This rubric evaluates project-based learning presentations on four criteria: content, conventions, organization, and presentation. A level 4 score indicates well-thought-out content that supports the solution, no errors, clear organization, and effective multimedia use. A level 3 score has minor errors and good organization. A level 2 score has some errors but supports the solution with sources and organization that could be improved. A level 1 score has inconsistent content, poor structure, and errors.
This rubric evaluates project-based learning presentations on four criteria: content, conventions, organization, and presentation. A level 4 score indicates well-thought-out content that supports the solution, no errors, clear organization, and effective multimedia use. A level 3 score has minor errors and good organization. A level 2 score has some errors but supports the solution with sources and organization that could be improved. A level 1 score has inconsistent content, poor structure, and errors.
This rubric evaluates project-based learning presentations on four criteria: content, conventions, organization, and presentation. A level 4 score indicates well-thought-out content that supports the solution, no errors, clear organization, and effective multimedia use. A level 3 score has minor errors and good organization. A level 2 score has some errors but supports the solution with sources and organization that could be improved. A level 1 score has inconsistent content, poor structure, and errors.
This rubric evaluates project-based learning presentations on four criteria: content, conventions, organization, and presentation. A level 4 score indicates well-thought-out content that supports the solution, no errors, clear organization, and effective multimedia use. A level 3 score has minor errors and good organization. A level 2 score has some errors but supports the solution with sources and organization that could be improved. A level 1 score has inconsistent content, poor structure, and errors.
Is well thought out No spelling, Information is Multimedia is used
and supports the grammatical, or clearly focused in to clarify and solution to the punctuation errors an organized and illustrate the main challenge or thoughtful manner. points. High-level use of question vocabulary and Information is Format enhances Reflects application word choice constructed in a the content. 4 of critical thinking logical pattern to Presentation support the Has clear goal that captures audience solution. is related to the topic attention.
Is pulled from a Presentation is
variety of sources organized and well laid out. Is accurate
Is well thought out Few (1 to 3) Information Multimedia is used
and supports the spelling, supports the to illustrate the solution grammatical, or solution to the main points. punctuation errors challenge or Has application of Format is question. critical thinking that Good use of appropriate for the is apparent vocabulary and content. 3 word choice Has clear goal that Presentation is related to the topic captures audience attention. Is pulled from several sources Presentation is well organized. Is accurate
2 Supports the Minimal (3 to 5) Project has a focus Multimedia loosely
solution spelling, but might stray illustrates the main grammatical, or from it at times. points. Has application of punctuation errors critical thinking that Information Format does not is apparent Low-level use of appears to have a suit the content. vocabulary and pattern, but the Has no clear goal Presentation does word choice pattern is not not capture Is pulled from a limited number of consistently carried audience attention. sources out in the project. Presentation is Has some factual Information loosely loosely organized. errors or supports the inconsistencies solution.
Provides More than 5 Content is Presentation
inconsistent spelling, unfocused and appears sloppy information for grammatical, or haphazard. and/or unfinished. solution punctuation errors Information does Multimedia is Has no apparent Poor use of not support the overused or application of critical vocabulary and solution to the underused. thinking word choice challenge or Format does not 1 question. Has no clear goal enhance content. Information has no I pulled from few Presentation has apparent pattern. sources no clear organization. Has significant factual errors, misconceptions, or misinterpretations