Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rev S12 Syllabus 3
Rev S12 Syllabus 3
Rev S12 Syllabus 3
Graduate Seminar:
Islamic Revolution of Iran
Description:
This course will provide students with a comprehensive understanding of the Islamic
Revolution that took place in Iran in 1978-79. Students will learn the many theories
regarding how and why this revolution (and revolutions in general) happened, what
factors contributed to its development, and how Iranian society, culture, politics, and
religious beliefs and practices were affected by the revolution, in the following decades.
In addition to weekly reading assignments, students will discuss these texts and present
their research in class. In addition to class participation, students will write a graduate
level research paper, as well as a detailed proposal for this paper. This paper must be
based on research using primary sources or some similarly appropriate primary evidence.
Requirements:
Weekly reading assignments, substantial classroom presentations and discussion, and a graduate
level research paper. By week ten, students will also submit a detailed proposal (5-15 pages)
outlining their research project.
Prerequisite:
Graduate student standing.
Texts:
Course packet (Available for purchase at Speedway Copies in Dobie Mall)
Nikki Keddie Roots and Results of Revolution
Jason Brownlee Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization
Grading:
Class participation 25%
Analytical paper on one week’s readings 10%
Short paper (due in week nine) 25%
Research paper (due on last class day) 40%
Course Syllabus
Week 9 (March 21) Aspects of Social & Cultural Transformation after the Rev.
Proposal is due at the beginning of class
Week 9. Aspects of Social & Cultural Transformation after the Islamic Revolution
Fariba Adelkhah “Looking out for Number One: A Competitive Society” in Being
Modern in Iran.
Houchang Chehabi “A Political History of Football in Iran” (Iranian Studies 35:4).
Philippe Rochard “The Identities of the Iranian Zurkhanah” (Iranian Studies 35:4).
Mansoor Moaddel “Class Struggle in Post-Revolutionary Iran” (IJMES 23:3)
Sussan Siavoshi “Cultural Policies and the Islamic Republic: Cinema and Book
Publication” (IJMES 29:4)
Hossein Shahidi “From Mission to Profession: Journalism in Iran, 1979-2004”
(Iranian Studies 39:1).
Farhad Khosrokhavar and M. Amin Ghaneirad “Iran’s New Scientific Community”
(Iranian Studies 39:2).
Said Amir Arjomand “Chapter 6: Social and Political Consequences of the Integrative
Revolution” and “Appendix: Two Models of Revolution” in After
Khomeini: Iran Under His Successors
Course Syllabus
Week 11. Economic Issues and Policies after the Islamic Revolution
M. H. Pesaran “The System of Dependent Capitalism in Pre-and Post-Revolutionary
Iran”
M. R. Ghasimi “The Iranian Economy After the Revolution: An Economic Appraisal
of the Five-Year Plan” (IJMES 24:4)
Sohrab Behdad “Islamization of Economics in Iranian Universities” (IJMES 27:2)
M. Hashem Pesaran “The Iranian Foreign Exchange Policy and the Black Market for
Dollars” (IJMES 24:1)
Sohrab Behdad & Farhad Nomani “Workers, Peasants, & Peddlers: A Study of Labor
Stratification in Post-Revolutionary Iran” (IJMES 34:4)
Valentine Moghadam “Women’s Employment Issues in Contemporary Iran:
Problems and Prospects in the 1990’s” in Iranian Studies, 28:3-4 (1995).
Fatemeh Etemad Moghadam “Undercounting Women’s Work in Iran” (Iranian
Studies 42:1).
Arang Keshavarzian “Regime Loyalty and Bazari Representation Under the Islamic
Republic of Iran: Dilemmas of the Society of Islamic Coalitions” (IJMES
41:2).
Course Syllabus
2) What is the author’s main thesis? What other significant points does he/she argue?
4) What sources are used? How are they used? Are they appropriate to the study at hand?
5) What methodology is used? Is it appropriate for the topic at hand? What other
methodologies could they have used?
6) What is the author’s disciplinary approach/perspective? How does this affect his/her
approach?
7) How does this study relate to debates in the field? How does it compare to other
research on this topic?
8) Does the author successfully prove his/her thesis and main arguments?
9) What sorts of biases can you detect? How do these biases affect his/her main
arguments?