Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Brief Guide To Research Proposal Preparation
A Brief Guide To Research Proposal Preparation
A BRIEF GUIDELINE
Dr. Ida Rosnita Ismail
UKM-Graduate School of Business
• Popular writing (e.g. article in magazine,
newspapers, social media, and book).
• What to include?
1. General introduction to the study problem – what it is?
2. Importance of the study problem – why it is important “now”?
3. Supporting facts, preferably some statistics published by authorities, about the study problem.
4. The “problem” about the study problem – creating the urgency with justifications (i.e., so what?).
5. An impactful conclusion – the “bam”!
• How to write?
• Use your creativity but it must follow the academic standard.
• Avoid starting with question, which is a popular writing approach.
• Length of the background is between 2 to 3 pages only.
• A research gap relates to the unfulfilled theoretical knowledge about the problem.
• A research problem answers the “so, what” question, whereas research gap answers the “what else”,
“why”, and “how” questions.
• A problem that is, has been, or can be solved using existing knowledge without having to undertake a
research effort does not qualify as a research problem.
1. Identify evidence from previous studies about how to address the POI.
2. Describe each option and its effects on the POI.
3. Choose an option and provide reason for its suitability.
4. State the purpose of the current study.
• Quantitative research questions start with “Do”, “Does”, “Is”, and “Are”, whereas qualitative research
questions start with “What”, “Why”, and “How”.
• Qualitative studies rely heavily on research questions, but quantitative studies have a few research
questions – usually one grand research question incorporating all study variables’ relationships is
sufficient for a quantitative study.
• Research objectives must be measureable, and usually follows the SMART principle.
• The choice of word is important in research objectives because the words will determine the required
data analysis technique of the study.
• Contribution is about how will your research contribute or add to the existing body of knowledge for
both scholars and practitioners? Additional knowledge.
• Significance is about why should the stakeholders be bothered by your research, and what difference
will your study bring to the existing theory and practice? Importance of study.
• Both contribution and significance must be discussed in terms of theory and practice – known as
theoretical contribution/significance and practical contribution/significance.
• Why it matters? A variable can be defined in many ways; thus, you define the variable according to the
need of your study objective.
• Conceptual definition refers to how you define a variable based on its concept.
• Corporate reputation is a collection of individuals’ attitudes about a company based on
subjective, emotional, and cognitive mindsets (Schwaiger, 2004).
• Operational definition refers to how you measure the variable based on the conceptual definition.
• Corporate reputation is the extent to which a client thinks that an organization is competent in
delivering its services and like about the organization.
• Avoid reporting, but focus on synthesizing – requires divergent search and convergent thinking.
• Use simple English and appropriate tenses . Avoid combining too many ideas in a sentence. Avoid
using jargons, proverbs, idioms, metaphors, and simile. Avoid using too many conjunctions.
Signposting is welcome.
• Include relevant and interesting or relevant but not interesting support only. Avoid including not
relevant but interesting or not relevant and not interesting support.
• General theory discusses the concept and may or may not discuss the relationship.
• Underpinning theory discusses the relationship between two variables – explain the arrow/relationship
in a conceptual framework.
• Underpinning theory can explain the whole model or a specific relationship – adopt or adapt.
• No specific way, but the common and easy way is to follow these steps:
1. State the relationship and relate to the underpinning theory, or vice versa.
2. Explain how variable X relates to variable Y according to the underpinning theory.
3. Provide theoretical justifications – insert your own voice, logical arguments, and provide specific
example.
4. Support with empirical findings – results from previous studies that show there is a relationship
between variable X and variable Y, either direct evidence or indirect evidence.
5. Develop the hypothesis based on the justified arguments you have presented above,
X Y X M Y
X1
Z
X2 Y
X Y
X3
Z
Z
X1
X Y M1 Y1
X2
M2 Y2
X3
X M Y
• Common designs – survey, in-depth interview, experiential sampling, case study, grounded theory,
ethnography, and experiment.
• Mixed-method design is chosen based on specific reason – research question must indicate the need to
employ this design, which, in turn, is based on the research gaps.
• Sample is drawn from the population – must be representative of the study population.
• Various sampling strategies – choose the most appropriate, not the most convenient.
• Expected sample size must be mentioned – various ways to calculate the size, but justifications must be
made based on the range established in previous studies.
• Survey questionnaire – highly recommended to adopt or adapt, but not self-developed, which requires
a researcher to establish reliability and validity.
• Run a pretest and a pilot test before collecting data for actual/full/complete study.
• Must describe how exactly data collection is to be carried out – including ethics approval if necessary.
• Differentiate between preliminary analysis (note: the data cleaning stage) and main analysis.
1. Missing values – including incomplete data
2. Outliers
3. Data distribution
4. Linearity
5. Multicollinearity
6. Nonresponse bias
• Report both descriptive analyses (usually background of the respondents) and inferential analysis for
the main analysis.