Professional Documents
Culture Documents
35 - Neuromuscular Junction Disorders Lecture
35 - Neuromuscular Junction Disorders Lecture
• Learning Objectives
• Neuromuscular Transmission
• Myasthenia Gravis
• General Considerations
• Pathogenesis
• Clinical Findings
• Differential Diagnosis
• Treatment
• Prognosis
• Congenital Myasthenia Syndromes
• Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome
• General Considerations
• Clinical Findings
The acetylcholine diffuses across the synapse and binds to the acetylcholine receptors on
the postsynaptic muscle membrane. The binding of acetylcholine to these receptors
facilitates increased conduction of sodium and potassium. This leads to transient
depolarization of the postjunctional muscle membrane known as an end-plate potential.
This depolarization allows for the generation and propagation of action potentials in the
postsynaptic muscle cell. These processes initiate a chain of events in the muscle cell that
culminates in muscle contraction. Disorders of the neuromuscular junction result from a
disruption of this series of events.
MYASTHENIAGRAVIS
(AUTOIMMUNE
MYASTHENIA)
General Considerations
Myasthenia gravis (MG), the most common of the neuromuscular junction disorders,
is an acquired, predominantly antibody-mediated autoimmune disease. In this
disorder, antibodies are often targeted against the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor
(AChR) at the neuromuscular junction, resulting in an overall reduction in the number
of AChRs and damage to the postsynaptic membrane. However, other associated
antibodies have also been identified, as discussed below.
Pathogenesis
Although MuSK antibody-positive patients can present similarly to those with AChR
antibody-positive myasthenia, they can also have atypical features such as selective
weakness of the face, bulbar or respiratory muscles, as well as marked muscle atrophy
with relative ocular sparing. This presentation can also be associated with paraspinal and
esophageal muscle weakness, which is uncommonly seen in more classic MG
presentations. In addition, MuSK-associated MG can have variable responses to
anticholinesterase drugs, such as hypersensitivity and nonresponsiveness, and clinical
worsening has been documented.
Within the first year of disease onset, up to 75% of patients develop generalized
symptoms. Bulbar symptoms are common and include dysarthria, dysphagia,
facial weakness, and weakness of mastication. Because of palatal weakness,
patients often have nasal speech and can regurgitate liquids through the nose.
Bulbar manifestations are often the most disabling symptoms. Limb and trunk
weakness is common in a proximal greater than distal distribution. Frequently, the
arms are more affected than the legs. The quadriceps, triceps, and neck extensor
muscles appear to be preferentially involved.
In addition to the effects on the mother, infants and children of mothers with
myasthenia can develop transient or, rarely, permanent weakness. Approximately
one third of infants of mothers with autoimmune MG have transitory neonatal
myasthenia, with weakness appearing within the first 4 days of life and usually
lasting for approximately 3 weeks. Infants with neonatal myasthenia often are poor
feeders and have a weak cry. Weakness is the result of placental transfer of
maternal antibodies to the fetal blood circulation, most commonly involving AChR
antibodies, which can bind both the fetal and adult forms of the receptor. This
condition also has a high recurrence risk for future pregnancies. The fetal form of
the receptor, which differs from the adult form by a single subunit, persists until 30–
33 weeks’ gestation, after which it is replaced by the adult receptor. There is no
clear association between neonatal weakness and maternal clinical status or
antibody levels.
5. Tensilon (edrophonium) test—Tensilon, which has been used since the 1950s,
evaluates the response to a short-acting cholinesterase inhibitor. When performed, the
examiner must choose a clinical feature to observe, most commonly ptosis. One
milligram of edrophonium is given intravenously as a test dose, followed by 3-mg dose
if no adverse event is seen. A clinical response should be seen within 30–60 seconds. If
no response is seen, an additional 3 mg of edrophonium can be given and the patient
examined again. If there is still no improvement, a final 3-mg dose can be given, for a
total of 10 mg. If there is no clinical improvement after 2 minutes, the test is negative.
Studies suggest a sensitivity of 70–95% for this test. Specificity is not as high; positive
tests have been reported in a variety of conditions, including Lambert-Eaton
myasthenic syndrome, botulism, snake envenomation, motor neuron disease, and
multiple sclerosis. Of note, this test has fallen out of favor over the years due to
potential, serious cholinergic side effects, including increased oropharyngeal
secretions and respiratory decompensation as well as bradycardia or asystole. It should
be performed under cardiac monitoring with atropine readily available.
Treatment
A. Symptomatic Treatment
B. Immunosuppressive Treatment
Cyclophosphamide is an alkylating agent that has been used in patients with refractory
disease. Side effects include severe bone marrow suppression, bladder toxicity, and risk of
neoplasm.
Cyclosporine is used for patients with severe MG who cannot be managed with less toxic
forms of therapy. Major side effects include renal toxicity, hypertension, neurotoxicity.
Tacrolimus, another macrolide with greater potency than cyclosporine, has also been
recently recommended as a potential second-line agent in cases of MG that do not respond
to traditional immunosuppressive agents. Although evidence for its efficacy is limited, one
meta-analysis looking at five trials found clinical improvement and a trend toward a steroid-
sparing effect at 6 months of therapy. Major side effects include hypertension, hyperkalemia,
neurotoxicity, and nephrotoxicity. Treatment with cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, and
tacrolimus should be managed by a physician who is familiar with their adverse effects and
monitoring requirements.
Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant, although not readily performed at this point,
has been shown to be effective in the treatment of seven severe, refractory cases of MG.
Plasmapheresis usually produces clinical improvement within the first week, and
benefits usually last for 1–2 months. Complications are uncommon but include
hypotension, bradycardia, electrolyte imbalance, and infection. IVIG has similar
efficacy to plasmapheresis. Side effects include malaise, hypersensitivity, aseptic
meningitis, and, rarely, renal insufficiency, stroke, and myocardial infarction. In
addition, patients with immunoglobulin A deficiency can develop anaphylaxis. In
most patients, however, IVIG is well tolerated. There has been debate as to whether
plasma exchange or IVIG is the preferred short-term immunotherapy for MG. In
practice, the choice of therapy for acute disease is often dependent on feasibility
and on resources available in a given situation.
C. Treatment of Myasthenic Crisis
Several classes of drugs are associated with clinical worsening of existing MG, and a
smaller group of drugs actually causes MG in occasional patients. D-Penicillamine,
interferon alpha, and bone marrow transplantation have all been implicated in causing
MG. The mechanism is unclear, but there is evidence of an autoimmune basis for both
penicillamine and interferon alpha. In most cases, the symptoms resolve with
discontinuation of the medication. Many other drugs are associated with myasthenic
worsening.
Because any drug can potentially worsen symptoms, patients with MG should be warned
about possible exacerbation with the use of prescription and over-the-counter
medications.
Prognosis
Eighty percent of patients with more focal disease eventually develop generalized MG.
Progression to maximum severity typically occurs within the first 2 years of onset.
Spontaneous, long-lasting remissions are uncommon, but have been reported in 10–20%
of patients. For patients with disease limited to the ocular muscles, cholinesterase
inhibitors, low-dose corticosteroids, or nonmedicinal therapy (eg, eyelid crutches) may be
sufficient to control symptoms.
Most patients with generalized MG enjoy a normal and productive life when adequately
treated. However, quality of life may be compromised as a result of both the limited
efficacy and the side effects of available drugs. Patients with an underlying thymoma often
have a more aggressive disease course.
CONGENITAL
MYASTHENIA
SYNDROMES
There are multiple congenital myasthenic syndromes, which are the
result of genetic defects in presynaptic, synaptic, and postsynaptic
proteins. Symptoms are present at birth or appear in early childhood.
Typical symptoms are similar to those seen in autoimmune MG, with
fluctuating and fatigable muscle weakness resulting in ptosis,
ophthalmoparesis, neck and limb, as well as respiratory muscle,
weakness. Weakness typically affects cranial muscles, and there is often
an associated high-arched palate. Similarly affected relatives can often be
identified. Cholinesterase inhibitors are helpful in the treatment of some
of these syndromes only.
Antibodies against P/Q-type VGCCs can be detected in more than 90% of patients
with LEMS. In addition, antibodies to N-type VGCCs can be found in up to 50% of
patients; this percentage is higher in malignancy-associated LEMS. Organ-specific
autoantibodies (to thyroid, gastric parietal cells, or skeletal muscle) and non–
organ-specific autoantibodies (antinuclear, antimitochondrial) are also found in
patients with LEMS.
Electrodiagnostic studies help confirm the diagnosis and monitor disease
progression. The CMAP is low in most muscles tested and CMAP amplitude at
rest is the best marker of disease severity. As in MG, most patients have a
decrementing response to slow rates of repetitive stimulation; however, the
decrement progresses during the course of the stimulation. Following exercise
or repetitive stimulation at 20–50 Hz, there is usually a marked facilitation, with
doubling of the CMAP amplitude. Of note, electrodiagnostic study findings in
LEMS differ markedly from MG and are useful in distinguishing these
neuromuscular junction disorders.
Differential Diagnosis
The first step in management should be an evaluation for malignancy, especially in older
patients or those with a history of smoking. If LEMS is associated with a malignancy,
symptoms often improve dramatically with tumor removal. If no malignancy is found at
initial presentation, patients should undergo regular surveillance, because the
presentation of LEMS can predate the detection of neoplasm by years. For those with no
underlying neoplasm, or insufficient symptom control with tumor removal,
pharmacotherapy is used.
Unlike MG, LEMS is not very responsive to anticholinesterase drugs, which, however, do
potentiate the effects of 3,4-DAP and guanidine, allowing the use of lower doses. If the
preceding symptomatic therapy is insufficient, immunosuppressive therapy can be
attempted, but it is less effective in LEMS than in MG. If weakness is severe,
plasmapheresis or high-dose IVIG often provides rapid, although usually transitory,
improvement.
Prognosis
The initial symptoms of food-borne botulism (but not the wound-acquired form)
may be gastrointestinal—nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea—and generally appear
within 2–36 hours of ingestion. Constipation is more common once neurologic
symptoms are present. The earliest neurologic symptoms are oculobulbar and
include dry mouth, blurred vision, diplopia, dysarthria, dysphagia, and dysphonia. In
contrast to most cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome, botulism is characterized by a
descending paralysis. Weakness begins in the cranial nerves, followed by the upper
extremities, respiratory muscles, and finally lower extremities. The weakness
progresses from proximal to distal muscles. Respiratory weakness can be severe and
require prolonged intubation. Botulism also affects autonomic synaptic
transmission, resulting in constipation, postural hypotension, and urinary retention.
On examination, pupils are unreactive and tendon reflexes are absent.
Most infantile cases occur before the age of 6 months, and the first signs may be
constipation, weak cry, and poor feeding. Weakness then progresses over days,
causing poor suck and head control, hypotonia, and deceased movement.
Autonomic signs and symptoms include hypotension, tachycardia, and dry mouth.
Both blood and stool can be sent for detection of the botulinum toxin. C botulinum
itself can be detected in stool. If possible, a food sample should also be sent for
identification of the toxin.
Electrodiagnostic studies can support the diagnosis of botulism and help rule out other
possible diagnoses such as Guillain-Barré syndrome. The most consistent finding is a
small CMAP in response to a supramaximal stimulus. As with LEMS, repetitive
stimulation testing may show a decrement of the CMAP to low rates of stimulation and
post-exercise facilitation of the CMAP amplitude.
Differential Diagnosis
Botulism must be distinguished from MG, LEMS, Guillain- Barré syndrome (particularly
the Miller Fisher variant), tick paralysis, diphtheritic neuropathy, and intoxication
(including paralytic shellfish poisoning and organophosphates).
Treatment
Prognosis
CLINICAL a complicated facial lift. Her attending asked her to stop assisting in surgery and to
immediately seek medical evaluation. She has not experienced diplopia, dysarthria,
dysphagia, difficulty walking up stairs, difficulty blow drying her hair, or shortness of
Her neurologic examination is notable for normal mental status and speech. Her cranial
nerve examination reveals bilateral ptosis on primary gaze, which worsens with sustained
upward gaze for 90 seconds. Extraocular muscles are intact as is her facial strength. Her
motor strength is normal with the exception of 4+/5 in the deltoid muscles bilaterally. On
repetitive testing of the right iliopsoas muscle fatigability is elicited, which improves after
2 minutes of rest. Her sensory examination and deep tendon reflexes are normal.
QUESTIONS
1. What is the most likely diagnosis? What are the other possibilities?
2. What diagnostic workup will you order?
3. How will you manage this patient?
MAIN • Current Diagnosis & Treatment Neurology, 3rd ed,
John C.M. Brust, Chapter 22, pp 363-374
REFERENCE
The contents of this slide presentation are largely lifted from the above reference book, with some minor
alterations in wordings, sentence construction and sequence of sentences or paragraphs to suit the needs of
the students of AMA School of Medicine. Materials in the presentation that are not found in the above
reference are taken from the references listed under Related Readings or from various internet sources.
• Hankey’s Clinical Neurology, 2ed, Philip B. Gorelick
RELATED et al, Chapter 22, pp 855-870