Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Conservation, Livelihoods and Justice in ‘New’ Wildlife frontiers:

A case of Loliondo Game Controlled Area (GCA) in Tanzania

By Valentin Ngorisa Olyang’iri1

Abstract:

This paper explores the relationship between forms of conservations approaches and
emergency of ‘new’ or rather renewed forms of frontiers and marginalization of residents
communities. I argue that unlike some portrayals of community based and fortress
conservations approaches that largely assumed and taken over across sub-Saharan Africa
and Tanzania in particular for the double impacts of communities and wildlife
conservation, the later has persistently been implemented practically while the former has
existence and in many cases in academic writings. In particular, this paper reflects on
emergency of ecological frontiers between the central government (Tanzania National Park
Authority), private sector (sport-hunting tourism vs local communities, and the local
government authorities (elected District and village councils). The ecological frontiers are
critical areas subjected by conservation led institution to be under threat of deterioration
and are the homes to the world big five (Elephants, Black Rhinos, Lions, Giraffes, &
Leopards) while for local communities these areas are good for pasture and water during
dry seasons. These frontiers are increasing subject to new wave of climate change threats,
a return to fortress cum militarized conservation, prompted in part by rising of wildlife
tourism related accumulation in areas adjacent or within village lands. Drawing on recent
government led closed discussions, media and NGOs reports in the area, we examine the
new wildlife frontiers at this conjuncture of neoliberal intervention, climate change, and
land grabs. We outline the complex ways through which the involvement of new actors,
new technologies and practice of boundary mapping marginalize and disposes resident
communities from their land, but also exclude them from wildlife conservation practices
which in turn will not serve the big five, environment but also bring injustice to the
surround communities. Whereas paying attention to the complexity of involvement of
actors and shift in relation to control, and decision making, the paper, however, presents
how marginalization in these frontiers can be challenged.

Keywords: Commodities, conservation, livelihoods, justice, marginalization, wildlife

1
He is an Independent researcher on natural resources and development and land rights activist based in Tanzania.
He holds MSc. Environmental Governance from the University of Manchester Uk (2015/2016). E-mail
ngorisajr@gmail.com

You might also like