N3 Full Report

NOZZLE REPORT
Tabular Results
Results were generated with the finite element program FE/Pipe®. Stress results are post-processed in accordance with the rules specified in ASME Section III and
ASME Section VIII, Division 2.
Analysis Time Stamp: Wed May 27 07:58:13 2020.
Model Notes
Load Case Report
Solution Data
ASME Code Stress Output Plots
Stress Results - Notes
ASME Overstressed Areas
Highest Primary Stress Ratios
Highest Secondary Stress Ratios
Highest Fatigue Stress Ratios
Stress Intensification Factors
Allowable Loads
Flexibilities
Graphical Results
Model Notes
Model Notes
Input Echo:
Model Type : Cylindrical Shell
Parent Geometry
Parent Outside Diam. : 10999.000 mm.
Thickness : 6.000 mm.
Fillet Along Shell : 6.000 mm.
Parent Properties:
Cold Allowable : 138.0 MPa
Hot Allowable : 138.0 MPa
Material ID #2 : Low Alloy Steel
Ultimate Tensile (Amb) : 483.0 MPa
Yield Strength (Amb) : 244.0 MPa
Yield Strength (Hot) : 244.0 MPa
Elastic Modulus (Amb) : 199227.0 MPa
Poissons Ratio : 0.300
Weight Density : 0.7682E-04 N /cu.mm.
Nozzle Geometry
Nozzle Outside Diam. : 60.325 mm.
Thickness : 5.540 mm.
Length : 250.000 mm.
Nozzle Weld Length : 6.000 mm.
RePad Width : 6.000 mm.
RePad Thickness : 6.000 mm.
RePad Weld Leg : 6.000 mm.
Nozzle Tilt Angle : 0.000 deg.
Distance from Top : 305.000 mm.
Distance from Bottom : 12190.000 mm.
Nozzle Properties
Cold Allowable : 118.0 MPa
Hot Allowable : 118.0 MPa
Material ID #2 : Low Alloy Steel
Ultimate Tensile (Amb) : 414.0 MPa
Yield Strength (Amb) : 225.0 MPa
Yield Strength (Hot) : 225.0 MPa
Elastic Modulus (Amb) : 199227.0 MPa
Poissons Ratio : 0.300
Weight Density : 0.7682E-04 N /cu.mm.
Design Operating Cycles : 0.

Ambient Temperature (Deg.) : 21.00
Uniform thermal expansion produces no stress in this geometry.

Any thermal loads will come through operating forces and
moments applied through the nozzle.
Nozzle Inside Temperature : 77.00 deg.

Nozzle Outside Temperature : 77.00 deg.
Vessel Inside Temperature : 77.00 deg.
Vessel Outside Temperature : 77.00 deg.
Nozzle Pressure : 0.105 MPa

Vessel Pressure : 0.105 MPa
FEA Model Loads:

These are the user defined loads applied to the FEA model
at the end of the nozzle in global coordinates.
Forces( N ) Moments (N-m)
Load Case FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPER: 19.0 186.0 -39.0 127.5 -13.7 0.0
The "top" or "positive" end of this model is "free" in

the axial and translational directions.
Stresses are NOT averaged.
Vessel Centerline Vector : 0.000 1.000 0.000

Nozzle Orientation Vector : 1.000 0.000 0.000
Table of Contents
Load Case Report

FE/Pipe Version 10.0 Jobname: NOZZLE $P
Released Nov 2017 7:57am MAY 27,2020
Load Case Report $X
Inner and outer element temperatures are the same

throughout the model. No thermal ratcheting
calculations will be performed.
THE 7 LOAD CASES ANALYZED ARE:
1 SUSTAINED (Pr Only)
Sustained case run to satisfy local primary

membrane and bending stress limits.
/-------- Loads in Case 1

Pressure Case 1
2 OPERATING (Fatigue Calc Performed)
Case run to compute the operating stresses used in

secondary, peak and range calculations as needed.

Pressure Case 1
Loads from (Operating)
3 Program Generated -- Force Only
Case run to compute sif's and flexibilities.

Loads from (Axial)

Loads from (Inplane)

Loads from (Outplane)

Loads from (Torsion)

Pressure Case 1
Table of Contents
Solution Data
Solution Data
Maximum Solution Row Size = 1032

Number of Nodes = 5220
Number of Elements = 1704
Number of Solution Cases = 7
Summation of Loads per Case
Case # FX FY FZ
1 4029106. 898156. 1.
2 4029125. 880400. -38.
3 131484. 0. 0.
4 0. 1. 0.
5 0. 0. -1.
6 0. 0. 0.
7 4029106. 898156. 1.
Table of Contents
ASME Code Stress Output Plots

ASME Code Stress Output Plots $X
1) Pl < SPL (SUS,Membrane) Case 1
2) Qb < SPS (SUS,Bending) Case 1
3) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Inside) Case 1
4) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Outside) Case 1
5) S1+S2+S3 < 4S (SUS,S1+S2+S3) Case 1
6) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Inside) Case 2
7) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Outside) Case 2
8) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (EXP,Inside) Case 2
9) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (EXP,Outside) Case 2
10) Membrane < User (OPE,Membrane) Case 2
11) Bending < User (OPE,Bending) Case 2
12) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (SIF,Outside) Case 3
Table of Contents

- Results in this analysis were generated using the finite

element solution method.
- Using 2013-2017 ASME Section VIII Division 2
- Use Polished Bar fatigue curve.
Assume pressure increases all other stresses.
- Assume free end displacements of attached pipe

(e.g. thermal loads) are secondary within the limits
of nozzle reinforcement.
- Use Equivalent Stress (Von Mises).
- S1+S2+S3 evaluation omitted from operating stress.

Include S1+S2+S3 evaluation in primary case evaluation.
Assume bending stress not local primary for S1+S2+S3.
- Use local tensor values for averaged and not

averaged stresses.
Table of Contents
ASME Overstressed Areas

ASME Overstressed Areas $X
*** NO OVERSTRESSED NODES IN THIS MODEL ***
Table of Contents
Highest Primary Stress Ratios

Highest Primary Stress Ratios $X
Pad/Header at Junction
Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Inner) Load Case 1

121 488 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 3) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Inside) Case 1
24%
Branch at Junction
Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Outer) Load Case 1

MPa MPa 4) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Outside) Case 1
21%
Branch Transition
Pl SPL Primary Membrane Load Case 1

MPa MPa 1) Pl < SPL (SUS,Membrane) Case 1
5%
Pad Outer Edge Weld

38%
Branch removed from Junction

7%
Table of Contents
Highest Secondary Stress Ratios

Highest Secondary Stress Ratios $X
Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Inner) Load Case 1

MPa MPa 3) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Inside) Case 1
24%
Branch at Junction

MPa MPa 7) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Outside) Case 2
21%
Branch Transition

5%
Pad Outer Edge Weld

24%

6%
Table of Contents
Highest Fatigue Stress Ratios

Highest Fatigue Stress Ratios $X
Pl+Pb+Q+F Damage Ratio Primary+Secondary+Peak (Inner) Load Case 2

81 0.000 Life Stress Concentration Factor = 1.350
MPa 0.007 Stress Strain Concentration Factor = 1.000
Cycles Allowed for this Stress = 1,496,471.
Allowable "B31" Fatigue Stress Allowable = 345.0
12,178.3 Markl Fatigue Stress Allowable = 1689.2
MPa WRC 474 Mean Cycles to Failure = 2,907,019.
WRC 474 99% Probability Cycles = 675,327.
0% WRC 474 95% Probability Cycles = 937,606.
BS5500 Allowed Cycles(Curve F) = 418,709.
Membrane-to-Bending Ratio = 0.784
Bending-to-PL+PB+Q Ratio = 0.560
Plot Reference:
8) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (EXP,Inside) Case 2
Branch at Junction
Pl+Pb+Q+F Damage Ratio Primary+Secondary+Peak (Outer) Load Case 2

Cycles Allowed for this Stress = 1.0578E8
WRC 474 99% Probability Cycles = 2,490,188.
0% WRC 474 95% Probability Cycles = 3,457,313.
Plot Reference:
Branch Transition

MPa WRC 474 Mean Cycles to Failure = 7.6896E8
WRC 474 99% Probability Cycles = 1.7864E8
0% WRC 474 95% Probability Cycles = 2.4801E8
BS5500 Allowed Cycles(Curve F) = 1.7615E8
Plot Reference:
Pad Outer Edge Weld

Cycles Allowed for this Stress = 1,976,957.
WRC 474 99% Probability Cycles = 1,101,504.
0% WRC 474 95% Probability Cycles = 1,529,300.
Plot Reference:

MPa WRC 474 Mean Cycles to Failure = 4.7342E8
WRC 474 99% Probability Cycles = 1.0998E8
0% WRC 474 95% Probability Cycles = 1.5269E8
BS5500 Allowed Cycles(Curve F) = 82,021,856.
Plot Reference:
Table of Contents
Stress Intensification Factors

Stress Intensification Factors $X
Branch/Nozzle Sif Summary
Peak Primary Secondary SSI

Axial : 22.582 16.727 33.454 2.048
Inplane : 3.760 2.785 5.570 1.554
Outplane: 3.814 2.825 5.650 1.361
Torsion : 0.615 0.797 0.910 0.784
Pressure: 0.849 0.966 1.258 0.963
The above stress intensification factors are to be used

in a beam-type analysis of the piping system. Inplane,
Outplane and Torsional sif's should be used with the
matching branch pipe whose diameter and thickness is given
below. The axial sif should be used to intensify the
axial stress in the branch pipe calculated by F/A. The
pressure sif should be used to intensify the nominal
pressure stress in the PARENT or HEADER, calculated
from PDo/2T. B31 calculations use mean diameters and
Section VIII calculations use outside diameters. SSIs are
based on peak stress factors and correlated test results.
Pipe OD : 60.325 mm.

Pipe Thk: 5.540 mm.
Z approx: 13059.382 cu.mm.
Z exact : 11981.341 cu.mm.
(SSI = SIF^x) Axial Inpl Outpl Tors Pres

SIF/SSI Exponents: 0.904 0.773 0.776 0.467 0.213
SIF/SSI exponent based on relationship between primary and

peak stress factors from the finite element analysis.
B31.3 Branch Pressure i-factor = 314.915

Header Pressure i-factor = 1.700
The B31.3 pressure i-factors should be used with with

F/A, where F is the axial force due to pressure, and
A is the area of the pipe wall. This is equivalent to
finding the pressure stress from (ip)(PD/4T).
B31.3 (Branch)
Peak Stress Sif .... 0.000 Axial
30.140 Inplane
39.879 Outplane
1.000 Torsional
B31.1 (Branch)
39.879 Inplane
39.879 Outplane
39.879 Torsional
WRC 330 (Branch)
43.190 Inplane
39.879 Outplane
43.190 Torsional
Table of Contents
Allowable Loads
Allowable Loads $X
SECONDARY Maximum Conservative Realistic

Load Type (Range): Individual Simultaneous Simultaneous
Occuring Occuring Occuring
Axial Force ( N ) 13909. 3629. 5444.
Inplane Moment (mm. N ) 1049629. 193668. 410831.
Outplane Moment (mm. N ) 1034861. 190943. 405051.
Torsional Moment (mm. N ) 5921990. 1553956. 2330934.
Pressure (MPa ) 0.42 0.10 0.10
PRIMARY Maximum Conservative Realistic

Load Type: Individual Simultaneous Simultaneous
Occuring Occuring Occuring
Axial Force ( N ) 13909. 2870. 4305.
Inplane Moment (mm. N ) 1049629. 153157. 324894.
Outplane Moment (mm. N ) 1034861. 151002. 320323.
Torsional Moment (mm. N ) 3383226. 887773. 1331660.
Pressure (MPa ) 0.28 0.10 0.10
NOTES:
1) Maximum Individual Occuring Loads are the maximum

allowed values of the respective loads if all other
load components are zero, i.e. the listed axial force
may be applied if the inplane, outplane and torsional
moments, and the pressure are zero.
2) The Conservative Allowable Simultaneous loads are

the maximum loads that can be applied simultaneously.
A conservative stress combination equation is used
that typically produces stresses within 50-70% of the
allowable stress.
3) The Realistic Allowable Simultaneous loads are the

maximum loads that can be applied simultaneously. A
more realistic stress combination equation is used
based on experience at Paulin Research. Stresses are
typically produced within 80-105% of the allowable.
4) Secondary allowable loads are limits for expansion

and operating piping loads.
5) Primary allowable loads are limits for weight,

primary and sustained type piping loads.
Table of Contents
Flexibilities
Flexibilities $X
The following stiffnesses should be used in a piping,

"beam-type" analysis of the intersection. The stiff-
nesses should be inserted at the surface of the
branch/header or nozzle/vessel junction. The general
characteristics used for the branch pipe should be:
Outside Diameter = 60.325 mm.

Wall Thickness = 5.540 mm.
Axial Translational Stiffness = 2537. N /mm.

Inplane Rotational Stiffness = 759382. mm. N /deg
Outplane Rotational Stiffness = 618438. mm. N /deg
Torsional Rotational Stiffness = 414774304. mm. N /deg
Intersection Flexibility Factors for Branch/Nozzle :
Find axial stiffness: K = 3EI/(kd)^3 N /mm.

Find bending and torsional stiffnesses: K = EI/(kd) mm. N per radian.
The EI product is 0.71916E+11 N mm.^2
The value of (d) to use is: 54.785 mm..
The resulting bending stiffness is in units of force x length per radian.
Axial Flexibility Factor (k) = 8.026

Inplane Flexibility Factor (k) = 30.170
Outplane Flexibility Factor (k) = 37.046
Torsional Flexibility Factor (k) = 0.055
Table of Contents
Finite Element Model
Finite Element Model
Elements at Discontinuity
1) Pl < SPL (SUS Membrane) Case 1

2) Qb < SPS (SUS Bending) Case 1
3) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS Inside) Case 1
4) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS Outside) Case 1
5) S1+S2+S3 < 4S (SUS S1+S2+S3) Case 1
6) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE Inside) Case 2
7) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE Outside) Case 2
8) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (EXP Inside) Case 2
9) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (EXP Outside) Case 2
10) Membrane < User (OPE Membrane) Case 2
11) Bending < User (OPE Bending) Case 2
12) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (SIF Outside) Case 3

N3 Full Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

N3 Full Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

N3 Full Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

NOZZLE REPORT

Analysis Time Stamp: Wed May 27 07:58:13 2020.

Model Type : Cylindrical Shell

Design Operating Cycles : 0.

Uniform thermal expansion produces no stress in this geometry.

Nozzle Inside Temperature : 77.00 deg.

Nozzle Pressure : 0.105 MPa

FEA Model Loads:

Forces( N ) Moments (N-m)

The "top" or "positive" end of this model is "free" in

Stresses are NOT averaged.

Vessel Centerline Vector : 0.000 1.000 0.000

Load Case Report

Load Case Report $X

Inner and outer element temperatures are the same

THE 7 LOAD CASES ANALYZED ARE:

1 SUSTAINED (Pr Only)

Sustained case run to satisfy local primary

/-------- Loads in Case 1

2 OPERATING (Fatigue Calc Performed)

Case run to compute the operating stresses used in

/-------- Loads in Case 2

3 Program Generated -- Force Only

Case run to compute sif's and flexibilities.

4 Program Generated -- Force Only

Case run to compute sif's and flexibilities.

5 Program Generated -- Force Only

Case run to compute sif's and flexibilities.

6 Program Generated -- Force Only

Case run to compute sif's and flexibilities.

7 Program Generated -- Force Only

Case run to compute sif's and flexibilities.

Maximum Solution Row Size = 1032

Summation of Loads per Case

ASME Code Stress Output Plots

ASME Code Stress Output Plots $X

1) Pl < SPL (SUS,Membrane) Case 1

2) Qb < SPS (SUS,Bending) Case 1

3) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Inside) Case 1

4) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Outside) Case 1

5) S1+S2+S3 < 4S (SUS,S1+S2+S3) Case 1

6) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Inside) Case 2

7) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Outside) Case 2

8) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (EXP,Inside) Case 2

9) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (EXP,Outside) Case 2

10) Membrane < User (OPE,Membrane) Case 2

11) Bending < User (OPE,Bending) Case 2

12) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (SIF,Outside) Case 3

13) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (SIF,Outside) Case 4

14) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (SIF,Outside) Case 5

15) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (SIF,Outside) Case 6

16) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (SIF,Outside) Case 7

Stress Results - Notes

Stress Results - Notes

- Results in this analysis were generated using the finite

- Using 2013-2017 ASME Section VIII Division 2

- Use Polished Bar fatigue curve.

Assume pressure increases all other stresses.

* NO OVERSTRESSED NODES IN THIS MODEL *