Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    CORRIGENDUM3ABPII

    Uploaded by

    cyberchang20002576

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    CORRIGENDUM3ABPII

    Uploaded by

    cyberchang20002576
    6 views15 pages

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views15 pages

    CORRIGENDUM3ABPII

    Uploaded by

    cyberchang20002576

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 15
    No. CE/EAP/ABP-II/PMC/RFP/ICB/17/2022/46 Date: October 14, 2022 CORRIGENDUM-3 Project- Assam Bridge Project Il: Project Management Consultancy Services for “Construction of 4 lane Extradosed PSC Bridge over the River Brahmaputra connect Palashbari and Sualkuchi including viaduct, approach road, river training works etc” Ref: i) REP No.-CE/EAP/ABP-II/PMC/RFP/ICB/17/22/17 Dated 29” August, 2022 li) Tender Ref. No. CEEAP/ABPIIPMCRFP/ICB/17/22/17, Dated. 29" August, 2022 iil) Corrigendum No.1 dated 23" Sept, 2022. iv) Corrigendum No.2 dated 14" October, 2022. Consultancy Services for "Project Management Consultant” under ABP-II Addendum to the RFP: The replies to the Pre-bid queries/clarifications is enclosed as Annexure-A and Annexure-B for information to the prospective consultants. i : realist Chief Engineer (EAP), PWRD, Assam ARR&TI Complex, Fatasil Ambari, fae — Guwahati-25 a ANNEXURE-A to Corrigendum-3 ‘Tender Reference No.CE/EAP/ABP-I/PMC/RFP/ICB/17/22/17 Dated-290h August2022 ach roads, river traning works Pre-Bid Minutes (Querties Vs Replies) of PMC: Assam Bridge Project I: Project Management Consultancy Services for “Construction of 4 lane Extradosed PSC Bridge over the River Brahmaputa connecting Palashbari and Sualkuchi including viaduct ar ‘ete on EPC mode s Ne eterence ‘Clause as per mt onan Clason equred Careaton/ Mosfiation Expansion Page 2, Cause 3 or felsewhere Letter oF invitation |This Expression of Interest (EO!) cum Request for proposal (RP) i invited from the eigble | consulting firms/company from the NOB member countries published in web ste: We request the Authority to kindly allow Consultant to bid fortis prest Project irrespective of their Nationality ‘aternatvely [No modification of this clause. a |hup:www.ndb int>about-ussorganization.members only In case ofan International Agency/Bidder, the bidders shall be allowed to bid fhrough thee Indian subsidiary and utilize the experience of their lparent/eroup/holding compary. jause 3.4 iv OPage No. 14 |if' same CV is submitted by two or more firms in the technical proposal ofa same project, zero _|We request the Authority to Kindly allow individual Key Experts to participate in [The contents of the clause remain unchanged, 2 \marks shall be given for such CV ‘more than one Proposal Tause 5 Proposal levaluation; Sub- clause 5.2 [page No. 17 'Sub-citeria for employment with firm mark i. Permanent staf (those already employed with the frm prior to one year from the month (during which this notice is isued) = 5 marks li. Retainer/non-permanent staff = Zero marks (Gient is requested to Kindly amend the clause as specific experience In North-East Region of India [The refered cause 5s elated to Permanent Stall ofthe consulting firm/eompany only not for specific experience in NE. region of India. The contents ofthe clause 5 remain unchanged. [Qualification of key Personne; lenciouser 8 Page-65 'Senior Bridge Design Specialist |He should have experience in as least 2 bridge project having cable stay/cable Iuspension/extradosed span superstructure under Project Management/Construction 'Supervision/Authorty Engineer in developed country. |We request the Authonty to Kindly consider experience in india or abroad in place lof "developed country" Experience in developing countries will be considered [Qualication of Key Personne; lenclouser -8 Page-65-75 [Similar capacity of Key Experts [The "Similar Capacity” of Key Experts are not specified other than Team Leader cur sr Bridge Engineer [The “Similar Capacity" of Key Experts as specified in Note under Qualification lof key personnel [Page 65} of RIP shall be applicable forall 1S Key Personnel, Page 6, cause 13.5 The Consultancy Frma/ Companies should have minimum Experience of providing Construction Isupervsion/Authorty Engineer/independent Engineer/Project Management Consultant for at least one similar nature of workof4/6 (or more) laning road projects of worth Rs 1600 Crores or lequivalent USD inthe last Leas. (Road Project means, Roads/Highways/Expressways with lvidges) \We request you to modify the cause as below ‘The Consultancy Flrms/ Companies should have minimum Experience of providing (Construction Supervision/Authority Engincer/Independent Engincer/Project IManagement Consultant for at least one similar nature of work of Elevated Metro Rall Project or 4/6 (or more} laning road projects of worth Rs 1600 Crores or equivalent USO in the lst |1oyears. (Road Project means, Roads/Mighways/Expressways with Bridges.) [No modification ofthis clause. Page 6, clause 13.4 |The ConsuRaney Firms/Companies should have minimum experience of providing Consultancy services in Designing of atleast one Elevated Structure of length notlessthani500 metres with (viaduct, superstructure of which shall be of precast segmental construction in the last1Oyears (€levated structure means, bridges, elevated foxpressways/ flyovers, urban interchanges and elevated Metro rll); and |We request you to modify the clause as below= ‘The Consultancy Firms/Companies should have minimum experience of providing {consultancy services in Designing/ Design Review/proof Checking/ Feasibility study lof atleast one Elevated Structure of length notlessthan1500 metres with viaduct, ‘superstructure of which shall be of precast segmental construction in the lastioyears. (Elevated Structure means, bridges, elevated expressways/ flyovers, lurban interchanges and elevated Metrorail); No modification of his cause. gae No. 54 Clause 53, {TOR i The Proje Wanaperent Constant shal compe such review ad ards conmonsfObenaiion Te theron the Contraco within 15 en) days recep of such Drawings provides, however thatin ease ot Hobe or Sec estar oan as n pa commen sa se te ormiy er thera of such Orewings wth the Scpe of he proj ne speietons and standard fang which pena of Rs 25,000.09 shal be ehargeby te Employer. “ie Proje: Management Constant stall re the aval Assurance ln sate by he Contact’ and shal wes cormentt the Contractor within perio of 2 wen one) dye tating the modeatons, fay, ue theret alg which 3 pera ofS 25,000.06 shal be erage by me Employer. ‘he Proje: Management Contltan tal review ne manly roses report frished by the Conratar snd ends comments tereon tothe Author an the Carat tin (sve) da of eet of su Fer Tang cha penalty of Re. 25,00000/da tall changed by the Cnployer ‘he Projet Management Constant stall comalete the ele ote methodology proposed tobe adopted by the| ratr for excring the works, an convey its commer tthe Coiractr within period of 7 (sven yas he date of rexpt ofthe proposed methodology rom the contactor ang which penalty of 5 000.0/ay shal be charged bythe Employer The penalty s on higher side and there seems to be numerous penalties with will [put the consultant in jeopardy. We request you to reduce the penalty to 5,000/ day land further puta cap on overall penalty. INo change to the clause Page 9, Cause-6 {ast date of submission of RP Document (ke, Bid Due Date) -14:00 hrs on 15-10-2022 |We request you to provide aleast 3 weeks’ time for submission after replies to lqueres are issued, [Extension of Time Tor submission of proposals, Fany shall be dealt seperately idders are requested to verity the website forthe latest information related lo this RP, Page 1of 13, Fe eterence ‘clans 2s por Contant’ Creation required ‘lritetion / Moatation expansion 0 Point No.7, Page NoS The intending consulting frms/company shall have to make online payment through ETender portal for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand) only towards the cost of RFP document processing fees (non-refundable) (including all taxes) on the date of submission of their, [proposals [We request you to reduce the Tender fee amount to Rs 5,000/- which is s per the [standard norms used by the Ministry forall MoRTH, NHAI, PWD, NHIDCL projects. [No change to the Tender Fee, Regarding submission of cost, Kindly visite jporal for Corrigendum already published on 23rd September, 2022, Point No.8, Page No.5 JFhe Applicant shall submit as part of ts Proposal, online bid security of Rs.7,50,000 [seven aks ‘thousand only in the form ofa unconditional Bank Guarantee Issued by a Nationalized/ [we request you to reduce the Bid Security amount to Rs 2,00,000/- which is a per Ihe standard norms used by the Ministry for al MoRTH, NHAl, PWD, NHIDCL No change to the Bid Security amount Regarding submission of Bid Security, kinaly visit e-portal for Crrigendum-1 already published on 23rd September, u ‘Scheduled Bank located in India (as per the format specified in Appendix N of this RFP document-[projects. 2022. ‘the "Bid Security"), valid for 45 days beyond the validity ofthe bid Point No, Page NoS [Bid Security of IV shall be n the name of the IV that submits the proposal. Unqualified bidders|Kindly alow in name of Vor Lead Member. No change to the clause jwould be informed regarding their non- qualification, without any explanation and thereafter 2 {sid Security would be returned unopened after the evaluation of the financial proposal and ‘signing the contract agreement with the successful bidder. (Cause No.13 ‘The lead partner must full atleast S10 of eligibility criteria oF 13 (a) &[@) and other IV partner _[since, Joint fulilment is allowed for A), C), Isidders are requested to verify the e portal for latest information vide [A Eligibility Criteria for {should ffl atleast 30% of eligibility criteria at 13 (a) & () of table in para (A) above. Each _|D) and &), we request to consider Joint fulfilment for 8) also. [corrigendum -1. published an 23rd September, 2022. lsole applicant firm Point [partner of )V must meet the requirement of eligibility criteria as mentioned at 13 () In para A 413 |no. 8) labove. Also, the lead partner and JV partner jointly should meet the eligibility criteria as Page No. 7 mentioned at 12(a), (] & (4) of table in para (A) labove. (Clause No.13 (However, consortium shall not be alowed in any case Please dary, Tint Venture partners are limited to 2 (wo) )Eligity Criteria for kindly verify lause 12 of Section: Information to Consultants. For1V 114 bole applicant frm Point (consortium with mare than two members of the JV isnot allowed. io. 8) Page No.7 (Cause Nos iThe Applicant whether a sole Applicant or @1V may include an Associate frm/company. [lease reconfirm associate ls alowed since ths ls not mentioned n Clause 12 of |The Joint Venture company of two partners may submit bid in Association of [A eligibity Criteria for {credentials of Associate fem/company, except key personnel if any wil ot be considered for Page 6 lanother Firm. ‘sole applicant firm Point evaluation. Maximum number of key personnel ofthe Associate frm during the RIP proposal and [The condition of association wil be limited as mentioned inthe clause. 35 tno. 8) jin implementation of the projects limited to 2 (two). Page No [Point No.1i Page No. |The total time period for the assignment as Project Management Consultant willbe for 63 [Please reconfirm that 3 months is for Review of DPR [| months Yor review of the cost estimate based on current market prices at the imeonths (3 months for DPR, Design review, procurement of EPC contract; 48 months for time of reviewing, outline drawings design ofthe DPR, technical specification, 16 [construction period and 12 months for Defect Liability Period preparation of EPC bidding documents including Employer's Requirement |with reduced manpower). including O& M Reguicements etc based on DPR of the project. Page 23 For each of the above marking, the marking wl be done on scale of 100 and willbe assigned [Please explain the marking scheme. {Kindly refer to the Detailed evaluation Report annexed at Annexure’ of the \weightage as IP document fr the marking system," For each ofthe above marking, the ay Iabove. ‘marking willbe done on scale of 100 and will assigned weightage as above" is deleted, | [Detailed Evaluation of key Team Leader cum Sr. Bridge Engineer Is this Is Bridge postion we request you to add Bridge projects also as below: Detailed Evaluation Criteras [personnel \) Total Professional Experience in Highway Project ‘Team Leader cum Sr. Bridge Engineer Modification is as under- lit Experience as Team Leader/Senior Resident Enginees/ Project Manager or similar capacity in |) Total Professional Experience in |) Total Professional Experience in Highway project Highway/Bridge Project Highway/Bridge Project ‘Experience as Team Leader Senior Resident Engineer/Project Manager or similar capacity ini) Experience as Team Leader/Senior Resident Engincer/ Project Manager or sirilar i) Experience as Team Leader/Senior Resident Engineer/ Project Manager or 8 construction Supervision /IC for {capacity in Highway/Bridge project similar capacity in Highway/Bridge project latieast two Major Highway Projects. ii) Experience as Tear Leader/ Senior Resident Engineer/Project Manager or _ il) Experience as Team Leader/ Senior Resident Engineer/Project Manager or ‘similar capacity in Construction Supervision /IC for ‘similar capacity in Construction Supervision /IC/AE/IE for atleast two Major Highway/Bridge Projects atleast two Major Highway/Bridge Projects [Detailed Evaluation ofkey [Team Leader cum Sr. Bridge Engineer [We request you to consider as below [No change to this qualification requirement under tis clause. However, lpersonnel [Tear Leader/Resident Engineer/Project Manager or similar capacity of at least one experience in developing countries will be considered. |cTeam Leader/Resident Engineer/Project Manager or similar capacity of at least one span of 125|span of 100-125 M of cable stayed/cable suspension/extradosed Bridge in 19 lsS0 Mof cable stayed/cable suspension/extradosed Bridge in Construction Supervision of [Construction Supervision/ Design/OPR of Highway Project in developed / Highway Project in developed {developing country try [Detaled Evaluation ofkey [sr Bridge Design Specialist |We request you to consider as below [Detaled Evaluation Criteria lpersonnel ib) Experience of Bridge Design/Review of at least 02 Construction/supervision _|Sr. Bridge Design Specialist (bis modified 2s below: 20 'b) Experience of Bridge Design/Review of atleast 02 Construction/supervision projects in project in developed/ developing country also. [Experience of Bridge Design/Review of atleast 02 Construction/Supervsion of (developed country [Project in developed/developing county. Page 20f 13 2 alerece cae spe Comat’ Ciena Ctartenton/ Mostetion/ Banton Detated Fratton of key [Resident Cum Cable Stayed 6rdgeEngheer We request you considers Below Residant cum Cable Stayed BigeErineer an evonel Eh experience of” years in sma capscly of major cable stayed cable suspension extradosed ] Experience of years in simlarcapacty of mor able stayed cable suspnsin/|No change to the qualfstionrequvement Iriges in developed lsradosed bridges in developed /develoing country Jeunty Deiaed Battin offeror Environmental per lve equest you to cose highway Boje aon the TO yeas oTexpeence. [enor Envronmenta Exper personne! fi emvronmertal exper having experience of not less than 10 years inthe fed of ver bridge |i Environmental Expert having experience of not ss than IO yenrsin the field of |W change tothe qualieatoneterla Proje etc and hove aecuat towed in oqvatc eon. fiver ride bighway project, ete and have adequate knowedgen EJ Jaquatic ecology. Betaied Evatuatonofkey”|Geoteh Gu Foundation Sper i euesk yu Yo CORTE ge engin OF BOOT ewe Seoiec-Com Foundation pert 23 personnel In) Experience of Computer Aided Foundation Design of Bdge length more thant km. No change tothe quaifleation teria KecrowT [Due Dae Tone & Patel le request he Ger to provide alent? dys tne for PyscaT submision aie odication of Case wo 22 23 Seton Page BE 24 Posen. 883 online submision. ard contes cause no. 22.823 (ate of submisin ion or before 1:30 rs on 15/10/2002 ETON i case Tori enpeience dain shoul be subiied a per Hague Converon To which dias doa Sinatra cena oefan No change os Sae age No. 13 nels Translation Version and duly apostle by concemed Tange ae tobe anfted and then te translated version supposed to be Jdauce no. 3.400) Emtassy/ Consus, nestled by Authorised agencies in the County proto notarizton Al International rms are folowing this procedure fr ther roposasin ind. _ owever,ndon embassy/ Consulate authentication should be made mandatory ony for document in language of countries that are not signatory to Hague ecmvetion ease confirm rent ae average anna ver The mimo requrement Rs 75 Gres However, Sma ae tang awarded [Corecon= 26 Paseo. [i tess than Rs. crores or equivalent USD-0 Kors. 70 crores or eauvelent USO ad above Ihe minim requirements Rs. 75. or above orequvalert USD, SLNo.2 liv: 70 crores orequvalent USO and above-3 request you to pease ecty the same nue Icnstraean SopenSion/ Authority Engineer Independent Engines ojec Management apart Tom these Bees, cable suspension idee rasa mentonedia the RIP —aronire of RF maybe read as “Construction Superson] AatBorRy Pave Wot Ionaitant a xtradosed/ Cable Stayed PSC Bridge consisting of minimum spanof 135 mtsin [Dato Shee. Cpner/ independ Engnet/Project Management Corsutantfa | Sno. asin proectin the lst 10 years. we veqvest yout nlde cable suspension tigen Annexure aswel since such fntrodsed Cable toyed/Cabe Suspension, PSC Orie consisting of 35 mts 2 land ridges are more complex than eeable stayed exradosed bridges andi wil ina singe pojectinthe ast 10 year. bata sheet Jrsureporipaton of ms having expertise in supervising such projects lste no. 2 ease cont [cawse's2, 51. No.3 Famenuret [rojak rears Rand] Tiga Eaprsiwap] Wig WIRE Consng oT evadase] cable We request you orclode cable suspension ages cteron sce such annexure1 S.No, 3 of HP may be comected and Be read as lace no. 2 stayed structures cross perma ers /sesfceets) rec re more comples hana able stayed entrdosediriges and twill Kno. lrsure paricipeion offs having expertise nsuperdsng such pret. he Consultancy Frms/Companisshoul have minimum expeinceot fine ease confirm roviinecorstctonSopesson/authoryEngncer/ndependent ag ona Sest Eneneer/Pojet Management Constanta projet consiting of Extra Pave No. 23 ose/CabeStayedeate suspension PSC Behaving at ast neni [cause 32,51 No.3 xe dosedcabe stayed span of135 M in singe projet in ast 20 years. [rojeameans Roa vigharey/Expressway th ridges acoss pete fiver sears) | one {eae Sarre means lated wxpresiways vos ba ecranges and levied Apart Fam ths, Brides ove iveaea/eeea] ao meiioned in the RFP (Sata |The Constancy irms/Companiehoul have minimum age No.2 ev ris) [sree lexperienceofprovang Construcionsuperason/Authrty b.no. 5 le request yout ince Bridge over ever/sea/rees) in Anoexure 2s welto ngneet/ndependent ngree/Pojett Management Constant of atleast . ensure partcpation a fms hving expertise n supers such projects, lone HevatedStructre of engthntlessthant500 miswth 2 [pata sheet Pease conn oduct supertructureotwtich shale of precastsegmental construction In race No. 23 Ie as Overs lentedStctuemeans, elevatedxoresevays fyover Jaws 52,51 no. troaninterchanges and elevated Metro vals Bridge over verseacreet} Prenel engring af ast one ClevatedSudtre a engi so ls han TSOO mvs wih wadoct” |The imam veqlement feng of Elevated Siructure 1500 is, However, 3 Annexure, SLG oF RP may be reed and earered as lage No.2 Jordon with superstructure of precast segmental earstructon nthe lst 10 years. Iran ore beng awarded for Elevated strcture of length of 1000 mis or mre. i Elevated Stace oflngth es han 1500 mts with viadt potion eto Kuno.e [i eevated structure of length ess tan 2000 rs wi viaduct potion et. -0 i) elevated Sucre of length of 1500 nts or more with vad portion ee ao bd [a Fevate structure of length of 000 sor more wind! portion et. -3 Request yout please rctiy the same. i [ata seet lage No. 23 fosse52 s.no.s : Bop ayole Page 301 13. Chiof Engineer, EAP, PW.R.D 2) Ne coon pene Conant Caen oad lion Mostetn xpaon Pare RIVER TRATaNG PERT or is poston P Degree Fyoloy Water evorcr aS. No.1 1.& ——[anerored Page No. 28 ProesionalExpertence a ghway Project [perience a arlogat 51.2 being coniered. Therefore, we request (River Training Exper: si [sta ou tony cosiae oiperene af ge ration & Dar, Water sours nd [nl rea and correct SL 2) of AMenure of RI as below Mood cnet management roel as wel unr Pessoal fperence. ['rotesonal perience inHihway caning of major bapes/Bedgfirigaton/ater Resource Project” |Annexure-t [RIVER TRAINING EXPERT [Piease define “Major Projects” as mentioned under this criterion. ‘Annexure of REP Pe No. 29 [Dperence of ver vatingof atleast ree major iets fiver Ting ber sa [srt 20) Kind read ond covet L.2(a) oF AP as below Petperence of ver alin wer of teat three malo projects of Iehwoy/onagfiiation OAM ater Resource” |Annexure-1 PLANNING AND CAD EXPERT ~ ia the RFP, Experience in Developed Countries for similar project is mentioned [Experience in developing countries will also be considered. Poe Wo 31 Experence in develoned/ developing Counties for sar pojct, der Preferential Qualcaton St no.2s) le reques you to Kil conn if Experience of Developing country wil be aa lenetosune Konsiered for geting mars uner ts citron, Poe Wo. 73 Panning and CAD Expere feared pc AND CAD ERPERT le under Wat Expres of 5 Projet wi aa be oad nde is RPO GTN Project wi ao be cond aa {rage to. 31 [spereneo Primavera CPM/PERT/COM, [eterna the some bmenoned t No.5 under esentl Qualico’ nthe ste 20 Enclosure a the AP Page No. 73) Famers ei Enver pert ini cosiar asia Projects wa undo Ts Gaon ac, rere fascia Proje wil ao be OPIS. 3 [rage no.22 Profesional Experience a Roa Bridge Projects Emrormentl Epes wort. on hese projects a wel ino. 2 RfP page 65 Cl. 17 17. Training Isa specific component under the assignment. The Consultant shall make necessary| [arrangement for international training/exposure trp tothe PWD Engineers, The Consultant shall We request clrent to inimate the tentative names of counties to make necessary [arrangement for international traning/ exposure trp to the PWD Engineers so that [Any technologically developed courivies may be considered in financial lproposal. Preferable countries from Europe, South East Asia, Austraa 36 |provide for three batches of foreign international trainings/exposure trips to Engineers in [proper financial implication may be assessed for financial proposal. {technologically developed countries RiP page 6 13} He should Rave experience n at least 2 Bridge project having cable stay/cable suspension] |The experience required in Developed county. iis observed that similar cable stay [Experience of developing countries wil also be considered |QUALIEICATION OF KEY extra dosed span superstructure under Project Management/Canstruction supervison/ Authority bridge projects are done in many developed an developing counties with best 37 [PERSONNEL SENIOR —_[Engineerin developed country in similar capacity 95 defined in Note above. practices. The criteria shouldbe relaxed to developed/ developing countries. |BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIALIST Section No, [Note [in case of on-going projects, the physical progress of work on the date of submission of [in ease of multiple evil contracts under one consulting assignment, weighted Employer's Cerificate willbe considered for physical progress of work on the Information to Consultant. |the RfP shall not be less than 90%, which should be authenticated through an Employer's average of the physical progress of all the multiple civil contracts will be date of submission of RIP. ‘/ (certificate ‘consolidated to work out overall physical progress of the consultancy agreement / [Page no. 8/ contract. I) [For Ex. Let us say a Consultancy assignment (A) has 3 cil contracts namely X, Vand Eligibility Criteria for sole respectively, and [applicant frm (construction Project cost of contract X 200 Cr with Physical progress ~ 100% 8 [construction Project cost of contract Y -B0 Cr with Physical progress ~ 80% [construction Project cost of Contract 2-100 Cr with Physical progress —70% |Weighted avg = (200*100%+80°B09S#100"70)/(20080+100} |=87.39% [The consultancy assignment (A) is ongoing with total physical progress of 87.89% [and hence shall not be considered as the qualifying project, (Section No.t, IThe last ten years as indicated above means [As per current international practices, latest credentials should be considered prior [Last 10 years means FY 2011-12 to FY 202021. Information to Consultant. |F.¥. 2011-42 to 2020-21. to the submission ofthe proposal forthe evaluation purposes. ap [A Eat crea for Hence it is requested thatthe experience of last ten years prior to the proposal Isole applicant frm ‘submission date shal be considered for the evaluation. |We request the client to kindly consider our suggestion Page dt 13 Khe wt= 2 PAP WARD tosil Ambarl, Guwahati-25 Se] meee ioe Cont Crores an oenin loon Seaton Nos, B] Eig iter Tor partners case of ong or Rede on THT ee understand tthe woihag fH eB aed yt ea riba & 30% ral wart ar Corend pubertal on 238 Inomtono Consultant learner sabe lowed) shal be a nde: Rove tue the member shale apleblearss le iecel (eptaribe, 2022 i [tesono 98) 6) 8 (8 eatin the uiory egy cetera fore ed pariner must ui at east 5% Felli teri of 23) & ad other .V parr ateaplean tim, Poge tou fiat ect 30x of payee 13 8) & (ef table pur) above Each equsthe cent tokndy consider or sapeston 40 low o/ctauseNo-138|artner of lV rust as he eqienet fell eeiasmentoned at 13 ()gt8& ove Ao tees purine’ ad partner ty sou meet he lly eter a Inenionedat 2), 0 & [tof tale pre (8) above Led patie ofthe 5 must net he teria 13 eae gra [above Honever, consortium sal note llowedn ayes Secon T= eration oe Conan Fs Compares ol have imum experience of rong Consnaion incase nappa varicatedin he Wop a aN We eh ETB FeV |) Sale Ym eee owen Cnaitanes Pope No [Superson / Author Eng’ / Independent Fognce jet aragerent Constant oa esto mes prof! cot ter 16001 mating tat 3200 cart OF poe bi |) Lead member mst meet rnin 5% cf requirement fer/Parano.) Cause No. leas onesntorneture of work of or morel rng oad projets of worth Re 1600 rove case of sole pcan ony single eet of 680 Cpa ot wl sui he i Other member must met minum 30% othe eqremert ae) equalentuSDin the st 10 years. Road Project meno, Reads ighwaye/Exgreseuny requirement IM) Al member combined mst mee the requirement een Pe |We request the client to kindly consider the minimum sharing of 50% for lead note Pore on 30% or pater, an conbiedly the] ee ou 200 Graft ach prner of V st meet the rearerent felity tera Kost s.r fo perpen the dng prone | we request th cnt ony coe our get, [Section- 2:- Letter of For Key Personnel eg, Team Leader, Resident. cum Bridge Engineer, Cable Stayed Bridge Expert, [1. Pl explain what is understood by “such projects” and what all projects we need [Annexure "Detailed Evaluation Report™of RIP willbe the basis of evaluation | [rvtaton‘o eile \ighwoy Desig nee and Rood afer Expat tte Conutars sould pretercnddstes tec ropes Conutants, Cause faving experience on such Projects, Such personel hal erated her thn the canddbter_conierunder hs eb sa [pam ragei2 hovng seh | expt ata |. cent has akeny povided the deta tech evaluation whch sanesed Vamerure 1 ther any rhe nama certo erat these ey pects TRCIOSURES, EA LEOER COWS. BRIDGE EGER rar coo nodes Tiny ead fan a SS oF Cres NO? uateat onorKey | sDetied valuation rer (Tear Leader cum Sr. ge enee) B Onbena ef Constant: Team LeaderResdent Engineer under Constrcon personnal, Doge 65 & Spero Detalad Evolution Crea. Team Leader Resident Engineer rojet Manager or sir capacity of atleast one span ot _ |b on teal of Contactor: Projet Manager Conrcton/ Consructon | fas aso rca styedeable suspension /enradosed eigen Cosracon superison of [Superson 2 Nehrway Projectndevtoped county le eaves the cent to conte Selor be Enger 5 part of sir capacty hwo roe -0rmarts Ds the eperence to be pronded ude eam ade cum Brge ener nt rjc =0 marks Ince perce cr igs Engine add 2 mart entrar ac ational rjc sb to maximum 35 mars le request the cent to tnd conser our sgt, PPENOKES. Fora Caretam Vis (6 For Proposed feo Sa Kini caiy wheter an underaing om the exper wile walled ie Eaves Ce anda Page 40 ett) eperence Crates rom Employes tobe athe mando, freevper - |doesn'’t have some of the experience certificates from the employer. We request the ctem tony cry he same ICSFECALCONOTIONE [6:16 The amour payable olen arene EN 5. Since constant ave to propose ogy apes wih developed county or anverlon TURD NR te at of onveion shal be7 (wer days or conraacr, The ceingin leary perce tk eqvestd tat remuneration amount rl be pad accord in USO [etre te date ad tie fbn of donne lnwsee 62.8 2th) The roe for oregano Persone are se forth in Append GH eat the fore exper Kindly cof, 4s |oaseaee 53a) he orig rene shallbe incl uency. tos oe at) Remuneration fr fori Persone sabe ain lc carey and remuneration fo 2. the raiens le ade oly Lc caency, hen we equ the cent fos Pesonel hal be pid nal ure dete the eran at, eset ide propove USD curency agaist foreign poston Kel cot, eer [7.2 The Cosa sha aang Wing apa ov Pile Procurement NepoTaVon Tiny conn owl Set Ws aa odggaig ci tvards we ann |The Trainee nding GST charge of the ste al be bore by he Heme ofetrence/ pubic Procurement Contract Monegan orn te Pocvemnt Tear compring of inte reputed ston na Constant ter expenditure sabe es perth State Gove cea Got Peges2 Cause1?2 [engines of PRD The Consulta sal prepare orang ln for 3-4 day warn inoatches {We request the cent only arty he sae roms 1* for 20 Engineers in the reputed institution eg Administrative Staff College of India, Hyderabad, Inca Nationa stitute of nan Magee, Fava, nad soon Scan Trarma ont Te nen Osan eTcompary al ave To mak onlin payer ough E Tender here sears navraly reevEng Te CO of RFP doce eo Be ply he rw te por ar raion CoVerdunr was published on Bd Consultan Page. porta fra sum of 50000 Rupees ty hosed) nivtonrasthecostot re eatenbe, 2022 thse ou? fr document processing es (eet) Falconry wl raved to reper an [onthe etener portal the ost of RP document oes enone S he web. ete cero |(0} but as per the RFP, the cost of document fee to be paid by the bidder is INR 5.000 oe we request the cert trl cant the same Page Sof 13 Rp Fe] eterence clause a por (ccaton / Moafestion / xparation a8 Section-l (information to (Consultan ts/ Page no. 5/ (Clause 8 iThe Applicant shall submit as part of ts Proposal, online bid security of Rs 7,50,000 (seven Takis lity thousand only in the form ofa unconditional Bank Guarantee issued... inthe |name of the JV that submits the proposal. The Bid submitted without Bd Security will be ‘summarily rejected. [There seems an anomaly regarding the Bid security (EMD] to be paid by the bidder [son the e-tender portal, the cost of aid Security tobe submitted by the bidder is Imentioned as Rs. zero (0) but as per the RFP, the cost of bid security to be paid by ithe bidder is INR 7,50,000 |we request the client to kindly clarily the same. Kindy vist the e portal or aifiation. Corrigendurna was published on 23rd | ‘September, 2022 inthis regard, “9 ection (etter oF Invitation) / Page no. 19/ Clause 6.7 INEGOTIATIONS 15.7 Replacement of key personnel shall be considered only in unavoidable circumstances. In no (case more than three replacements of key personnel shall be permitted during negotiation and in such cases Consultant and such key personnel shall have to submit affidavit to the effect that sting te pero of arent sted pare of Seton - the partners shall be debarred upto ane year for Employer's consultancy projects its observed that Para 8 of Secioni referenced inthis Causes rested to 1G ‘security and 's not relevant to replacement in any way. “The typographical error "Para 8” of Secton-| may be replaced with "Para 2 of ‘ection-iof this RP. Section? (letter of Invitation) Page 19/ Cause 6.7 Iepaceman fay personnal sal be considered anys uravlaleSreumslande,n no care were tan ee feslacenentsoFkey personel shal be ported during negtiasonandin such exes Canaan an such Key fersonna shel have to submt afidavt tothe eect hat during the peri of aignment spate pare Bot Eton, the replced key personnel sa not be professional employed anyerein Erployer’s wer, Employer lal not futher conser CV of uch key personnel rel or nde er ano is pojecs or this perio. The fecuctio in remuneration of such replacements shal be Shane 10% for 2st -eacement and 2nd replacement fesoecvely wthin ay pare fbi Incase curing negation hel within vat pard of be, more nan tw [placement are sought byte constants hs propa sal be considered 3¢ Non erponsv. in such cae the [rtincd score of rerainingteincally aii rs meting the non-anfit cnaiton sabe evaluated to rive sew Hn ceding interaction wih he ey personel athe ine of nepotition is found ha the ey fescnne ropceed i unsuitable forthe asgnment poston, he rapiareren by aqulent or eter sta be lrovided by the cnsutant. The Key personnel wn such un stale CV sal nt be considers In ay future ds fo fst poston fortwo yor No dedueson fr such replacement who are nt found sutabie during interaction shal Ie made inne eventuality tat im Iecomes nonesponve, fr te tid time, due tothe action af replacements more than Ze personel during Jegoiotion, te frn ad its onan V partners sal be deboredupte one yes or Employers corsency oie. [Tis to Righlight that the dlause seems contradictory at two places in isl Initially says three replacements are allowed but later on it says that two replacements wil be allowed with penalty of 8% and 10% for first and second replacement respectively. [as 15 nos. of key experts would be required to be deployed, it's kindly requested to allow replacement of 5 nos, of key experts with reduction of remuneration as, below: + 8% for first and second replacement + 10% for subsequent replacements Kindly consider. Il The typographical eror "Para 8" of Section may be replaced with "Para (of Section |i) Maximum three replacement during negotiation is permitted |i) After that for 1st eeplacement reduction of enumeration @5% and for 2nd [replacement reduction in renumeration @10% etc. Isection5, Format for Isubmission of Financial ias per Financial Proposal Format, man-month against the position of ARE Highway is mentioned laxta man-months, however as per Enclosure ~ A the same is mentioned as 2x24 man months. Ikndly specify the duration and no. of ARE required under this assignment. We Irequest the client to kindly clarify the same. IManmonths ARE Highway is 2 IManmonths= 2x24 manmonths 2 projects -0 mark 2 Projects 15 marks |Add 2.5 marks extra for each additional project subject to maximum 20 marks ingineer/ Independent Engineer/ Independent Consultant/ Construction ‘Supervision are similar, hence requested to consider the project experience of [authority Engineer/ Independent Engineer/ Independent Consultant/ Construction 'superuison will be considered under this head for evaluation Proposal & Isection 6 Terms of, Isconstruction period may be suitably adopted as per construction period of EPC contract. The Reference/ Page no. _|man-month against each key personnel/ sub — professional shall be same as specified in 8 & Page enclosure A of TOR. 51 io. 66 lg Appendix C3: {Breakdown of local/ foreign currency costs, & lenclosure-A [Detaled Evaluation Experience of providing consultancy services in Designing of at eas one Elevated Structure of ~ [As maximum mark under this Read Is 4 marks. Hence the evaluation criteria should. [Experience of providing Construction Supervsion/Authority [Report/ Page 2 & Annexure |length not les than 1500 mrs with viaduct portion with superstructure of precast segmental |be revised as below: lengineer/independent Engineer/Froject Management Consultant/ |1/S1.No.5 struction inthe last 20 years (Elevated Structure means, bridges, elevated expressways / independant Consultant of atleast one Elevated Structure of length not less hiyovers, urban interchanges and elevated Metro rails; 4 marks i) levated Structure of length |i Elevated Structure of length less than 1500 mtrs with viaduct portion ete.-0 _|than 1500 mtrs with viaduct portion of superstructure of precast segment less than 1000 mirs with viaduct portion etc.~O marks Irarks. [construction in the lat 10 years, (Elevated Structure means, elevated 52 (i (i Elevated Structure of length of 1000 mtrs or more with viaduct portion ete.~3 marks lexpressways / flyovers, urban interchanges and elevated Metro rail); (i) Elevated Structure of length of 1500 mtrs or mare with viaduct portion etc.—4 |) Elevated structures with viaduct portion et. les then 1500 mirs length ‘mas project -O marks |We request the clint to kindly consider our suggestion i Elevated structures with via duct portion ete. 1500 mtrs length or more 5 Imarks [Annexure of Detaled |Team Leader cum Sr. Bridge Engineer SI No. 2 (a}] \We understand that Major Highway projects means Projects consisting of Major [Experience under AEVIE/CSC/IC will be considered ae [valuation/ Team Leader [ridge of 1000 M length or in ease of Metro Project, project costing more than [Authority Engineer leum sr. experience as Team Leader? Senior Resident Engincer/ Project Manager or similar capacity in s.3000 Cr. le= Independent Engineer lridge Engineer/ Sl.No. 2 construction Supervision /1C fr atleast two Major Highway Projects. Input should not be ess [OR Kindly define the term Major Highway Project (¢SC= Construction Supervision consultant 3 oun) 19 12 months | lalso, we would lie to submit that as scope and services of consultants of Authority |IC= Independent Consultant Page 6 of 13, fe -eterance ‘Clauses per nie Constant’ Cafeation required ‘lartetion / Mosiestion Explanation iEnclosure-8, (qualification of key personnel, Se. Bridge Design Specialst/ Page 65 ‘Se Bridge Design Specialist Essential Qualification 1) The candidate should be Post Graduate in Structure with Graduate in Civil Engineering from 2 ‘recognized university IW understand thatthe essential educational qualification ofS. Bridge Design 'Specialists Graduate in Cl Engincering from a recogrized university and Post leraduate degree in Structural wil get extra weightage but it isnot essential |quaification. se. Bridge Design Specialist I) General qualification is Engineering graduate (Civil from recognized |University/institute i) Essential qualification is Post Graduate degree in Structural Engineering, 54 |e Detaled Evaluation [We request the client to kindly laify the same. Icom recognized UniversityInstitute (criteria of Sr. Bridge Design |2. General Qualification Specialist) |) Engineering Graduate (civil) from recognized university ~ 15 marks Page no. 5 W) Post graduate degree in Structural Engg. from recognized university ~10 marks iEnclosure-6, [Team Leader cum Sr Bridge Engineer |We undarstand thatthe essential educational qualficalion of Team Leader cum Sr_|Team Leader cum Sr Br. Engineer ‘qualification of key [Bridge Engineer is Graduate in Civil Engineering from a cecognized university |i) General qualification is graduate in Cl Engineering from recognized personnel, Team Leader {Essential Qualifications and experiences 1)Graduate in Civil Engineering from 3 recognized _ It's also understood that Post graduate degree in Civil Engineer/ Construction _|University/Institute leum sr. lunversity with post graduate degree in Ci Engineer/ Construction Management/ MBA. [Management/ MBA is preferential qualification, however it will get extra weightage |i Essential qualification is Post Garduate Degree in Structural ridge Engineer / Page 65. |Preterential Qualification \during evaluation. [ngineering/Construction Management/MBA 55 [& Detailed Evaluation _|1)Post Graduate degree in Civil Engineering 'We request the clint to kindly clarify the same, (criteria of Team Leader —_|1.General Qualifcation cum Sr. ) Graduate in Civil Engineering from recognized university ~20 marks Iaridge Engineer/ I) Post Graduate Degree in Engineering in Civil Engg/Construction management/MBA ~ 5 marks Page no. 3 56 lannexure - [of Detaled [evaluation Criteria Se. [Bridge Design Specialist/ [Page no. 5 ir, Bridge Design Speclalst- SU No. 2 (a) i) Experience as Sr. Bridge Design Specalist/ Resident [ridge Engineer/ Project Manager or similar capacity in bridge project (design experience) i

    You might also like