The students measured their standing height and the height of three jumps to calculate their hang time using the equation y=yo+Vo+1⁄2at^2. They found their average jump height and plugged it into the equation along with values for the initial position and velocity being zero. This allowed them to solve for time and thus calculate their hang time. Milo's hang time was calculated to be -0.51 seconds and Thalia's was -0.37 seconds, showing they could accurately determine hang time using kinematic equations and experimental data.
The students measured their standing height and the height of three jumps to calculate their hang time using the equation y=yo+Vo+1⁄2at^2. They found their average jump height and plugged it into the equation along with values for the initial position and velocity being zero. This allowed them to solve for time and thus calculate their hang time. Milo's hang time was calculated to be -0.51 seconds and Thalia's was -0.37 seconds, showing they could accurately determine hang time using kinematic equations and experimental data.
The students measured their standing height and the height of three jumps to calculate their hang time using the equation y=yo+Vo+1⁄2at^2. They found their average jump height and plugged it into the equation along with values for the initial position and velocity being zero. This allowed them to solve for time and thus calculate their hang time. Milo's hang time was calculated to be -0.51 seconds and Thalia's was -0.37 seconds, showing they could accurately determine hang time using kinematic equations and experimental data.
The students measured their standing height and the height of three jumps to calculate their hang time using the equation y=yo+Vo+1⁄2at^2. They found their average jump height and plugged it into the equation along with values for the initial position and velocity being zero. This allowed them to solve for time and thus calculate their hang time. Milo's hang time was calculated to be -0.51 seconds and Thalia's was -0.37 seconds, showing they could accurately determine hang time using kinematic equations and experimental data.
Washington Latin Public Charter School 5200 2nd Street NW DC, 2011 Figure 2: Introduction: The purpose of this lab was to see if we could calculate our hang time. I did this by Figure 1: Stading Jumping/Measring averaging the height of or 3 jumps and used the equation y=yo+Vo+½at²r. We communicated in a scientific framework by having neat work that Figure 1 (standing): The first Figure 2 (should be jumping): Then thing we did was we stood we jumped as high as we could without you could easily follow. We designed and walking/running and put the tape executed investigations by recording the heights straight up and reached as where we landed on the wall. Then after of our standing position and of each jump, high as we could standing next jumping 3 times we measured the to the wall and stuck the tape heights of our jumps (and standing analyzing the data received, checking our on the wall. position,) and found the average. algebraic work methodically, and were able to calculate are time in the air by using the formula of y=yo+Vo+½at²r. We developed models by using mathematical equations to represent the real world model that we made of our jump (the tape paste on the wall.) We used mathematical and computational thinking by using the correct equations, variables, and generally doing the algebra correctly. We used the problems solving process by seeing the physical model and being able to apply to physics and math. Conclusion: The final result of our calculations was that ilos hang time was -0.51 and Objective: Can you accurately my Hang time was -0.37. The calculate the Hang time of your data shows that this is the jump? hang time because all of our answers make logical sense Data and Analysis: We used these equations to calculate the hang time.Since we wrote out our equation since they are not greater we were able to check every part of work, and see each mistake we could have made. Some errors that could have occurred was that we did not measure correctly and than 1 and I was able to Materials/Equations: might have messed up on one of our measurements. g=-9.81 0.33=0+0+½(-9.81*t^2) catch all the mistakes in my yo=0 Vot=0 -0.33=½(-9.81*t^2) -0.66=-9.81*t^2 work. This shows that I must y=average in meters Duck tape -0.067+t^2 -0.25=t have gotten the correct Pencil Paper -0.17=0+0+½(-9.81*t^2) answers since I was able to y=yo+Vo+½at²r https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h96167-09NFMUQgNek3 -0.17=½(-9.81*t^2) -0.34=-9.81*t^2 see my work and because of Cogxdlv-4WDfR51yZusy72_0/edit https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/11B3mLXWn-uiQfyoT eYMnXNPRe0o2z1HFRwDb4DAEc6w/edit#gid=0 0.0346=t^2 0.18601=t that check for all of my 0.37=t mistakes.