated PRP
6 consecutive weeks (Phase 1). Patients who completed 6-month (aPRP) intracavernosal injection weekly (totally 3 times),
follow-up were offered 6 additional sessions (Phase 2); Group A while Group B received PRP injections according to the same
received 2 sessions per week, and Group B received 1 session per schedule plus 5 mg of tadalafil daily during 28 days. The
week. Patients were then followed up for 6 months. IIEF-EF International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Erection
domain score, Minimally Clinical Important Differences Hardness Scale (EHS), EndoPAT, Penile duplex Doppler ul-
(MCID), Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) and triplex ultraso- trasound (PDDU), Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) and com-
nography parameters were assessed. plications (if any) were evaluated at 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months.
Results: In Phase 1, both groups improved in IIEF-EF, MCID, Data sets were statistically compared and p<0.05 was consid-
SEP3 and mean peak systolic velocity (PSV) compared to baseline. ered as significant.
MCID were achieved in 62% (Group A) and 71% (Group B), Results: At week 4 and at 3 months Group B shows significant
while SEP3 “Yes” response was 47% in Group A, and 65% in improvement in IIEF score compared to baseline (p¼0.001).
Group B (Group A vs Group B p-value ¼ 0.02). Mean PSV at There was no apparent difference in results between groups at 6
baseline and 3m-FU-1 were 29.5 and 33.4 cm/s for Group A and months. SEP score was similar in both groups during the study,
29.6 and 35.4 cm/s for Group B (p ¼ 0.06). In phase 2, Group A but EHS score was higher in group B at 3 months (p¼0.002).
experienced a greater increase in SEP3 %Yes responses (Group A ¼ EndoPAT - endothelial function was significantly improved in
+14.9; Group B ¼ +0.3). When the impact of the total number of both groups at 6 months compared to baseline (p¼0.018) as well
sessions received was examined, minimal clinically important dif- as resistive index (RI) in the cavernosal arteries (p¼0.001). The
ference (MCID) in IIEF-EF domain from baseline were achieved in treatment was well tolerated and none of the men experienced
62%, 74% and 83% of patients after 6, 12 and 18 sessions, treatment related discomfort or reported any adverse effects from
respectively. No treatment-related side-effects were reported. the treatment.
Conclusion: Total number of LiST sessions impacts the efficacy Conclusion: PRP seems to be able to improve vascular endo-
of ED treatment. Retreating patients after 6 months may further thelial function and erection hardness to treat erectile dysfunc-
improve erectile function, without side effects. 12 sessions may tion with less adverse effects and better safety. Longer followup is
be delivered within 6 weeks without a 3-week break period. needed to establish the place of PRP in restoring of erectile
Patients may benefit more in sexual performance from 12 ses- function.
sions, twice per week, compared to 6 sessions, once a week. It is Disclosure: Work supported by industry: no.
meaningful and safe to repeat shockwave therapy, up to a total of
18 sessions. 287
Disclosure: Work supported by industry: yes, by Dornier
INTRACAVERNOUS PROSTAGLANDIN
MedTech Systems, GmbH (Wessling, Germany) (industry
INJECTION MIGHT BE A GOOD METHOD
funding only - investigator initiated and executed study).
TO EVALUATE OBJECTIVELY THE
RESPONSE TO LISWT AND TO PREDICT
286 THE NUMBER OF LISWT SESSIONS
EFFICACY OF AUTOLOGOUS PLATELET- NEEDED IN ED PATIENTS
RICH PLASMA FOR THE TREATMENT OF Feghali, J.1
1
ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION KMC-AUB Hospital, Jounieh-Lebanon
Epifanova, M.V.1; Chaliy, M.E.2; Gvasalia, B.R.3; Repin, A.M.2; Objective: Since 2010 Low Intensity Shock Wave Therapy
Artemenko, S.A.2 (LISWT) is used for treating patients with Erectile Dysfunction.
1
Research Institute for Uronephrology and Reproductive Health, Till now there is no objective method to evaluate objectively the
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Moscow, Russia); response to LISWT and predict the number of LISWT sessions
2
Department of Urology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical needed in vasculogenic Erectile Dysfunction (ED) patients which

J Sex Med 2018;15:S123eS407

You might also like