Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jcem 2160
Jcem 2160
A d v a n c e s i n G e n e t i c s — E n d o c r i n e R e s e a r c h
Context: Two potassium (K) channel genes, Kcnk3 and Kcnk9, when deleted in mice, produced a
model of hyperaldosteronism and hypertension.
Objective: Our objective was to explore genetic variation [single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP)]
in KCNK3 and KCNK9 in relation to blood pressure (BP) and aldosterone production in humans.
Subjects and Study Design: Two groups of healthy European Americans (EA) and African Amer-
icans (AA) were studied: 1) a longitudinal study group (age ⬃14 yr when enrolled, 444 EA and 351
AA) and 2) an inpatient cross-sectional study group (age ⬃23 yr, 85 EA and 109 AA). Plasma renin
activity, plasma aldosterone concentration, and level of serum K were measured cross-sectionally;
BP was measured semiannually in the longitudinal study. SNP were selected to provide coverage
of the genes for both EA and AA (15 in KCNK3 and 74 in KCNK9).
Results: No associations with KCNK3 were observed. In the longitudinal study, multiple SNP in
KCNK9 associated with systolic BP in AA, whereas associations were primarily with aldosterone
production in EA. The direction of the changes was the same for aldosterone production and BP,
whereas serum K changed in the opposite direction. In the cross-sectional study, associations were
observed only in AA. Combining the two studies, one SNP in particular, rs888345, was strongly
associated with BP in AA and with indices of aldosterone production in AA and EA.
Conclusion: Results of an exploratory study suggest that BP and aldosterone production may be
affected by variations in KCNK9. The findings could have relevance to risk for hypertension. (J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 97: E2160 –E2167, 2012)
ldosterone stimulates reabsorption of sodium (Na) stasis, becoming instead pathogenic by participating in the
A and secretion of potassium (K) in the kidney’s distal
nephron (1). These separate although interrelated actions
development of hypertension. Indeed, approximately
10% of individuals with hypertension have primary aldo-
of aldosterone serve to, respectively, defend against vol- steronism, the consequence of either adrenal tumor devel-
ume depletion due to Na loss and prevent hyperkalemia. opment or adrenal hyperplasia (2), and 20% or more of
The regulation of aldosterone production likely evolved those with resistant hypertension [high blood pressure
during an early ancestral period when diets contained little (BP) refractory to multiple medications] have either pri-
Na and a surfeit of K. Today, aldosterone production may mary aldosteronism (3) or normal aldosterone levels but
exceed what is required for achieving Na and K homeo- respond to treatment with antagonists of aldosterone (4).
ISSN Print 0021-972X ISSN Online 1945-7197 Abbreviations: AA, African-American; ARR, aldosterone to renin ratio; BMI, body mass
Printed in U.S.A. index; BP, blood pressure; EA, European-American; GCRC, General Clinical Research Cen-
Copyright © 2012 by The Endocrine Society ter; LD, linkage disequilibrium; MAF, minor allele frequency; PAC, plasma aldosterone
doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-2196 Received May 10, 2012. Accepted July 24, 2012. concentration; PRA, plasma renin activity; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; TASK1,
First Published Online August 14, 2012 TWIK-related acid-sensitive K⫹ channel 1; ZG, zona glomerulosa.
TABLE 1. Characteristics of subjects at time of enrollment in the longitudinal study group (mean ⫾ SD)
Males Females
Characteristic EA (n ⴝ 229) AA (n ⴝ 150) P value EA (n ⴝ 215) AA (n ⴝ 201) P value
Age (yr) 14.0 ⫾ 4.1 14.7 ⫾ 4.2 0.71 14.5 ⫾ 4.4 15.0 ⫾ 4.7 0.52
BMI (kg/m2) 20.9 ⫾ 4.8 23.8 ⫾ 6.2 ⬍0.0001 21.2 ⫾ 4.6 24.5 ⫾ 6.9 ⬍0.0001
SBP (mm Hg) 107.1 ⫾ 12.7 109.4 ⫾ 12.5 ⬍0.0001 102.8 ⫾ 10.1 105.2 ⫾ 10.2 ⬍0.0001
DBP (mm Hg) 62.2 ⫾ 10.7 64.1 ⫾ 10.8 ⬍0.0001 61.7 ⫾ 9.7 62.9 ⫾ 9.7 0.0004
PAC (ng/dl) 14.0 ⫾ 9.0 8.8 ⫾ 6.5 0.0001 14.7 ⫾ 9.6 9.2 ⫾ 6.8 0.0001
PRA (ng/liter 䡠 sec) 3.3 ⫾ 2.3 2.6 ⫾ 2.0 0.002 3.3 ⫾ 2.5 2.8 ⫾ 2.1 0.0008
ARR 5.30 ⫾ 3.6 4.9 ⫾ 6.8 0.001 5.8 ⫾ 4.5 5.1 ⫾ 7.9 0.001
K (mmol/liter) 4.2 ⫾ 0.4 4.3 ⫾ 0.7 0.88 4.2 ⫾ 0.4 4.3 ⫾ 1.0 0.32
DBP, Diastolic BP; SBP, systolic BP.
and KCNK9 were selected from Single Nucleotide Polymor- Statistical analysis
phism Database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/)
using the criteria of R2 ⫽ 80% and minor allele frequency over Longitudinal study
10% based on HapMap YRI (Yoruba from Nigeria) data. Sev- All BP data, which spanned the ages 5–25 yr, were used in the
enty-four tagging SNP of KCNK9 and 15 of KCNK3 were se- analyses. A semiparametric mixed-effect model for repeated
lected. All SNP were in Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (P value measurement analysis of the longitudinal data were used to test
⬎0.05). SNP location was determined from the annotations in for associations of each SNP with systolic and diastolic BP. The
the NCBI human genome assembly Build 36.2. model incorporates genetic (SNP) effects on BP as a fixed effect
Genotyping was carried out using a modified single-nucle- at the population level and subject-specific growth curves of BP
otide extension reaction with allele detection by mass spectrom- level as random effects. Nonparametric growth curve models
etry (Sequenom MassArray system; Sequenom, San Diego, CA). with random subject effects were fitted using penalized splines,
The assays were designed and run with either of two formats, and additive genetic effects were tested after adjusting for sex,
hME or iPLEX. The genotyping success rate for each genotype age, body mass index (BMI), and four principal component
was over 95%, and minor allele frequencies were over 10%. SNP scores (15, 16) for accommodation of subpopulation differences.
coverage across both genes was evaluated using the program The code for these analyses was written using R software (version
Haploview version 4.2, which examines the extent of linkage 2.13.1). For biochemical measurements such as PRA, PAC,
disequilibrium (LD) between pairs of SNP to estimate how well ARR, and serum K, we used a parametric mixed-effect model
the selected SNP represented the genetic information contained with a random effect for data analysis. Genetic variations were
in nongenotyped SNP. included in the models of main factors of interest. We adjusted
PAC for PRA and serum K as well as for sex, age, BMI, and
Quality control and population stratification principal component score (reflecting the magnitude of popula-
Due to potential differences in minor allele frequencies and tion stratification for each subject). The mixed-effect model anal-
LD patterns, EA and AA were studied separately. We genotyped ysis was implemented using SAS PROC MIXED (version 9.2).
57 ancestry-informative SNP markers (12, 13) 10 on the X-chro- Many of the SNP were in LD, and thus, we estimated a gene-wide
mosome to correct for population stratification and exclude in- significance threshold using Nyholt’s method (17) that takes into
dividuals who were misclassified as to ancestry. In addition, we account LD among SNP and calculates an effective number of
performed principal component analysis on the ancestry-infor- independent tests for a given gene. The estimated significance
mative SNP markers using EIGENSTRAT and obtained the first thresholds for KCNK9 that took into account the multiplicity of
10 eigenvectors. comparisons was P ⫽ 0.0011 for AA and 0.0014 for EA.
TABLE 3. Associations of selected SNPs in KCNK9 in subjects from the longitudinal study group (P values)
AA (n ⴝ 351) EA (n ⴝ 444)
SNP NT MAF SBP DBP PAC ARR Serum K MAF SBP DBP PAC ARR Serum K PRA
rs2542424 C/T 0.30 0.07 0.026C1 0.20 0.12 0.56 0.44 0.05 0.09 0.16 0.74 0.87 0.02C2
rs2545462 T/G 0.47 0.02T1 0.11 0.12 0.64 0.08 0.40 0.33 0.21 0.92 0.67 0.66 0.23
rs888345 G/A 0.15 0.009G2 0.02G2 0.01G2 0.003G2 0.02G1 0.20 0.29 0.15 0.005G2 0.009G2 0.56 0.19
rs13256087 A/G 0.27 0.90 0.91 0.70 0.40 0.56 0.37 0.04G1 0.01G1 0.37 0.46 0.58 0.50
rs1469039 A/G 0.19 0.03A2 0.26 0.99 0.87 0.22 0.17 0.78 0.87 0.0009A2 0.0005A2 0.53 0.15
rs2545460 A/G 0.39 0.24 0.026A2 0.87 0.89 0.15 0.47 0.73 0.52 0.10 0.03A2 0.76 0.04A1
rs12114521 A/G 0.49 0.02A2 0.11 0.89 0.46 0.62 0.04 0.43 0.98 0.01A2 0.08 0.31 0.82
rs3780045 T/C 0.13 0.01T1 0.05 0.50 0.05 0.38 0.03 0.07 0.58 0.93 0.71 0.22 0.31
rs3824281 A/G 0.33 0.004A1 0.10 0.51 0.23 0.05 0.06 0.45 0.87 0.01G1 0.010G1 0.54 0.73
rs7004779 T/C 0.15 0.31 0.63 0.16 0.11 0.01T2 0.03 0.92 0.29 0.006T1 0.004T1 0.27 0.15
rs3780037 T/G 0.30 0.01T1 0.02T1 0.86 0.91 0.02T1 0.23 0.11 0.17 0.73 0.29 0.04T2 0.46
rs10110946 C/T 0.23 0.01C1 0.11 0.73 0.91 0.11 0.24 0.10 0.14 0.77 0.36 0.03C2 0.50
rs7828107 A/C 0.21 0.004A2 0.83 0.49 0.09 0.29 0.49 0.11 0.37 0.50 0.38 0.01A1 0.30
Superscript letters depict nucleotides associated with risk alleles; direction of the arrow depicts whether level of phenotype increases or decreases.
DBP, Diastolic BP; NT, nucleotides with minor allele followed by major allele; SBP, systolic BP.
TABLE 4. Associations of selected SNP in KCNK9 in subjects from the cross-sectional study group (P values)
AA (n ⴝ 106) EA (n ⴝ 83)
SNP NT SBP DBP PAC ARR Serum K Urine K SBP DBP PAC ARR Serum K Urine K
rs4736287 G/C 0.01G1 0.06 0.40 0.53 0.04G2 0.83 0.94 0.95 0.22 0.96 0.28 0.38
rs2545432 A/G 0.01A1 0.01A1 0.37 0.89 0.13 0.90 0.70 0.62 0.46 0.34 0.03 0.12
rs741463 C/G 0.96 0.62 0.25 0.01C2 0.04C1 0.94 0.08 0.55 0.77 0.60 0.94 0.36
rs888345 G/A 0.03G2 0.10 0.67 0.57 0.82 0.32 0.85 0.84 0.92 0.05 0.26 0.44
rs13256087 A/G 0.46 0.95 0.04A1 0.006A1 0.08 0.72 0.13 0.67 0.85 0.46 0.90 0.16
rs1469039 A/G 0.04A2 0.53 0.97 0.56 0.03A2 0.35 0.76 0.69 0.98 0.09 0.20 0.34
rs882555 T/C 0.57 0.32 0.02T2 0.17 0.50 0.04T2 0.98 0.40 0.06 0.79 0.71 0.07
rs2542481 A/G 0.03A2 0.67 0.27 0.15 0.01A1 0.30 0.21 0.52 0.67 0.66 0.85 0.99
rs888349 G/T 0.04G2 0.39 0.50 0.38 0.02G2 0.39 0.59 0.27 0.22 0.67 0.33 0.05
rs3780037 T/G 0.02T1 0.29 0.45 0.23 0.89 0.005T1 0.69 0.68 0.19 0.22 0.37 0.42
rs10110946 C/T 0.02C1 0.09 0.20 0.10 0.13 0.01C1 0.53 0.61 0.53 0.19 0.95 0.35
rs7828107 A/C 0.02A2 0.27 0.22 0.35 0.36 0.73 0.83 0.29 0.95 0.56 0.53 0.69
Superscript letters depict nucleotides associated with risk alleles; direction of the arrow depicts whether level of phenotype increases or decreases.
DBP, Diastolic BP; NT, nucleotides with minor allele followed by major allele; SBP, systolic BP.
0.005), whereas rs34292597 alone was not. In addition, albeit with a milder phenotype [aldosterone excretion
there was evidence to suggest that any of eight SNP in rates increased 37%, whereas they increased 400% in
KCNK3 and rs3824281 in KCNK9 interacted to enhance Kcnk9/Kcnk3 double-knockout mice (23); BP also in-
associations with BP, serum K, PAC, and ARR. Thus, creased more in the double knockout than in the Kcnk9].
there was suggestive evidence for an interaction of the two In the present study, variations in KCNK3 showed no
channel subunits in humans. associations; however, an interaction of the genes was sug-
gested in that selected SNP from each gene showed stron-
Additive effects ger associations with BP, serum K, PAC, and ARR than did
To look for additive effects, we incorporated the nine individual SNP.
SNP into a single model as additive terms. In so doing we Associations were observed in both the longitudinal
found that two of the nine SNP remained significant: and the cross-sectional study groups and in AA and EA
rs3780037 (P ⫽ 0.0023) and rs7828107 (P ⫽ 0.046). The with P values ⬍0.05. We analyzed 74 SNP to capture most
remaining SNP appeared to function nonadditively. The of the variability in KCNK9, in keeping with the explor-
individual effect sizes of rs3780037 and rs7828107 were atory intent of the study. One SNP (rs1469039 in EA in the
1.7 and 2.8 mm Hg, respectively. We estimated the addi- longitudinal group) met the stringent threshold for signif-
tive effect size of the two SNP when homozygous for the icance given the multiple testing. Several others were nom-
risk alleles (TT for rs3780037 and CC for rs7828107) inally significant and worth targeted exploration in other
would be 3.8 mm Hg higher than those heterozygous (GT samples.
for rs3780037 and AC for rs7828107). The heterozygous The findings were also noteworthy in that individual
group was estimated to be 3.5 mm Hg higher than the SNP associated with multiple phenotypes whose direc-
group homozygous for the nonrisk alleles (GG for tional change was consistent with the known biology
rs3780037 and AA for rs7828107). (PAC and ARR increased or decreased as BP increased or
decreased with serum K going in the opposite direction; an
exception was rs3780037 in AA, Table 3). In the longi-
Discussion tudinal group, rs888345 showed associations with five
phenotypes in AA and two in EA. Additionally, six SNP
Although it is widely accepted that BP variability, includ- that showed an association in the longitudinal study group
ing the development of hypertension, has a strong genetic showed an association in the cross-sectional study. There
basis (6, 18), BP genes have been exceptionally elusive were, therefore, elements of replication when one consid-
(19). Most hypertension is accompanied by an exagger- ers associations with the same SNP in two separate race
ated retention of Na (20). It therefore follows that genetic groups as well as in separate study groups. These inter-
contributions frequently encode for proteins involved nally and externally consistent findings suggest that the
with the reuptake of Na in the kidney. What has become associations go beyond simply mere coincidence, despite
increasingly apparent is that aldosterone with its Na-re- their only nominal significance given the low sample size.
taining properties participates in the pathogenesis of hy- The observations should be tested in more directed future
pertension including common forms (4, 5). Production of studies.
aldosterone is highly sensitive to the transmembrane po- In the longitudinal study group, where BP had been
tential of the ZG cells, a characteristic coupled to the ac- measured repeatedly over time and thus from the sheer
tivity of K channels (21, 22). We report on translational numbers of observations could be more informative, mul-
studies, taking findings in the mouse (deletion of Kcnk3 tiple SNP in KCNK9 showed an association with BP in AA
and Kcnk9 led to hyperaldosteronism and hypertension) (nine SNP associated with systolic BP) (Table 3). At the
(12) and exploring those genes in human subjects. Our same time, there was no similar degree of association with
sample sizes were not of optimal size, but this was miti- aldosterone production. However, levels of aldosterone
gated in part by the refined phenotypic measurements and (and PRA) were measured cross-sectionally with fewer
the choice of young subjects. In the longitudinal study overall actual assessments, and thus as phenotypes, they
group (n ⫽ 795), BP was measured biannually over a pe- may have been less robust. In addition, because BP in AA
riod of years, and in the cross-sectional study group (n ⫽ is characteristically salt sensitive (24), minor increases in
189), assessments were carried out in the GCRC under Na reabsorption from small differences in the level of al-
tightly controlled and standardized conditions. dosterone may have been enough to increase BP. Evidence
We found common variations in KCNK9 that associ- for a genetic influence on aldosterone production was, on
ated with BP and production of aldosterone. In mice, de- the other hand, apparent in EA but without a comparable
letion of Kcnk9 alone also produces hyperaldosteronism, change in BP. In this case, BP may simply have been less
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article-abstract/97/11/E2160/2836322
by Universidad Autonoma de Madrid user
on 24 July 2018
E2166 Jung et al. Potassium Channel Genes, BP, and Aldosterone J Clin Endocrinol Metab, November 2012, 97(11):E2160 –E2167
responsive to the Na retention evoked by aldosterone. In Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: J.
the cross-sectional study, no SNP in EA associated with Howard Pratt, M.D., CL365, 541 Clinical Drive, Indianapolis,
Indiana 46202-5111. E-mail: johpratt@iupui.edu.
any of the phenotypes. The findings are in keeping with This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
AA residing closer to a threshold wherein only a small Grants HL095086 (to W.T. and J.H.P.) and HL089717 (to
increment in Na uptake may be sufficient to affect BP. P.Q.B.) and the Indiana Clinical and Translational Science In-
Although the genetic variations in KCNK9 reported stitute, by the Department of Veterans Affairs, by the Regenstrief
Institute, and by the Center for Medical Genomics at Indiana
here in healthy individuals are not contained within the University School of Medicine.
coding sequences of the gene, it is possible that they are in Disclosure Summary: The authors have nothing to disclose.
LD with coding variants or that intronic variants modify
the expression of TASK3 subunits to produce changes in
the K conductance of the ZG cell. If the reduction in K References
conductance is small, the baseline membrane potential of
1. Meneton P, Loffing J, Warnock DG 2004 Sodium and potassium
the ZG cell may not change significantly and the expressed handling by the aldosterone-sensitive distal nephron: the pivotal role
phenotype, aldosterone production, may be normal. of the distal and connecting tubule. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol
287:F593–F601
However, a reduced K conductance would render the ZG 2. Funder JW, Carey RM, Fardella C, Gomez-Sanchez CE, Mantero F,
cell more susceptible to depolarizing influences (such as Stowasser M, Young Jr WF, Montori VM 2008 Case detection,
angiotensin II and ACTH) and, thus, we predict may mod- diagnosis, and treatment of patients with primary aldosteronism: an
Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol
estly amplify responses to physiological concentrations of Metab 93:3266 –3281
aldosterone secretagogues and thus increase the risk for 3. Calhoun DA, Jones D, Textor S, Goff DC, Murphy TP, Toto RD,
White A, Cushman WC, White W, Sica D, Ferdinand K, Giles TD,
hypertension. By contrast, mutations in the coding region
Falkner B, Carey RM 2008 Resistant hypertension: diagnosis, eval-
of KCNJ5 channels found in a subset of patients with uation, and treatment: a scientific statement from the American
tumorigenic primary aldosteronism that change the ion Heart Association Professional Education Committee of the Council
for High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation 117:e510 – e526
selectivity of the channel pore itself are responsible for 4. Nishizaka MK, Zaman MA, Calhoun DA 2003 Efficacy of low-dose
large overproduction of aldosterone observed in some pa- spironolactone in subjects with resistant hypertension. Am J Hyper-
tients with severe primary aldosteronism (25). The same tens 16:925–930
5. Vasan RS, Evans JC, Larson MG, Wilson PW, Meigs JB, Rifai N,
group also found KCNK9 and KCNK3 expressed in al- Benjamin EJ, Levy D 2004 Serum aldosterone and the incidence of
dosterone-producing adrenal adenomas (25). hypertension in nonhypertensive persons. N Engl J Med 351:33– 41
6. Manatunga AK, Reister TK, Miller JZ, Pratt JH 1992 Genetic in-
Our subjects were healthy and for the most part too
fluences on the urinary excretion of aldosterone in children. Hyper-
young to have hypertension. Although this could be con- tension 19:192–197
sidered a limitation, at the same time, it provided the ad- 7. Czirják G, Enyedi P 2002 Task-3 dominates the background potas-
sium conductance in rat adrenal glomerulosa cells. Mol Endocrinol
vantage of having eliminated the confounding influences 16:621– 629
that accompany age and/or the hypertensive state, includ- 8. Czirják G, Fischer T, Spät A, Lesage F, Enyedi P 2000 Task (twik-
ing the attendant use of antihypertensive medications. Al- related acid-sensitive K⫹ channel) is expressed in glomerulosa cells
of rat adrenal cortex and inhibited by angiotensin II. Mol Endocrinol
though genetic associations were observed in AA and EA, 14:863– 874
providing some measure of replication, confirmation of 9. Dluhy RG, Axelrod L, Underwood RH, Williams GH 1972 Studies
of the control of plasma aldosterone concentration in normal man.
our findings in other populations will be necessary to fully
II. Effect of dietary potassium and acute potassium infusion. J Clin
establish a role for KCNK9 in causing BP variability. Invest 51:1950 –1957
In summary, genetically derived differences in the ac- 10. Pratt JH 1982 Role of angiotensin II in potassium-mediated stim-
ulation of aldosterone secretion in the dog. J Clin Invest 70:667– 672
tions of a K channel that is expressed in ZG cells and that 11. Heitzmann D, Derand R, Jungbauer S, Bandulik S, Sterner C,
normally functions to restrain aldosterone production Schweda F, El Wakil A, Lalli E, Guy N, Mengual R, Reichold M,
showed associations with BP and level of plasma aldoste- Tegtmeier I, Bendahhou S, Gomez-Sanchez CE, Aller MI, Wisden
W, Weber A, Lesage F, Warth R, Barhanin J 2008 Invalidation of
rone in this exploratory study. The findings will hopefully Task1 potassium channels disrupts adrenal gland zonation and min-
encourage additional testing of associations in other pop- eralocorticoid homeostasis. EMBO J 27:179 –187
12. Davies LA, Hu C, Guagliardo NA, Sen N, Chen X, Talley EM, Carey
ulation groups.
RM, Bayliss DA, Barrett PQ 2008 Task channel deletion in mice
causes primary hyperaldosteronism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:
2203–2208
13. Manatunga AK, Jones JJ, Pratt JH 1993 Longitudinal assessment of
Acknowledgments blood pressures in black and white children. Hypertension 22:
84 – 89
We greatly appreciate the excellent technical support provided 14. Chun TY, Chander PN, Kim JW, Pratt JH, Stier Jr CT 2008 Aldo-
by Mary Anne Wagner. sterone, but not angiotensin II, increases profibrotic factors in kid-
ney of adrenalectomized stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive ogy, diagnosis, and management. New York: Raven Press; 1105–
rats. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 295:E305–E312 1129
15. Ruppert D, Wand MP, Carroll RJ 2003 Semiparametric regression. 21. Lotshaw DP 2001 Role of membrane depolarization and T-type
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press Ca2⫹ channels in angiotensin II and K⫹ stimulated aldosterone se-
cretion. Mol Cell Endocrinol 175:157–171
16. Durbán M, Harezlak J, Wand MP, Carroll RJ 2005 Simple fitting of
22. Aguilera G, Catt KJ 1986 Participation of voltage-dependent cal-
subject-specific curves for longitudinal data. Stat Med 24:1153–
cium channels in the regulation of adrenal glomerulosa function by
1167 angiotensin II and potassium. Endocrinology 118:112–118
17. Li J, Ji L 2005 Adjusting multiple testing in multilocus analyses using 23. Guagliardo NA, Yao J, Hu C, Schertz EM, Tyson DA, Carey RM,
the eigenvalues of a correlation matrix. Heredity (Edinb) 95:221– Bayliss DA, Barrett PQ 2012 Task-3 channel deletion in mice re-
227 capitulates low-renin essential hypertension. Hypertension 59:999 –
18. Ward R 1990 Familial aggregation and genetic epidemiology of 1005
blood pressure. In: Laragh JH, Brenner BM, eds. Hypertension: 24. Weinberger MH, Miller JZ, Luft FC, Grim CE, Fineberg NS 1986
Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. New York: Raven; Definitions and characteristics of sodium sensitivity and blood pres-
sure resistance. Hypertension 8(6 Pt 2):II127–II134
81–100
25. Choi M, Scholl UI, Yue P, Björklund P, Zhao B, Nelson-Williams C,
19. Harrap SB 2003 Where are all the blood-pressure genes? Lancet
Ji W, Cho Y, Patel A, Men CJ, Lolis E, Wisgerhof MV, Geller DS,
361:2149 –2151 Mane S, Hellman P, Westin G, Åkerström G, Wang W, Carling T,
20. Hall JE, Guyton AC 1990 Control of sodium excretion and arterial Lifton RP 2011 K⫹ channel mutations in adrenal aldosterone-pro-
pressure by intrarenal mechanisms and the renin-angiotensin sys- ducing adenomas and hereditary hypertension. Science 331:768 –
tem. In: Laragh JH, Brenner BM, eds. Hypertension: Pathophysiol- 772