Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This Content Downloaded From 139.179.182.150 On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 07:09:40 UTC
This Content Downloaded From 139.179.182.150 On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 07:09:40 UTC
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1505229?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Taylor & Francis, Ltd. and International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic
Works are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Studies in
Conservation
A NUMBER Of samples of Turkish plaster and consists of fine white calcium carbonate with
whitewash to which fragments of the original only occasional grains of brownish sand.
Byzantine wall painting adhered were exam- Layer (b) is the thick Turkish plaster applied in
ined in the Scientific Department of the the nineteenth century. It is mainly calcium
National Gallery, London. During the course carbonate, coarse and of a cream colour, but
of the work at Trebizond Mr Winfield collec- speckled throughout its thickness with small,
ted nearly one hundred small samples of paint hard, glassy, dark particles which proved to be
and plaster, and some of the more recently the local sand from the beach at Trebizond.
collected still await detailed examination, Examined under the microscope at low power,
so that the following is only a preliminary these sand grains, blackish-green by reflected
report. It is hoped that a fuller account may light, are a clear olive green by transmitted
appear elsewhere at a later date [I]. light. Chemical analysis showed their com-
position to be an iron magnesium silicate. The
The Covering Layers dark green mineral which forms the main con-
stituent of this sandwas identified as a diopsidic
Fig. I represents the layer structure of paint pyroxene, the only other constituent present,
and plaster before the uncovering of the paint- and this in minor quantities only, being a basic
ings. Of the covering layers, layer (a) is white- plagioclase [2]. The identity of the dark green
wash with which the paintings were coated sandy particles is of interest because, as will be
--(c) 19th-century seen below, in two samples of the original
whitewash
Byzantine paintings it was found to have been
* -(b) 19th-century
AS 4 ~a Turkish plaster Coat- used as a pigment in underpainting. A con-
4 * *. (a) i6th-century ing siderable amount of fibrous material was also
/ whitewash Layers
-(3) Paint layers - found in the Turkish plaster (layer (b)). Two
\(2) Upper Byz- types of fibrous material were present, the first
antine plaster Orig-
fine and rather silky and identified as flax fibre,
In many parts of the Byzantine painting The most frequently occurring pigments
there are two or even three superimposed were, as might be anticipated, the earth
paint layers, and these are by no means mere colours. As mentioned above, a considerable
overlappings of different-coloured areas of the amount of underpainting is carried out in a
design but intentional shading and modelling yellow ochre colour. A very intensely col-
of areas of colour, and in some cases superim- oured red-brown earth also occurs, corres-
posed layers are used for the purpose of pro- ponding roughly to the colour we know as
ducing colours unobtainable with the single burnt sienna but stronger and redder in hue
pigments available. Cross-sections were pre- than most specimens which go under that
Resumre'
Ceci est un rapport prdliminaire sur fut le seul pigment vert identifid), blanc de
l'examen microscopique et chimique d'dchan- chaux, noir de charbon de bois, vermillon,
tillons de peinture et de platre. Au XVIe outremer naturel (qui, a une petite exception
siecle, les Turcs recouvrirent les fresques prIs, est le seul pigment bleu identifie). On
d'une couche de chaux, suivie au XIXe trouve des dorures seulement dans les pr6-
siecle d'une 6paisse couche de platre et livements effectu s dans la vofite d'abside.
encore de la chaux. La chaux employee Un trait inusit6 est l'emploi de sable local vert-
consiste en carbonate de calcium relativement noiratre comme premi&re couche pour du
pur. Mais l'6pais plktre turc contient, en plus, vert pale. Les pigments n'Itaient pas m lang6s
du sable local vert-noir$tre, du lin et autres exceptd avec du blanc, mais des effets de
fibres v6g6tales. Le platre byzantin, sous la couleurs varids 6taient obtenus par des
peinture, est 6galement du carbonate de couches superpos6es.
calcium, contenant de la paille, mais pas de Cet article pr6sente une comparaison avec
sable. un autre groupe de peintures murales byzan-
Dans les couches de revetement inf6rieures, tines plus r6centes, celles de la Kariye Qamii,
on ne put d6couvrir aucun support organique, " Istanbul, d6crites prec6demment dans cette
mais un peu de glu animale fut extraite des revue.