Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fishkin Manipulation and Democratic Theory
Fishkin Manipulation and Democratic Theory
E-d ited by
Wayne·Le Cheminant
John M. Parrish
' - ~~ ~~o~1~~n~~~up
NEW YORK AND LONDON
First published 2011
by Routledge
270 Madison ~venue, New York, NY 10016
The right of the editors to be identified as the authors of the editorial material, and of the
authors for their individual chapters, has been asserted by them in accordance with sections
77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988.
All rights rcsctved . 'o pnrt of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or. uti lised in 1\11>1
form or by any dcctr(m.ic, mccb:lllical, or other n\ta.ns,.now k.now11 or hcrcnftcr invented,
including phowcopying :uld recording, or in :my informru.ion srora.gc or rc!lricvnl syst·m,
without permission in writing from the publishers.
~
l
SUSTAINABLE
FORESTRY
1
INITIATIVE
Certified ~ibar Sourcing
w..IW5fi~ogram.o~ .1
NSF-SFI-COC·C0004285
TM!.IIIfiMIIIf'pJ~WIIw..,t-t.
I
l Manipulation and
Democratic Theory
James S. Fishkin
Notes
l. ec Ricbard Conniff, "The Myth of Clean Coal," Yale 360 at http://e360.
Y.alc.cdu/content/feature.msp?id=2014 '
2. Stephen Ausolabehcre and Shanto Iyengar, Going Negative (New York: Free
Press, 1995), p. 65.
3. Ansolabeherc and Iyengar, Going Nt;gativt;, p. 95. .
4. Kim Arlington, ":Hawke: Child~cn Overboard the Mosr Despicable ofLies."
Mel!Jot,smc Age, Augus 24, 2004, http://www.thcabre.c_o m .au/articlcs/
2004/08/24/109324652043l.html?from, starylhs .
5. M<tnipulatior_l is sometimes used more broadly, but I am focusing here on its
objectionable forms. •
6. ee my Whm the People Spcit}t: Deliberative Dtmtocracy a,l.d PJtblw Conmlta-
tiotJ (Oxford: xford University Press, 2009).
7. Joseph A. Schumperer, Cafiitalism) Socialism awf Democra.r.y (New Ycwk:
Harper and Row, 1942); Richard A. Posner, Law, Pragmatism tmd Det~:Joc
rac,y ( ambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003), p. 269; and Jan'
. Shapiro The Moral Hmt~datiom o[Po!itics (New HaYen, CT: YaJe University
Press, 2002).
8. See 'Robert A. Dahl, Demom~ocy rmd its Ct·iti.cs (New Haven, T: Yak Uni-
versity Press, 1989), pp. 121-22 for a critique ofSchumpercr on the issue af
inclusion.
9. See http://cdd.stanford.edu/pollsjeu
.•