Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GCED Activity 3
GCED Activity 3
MELANIE V. SEGUI
1. What is the purpose of the study?
*The study aimed to promote the values of education for citizenship to enable
students to work towards a more peaceful, just, sustainable, and inclusive
world. The study's primary goal was to help people live in fair, safe, moderate,
and inclusive societies by providing learners with the competencies and
opportunities to exercise their rights and fulfill their obligations.
2. What is the most likely event or circumstance that led the author to develop the
study?
* Event or circumstance that led the author to develop the study, indications,
theories, and experiences relating to GCED in Arab contexts suggest that there
are a number of challenges in integrating citizenship education into the
curricula and deciding on its subject matter and method of delivery . A similar
trend in Oman to develop critical thinking or twenty-first century abilities has
given rise to the idea of promoting global citizenship in education. To build
more potent avenues for encouraging a feeling of global citizenship among
Omani students, a number of elements must be improved.
3. Discuss the study's topic's effects on the population, the local area, and the
environment as a whole.
For the purpose of analyzing how global citizenship concepts are incorporated
into national policies, six main themes have been identified: (1) Social justice
and human rights. The expansion of that right to higher education serves as
confirmation of this; under the current system, education is to be equally
accessible to all, facilitating entry to higher education based on competence
and merit. All of these elements work together to prepare and develop a global
citizen who is aware of and asserts his or her rights.
(2) Promoting a culture of peace and tolerance; The Omani people have made it
a way of life to uphold the idea of spreading tolerance and peace. The three
policy texts support this viewpoint and help young people internalize it. An
examination of the government's educational priorities, which connected
characteristics found in its educational philosophy to the primary educational
approach, revealed that this philosophy stands between conservatism and
modernity by fusing preservation of Arab-Islamic national culture with an
openness to universal values and values of peace.
(4) Cultural and civilizational diversity; One of the vision's goals is "a conscious
knowledge-based society that preserves its identity, with skills and capabilities,
and keeps pace with knowledge developments and technical changes," within
the priority of citizenship, identity, heritage, and national culture. This goal
includes the principle of cultural and civilizational diversity. A conscious
society that is aware of the different issues in its environment is what is meant
by the ideal society.
(5) Ecological balance; The most crucial subjects were concern for
environmental protection, acting responsibly toward the environment, and
awareness of sustainability challenges. Due to the need to guarantee continuity
for future generations and save resources, a healthy and sustainable
ecosystem must be created.
6. What does the other author have to say about GCED based on the readings?
The author shows how ideas like globalization and global citizenship are
reflected in social studies curriculums across the nation. He will also contend
that the social studies classroom is the main setting for their curriculum
application, notwithstanding the multidisciplinary nature and meaning of the
phrases "globalization" and "global citizenship."
7. What steps are being taken to close the gaps in the study's findings?
Second, international education, global education (Davis, Evans, & Reid, 2005),
multicultural education (Banks, 2004; Dunn, 2002), peace education (Smith &
Fairman, 2005), human rights education (Guadelli & Fernekes, 2004), and
economic education are commonly used to conceptualize global citizenship
education. Practitioners are well aware that none of these approaches, with the
possible exception of economic education, have so far found a place in school
curricula.
Third, Due to the similarities in justification and the variety of models that
citizenship education provides, global citizenship education should be viewed
within the context of citizenship education as a whole (Davis, Evans, & Reid,
2005)
The fourth barrier on our list is the worry that promoting global citizenship will
erode national loyalty. Most of the time, patriotism is understood in its
conventional sense.
State standards are one of the most effective tools for curriculum creation.
Since the middle of the 1990s, voluntary national standards—then state
standards—have established what students should learn and be taught in a
variety of subjects, including social studies (Finn & Kanstoroom, 2001). State
standards can function as a trustworthy indicator of curricular content changes
between states, despite their relative rigidity as a result of the difficult revision
process. By examining the state standards, it is now possible to ascertain the
general direction of content growth in several sectors of education.
This essay seeks to ascertain how the idea of global citizenship is portrayed in
state social studies standards. This study was guided by the following
questions: 1) Do state social studies standards or similar state curricular
guiding documents include the terms globalization and global citizenship? 2)
What phrases or concepts have a conceptual relationship to globalization?
If civic engagement and global citizenship aren't stated in the text, how are they
applied in state social studies standards?
Due to this, the term (and concept) "global citizen(ship)" is only mentioned in
the standards of two states, despite the fact that many other states' social
studies standards—particularly those pertaining to civics and government—
make an effort to conceptualize civic commitments that transcend national
boundaries. How much does the term "global citizen" differ from "citizen of the
world" semantically? Not much; they are virtually interchangeable. With other
replacements, or rather political and ideological euphemisms, this is not the
case. Phrases like "productive, knowledgeable citizens in a global society,"
"responsible citizens and active participants in...global society," or "competent
citizens in a culturally diverse and interconnected globe" are imprecise and
change the focus.
13. What implications, if any, do the study's overall findings have for your personal
situation?
Social education content is an area that is evolving quickly, thus it is our
responsibility as educators to make sure that our students are equipped to live
as responsible, knowledgeable, and global citizens in the future.
14. What are the gaps that the author felt compelled or required him to perform the
study?
It should be noted that, unlike the social studies requirements of those states
where this notion is not taught at all in any form, the concepts described offer
classroom teachers at least some recommendations about global citizenship
education despite their ambiguity and vagueness. However, this does not imply
that educators in those jurisdictions disregard the importance of teaching
about global citizenship. However, it does imply that teachers who choose to
incorporate aspects of global citizenship education into their curricula will lack
curricular explanation and support. It also means that, as a result of the
pressure of constant and unrelenting accountability, which, as many
practitioners are aware, typically entails that what is not assessed is not taught,
themes relevant to global citizenship are buried behind more "essential" things.
15. What crucial GCED factors might you need to have included if you were the
study's author?
Cultural and Civilizational Diversity is what I choice for GCED factors, All
citizens have the same rights and obligations under the law. They shall not be
treated differently from one another in this regard based on their gender,
ethnicity, race, language, religion, or socioeconomic standing. Article 23 states
that "Personal freedom is secured in accordance with the law, and this
confirms the concern for the human being, far from any difference owing to any
of the aforementioned causes relating to religion, language, gender, or other,
and taking into account diversity." The same is true of Article 35, which states:
"Freedom of opinion and expression thereof in writing, speaking, or by any
other means, is guaranteed, subject to the restrictions imposed by the law."