Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • ML Model Analyisis - HT

    Uploaded by

    Ana Ramatulai Djalo Djalo
    5 views1 page
    The document compares the performance of different machine learning models on an imbalanced dataset after applying SMOTE oversampling with different hyperparameters. It shows that Multinomial Naive Bayes achieved the best accuracy of 0.68 with an alpha of 0.1, Multinomial Logistic Regression achieved 0.69 accuracy with C of 0.01, and Support Vector Machine achieved 0.64 accuracy with C of 1.0.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    ML MODEL ANALYISIS - HT

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document compares the performance of different machine learning models on an imbalanced dataset after applying SMOTE oversampling with different hyperparameters. It shows that Multinomial Naive Bayes achieved the best accuracy of 0.68 with an alpha of 0.1, Multinomial Logistic Regression achieved 0.69 accuracy with C of 0.01, and Support Vector Machine achieved 0.64 accuracy with C of 1.0.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    5 views1 page

    ML Model Analyisis - HT

    Uploaded by

    Ana Ramatulai Djalo Djalo
    The document compares the performance of different machine learning models on an imbalanced dataset after applying SMOTE oversampling with different hyperparameters. It shows that Multinomial Naive Bayes achieved the best accuracy of 0.68 with an alpha of 0.1, Multinomial Logistic Regression achieved 0.69 accuracy with C of 0.01, and Support Vector Machine achieved 0.64 accuracy with C of 1.0.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Model Best SMOTE Hyperparameter Hyperprameters Best Hyperparameters Best Accuracy Through GridSearchCV

    Multinomial Naive Bayes k_neighbors: 10 alpha: [0.01, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0] alpha: 0.1 0.68
    penalty: ['l1', 'l2', 'elasticnet', 'none' ] penalty': 'none'
    Multinomial Logistic Regression k_neighbors: 2 C: [0.01, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0,] C: 0.01 0.69
    solver: ['lbfgs', 'newton-cg', 'sag', 'saga'] solver: 'saga'
    decision_function_shape: ['ovo', 'ovr'] decision_function_shape: 'ovo'
    Support Vector Machine k_neighbors: 10 0.64
    C: [0.01, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0,] C: 1.0
    Random Forests k_neighbors: 3 - - -
    n_neighbors: [5,6,7,8,9,10, ] n_neighbors: 5
    K-Nearest Neighbour k_neighbors: 10 weights: ['uniform', 'distance'] weights: 'distance' 0.54
    p: [1, 2, 3] p: 2

    You might also like