The document discusses three types of evidentiality: 1) Indirect evidence which is inferred rather than directly witnessed, including inferences from physical evidence, general knowledge, or past experiences. 2) Reportative evidence which is information reported by others rather than directly witnessed, including neutral, admirative, or dubious reported statements. 3) Direct evidence which is information that was personally experienced through first-hand observation or senses.
The document discusses three types of evidentiality: 1) Indirect evidence which is inferred rather than directly witnessed, including inferences from physical evidence, general knowledge, or past experiences. 2) Reportative evidence which is information reported by others rather than directly witnessed, including neutral, admirative, or dubious reported statements. 3) Direct evidence which is information that was personally experienced through first-hand observation or senses.
The document discusses three types of evidentiality: 1) Indirect evidence which is inferred rather than directly witnessed, including inferences from physical evidence, general knowledge, or past experiences. 2) Reportative evidence which is information reported by others rather than directly witnessed, including neutral, admirative, or dubious reported statements. 3) Direct evidence which is information that was personally experienced through first-hand observation or senses.
The document discusses three types of evidentiality: 1) Indirect evidence which is inferred rather than directly witnessed, including inferences from physical evidence, general knowledge, or past experiences. 2) Reportative evidence which is information reported by others rather than directly witnessed, including neutral, admirative, or dubious reported statements. 3) Direct evidence which is information that was personally experienced through first-hand observation or senses.
1. Indirect/Inferential/Circumstantial Evidence: indicates information was not
personally experienced but was inferred from indirect evidence
- Information inferred from direct physical evidence (It seems…, It appears…, I
assume…, I suppose…, I presume…, etc.)
- Generic/Gnomic: Information inferred by general knowledge
- Expectational: Information inferred from personal experience with similar
situations (From my experience…, etc.)
- Speculative/Alethic: Information inferred from past deferred realization (It is
possible that…, it is probable that…, evidently…, apparently…, obviously…, It would be the case that…, It must be the case that…, as far as I understand…, as I can see…, Upon reflection…, etc.)
2. Reportative/Narrative/Renarrative Evidence: indicates information was not
personally experienced but was reported from event witnesses
- Felicitous (Neutral) Hearsay: indicates reported information without confirming
its accuracy and without taking responsibility.
- Mirative (Admirative) Infelicitous Hearsay: indicates reported information
without confirming its accuracy but expresses surprise and acceptance of a previously unexpected state of affairs.
- Dubitative Infelicitous Hearsay: indicates reported information without
confirming its accuracy but expresses doubt, uncertainty and rejection of statement perceived as dubious.
- Quotative/Confirmative: indicates reported information that is confirmed as
accurate but might still be open to contextual interpretation.
3. Direct/Egophoric/Witnessed/Perceptual Evidence: indicates information that
was personally experienced through direct observation or other sensory experience.