INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR)

I, LOLOBETH G. MENDEZ of the PROVINCIAL COOPERATIVE AND ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, Division of Entrepreneurship Development and M
and agree to be rated on the attainment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated measures for the period July to December 2022.

LOLOBETH G. MENDEZ
Ratee
Date: _______________
Reviewed by: Date Approved by:

ROEL P. DOLAYPAN, JR. JUDITTE L. ASUNCION

Immediate Supervisor Head of Office

SUCCESS INDICATORS Rating

MFO/PAP
A. ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
a. MSME Beneficiaries Monitored
a.1 Preparatory Activity
a.2 Implementation
Conduct of Project Monitoring and
Assessment
(TARGETS + ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS
MEASURES) Q E T
Prepared M&E Action Plan and Submitted
to DC, with minor corrections, at the end of
January 2022
5 projects monitored with quarterly and
annual monitoring and evaluation (M&E) 5 projects monitored with quarterly reports
reports with an average of very satisfaction M&E reports with an average of very 4 5 5
survey rating within the set schedule satisfaction client survey rating within the
set schedule

a.1 Post Implementation Activity

Prepared 2 Quarterly M&E reports and 1
Annual M&E report submitted to DC with Prepared and submitted 2 quarterly reports
minor corrections, within 10 days after the and 1 annual M&E report to DC without 5 5 5
ensuing quarter corrections, 6 days after the ensuing month
b. 100% of NGAs programs complemented/facilitated to MLGUs and beneficiaries
b.1 Preparatory Activity
Action plan prepared and submitted on DA-
PhilFIDA, TESDA & DOLE programs 1 Action plan prepared and submitted on
complemented/ facilitated to MLGUs and NEDA Innovation Project complemented/
beneficiaries to DC, with minor correction, facilitated to MLGUs and beneficiaries to
5 5 5
100% approved, coordinated at least 1 DC, without correction, 100% approved,
month before the set schedule coordinated at least 1 month before the set
schedule

b.2 Implementation
100% of DA-PhilFIDA, TESDA & DOLE
programs complemented/facilitated to
MLGUs and beneficiaries with average
client satisfactory rating based on
workplan/DFPPT
100% of NEDA program
complemented/facilitated to MLGUs and
4 5 5
beneficiaries with average client
satisfactory rating based on workplan

b.3 Post Activity

100% Post activity reports prepared and 100% post activity reports prepared and
submitted to DC with minor corrections, 6 submitted to DC without correction, 3 days 5 5 5
days after the training after the training
c. Conduct of Capability Building
c.1 Preparatory Activity
 1 training designs prepared, submitted and 1 training designs prepared, submitted and
approved by the DC with minor corrections, approved by the DC without corrections, 3 5 5 5
3 months before the set schedule months before the set schedule
Coordinated with the resource 1 training were coordinated with the (a)
1 training were coordinated with the (a)
speakers, prospective participants resource speakers, (b) prospective
resource speakers, (b) prospective
and venue reservation participants and (c) venue reservation one
participants and (c) venue reservation one 5 5 5
month before the scheduled date of
month before the scheduled date of
trainings
trainings
c.2 Implementation of Capability
Building 1 training conducted with an Average of at 1 training conducted with an Average of
least satisfactory client satisfaction rating very satisfactory client satisfaction rating 4 5 5
within the set schedule within the set schedule
c.3 Post Activity
Preparation of Post -Training Report 1 Post training report prepared and 1 Post training report prepared and
submitted to DC with minor corrections, 6 submitted to DC with minor corrections, 3 4 5 5
days after the training days after the training
d. Conduct of Market Events (i.e., F2C Market Activities)
d.1 Preparatory Activity

Coordinated with the prospective
exhibitors and venue reservation
d.2 Implementation of the Market
Events
d.3 Post Activity
Preparation of Post Activity Report
e. Distressed CAEs rehabilitated
e.1 Preparatory Activity
Activity design prepared, submitted and
approved by the DC with minor corrections,
approved by the DC with minor corrections,
3 months before the set schedule
5 market events (i.e. F2C related market
events) coordinated with the (a) prospective 5 market events coordinated with the (a)
exhibitors and (b) venue reservation 2
months before the scheduled date of the
activity
5 market events conducted with an
Average of at least satisfactory client
satisfaction rating within the set schedule
1 Post Activity Report, includung
consolidated sales report of the events,
prepared and submitted to DC with minor
corrections, 6 days after the activity
Activity design prepared, submitted and
4 5 3
2 months before the set schedule
prospective exhibitors and (b) venue
5 5 5
reservation 2 months before the scheduled
date of the activity
5 market events conducted with an
Average of very satisfactory client 4 5 5
satisfaction rating within the set schedule
1 Post Activity Report, includung
consolidated sales report of the events,
4 5 4
prepared and submitted to DC with minor
corrections, 6 days after the activity
 100% activity designs prepared, submitted
to the DC with minor corrections, 3 months
before the set schedule

Coordinated to key stakeholders for 100% coordinated with the (a) resource
the activity speakers, (b) prospective participants and
(c) venue reservation one month before the
scheduled date of trainings

e.2 Implementation
Conduct of Activties 100% activities conducted with an Average
of at least satisfactory client satisfaction
rating within the set schedule

e.3 Post Activity

Preparation of Post -Activty Report 100% Post Activty reports prepared and
submitted to DC with minor corrections, 6
days after the activity

f. Balik Probinsiya Program (B2P)

f.1 Preparatory Activity
 100% of B2P beneficiaries interviewed,
1 (100%) of B2P beneficiaries interviewed,
assessed and identification of proper
assessed and identification of proper
government intervention with an Average of
at least satisfactory client satisfaction government intervention with an 5 5 4
rating, 6 days after the activity outstanding client satisfaction rating, 6 days
after the activity
f.2 Implementation
100% of B2P Beneficiaries Assisted, with 1 (100%) of B2P Beneficiaries Assisted,
an Average of at least satisfactory client with an outstanding satisfactory client 5 5 5
satisfaction rating, within the set schedule satisfaction rating, within the set schedule
f.3 Post Implementation
100% Post Activty reports prepared and 100% Post Activty reports prepared and
submitted to DC with minor corrections, 6 submitted to DC with minor corrections, 6 4 5 4
days after the activity days after the assessment
g. Business Recovery Program
g.1 Preparatory Activity
100% activity designs prepared and
submitted to DC with minor corrections, 3
months before the set schedule
Coordinated to key stakeholders for 100% coordinated with the (a) resource
the activity
g.2 Implementation
Conduct of Activties
g.3 Post Activity
Preparation of Post -Activty Report
B. INVESTMENT PROMOTION PROGRAM
a. Municipalities complying wit ease of doing business provided with incentive
a.1 Preparatory Activity
a.2 Implementation
a.3 Post-Implementation Activity
speakers, (b) prospective participants and
(c) venue reservation one month before the
scheduled date of trainings
100% activities conducted with an Average
of at least satisfactory client satisfaction
rating within the set schedule
100% Post Activty reports prepared and
submitted to DC with minor corrections, 6
days after the activity
1 Action plan submitted in complying with
100% of municipalities complying with ease
of doing business provided with incentive to
DTI/DILG, with minor corrections, within the
first quarter of 2022
100% of municipalities complying with ease
of doing business provided with incentive, 100% PLGU complying with ease of doing
100% meet standards at the end of 3rd business provided with incentive, 100% 5 5 5
quarter meet standards at the end of 3rd quarter
1 Consolidated LGU compliance to EODB
prepared and submitted to DC, with minor 1 Consolidated PLGU compliance to EODB
corrections, within the 4th Quarter of 2022 prepared and submitted to DC, with minor 4 5 5
corrections, within the 4th Quarter of 2022
b. Investment Promotions Participated
100% of invesment promotion activities
participated before the end of 3rd qtr
c. Investment Priority Plan Prepared and Submitted
1 investment priority plan submitted,
acceptability/approval on 3rd presentation
before the end of 3rd quarter
1 (100%) of DTI investment Forum
5 1
participated on December 2022
1 investment priority plan submitted, with
3 5 1
minor content revision on the 4th quarter

d. Promotion Collateral Prepared

d.1 Preparatory Activity
20 MSMEs screened and assessed and 19 MSMEs screened and assessed and
accepted with minor correction, within the accepted with minor correction, within the 4 3 5
set schedule set schedule
d.2 Implementation and Post Implementation Activity
1 Promotional Collateral prepared and
accepted by the DC on 3rd presentation, by 1 Promotional Collateral prepared and
end of 3rd qtr. accepted by the DC, with minor corrections, 5 5
on 3rd presentation, by end of 3rd qtr.

C. SUPPORT TO OPERATIONS
100% of meetings per committee/task force
(Climate Change) attended, minutes of the
meeting prepared and submitted to DC with
minor corrections 3 days after the meeting
100% of meetings per committee/task force
(Climate Change) attended, minutes of the
meeting prepared and submitted to DC with
no corrections 3 days after the meeting 5 5 3

100% of meetings per committee/task force
(NVIDC) attended, minutes of the meeting
prepared and submitted to DC with minor
corrections 3 days after the meeting
100% of meetings per committee/task force
(NVIDC) attended, minutes of the meeting
prepared and submitted to DC with minor
3 5 1
content revisionbeyond 5 days after the
meeting

D. SUBMISSION OF REQUIRED HR DOCUMENTS

a. Submission of DTR 100% of DTR submitted on set deadline, 100% of DTR submitted on set deadline,
complete, accurate and neat complete, accurate and neat 5 5 5

b. IPCRs (target) prepared and IPCRs (target) prepared as to prescribed IPCRs (target) prepared as to prescribed
submitted format and approved subnitted to format and approved submitted to
concerned official for review on the set concerned official for review on the set 5 5 5
deadline deadline
c. IPCRs (ratings) IPCRs (ratings) prepared as to prescribed IPCRs (ratings) prepared as to prescribed
format and approved subnitted to format and approved subnitted to
concerned official for review on the set concerned official for review on the set 5 5 5
deadline deadline

Attendance to meetings/seminars/trainings
a. General staff meeting/section 90% of scheduled general/section meetings 100% of scheduled general/section
meetings attended attended in full as scheduled 5 5
meetings attended in full as scheduled
Final Average Rating 4.46 4.93 4.30
Comments and Recommendation for Development Purposes
Discussed with Date Date Final Rating

LOLOBETH G. MENDEZ ROEL P. DOLAYPAN JR. JUDITTE L. ASUN

Employee Supervisor Head of Office

pment and Management Services, commit to deliver

Date

Outstanding – 5
Very Satisfactory – 4
Satisfactory – 3
Unsatisfactory - 2
Poor - 1

Remarks
A

1st semester accomplishment

1st semester accomplishments - 10

projects monitored with quarterly
4.67 reports with an average of
outstanding satisfaction survey rating
within the set schedule

1st semester accomplishments -

Prepared and submitted 2 quarterly
5.00 reports M&E report to DC without
corrections, within the set schedule
5.00

4.67

5.00
 NEDA Innovation Project: Handicraft
5.00 and souvenir Making (Oct 14-15);
souvenir making (Dec 12-15)

5.00

4.67

4.67
4.00

1st semester - 2 mini trade fair

5.00

1st semester - 2 mini trade fair

4.67

1st semester - 2 mini trade fair

4.33
demand driven

demand driven

demand driven

demand driven
4.67

5.00

4.33

1st semester accomplished

 1st semester accomplished

1st semester accomplished

1st semester accomplished

1st semester accomplished

5.00

4.67
3.00

3.00

4.00
5.00

4.00

3.00

5.00

5.00
 5.00

5.00

4.55

Date

TE L. ASUNCION

ead of Office
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR)

I, MARICRIS B. ROMERO of the PROVINCIAL COOPERATIVE AND ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, Division of Entrepreneurship Development and M
attainment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated measures for the period January to December 2022.

Reviewed by: Date Approved by:

ROEL P. DOLAYPAN, JR. JUDITTE L. ASUNCION

Immediate Supervisor Head of Office

SUCCESS INDICATORS INDIVIDUAL ACTUAL Rating

MFO/PAP ACCOUNTAB ACCOMPLIS
(TARGETS + MEASURES) LE HMENTS Q
A. ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
a. NGAs programs complemented/facilitated to MLGUs and beneficiaries
a.1 Preparatory Activity
Action plan prepared and R. Romero Action plan(s) prepared, submitted
submitted on DOST programs and approved by DC:
complemented/ facilitated to 5=without
MLGUs and beneficiaries to DC, correction
with minor correction, 100% 4=with minor correction
approved, coordinated at least 1 3=with
month before the set schedule minor content revision
2=with major content
revsion

a.2 Implementation
100% of DOST programs R. Romero Average Client survey rating
complemented/facilitated to
MLGUs and beneficiaries with 5=oustanding
average client satisfactory rating 4=very satisfactory
based on workplan/DFPPT 3=satisfactory

2=unsatisfactory
1=poor

a.3 Post Activity

 100% Post activity reports L. Mendez Post Activity Reports submitted to DC
prepared and submitted to DC 5=without
with minor corrections, 6 days correction
after the training 4=with minor correction
3=with minor content
revision
2=with major content revsion

b. Conduct of Trade Fair (Provincial Trade Fair)

d.1 Preparatory Activity
Coordinated with the prospective
exhibitors and venue reservation
1 Provincial Trade Fair
coordinated with the (a)
prospective exhibitors and (b)
venue reservation 2 months
before the scheduled date of the
activity
R. Romero 5=coordinated with a, b, and c
3=coordinated
with a and b only
1=coordinated with a only

at least 5 promotional materials Promotional Materials posted via

prepared and submitted to DC social media:
with minor corrections, 2 months 5=without correction
before the scheduled date of the 4=with minor correction
activity 3=with
minor content revision
2=with major content
revsion

d.2 Implementation of the Trade Fair

1 Provincial Trade Fair promoted R. Romero Average Client survey rating

via social media platform with
with minor corrections within the 5=oustanding
set schedule 4=very satisfactory
3=satisfactory

2=unsatisfactory
1=poor

100% of the MSME-Exhibitors Average Client survey rating

monitored with an average of
very satisfaction rating, within the 5=oustanding
schedule 4=very satisfactory
3=satisfactory

2=unsatisfactory
1=poor

d.3 Post Activity


b. Livelihood Assistance Acted Upon
b.1 Preparatory Activity
b.2 Implementation of Livelihood Assessment and Validation
Conduct of Livelihood and
Assessment and Validation
Preparation of Project Proposal
(Mungkahing Proyekto)
1 Consolidated MSME-Exhibitors R. Romero
Monitoring report prepared and
submitted to DC with minor
corrections, 6 days after the
activity
100% of livelihood requests M. Romero
entered into the Livelihood
Assistance Database, with minor
correction, within 2 days upon
receipt
100% of livelihood request list
submitted to DC and coordinated
with beneficiaries, 1 month before
the assessment and site
validation
100% of livelihood beneficaries M. Romero
schedules are assessed and
validated with an average
satisfaction survey rating, within
the set schedule
100% of project proposals
prepared for livelihood requests
submitted and accepted by the
DC on 3rd presentation within set
schedule
Post Activity Reportsincludung
consolidated sales report of the
events, submitted and approved by
DC
5=without correction
4=with minor correction
3=with
minor content revision
2=with major content
revsion
Updated Livelihood Assistance
Beneficiaries DataBase submitted and
accepted by the DC
5=without correction
4=with minor
correction
3=with minor content revision
2=with major
content revsion
M. Romero 12 or monthly submission of
Assessment and Site Validation
Activity
5=100% livelihood request
included in the schedule
4=99%-80%
3=79%-50%
2=Below 50%
Average Client survey rating
5=oustanding
4=very satisfactory
3=satisfactory
2=unsatisfactory
1=poor
M. Romero Project Proposals Prepared,
submitted and accepted by the DC on
3rd presentation
5=without correction
4=with minor correction
3=with
minor content revision
2=with major content
revsion
b.3 Post Implementation
Preparation of Livelihood
Assessment Report
Preparation of Memorandum of
Agreement for Livelihood
Beneficiaries
c. Labelling Requests of MSMEs acted upon
c.1 Preparatory Activty
Conduct of Profiling and Needs
Assessment to labelling requests
from MSMEs
c.2 Implementation and Post Implementation Activity
d. Implementation of Product Accreditation and Branding System
d.1 Preparatory Activty
Conduct of Profiling and Needs
Assessment to MSMEs
d.2 Implementation and Post Implementation Activity
Prepared, submitted and M. Romero Assessment Report submitted to DC
reviewed by DC the Assessment 5=without
Report, with minor correction, 6 correction
days after the assessment or site 4=with minor correction
validation 3=with minor content
revision
2=with major content revsion
100% of Memorandum of M. Romero Memorandum of Agreement
Agreement (MOA) for livelihood Prepared, submitted and endorsed to
beneficiaries prepared, submitted DC: 5=without
and endorsed to DC with minor correction
correction, 4 days after the 4=with minor correction
approval of the assessment 3=with minor content
report revision
2=with major content revsion
100% of labelling requests M. Romero Average Client survey rating
profiled and assesssed, with
average of satisfactory or very 5=oustanding
satisfactory client satisfaction 4=very satisfactory
survey, upon receipt of request. 3=satisfactory
2=unsatisfactory
1=poor
100% of labelling requests of M. Romero Average Client survey rating
MSMEs acted upon, with average
client satisfactory rating, 3 5=oustanding
working days upon receipt. 4=very satisfactory
3=satisfactory
2=unsatisfactory
1=poor
100% of requests profiled and M. Romero Average Client survey rating
assesssed
5=oustanding
4=very satisfactory
3=satisfactory
2=unsatisfactory
1=poor
 100% of MSMEs assisted under M. Romero Average Client survey rating
the Product Accreditation and
Branding System, with average 5=oustanding
client satisfactory rating, 5 4=very satisfactory
working days upon receipt 3=satisfactory

2=unsatisfactory
1=poor

e. Proposals Prepared for Special Projects

e.1 Preparatory Activty
Conduct of Profiling and Needs 100% of requests profiled and M. Romero Average Client survey rating
Assessment to MSMEs assesssed
5=oustanding
4=very satisfactory
3=satisfactory

2=unsatisfactory
1=poor

e.2 Implementation and Post Implementation Activity

100% of proposals prepared for M. Romero Proposals prepared, submitted and
special projects, approved and approved by the DC:
accepted with minor correction, 5=without correction
12 working days upon received 4=with minor
correction 3=with
minor content revision 2=with
major content revsion

f. OTOP Hub Maintained

f.1 Preparatory Activty
Assisted in the preparation of 4 M. Romero 4 Operation and Management Action
Operation and Management Plan prepared, submitted and
Action Plan for submission to DC approved by the DC:
with minor corrections, 3 working 5=without correction
days before the end of the on 3rd presentation
ensuing quarter 4=with minor correction on
3rd presentation
3=with minor content revision
on 3rd presentation
2=with major content revsion
on 3rd presentation

f.2 Implementation
Assisted in the maintenance of 1 M. Romero Average Client survey rating
OTOP Hub with average very
satisfactory rating on plans 5=oustanding
implemented, within the set 4=very satisfactory
schedule 3=satisfactory

2=unsatisfactory
1=poor

f.3 Post Implementation Activity

 100% OTOP Hub Reports (i.e. M. Romero
Consignment Sales, Payable to
Suppliers, Inventory Management
System, General and Subsidiary
Ledgers and Financial
Statements) prepared and
submitted to DC with minor
corrections, 6 days after the
activity
B. INVESTMENT PROMOTION PROGRAM
a. Investor's facilitated
a.1 Preparatory Activty
Conduct of Profiling and Needs 100% of requests profiled and
Assessment to requests assesssed
a.2 Implementation and Post Implementation Activity
100% of proposals prepared for M. Romero
special projects, approved and
accepted with minor correction,
12 working days upon received
b. Promotion Collateral Prepared
b.1 Preparatory Activity
Conduct of Screening and Assisted in the screening and
Assessment to Qualified MSMEs assessment of 20 MSMEs with
minor correction, within the set
schedule
b.2 Implementation and Post Implementation Activity
Post Activity Reports of the events,
prepared and submitted by DC
5=without
correction
4=with minor correction
3=with minor content
revision
2=with major content revsion
M. Romero Average Client survey rating
5=oustanding
4=very satisfactory
3=satisfactory
2=unsatisfactory
1=poor
Proposals prepared, submitted and
approved by the DC:
5=without correction
4=with minor
correction 3=with
minor content revision 2=with
major content revsion
M. Romero Assessment Report prepared,
submitted and approved by the DC:
5=without correction
4=with minor correction
3=with minor content revision
2=with major content revsion
Preparation and Submission of Assisted in the preparation of 1 M. Romero Promotional Collateral, submitted and
Promotional Collateral Promotional Collateral submitted approved by the DC:
to the DC on 3rd presentation, by 5=without correction
end of 3rd qtr. 4=with minor
correction 3=with minor
content revision 2=with major
content revsion

C. SUPPORT TO OPERATIONS
100% of meetings per
committee/task force (Climate
Change) attended, minutes of the
meeting prepared and submitted
to DC with minor corrections 3
days after the meeting
M. Romero Minutes of the meeting prepared and
submitted to DC
5=without correction
4:=with minor correction
3=with minor content
revision
2=with major content revision

100% of meetings per M. Romero Minutes of the meeting prepared and

committee/task force (NVIDC) submitted to DC
attended, minutes of the meeting 5=without correction
prepared and submitted to DC
with minor corrections 3 days 4:=with minor correction
after the meeting 3=with minor content
revision
2=with major content revision

D. Submission of Requires HR Documents

a. Submission of DTR
100% of DTR submitted on set M. Romero DTR submitted, complete, accurate,
deadline, complete, accurate and and neat, no revision and approved
neat on first submission
5=12/12
4=10/12
3=8/12

b. IPCRs (target) prepared and
submitted
4=4/12
1=2/12
IPCRs (target) prepared as to M. Romero 5=prepared as to prescribed format
prescribed format and approved and approved submitted to DH for
subnitted to concerned official for review
review on the set deadline 1=not in accordance
with the prescribed format and
approved IPCR
c. IPCRs (ratings) IPCRs (ratings) prepared as to M. Romero 5=prepared as to prescribed format
prescribed format and approved and approved submitted to DH for
subnitted to concerned official for review, complete MOVs
review on the set deadline
3=prepared as to prescribed format
and approved submitted to DH for
review, no MOVs attached

1=not in accordance with

the prescribed format and approved
E. ATTENDANCE TO MEETINGS/SEMINARS/TRAININGS targets
a. General staff meeting/section 90% of scheduled M. Romero Percentage of staff/section meetings
meetings attended general/section meetings attended in full
attended in full as scheduled
5=97-100%
4=95-
96%
3=90-94%
2=85-89%
1=84%
Final Average Rating
Comments and Recommendation for Development Purposes
Discussed with Date Assessed by:
I certify that I discussed my assessment of the performance with the
employee

MARICRIS B. ROMERO ROEL P. DOLAYPAN, JR.

Employee Supervisor
COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR)

vision of Entrepreneurship Development and Management Services, commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the
2022.

MARICRIS B. ROMERO
Ratee
Date: _______________
Date

ITTE L. ASUNCION
Head of Office
Outstanding – 5
Very Satisfactory – 4
Satisfactory – 3
Unsatisfactory - 2
Poor - 1
Rating
Remarks
E T

The action plan includes: 5=1 or more months before the set Means of Verification (MOVs):
5=100% of NGAs programs schedule (1) Q = Approved Action Plan: DC
complemented/ facilitated to MLGUs 3=2 weeks before the set schedule determine if a. without correction; b.
and beneficiaries 1=below 2 weeks minor correction, c. minor content
revision, and d. major content
1=Less that 100% of revision
NGAs programs complemented/ (2) E = Completeness
facilitated to MLGUs and of the Action Plan
beneficiaries (3) T = Date of
the Approval of the Action Plan

NGAs programs 5=within the set schedule Means of Verification (MOVs):

complemented/facilitated to MLGUs 1=after the set (1) Q = Analysis of the Clients Survey
and beneficiaries schedule Rating Report with date of receipt by
5=100% the DC
3=below 100% (2) E = No. of Post
Activity Reports or its equivalent vis-
a-vis requests
(3) T = Date of
receipt by the DC of the Reports
mentioned in 1 and 2
 5=100% Post Activity Reports
prepared and submitted
3=below 100% Post Activity Report 4=4-6 days after the activity
prepared and submitted
1=No post Activity
submitted
5=1 trade fair coordinated
1=0
trade fairs coordinated
Prepared and submitted:
5=5 promo materials
3=4-3 promo materials
1=Less than 3 promo materials
5=1 Provincial Trade Fair conducted 5=within the set schedule
1= No Provincial Trade Fair
conducted
MSME-Exhibitors monitored:
5=100%
3=below
100%
Post Activity Reports submitted Means of Verification (MOVs):
5=3 days after the (1) Q = Signed (with date of signing)
activity Post Activity Reports: DC determine
if a. without correction; b. minor
3=7-9 days after the correction, c. minor content revision,
activity and d. major content revision
2=10-13 days after the activity
1=beyond 13 days (2) E = No. of signed Post Activity
Reports
(3) T = Date of Signed
Post Activity Reports
5=2 months before the set schedule Means of Verification (MOVs):
3=below 2 (1) Q = Approved Communication
months to 1 month before the set Plan and Receiving Copies of
schedule Communication Letters
1=below 1 month before the set (2) E =
schedule Response Letter or its equivalent
confirming the coordination
(3) T =
Date of the response letter or its
equivalent of the coordination
5=2 months before the set schedule Means of Verification (MOVs):
3=below 2 (1) Q = Approved Promo Materials
months to 1 month before the set
schedule (2) E = No. of Promo Materials
1=below 1 month before the set (3)
schedule T = Date of approval
Means of Verification (MOVs):
1=after the set (1) Q = Analysis of the Clients Survey
schedule Rating Report with date of receipt by
the DC
(2) E = Attendance
sheets, Post Activity Report and
photo documentation(s)
(3) T =
Date of Attendance sheets and Post
Activity Report
5=within the set schedule Means of Verification (MOVs):
1=after the set (1) Q = Analysis of the Clients Survey
schedule Rating Report with date of receipt by
the DC
(2) E = No. of Post
Activity Reports or its equivalent vis-
a-vis requests
(3) T = Date of
receipt by the DC of the Reports
mentioned in 1 and 2
5=Consolidated MSME-Exhibitors
Monitoring report prepared and
submitted to DC
1=Consolidated MSME- activity
Exhibitors Monitoring report prepared 2=10-13 days after the activity
5 = 100% of livelihood request
entered in the livelihood database
1 = Less
than 100% of livelihood request
entered in the livelihood database
5 = 12 chedule of assessment
prepared and accepted by the DC
1= Less than 12
The scheduled assessment and site 5 = within the set schedule
validation:
5 = 100% accomplsihed
4 = 99%-70% accomplished
3 = 69%-50%
accomplished 1 = less
that 50% accomplished
Project Proposals prepared and
submitted to the DC
5=100%
1=below
100%
Post Activity Reports submitted
5=3 days after the
activity
4=4-6 days after the activity
3=7-9 days after the
1=beyond 13 days
5 = upon receipt of the Livelihood
request
4 = 2 working days after the receipt
of the livelihood request
3= 3 working days after the
receipt of the request
2=5 woking days after the
receipt of the request
1 = after 5 working
days after the receipt of the request
5 = 1 Month
3 = Less than 1 month to 2
weeks 1 = Less than 2 weeks submitted to the DC
1 = after the set schedule
5=within the set schedule
1=after the set
schedule
Means of Verification (MOVs):
(1) Q = Signed (with date of signing)
Consolidated MSME-Exhibitors
Monitoring report prepared Report:
DC determine if a. without correction;
b. minor correction, c. minor content
revision, and d. major content
revision
(2) E = Consolidated
MSME-Exhibitors Monitoring report
prepared
(3) T = Date of Signed
Consolidated MSME-Exhibitors
Monitoring report prepared Report
Means of Verification (MOVs):
(1) Q = Updated Livelihood
Assistance Beneficiaries DataBase
submitted to the DC: DC determine if
a. without correction; b. minor
correction, c. minor content revision,
and d. major content revision
(2) E =Updated Livelihood
Assistance Beneficiaries DataBase
(3) T = date of endorsement to
accountable person as signed by the
DC
Means of Verification (MOVs):
(1) Q = Schedule of Assessment
(2) E
=Schedule of Assessment prepared
and Submitted to the DC
(3) T
=Date signed and approval of the
Schedule by the DC
Means of Verification (MOVs):
(1) Q = Analysis of the Clients Survey
Rating Report with date of receipt by
the DC
(2) E = Signed (i.e.DC)
assessment report vs scheduled list
of assessment
(3) T = Date of
actual visit vs set schedule
(assessment report) (MOVs):
Means of Verification
(1) Q =Project Proposals submitted
to the DC: DC determine if a. without
correction; b. minor correction, c.
minor content revision, and d. major
content revision
(2) E
=Project Proposals prepared and
Submitted to the DC
(3) T =Date
signed and approval of the report by
the DC
Assessment Report includes:
5 = 100% of all Assessed and
Site Validated
3 = 99%-50% of the
assessed and site validated
1 = Less
than 50%
Memorandum of Agreement
prepared and submitted to the DC for
review:
5=100%
1=below 100%
5 = 100% of labelling requests of
MSMEs profiled and assessed
1 = below 100% of labelling
requests of MSMEs profiled and
assessed
5 = 100% of labelling requests of 5=3 working days upon receipt
MSMEs acted upon with reports
1 = below 100% of labelling
requests of MSMEs acted upon with after 10 working days upon receipt
reports
5 = 100% of requests profiled and 5=2 working days upon receipt of
assessed
1 = below 100% of requests profiled 3 = 5 working days upon receipt of
and assessed
Assessment Report submitted Means of Verification (MOVs):
5=3 days after the (1) Q = Signed (with date of signing)
activity Assessment Reports: DC determine
4=4-6 days after the activity if a. without correction; b. minor
3=7-9 days after the correction, c. minor content revision,
activity and d. major content revision
2=10-13 days after the activity
1=beyond 13 days (2) E = No. of beneficiries included in
the report vs schedule site visit
(3)
T = Date of Signed the assessment
Reports
MOA prepared andt submitted to DC Means of Verification (MOVs):
5=3 days after (1) Q =Memorandum of Agreement
the approval of the assessment report submitted to the DC: DC determine if
4=4-6 days a. without correction; b. minor
3=7-9 days correction, c. minor content revision,
2=10-13 and d. major content revision
days
1=beyond 13 days (2) E =Memorandum of Agreement
prepared and Submitted to the DC
(3) T =Date signed and approval of
the MOA by the DC
5=upon receipt of the request Means of Verification (MOVs):
(1) Q = Analysis of the Clients Survey
1= after 1 working day upon receipt Rating Report with date of receipt by
the DC
(2) E =Signed (i.e.DC)
profiling form and assessment report
submitted to DC
(3) T = Signed
(with date of signing) reports
submitted to DC
Means of Verification (MOVs):
3 = 5 working days upon receipt (1) Q = Analysis of the Clients Survey
1= Rating Report with date of receipt by
the DC
(2) E =Signed (i.e.DC)
report submitted to DC
(3) T =
Signed (with date of signing) reports
submitted to DC
Means of Verification (MOVs):
request (1) Q = Analysis of the Clients Survey
Rating Report with date of receipt by
request the DC
1= after 7 working days (2) E =Signed (i.e.DC)
upon receipt upon receipt of the profiling form and assessment report
request submitted to DC
(3) T = Signed
(with date of signing) reports
submitted to DC
5 = 100% of requests of MSMEs
acted upon with reports
1 = below 100% of requests of
MSMEs acted upon with reports
5=10 working days upon receipt
3 = 15 working days upon receipt
1=
after 15 working days upon receipt
Means of Verification (MOVs):
(1) Q = Analysis of the Clients Survey
Rating Report with date of receipt by
the DC
(2) E =Signed (i.e.DC)
report submitted to DC
(3) T =
Signed (with date of signing) reports
submitted to DC

5 = 100% of requests profiled and 5=3 working days upon receipt of Means of Verification (MOVs):
assessed request (1) Q = Analysis of the Clients Survey
1 = below 100% of requests profiled 3 = 5 working days upon receipt of Rating Report with date of receipt by
and assessed request the DC
1= after 7 working days (2) E =Signed (i.e.DC)
upon receipt upon receipt of the profiling form and assessment report
request submitted to DC
(3) T = Signed
(with date of signing) reports
submitted to DC

5=100% of proposals prepared and 5=10 working days upon receipt Means of Verification (MOVs):
submitted and approved by the DC 3 = 12 working days upon receipt (1) Q = Proposals prepared and
1= submitted to the DC
1=below after 12 working days upon receipt (2) E =Signed
100% of proposals prepared, (i.e.DC) report submitted to DC
submitted and approved by the DC (3)
T = Signed proposal with date of
submission to the concerned agency

5=4 Operation and Management 5= 3 working days after the ensuing Means of Verification (MOVs):
Action plan prepared and submitted quarter (1) Q = operation and management
to DC plan prepared and submitted to the
3= after 5 working days after the DC
1=less than 4 Operation and ensuing quarter (2) E =Signed (i.e.DC) report
Management Action plan prepared 1 = after 10 working days after the submitted to DC
and submitted to DC ensuing quarter (3) T = Signed
proposal with date of submission to
the concerned agency

5=1 OTOP hub maintained with 5=within set schedule Means of Verification (MOVs):
reports 1= after the set (1) Q = Analysis of the Clients Survey
schedule Rating Report with date of receipt by
1=No OTOP hub maintained with the DC
reports (2) E =Signed (i.e.DC)
report submitted to DC
(3) T =
Signed (with date of signing) reports
submitted to DC
5= 100% OTOP Hub Reports
prepared and submitted
1=Less than 100%
OTOP Hub Reports prepared and
submitted
Post Activity Reports submitted Means of Verification (MOVs):
5=3 days after the (1) Q = Signed (with date of signing)
activity Post Activity Reports: DC determine
4=4-6 days after the activity if a. without correction; b. minor
3=7-9 days after the correction, c. minor content revision,
activity and d. major content revision
2=10-13 days after the activity
1=beyond 13 days (2) E = No. of signed Post Activity
Reports
(3) T = Date of Signed
Post Activity Reports

5 = 100% of requests profiled and 5=3 working days upon receipt of Means of Verification (MOVs):
assessed request (1) Q = Analysis of the Clients Survey
1 = below 100% of requests profiled 3 = 5 working days upon receipt of Rating Report with date of receipt by
and assessed request the DC
1= after 7 working days (2) E =Signed (i.e.DC)
upon receipt upon receipt of the profiling form and assessment report
request submitted to DC
(3) T = Signed
(with date of signing) reports
submitted to DC

5=100% of proposals prepared and 5=10 working days upon receipt Means of Verification (MOVs):
submitted and approved by the DC 3 = 12 working days upon receipt (1) Q = Proposals prepared and
1= submitted to the DC
1=below after 12 working days upon receipt (2) E =Signed
100% of proposals prepared, (i.e.DC)proposals prepared and
submitted and approved by the DC submitted submitted to DC
(3) T =
Signed proposal with date recieved
by the requestee

5=20 MSMEs screened and
assessed
3= less than 20 MSMEs
screened and assess
1=none
5=within the set schedule Means of Verification (MOVs):
1=after the set (1) Q = Assessment reprot with date
schedule of receipt by the DC: DC determine if
a. without correction; b. minor
correction, c. minor content revision,
and d. major content revision

(2) E = No. of MSME beneficiaries

in the assessment report submitted to
the DC
(3) T = Date of receipt by
the DC of the Assessment Report
5=1 Promotional Collateral and 5=before the end of 3rd qtr
submitted and approved by the DC 3 = end of 3rd qtr
1= after 3rd qtr
1=none
Means of Verification (MOVs):
(1) Q = Promo Collateral prepared
and submitted to the DC: DC
determine if a. without correction; b.
minor correction, c. minor content
revision, and d. major content
revision
(2) E =Promo Collateral
prepared and submitted to the DC

(3) T = Date of publish of the Promo

Collateral

5=100% of meetings per
committee/task force members
provided with agenda folders
1=below 100%
Minutes of the meeting or report Means of Verification (MOVs):
submitted (1) Q = Approved Minutes of
5=3 days after the meeting Meeting: DC determine if a. without
3= 5 days correction; b. minor correction, c.
after the meeting minor content revision, and d. major
1=beyond 5 content revision
days (2) E = No. of
approved minutes of meeting vis-a-
vis total committee/task force
meetings
(3) T = Date of the approved
Minutes of the meeting or report

5=100% of meetings per
committee/task force
1=below 100%
Minutes of the meeting submitted Means of Verification (MOVs):
5=3 days after the (1) Q = Approved Minutes of
meeting Meeting: DC determine if a. without
3= 5 days after the meeting correction; b. minor correction, c.
minor content revision, and d. major
1=beyond 5 days content revision
(2) E = No. of
approved minutes of meeting vis-a-
vis total committee/task force
meetings
(3) T = Date of the approved
Minutes of the meeting or report

5=100% of DTR DTRs submitted to the AO: AO IV to rate this indicator

1=99% 5=submitted 5
submitted days before deadline
4= 3 days after deadline
3=on
dedline
1=2 days afte
deadline
(for rating actual date of
5=IPCR targets prepared and 5=submitted to DH be
submission should Decindicates)
7/June7
submitted
1=no IPCR 4=submitted to DH Dec 10/June 10
target prepared
3=submitted to DH Dec 12/June 12
5=IPCR ratings prepared and 5=submitted to DH Jan 7/June 7
submitted
1=no 4=submitted to DH Jan10/June 10
IPCRratings prepared
3=submitted to DH Jan 12/June 12

5=100% meetings attended Means of Verifications (MOVs):

4=95% of (1) Q = Attedance sheets - present
metting attended vis-à-vis total general staff meetings
3=90% of meetings attended (2) E =
2=85% Attedance sheets
of meetings attended
1=80% and below

Date Final Rating Date

JUDITTE L. ASUNCION
Head of Office

I, SYLVIA P. FLORES of the PROVINCIAL COOPERATIVE AND ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, Division of Entrepreneurship Development and Management Services, commit to
deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated measures for the period July to December 2022.
Reviewed by:
ROEL P. DOLAYPAN, JR.
Immediate Supervisor
MFO/PAP
A. ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
a. MSME Beneficiaries Monitored
a.1 Preparatory Activity
a.2 Implementation
Conduct of Project Monitoring and
Assessment
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR)
SYLVIA P. FLORES
Ratee
Date: _______________
Date Approved by: Date
JUDITTE L. ASUNCION
Head of Office
Outstanding – 5
Very Satisfactory – 4
Satisfactory – 3
Unsatisfactory - 2
Poor - 1
SUCCESS INDICATORS Rating
(TARGETS ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS Remarks
+ MEASURES) Q E T A
Prepared M&E Action Plan and 1st semester accomplished
Submitted to DC, with minor
corrections, at the end of January
2022
5 projects monitored with quarterly 1st semester accomplishments - 10
and annual monitoring and 5 projects monitored with quarterly projects monitored
evaluation (M&E) reports with an and annual monitoring and
average of very satisfaction survey evaluation (M&E) reports with an 4 5 5 4.67
rating within the set schedule average of very satisfaction survey
rating within the set schedule
a.1 Post Implementation Activity
Prepared 2 Quarterly M&E reports Prepared 2 Quarterly M&E reports 1st semester accomplishments - 2
and 1 Annual M&E report submitted and 1 Annual M&E report submitted qrterly M&E reports
to DC with minor corrections, within to DC without corrections, 6 days 5 5 5 5.00
10 days after the ensuing quarter after the ensuing month
b. Livelihood Assistance Acted Upon
b.1 Preparatory Activity
100% of livelihood requests entered
into the Livelihood Assistance 100% of livelihood requests entered
Database, with minor correction, into the Livelihood Assistance
5 5 4 4.67
within 2 days upon receipt Database, without correction, within
2 days upon receipt

100% of livelihood request list 100% of livelihood request list

submitted to DC and coordinated submitted to DC and coordinated
with beneficiaries, 1 month before 5 5 5 5.00
with beneficiaries, 1 month before
the assessment and site validation the assessment and site validation
b.2 Implementation of Livelihood Assessment and Validation
100% of livelihood beneficaries 100% of livelihood beneficaries
schedules are assessed and schedules are assessed and
validated with an average validated with an outstanding 5 5 5 5.00
satisfaction survey rating, within the satisfaction survey rating, within the
set schedule set schedule
100% of project proposals prepared 100% of project proposals prepared
for livelihood requests submitted for livelihood requests submitted
and accepted by the DC on 3rd 4 5 5 4.67
and accepted by the DC with minor
presentation within set schedule corrections within set schedule
b.3 Post Implementation
Prepared, submitted and reviewed Prepared, submitted and reviewed
by DC the Assessment Report, with by DC the Assessment Report, with
minor correction, 6 days after the minor correction, 6 days after the 4 5 4 4.33
assessment or site validation assessment or site validation
 100% of Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA) for livelihood
beneficiaries prepared, submitted
and endorsed to DC with minor
correction, 4 days after the approval
of the assessment report
100% of Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA) for livelihood
beneficiaries prepared, submitted
and endorsed to DC with minor 4 5 4 4.33
correction, 4 days after the approval
of the assessment report

c. Distressed CAEs rehabilitated

c.1 Preparatory Activity
100% activity designs prepared, demand driven
submitted to the DC with minor
corrections, 3 months before the set
schedule

Coordinated to key stakeholders for 100% coordinated with the (a) demand driven
the activity resource speakers, (b) prospective
participants and (c) venue
reservation one month before the
scheduled date of trainings

c.2 Implementation
Conduct of Activties
100% activities conducted with an demand driven
Average of at least satisfactory
client satisfaction rating within the
set schedule

c.3 Post Activity

Preparation of Post -Activty Report
d. Balik Probinsiya Program (B2P)
d.1 Preparatory Activity
100% Post Activty reports prepared
and submitted to DC with minor
corrections, 6 days after the activity
100% of B2P beneficiaries
interviewed, assessed and
identification of proper government
intervention with an Average of at
least satisfactory client satisfaction
rating, 6 days after the activity
demand driven
1 (100%) of B2P beneficiaries
interviewed, assessed and
identification of proper government
5 5 4 4.67
intervention with an outstanding
client satisfaction rating, 6 days
after the activity

d.2 Implementation
 100% of B2P Beneficiaries
1 (100%) of B2P Beneficiaries
Assisted, with an Average of at least
Assisted, with an outstanding
satisfactory client satisfaction rating, 5 5 5 5.00
satisfactory client satisfaction rating,
within the set schedule
within the set schedule
d.3 Post Implementation
100% Post Activty reports prepared 100% Post Activty reports prepared
and submitted to DC with minor and submitted to DC with minor
4 5 4 4.33
corrections, 6 days after the activity corrections, 6 days after the
assessment
e. Business Recovery Program
e.1 Preparatory Activity
100% activity designs prepared and 1st semester accomplished
submitted to the DC with minor
corrections, 3 months before the set
schedule

Coordinated to key stakeholders for 100% coordinated with the (a) 1st semester accomplished
the activity resource speakers, (b) prospective
participants and (c) venue
reservation one month before the
scheduled date of trainings

e.2 Implementation
Conduct of Activties
100% activities conducted with an 1st semester accomplished
Average of at least satisfactory
client satisfaction rating within the
set schedule

e.3 Post Activity

Preparation of Post -Activty Report 100% Post Activty reports prepared 1st semester accomplished
and submitted to DC with minor
corrections, 6 days after the activity

B. SUPPORT TO OPERATONS
100% of meetings per
committee/task force (Climate
Change) attended, minutes of the
meeting prepared and submitted to
DC with minor corrections 3 days
after the meeting
100% of meetings per
committee/task force (Climate
Change) attended, minutes of the
meeting prepared and submitted to 5 5 3 4.00
DC with no corrections 3 days after
the meeting
 100% of meetings per
committee/task force (NVIDC)
attended, minutes of the meeting
prepared and submitted to DC with
minor corrections 3 days after the
meeting
100% of meetings per
committee/task force (NVIDC)
attended, minutes of the meeting
prepared and submitted to DC with 3 5 1 3.00
minor content revisionbeyond 5
days after the meeting

D. SUBMISSION OF REQUIRED HR DOCUMENTS

a. Submission of DTR 100% of DTR submitted on set
deadline, complete, accurate and
neat
b. IPCRs (target) prepared and IPCRs (target) prepared as to
submitted prescribed format and approved
subnitted to concerned official for
review on the set deadline
100% of DTR submitted on set
deadline, complete, accurate and 5 5 5 5.00
neat
IPCRs (target) prepared as to
prescribed format and approved
submitted to concerned official for 5 5 5 5.00
review on the set deadline

c. IPCRs (ratings) IPCRs (ratings) prepared as to IPCRs (ratings) prepared as to

prescribed format and approved prescribed format and approved
subnitted to concerned official for subnitted to concerned official for 5 5 5 5.00
review on the set deadline review on the set deadline
Attendance to meetings/seminars/trainings
a. General staff meeting/section 90% of scheduled general/section
meetings attended meetings attended in full as 5 5 5.00
scheduled

Final Average Rating 4.59 5.00 4.31 4.63

Comments and Recommendation for Development Purposes
Discussed with Date Date Final Rating Date

LOLOBETH G. MENDEZ ROEL P. DOLAYPAN JR. JUDITTE L. ASUNCION

Employee Supervisor Head of Office

 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR)

I, MARVIN A. TUCAY of the PROVINCIAL COOPERATIVE AND ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, Division of Entrepreneurship Development and Management Services, commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the
attainment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated measures for the period July to December 2022.

MARVIN A. TUCAY
Ratee
Date: _______________
Reviewed by: Date Approved by: Date

ROEL P. DOLAYPAN, JR. JUDITTE L. ASUNCION

Immediate Supervisor Head of Office
Outstanding – 5
Very Satisfactory – 4
Satisfactory – 3
Unsatisfactory - 2
Poor - 1
SUCCESS INDICATORS Rating
MFO/PAP (TARGETS + ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS Remarks
MEASURES) Q E T A
A. ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
a. 100% of NGAs programs complemented/facilitated to MLGUs and beneficiaries
a.1 Preparatory Activity
Action plan prepared and submitted on
DTI & other NGAs programs
complemented/ facilitated to MLGUs and
beneficiaries to DC, with minor correction,
100% approved, coordinated at least 1
month before the set schedule
1 Action plan prepared and submitted on
NEDA Innovation Project complemented/
facilitated to MLGUs and beneficiaries to
5 5 5 5.00
DC, without correction, 100% approved,
coordinated at least 1 month before the
set schedule

a.2 Implementation
100% of DTI & other NGAs programs 100% of NEDA program
complemented/ facilitated to MLGUs and complemented/facilitated to MLGUs and
beneficiaries with average client 4 5 5 4.67
beneficiaries with average client
satisfactory rating, within the set schedule satisfactory rating based on workplan

a.3 Post Activity

100% Post activity reports prepared and 100% post activity reports prepared and
submitted to DC with minor corrections, 6 submitted to DC without correction, 3 5 5 5 5.00
days after the training days after the training
b. Techno Missions Coordinated and Conducted
b.1 Preparatory Activity
 1 activity design prepared, submitted and 1st semester accomplished
approved by the DC with minor
corrections, 3 months before the set
schedule
1 Techno Mission coordinated with the (a) 1st semester accomplished
prospective proponent (b) concerned
partner agencies and (c) proposed venue
2 months before the scheduled date of
the activity

b.2 Implementation of Techno Mission

Conduct of 1 Techno Mission 1 Techno Mission conducted with an 1st semester accomplished
Average of at least satisfactory client
satisfaction rating, within the set schedule

b.3 Post Activity

Preparation of PostTravel Report 1 Post Travel Report prepared and 1st semester accomplished
submitted to DC, with minor corrections, 6
days after the activity

c.3 Conduct of Trade Fair

c.1 Preparatory Activity
Activity design prepared, submitted and Activity design prepared, submitted and
approved by the DC with minor approved by the DC without corrections, 3 5 5 5 5.00
corrections, 3 months before the set months before the set schedule
schedule
c.2 Implementation of the Trade Fair

1 Provincial Trade Fair conducted with an 1 Provincial Trade Fair conducted with an
Average of at least satisfactory client Average of very satisfactory client
4 5 5 4.67
satisfaction rating within the set schedule satisfaction rating within the set schedule

c.3 Post Activity

Preparation of Post Activity Report 1 Post Activity Report, includung
1 Post Activity Reports, includung
consolidated sales report of the events,
consolidated sales report of the events,
prepared and submitted to DC with minor 5 5 5 5.00
prepared and submitted to DC without
corrections, 6 days after the activity
corrections, 3 days after the activity
d. Product Accreditation and Branding System
d.1 Preparatory Activty
Conduct of Profiling and Needs 100% of requests profiled and assesssed demand driven
Assessment to MSMEs
d.2 Implementation and Post Implementation Activity
 100% of MSMEs assisted under the demand driven
Product Accreditation and Branding
System, with average client satisfactory
rating, 5 working days upon receipt

e. Proposals Prepared for Special Projects

e.1 Preparatory Activty
Conduct of Profiling and Needs 100% of requests profiled and assesssed
Assessment to MSMEs
e.2 Implementation and Post Implementation Activity
100% of proposals prepared for special
projects, approved and accepted on 3rd
presentation, 15 working days upon
received
100% of request profiled and assessed
with outstanding satisfaction survey 5 5 5 5.00
rating, upon receipt
100% proposals prepared, submitted and
approved by DC, on 1st presentation 5 5 5 5.00
without correction, 5 days upon receipt

f. OTOP Hub Maintained

f.1 Preparatory Activty
4 Operation and Management Action 1st semester accomplished
Plan prepared and submitted to DC with
minor corrections, 3 working days before
the end of the ensuing quarter

f.2 Implementation
1 OTOP Hub maintained with average
very satisfactory rating on plans
implemented, within the set schedule
f.3 Post Implementation Activity
1 OTOP Hub Annual Report (all
performance indicators included)
prepared and submitted to DC with minor
corrections, 6 days after the activity
1 OTOP Hub maintained with average
very satisfactory rating on plans 4 5 5 4.67
implemented, within the set schedule
1 OTOP Hub Annual Report (all
performance indicators included)
prepared and submitted to DC without 5 5 5 5.00
corrections, 3 days after the activity

B. INVESTMENT PROMOTION PROGRAM

b. Investor's facilitated
b.1 Preparatory Activty
Conduct of Profiling and Needs 100% of requests profiled and assesssed 100% of request profiled and assessed
Assessment to requests with outstanding satisfaction survey 5 5 5 5.00
rating, upon receipt
b.2 Implementation and Post Implementation Activity
100% of proposals prepared, accepted
on 3rd presentation, 15 working days 100% proposals prepared, submitted and
upon received approved by DC, on 1st presentation 5 5 5 5.00
without correction, 10 wdays upon receipt

c. Investment Promotions Participated

c.1Implementation and Post Implementation
100% of investment promotions Accomplished by Ms. Mendez (2ns
participated with average of 3 or semester - demand driven)
satisfactory client satisfaction survey
rating at the end of 3rd quarter

d. Investment Priority Plan Prepared and Submitted

d.1 Preparatory Activty
Coordinated with the concerned
partner agencies
Data gathering from concerned
stakeholders
100% of satekholders coordinated 2 100% of satekholders coordinated on the
months before the end of 2nd qtr 5 5 1 3.67
4th quarter
100% of data needed gathered and 100% of data needed gathered and
consolidated 1 month before the end of consolidated 1 month in the 4th quarter
5 5 1 3.67
2nd qtr

d.2 Implementation and Post Implementation Activity

1 investment priority plan submitted,
acceptability/approval on 3rd presentation 1 investment priority plan submitted, with
3 5 1 3.00
before the end of 3rd quarter minor content revision on the 4th quarter

C. SUPPORT TO OPERATIONS
100% of meetings per committee/task Accomplished by Ms. Mendez (2nd
force (Climate Change) attended, minutes semester - NVIDC/Price Monitoring)
of the meeting prepared and submitted to
DC with minor corrections 3 days after the
meeting
100% of meetings per committee/task Accomplished by Ms. Mendez (2nd
force (NVIDC) attended, minutes of the semester - NVIDC/Price Monitoring)
meeting prepared and submitted to DC
with minor corrections 3 days after the
meeting

D. SUBMISSION OF REQUIRED HR DOCUMENTS

a. Submission of DTR 100% of DTR submitted on set deadline, 100% of DTR submitted on set deadline,
complete, accurate and neat complete, accurate and neat 5 5 5 5.00

b. IPCRs (target) prepared and IPCRs (target) prepared as to prescribed IPCRs (target) prepared as to prescribed
submitted format and approved subnitted to format and approved submitted to
concerned official for review on the set concerned official for review on the set 5 5 5 5.00
deadline deadline

c. IPCRs (ratings) IPCRs (ratings) prepared as to prescribed IPCRs (ratings) prepared as to prescribed
format and approved subnitted to format and approved subnitted to
concerned official for review on the set concerned official for review on the set 5 5 5 5.00
deadline deadline

Attendance to meetings/seminars/trainings
a. General staff meeting/section 90% of scheduled general/section
100% of scheduled general/section
meetings attended meetings attended in full as scheduled 5 5 5.00
meetings attended in full as scheduled
Final Average Rating 4.74 5.00 4.33 4.70
Comments and Recommendation for Development Purposes
Discussed with Date Date Final Rating Date

LOLOBETH G. MENDEZ ROEL P. DOLAYPAN JR. JUDITTE L. ASUNCION

Employee Supervisor Head of Office
 DIVISION PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (DPCR)

I, ROEL P. DOLAYPAN JR. of the PROVINCIAL COOPERATIVE AND ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, Division of Entrepreneurship Development and Management
be rated on the attainment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated measures for the period July to December 2022.

ROEL P. DOLAYPAN JR.

Ratee
Date: _______________
Reviewed by: Date Approved by:

JUDITTE L. ASUNCION JUDITTE L. ASUNCION

Immediate Supervisor Head of Office
Outstan
Very Sa
Satisfac
Unsatisf
Poor -
SUCCESS INDICATORS Rating
MFO/PAP (TARGETS + ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS
MEASURES) Q E T
A. ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
a. MSME Beneficiaries Monitored
a.1 Preparatory Activity
M&E Action Plan Reviewed and M&E Action Plan Reviewed and
Submitted to DH, without corrections, Submitted to DH, without corrections,
at the end of January 2022 at the end of January 2022
a.2 Implementation
15 projects monitored supervised an 15 projects monitored supervised an
average of very satisfaction survey average of very satisfaction survey
4 5 5
rating within the set schedule rating within the set schedule

a.1 Post Implementation Activity

2 Quarterly M&E reports and 1 Annual 2 Quarterly M&E reports and 1 Annual
M&E report reviewed and submitted to M&E report reviewed and submitted to
DH without corrections, within 10 days DH without corrections, within 10 days 5 5 5
after the ensuing quarter after the ensuing quarter

b. 100% of NGAs programs complemented/facilitated to MLGUs and beneficiaries

b.1 Preparatory Activity
 Action plan on NGAs programs
complemented/ facilitated to MLGUs
and beneficiaries reviewed and
submitted to DH, with without
correction, 100% approved,
coordinated at least 1 month before the
set schedule
b.2 Implementation
100% of NGAs programs
complemented/facilitated to MLGUs
and beneficiaries supervised with
average client satisfactory rating,
within the set schedule
b.3 Post Activity
100% Post activity reports reviewed
and submitted to DH with without
corrections, 8 days after the training
c. Techno Missions Coordinated and Conducted
c.1 Preparatory Activity
1 activity design reviewed, submitted to
DH with withuot corrections, 3 months
before the set schedule
1 Action plan reviewed and submitted
on NEDA Innovation Project
complemented/ facilitated to MLGUs
5 5 5
and beneficiaries to DH, without
correction, 100% approved,
coordinated within the set schedule
100% of NGAs programs
complemented/facilitated to MLGUs
and beneficiaries supervised with 4 5 5
average ver satisfactory client survey
rating, within the set schedule
100% Post activity reports reviewed
and submitted to DH with without 5 5 5
corrections, 3 days after the training
 1 Techno Mission coordination to the
(a) prospective proponent (b)
concerned partner agencies and (c)
proposed venue reviewed and
submitted to DH for approval, 2 months
before the scheduled date of the
activity

c.2 Implementation of Techno Mission

1 Techno Mission supervised in with
an Average of at least satisfactory
client satisfaction rating, within the set
schedule

C.3 Post Activity

Review of PostTravel Report 1 Post Travel Report reviewed and
submitted to DH, with without
corrections, 8 days after the activity

d. Conduct of Capability Building

d.1 Preparatory Activity
1 training designs reviewed and 1 training designs reviewed and
submitted by the DH without submitted by the DH without
corrections, 3 months before the set corrections, 3 months before the set 5 5 5
schedule schedule
 1 training coordination to the (a)
prospective proponent (b) concerned
partner agencies and (c) proposed
venue reviewed and submitted to DH
for approval, one month before the
scheduled date of trainings
1 trainings coordination to the (a)
prospective proponent (b) concerned
partner agencies and (c) proposed
venue reviewed and submitted to DH
for approval, one month before the 5 5 5
scheduled date of trainings

d.2 Implementation of Capability

Building
1 training supervised with an Average 1 training supervised with a Average
of at least satisfactory client very satisfactory client satisfaction
satisfaction rating within the set rating within the set schedule 4 5 5
schedule

d.3 Post Activity

1 Post training report reviewed and 1 Post training report reviewed and
submitted to DH without corrections, 8 submitted to DH without corrections, 3 5 5 5
days after the training days after the training

e. Conduct of Market Events

e.1 Preparatory Activity
100% of Activity design reviewed and
submitted to DH without corrections, 3
months before the set schedule
3 trade fair/market events supervised
in the coordination to the (a)
prospective exhibitors and (b) venue
reservation, partner agency(ies), 2
months before the scheduled date of
the activity
Activity design prepared, submitted
and approved by the DH without
5 5 5
corrections, 3 months before the set
schedule
6 market events coordinated with the
(a) prospective exhibitors and (b)
5 5 5
venue reservation 2 months before the
scheduled date of the activity

e.2 Implementation of the Market Events

3 market events supervised in the
conduct of trade fair/market events
with an Average of at least satisfactory
client satisfaction rating, within the set
schedule
6 market events supervised in the
conduct of trade fair/market events
with an Average of at least very
satisfactory client satisfaction rating, 4 5 5
within the set schedule

e.3 Post Activity

1 Post Activity Report, includung 1 Post Activity Report, includung
consolidated sales report of the events, consolidated sales report of the events,
reviewed and submitted to DH with reviewed and submitted to DH with
4 5 4
minor corrections, 8 days after the minor corrections, 6 days after the
activity activity

f. Labelling Requests of MSMEs acted upon

f.1 Preparatory Activty
100% of labelling requests in the
profiling and needs assessment
reviewed and submitted to DH, with an
average of at least very satisfactory
rating, upon receipt of the requests
100% of labelling requests in the
profiling and needs assessment
reviewed and submitted to DH, with an
average of outstanding rating, upon 5 5 5
receipt of the requests

f.2 Implementation and Post Implementation Activity

100% of labelling requests of MSMEs 100% of labelling requests of MSMEs
designs reviewed and submitted to DH, designs reviewed and submitted to DH,
with average client satisfactory rating, with average outstanding client
5 5 5
3 working days upon receipt. satisfactory rating, 3 working days
upon receipt.

g. Product Accreditation and Branding System

g.1 Preparatory Activty
 100% of requests profiled and needs
assessment reviewed and submitted to
DH with an average of at least very
satisfactory rating, within 2 working
days

g.2 Implementation and Post Implementation Activity

100% of MSMEs the assistance of the
Product Accreditation and Branding
System reviewed and submitted to DH
for final review, with average client
satisfactory rating, 5 working days
upon receipt

h. Livelihood Assistance Acted Upon

h.1 Preparatory Activity
100% of livelihood requests profiled
and included in the Livelihood
Assistance Database , without
correction, within 2 days upon receipt
100% of livelihood requests profiled
and included in the Livelihood
Assistance Database , without
5 5 5
correction, within 2 days upon receipt

100% of livelihood request list 100% of livelihood request list

reviewed and submitted to DH and reviewed and submitted to DH and
coordinated with beneficiaries, 1 month coordinated with beneficiaries, 1 month 5 5
before the assessment and site before the assessment and site
validation validation

h.2 Implementation of Livelihood Assessment and Validation

100% of livelihood beneficaries
schedules supervised in the
assessment and validation with an
average satisfaction survey rating, 4
days upon receipt
100% of livelihood beneficaries
schedules supervised in the
assessment and validation with an
4 5 5
average of ver satisfaction survey
rating, 4 days upon receipt

Review of Project Proposal
(Mungkahing Proyekto)
100% of livelihood beneficiaries with
mungkahing proyekto reviewed and
submitted to DH without corrections,
10 working days after the site
assessment and validation
100% of livelihood beneficiaries with
mungkahing proyekto reviewed and
submitted to DH without corrections,
5 5 5
10 working days after the site
assessment and validation

h.3 Post Implementation

Livelihood Assessment Report Livelihood Assessment Report
reviewed and submitted to the DH, with reviewed and submitted to the DH,
minor correction, 15 days after the without correction, 15 days after the 5 5 5
assessment and site validation assessment and site validation
 100% of Memorandum of Agreement
(MOA) for livelihood beneficiaries
reviewed, submitted and accepted by
the DH with minor correction, 4 days
after the approval of the assessment
report
100% of Memorandum of Agreement
(MOA) for livelihood beneficiaries
reviewed, submitted and accepted by
the DH with minor correction, 4 days 4 5 4
after the approval of the assessment
report

h. Proposals Prepared for Special Projects

h.1 Preparatory Activty
100% of requests profiled and
assesssed reviewed and submitted to
DH, with minor corrections, within 3
working days upon receipt
100% of requests profiled and
assesssed reviewed and submitted to
DH, without corrections, within 3 5 5 5
working days upon receipt

h.2 Implementation and Post Implementation Activity

100% of proposals reviewed for special 100% of proposals reviewed for special
projects,and submitted to DH with projects,and submitted to DH without
minor corrections, 5 working days upon corrections, 5 working days upon 5 5 5
received received

j. Distressed CAEs rehabilitated

j.1 Preparatory Activity
100% activity designs reviewed,
submitted and approved by the DH
with minor corrections, 3 months
before the set schedule

j.2 Implementation
Conduct of Activties
j.3 Post Activity
k. Balik Probinsiya Program (B2P)
k.1 Preparatory Activity
k.2 Implementation
k.3 Post Implementation
l. OTOP Hub Maintained
l.1 Preparatory Activty
l.2 Implementation
l.3 Post Implementation Activity
100% coordination with (a) resource
speakers, (b) prospective participants
and (c) venue reservation supervised,
one month before the scheduled date
of trainings
100% activities supervised in the
conduct of the activity with an Average
of at least satisfactory client
satisfaction rating within the set
schedule
100% Post Activty reports reviewed
and submitted to DH with without
corrections, 8 days after the activity
100% of B2P beneficiaries supervised
in the assessment, validation and
endorsement to DH for proper
interventions with an Average of at
least satisfactory client satisfaction
rating, 6 days after the activity
100% of B2P Beneficiaries supervised
in the assistance, with an Average of at
least satisfactory client satisfaction
rating, within the set schedule
100% Post Activty reports reviewed
and submitted to DH with minor
corrections, 8 days after the activity
Operation and Management Action
Plan reviewed and submitted to DH
with minor corrections, 3 working days
before the end of the ensuing quarter
1 OTOP Hub maintained with average 1 OTOP Hub maintained with average
very satisfactory rating on plans very satisfactory rating on plans
implemented, within the set schedule implemented, within the set schedule 4 5 5

m. Business Recovery Program
m.1 Preparatory Activity
m.2 Implementation
m.3 Post Activity
Preparation of Post -Activty Report
B. INVESTMENT PROMOTION PROGRAM
a. Municipalities complying wit ease of doing business provided with incentive
a.1 Preparatory Activity
a.2 Implementation
a.3 Post-Implementation Activity
b. Investor's facilitated
b.1 Preparatory Activty
b.2 Implementation and Post Implementation Activity
100% investors assisted supervised
with an average of very satisfactory
rating, within the set schedule
c. Investment Promotions Participated
100% OTOP Hub Reports reviewed 100% OTOP Hub Reports reviewed
and submitted to DH with minor and submitted to DH without
5 5 5
corrections, 8 days after the activity corrections, 3 days after the activity
100% activity designs reviewed,
submitted to the DH with minor
corrections, 3 months before the set
schedule
100% coordination with (a) resource
speakers, (b) prospective participants
and (c) venue reservation supervised,
one month before the scheduled date
of trainings
100% activities supervised during the
conduct of the activity with an Average
of at least satisfactory client
satisfaction rating within the set
schedule
100% Post Activty reports reviewed
and submitted to DC without
corrections, 8 days after the activity
1 Action plan reviewed and submitted
to DH in complying with 100% of
municipalities complying with ease of
doing business provided with incentive
to DTI/DILG, without corrections, within
the first quarter of 2022
100% of municipalities complying with 100% PLGU complying with ease of
ease of doing business provided with doing business provided with incentive,
incentive, 100% meet standards at the 100% meet standards at the end of 3rd 5 5 5
end of 3rd quarter quarter
1 Consolidated LGU compliance to 1 Consolidated PLGU compliance to
EODB reviewed and submitted to DH, EODB prepared and submitted to DH,
with minor corrections, within the 4th 4 5 5
with minor corrections, within the 4th
Quarter of 2022 Quarter of 2022
100% of requests profiled and needs 100% of requests profiled and needs
assessment reviewed and submitted to assessment reviewed and submitted to
DH, with minor corrections, 3 working DH, without corrections, 3 working 5 5 5
days upon receipt days upon receipt
100% investors assisted supervised
with an outstanding satisfactory rating, 5 5 5
within the set schedule
a.1 Preparatory Activity
Reviewed and submit to DH business
preparation or its equivalent for the
investment promotion activities to be
participated, 2 weeks before the event
c.2 Implementation
100% of investment promotions
participated with average of 3 or
satisfactory client satisfaction survey
rating at the end of 3rd quarter
c.3 Post Implementation
Prepared 100% of Investment
promotions participated with minor
corrections, 6 days after the activity
d. Promotion Collateral Prepared
d.1 Preparatory Activity
20 MSMEs product shots reviewed,
submitted and approved by the DH
with minor correction, within the set
schedule
Reviewed and submit to DH business
preparation or its equivalent for the
investment promotion activities to be
participated, with minor correction, 2 4 5 5
weeks before the event
100% (1) of investment promotions
participated supervised with a very
satisfactory client satisfaction survey 4 5 1
rating at the end of 4th quarter
Prepared 100% of Investment
collaterals for participation with minor
4 5 4
corrections, 6 days after the activity
19 MSMEs product shots reviewed,
submitted and approved by the DH
with minor correction, within the set 4 3 5
schedule
d.2 Implementation and Post Implementation Activity
1 Promotional Collateral reviewed and 1 Promotional Collateral reviewed and
submitted to DH with minor corrections, submitted to DH with minor corrections, 4 5 3
by end of 3rd qtr. by end of 3rd qtr.
e. Investment Priority Plan Prepared and Submitted
e.1 Preparatory Activty
1 investment priority plan reviewed
and submittedto DH with minor 1 investment priority plan reviewed and
corrections before the end of 3rd submitted, with minor content revision, 3 5 1
quarter to DH, on the 4th quarter

C. SUPPORT TO OPERATIONS
100% of meetings per committee/task
force (Climate Change) attended,
minutes of the meeting prepared and
submitted to DC with minor corrections
3 days after the meeting
100% of meetings per committee/task
force (Climate Change) attended,
minutes of the meeting prepared and
submitted to DC with no corrections 3 5 5 3
days after the meeting

100% of meetings per committee/task 100% of meetings per committee/task

force (NVIDC) attended, minutes of the
meeting prepared and submitted to DC
with minor corrections 3 days after the
meeting
force (NVIDC) attended, minutes of the
meeting prepared and submitted to DC
with minor content revisionbeyond 5
3 5 1
days after the meeting

D. SUBMISSION OF REQUIRED HR DOCUMENTS

a. Submission of DTR 100% of DTR submitted on set 100% of DTR submitted on set
deadline, complete, accurate and neat deadline, complete, accurate and neat 5 5 5

b. IPCRs (target) prepared and IPCRs (target) prepared as to IPCRs (target) prepared as to
submitted prescribed format and approved prescribed format and approved
subnitted to concerned official for submitted to concerned official for 5 5 5
review on the set deadline review on the set deadline
c. IPCRs (ratings) IPCRs (ratings) prepared as to IPCRs (ratings) prepared as to
prescribed format and approved prescribed format and approved
subnitted to concerned official for subnitted to concerned official for 5 5 5
review on the set deadline review on the set deadline

Attendance to meetings/seminars/trainings
a. General staff meeting/section 90% of scheduled general/section
meetings attended meetings attended in full as scheduled 100% of scheduled general/section 5 5
meetings attended in full as scheduled

Final Average Rating 4.55 4.95 4.53

Comments and Recommendation for Development Purposes
Discussed with Date Date Final Rating

ROEL P. DOLAYPAN JR. JUDITTE L.

ASUNCION
Employee Head of Office
nd Management Services, commit to deliver and agree to

Date

Outstanding – 5
Very Satisfactory – 4
Satisfactory – 3
Unsatisfactory - 2
Poor - 1

Remarks
A

1st semester accomplished

1st semester accomplishment - 15

projects monitored
4.67

1st semester accomplishment - 2

qtrly M&E reports
5.00
5.00

4.67

5.00

1st semester accomplished

 1st semester accomplished

1st semester accomplished

1st semester accomplished

1st semester - 2 trainings 2nd

semester - NIC-NEDA Project
5.00
 1st semester - 2 trainings 2nd
semester - NIC-NEDA Project

5.00

1st semester - 2 trainings 2nd

semester - NIC-NEDA Project
4.67

1st semester - 2 trainings 2nd

5.00 semester - NIC-NEDA Project

5.00

1st semester accomplishment - 2

market events

5.00

1st semester accomplishment - 2

market events
4.67

4.33

5.00

5.00
 demand driven

demand driven

5.00

5.00

4.67

5.00

5.00
4.33

5.00

5.00

1st semester accomplished

 1st semester accomplished

1st semester accomplished

1st semester accomplished

1st semester accomplished

1st semester accomplished

1st semester accomplished

1st semester accomplished

4.67
5.00

1st semester accomplished

1st semester accomplished

1st semester accomplished

1st semester accomplished

1st semester accomplished

5.00

4.67

5.00

5.00
4.67

3.33

4.33

4.00
4.00

3.00

4.00

3.00

5.00

5.00
5.00

5.00

4.67

Date
 DIVISION PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (DPCR)

I, ROEL P. DOLAYPAN JR. of the PROVINCIAL COOPERATIVE AND ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, Division of Entrepreneurship Development and Management Services, commit to deliver and
agree to be rated on the attainment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated measures for the period January to June 2022.

ROEL P. DOLAYPAN JR.

Ratee
Date: _______________
Reviewed by: Date Approved by: Date

JUDITTE L. ASUNCION JUDITTE L. ASUNCION

Immediate Supervisor Head of Office
Outstanding – 5
Very Satisfactory – 4
Satisfactory – 3
Unsatisfactory - 2
Poor - 1
SUCCESS INDICATORS Rating
MFO/PAP ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS Remarks
(TARGETS + MEASURES) Q E T A
A. ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
a. MSME Beneficiaries Monitored
a.1 Preparatory Activity
M&E Action Plan Reviewed and 1 M&E Action Plan Reviewed and Submitted to DH,
Submitted to DH, without without corrections, at the end of January 2022
corrections, at the end of January 5 5 5 5
2022

a.2 Implementation
20 projects monitored supervised 20 projects monitored supervised with an average
an average of very satisfaction outstanding client survey rating within the set
survey rating within the set schedule 5 5 5 5
schedule
a.1 Post Implementation Activity
2 Quarterly M&E reports 2 Quarterly M&E reports reviewed and submitted to
reviewed and submitted to DH DH with minor correction, within 5 days after the
without corrections, within 10 ensuing quarter 4 5 5 4.67
days after the ensuing quarter

b. 100% of NGAs programs complemented/facilitated to MLGUs and beneficiaries

b.1 Preparatory Activity
Action plan on NGAs programs
complemented/ facilitated to
MLGUs and beneficiaries
reviewed and submitted to DH, Supervised or directed concernedstaff in the
with without correction, 100% coordination of the Site Visit and Assessment of As they come
approved, coordinated at least 1 PLGU Team to PhilFIDA, Baguio City
month before the set schedule

b.2 Implementation
100% of NGAs programs
complemented/facilitated to
MLGUs and beneficiaries
supervised with average client
satisfactory rating, within the set
schedule
100% of NGAs programs complemented/facilitated
to beneficiaries supervised with an average of
satisfactory client rating, within the set schedule
PhilFIDA Filature Facility, DA-PRDP
3 5 5 4.33
conduct of RAEB

b.3 Post Activity

100% Post Travel reports 100% Post Travel reports reviewed and submitted
reviewed and submitted to DH to DH without corrections, and avergae of 7-9 days
with without corrections, 8 days after the activity 5 5 3 4.33
after the activity

c. Techno Missions Coordinated and Conducted

c.1 Preparatory Activity
1 activity design reviewed, 1 activity design reviewed, submitted to DH with
submitted to DH with withuot withuot corrections, 3 months before the set
corrections, 3 months before the schedule 5 5 5 5
set schedule
 1 Techno Mission supervised in
coordination to the (a)
prospective proponent (b)
concerned partner agencies and
(c) proposed venue reviewed and
submitted to DH for approval, 2
months before the scheduled
date of the activity
1 Techno Mission supervised in coordination to the
(a) prospective proponent (b) concerned partner
agencies and (c) proposed venue reviewed and
submitted to DH for approval, 2 months before the
scheduled date of the activity 5 5 5 5

c.2 Implementation of Techno Mission

1 Techno Mission supervised in 1 Techno Mission supervised with an averagevery
with an Average of at least satisfactory client satisfaction rating, within the set
satisfactory client satisfaction schedule 4 5 5 4.67
rating, within the set schedule

C.3 Post Activity

Review of PostTravel Report 1 Post Travel Report reviewed 1 Post Travel Report reviewed and submitted to
and submitted to DH, with without DH, with without corrections, an average of 7-9
corrections, 8 days after the days after the activity 5 5 3 4.33
activity

d. Conduct of Capability Building

d.1 Preparatory Activity
2 training designs reviewed and 2 training designs reviewed and submitted to the
submitted to the DH without DH with minor corrections, 3 months before the set
corrections, 3 months before the schedule 4 5 5 4.67
set schedule

2 trainings supervised in 2 trainings supervised in coordination to the (a)

coordination to the (a) prospective proponent (b) concerned partner
prospective proponent (b) agencies and (c) proposed venue reviewed and
concerned partner agencies and submitted to DH for approval, one month before the
(c) proposed venue reviewed and scheduled date of trainings
submitted to DH for approval, one 5 5 5 5
month before the scheduled date
of trainings
d.2 Implementation of Capability
Building
a. Skills Training
b. Food Safety Training
2 trainings supervised with an 2 trainings supervised with an outstanding
Average of at least satisfactory satisfactory client rating within the set schedule
client satisfaction rating within the 5 5 5 5
set schedule

d.3 Post Activity

Preparation of Post -Training Report 2 Post training reports reviewed 2 Post training reports reviewed and submitted to
and submitted to DH with without DH with without corrections, 6 days after the
corrections, 8 days after the training 5 5 4 4.67
training

e. Conduct of Market Events

e.1 Preparatory Activity
100% of Activity design reviewed
and submitted to DH with without
corrections, 3 months before the
set schedule

3 trade fair events supervised in
the coordination to the (a)
prospective exhibitors and (b)
venue reservation, partner
agency(ies), 2 months before the
scheduled date of the activity
3 trade fair events supervised in the coordination to
the (a) prospective exhibitors and (b) venue
reservation, partner agency(ies), 2 months before
the scheduled date of the activity 5 5 5 5

e.2 Implementation of the Market Events

3 market events supervised in the 3 market events supervised in the conduct of trade
conduct of trade fair events with fair events with an Average of an Outstanding client
an Average of at least satisfaction rating, within the set schedule 5 5 5 5
satisfactory client satisfaction
rating, within the set schedule

e.3 Post Activity

 3 Post Activity Reports, includung 3 Post Activity Reports, includung consolidated
consolidated sales report of the sales report of the events, reviewed and submitted
events, reviewed and submitted to DH without corrections, 6 days after the activity
to DH with minor corrections, 8 5 5 4 4.67
days after the activity

f. Labelling Requests of MSMEs acted upon

f.1 Preparatory Activty
100% of labelling requests in the 100% of labelling requests in the profiling and
profiling and needs assessment needs assessment reviewed and submitted to DH,
reviewed and submitted to DH, with an Outstanding satisfactory rating, upon
with an average of at least very receipt of the requests 5 5 5 5
satisfactory rating, upon receipt
of the requests

f.2 Implementation and Post Implementation Activity

100% of labelling requests of
MSMEs designs reviewed and
submitted to DH, with average
client satisfactory rating, 3
working days upon receipt.
100% of labelling requests of MSMEs designs
reviewed and submitted to DH, withan outstanding
client satisfactory rating, 3 working days upon
receipt. 5 5 5 5

g. Product Accreditation and Branding System

g.1 Preparatory Activty
100% of requests profiled and 2nd semester of 2022
needs assessment reviewed and
submitted to DH with an average
of at least very satisfactory rating,
within 2 working days

g.2 Implementation and Post Implementation Activity

 100% of MSMEs the assistance 2nd semester of 2022
of the Product Accreditation and
Branding System reviewed and
submitted to DH for final review,
with average client satisfactory
rating, 5 working days upon
receipt

h. Livelihood Assistance Acted Upon

h.1 Preparatory Activity
100% of livelihood requests 100% of livelihood requests profiled and included in
profiled and included in the the Livelihood Assistance Database , with without
Livelihood Assistance Database , correction, within 2 days upon receipt
with without correction, within 2 5 5 5 5
days upon receipt

h.2 Implementation of Livelihood Assessment and Validation
Review of Project Proposal
(Mungkahing Proyekto)
h.3 Post Implementation
h. Proposals Prepared for Special Projects
h.1 Preparatory Activty
100% of livelihood request list
reviewed and submitted to DH
and coordinated with
beneficiaries, 1 month before the
assessment and site validation
100% of livelihood beneficaries
schedules supervised in the
assessment and validation with
an average satisfaction survey
rating, 4 days upon receipt
100% of livelihood beneficiaries
with mungkahing proyekto
reviewed and submitted to DH
without corrections, 10 working
days after the site assessment
and validation
Livelihood Assessment Report
reviewed and submitted to the
DH, with minor correction, 15
days after the assessment and
site validation
100% of Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA) for livelihood
beneficiaries reviewed, submitted
and accepted by the DH with
minor correction, 4 days after the
approval of the assessment
report
100% of livelihood request list reviewed and
submitted to DH and coordinated with beneficiaries,
1 month before the assessment and site validation 5 5 5 5
100% of livelihood beneficaries schedules
supervised in the assessment and validation with
an very satisfactory satisfaction survey rating within
set schedule 4 5 5 4.67
100% of livelihood beneficiaries with mungkahing
proyekto reviewed and submitted to DH without
corrections, 10 working days after the site
assessment and validation
5 5 5 5.00
Livelihood Assessment Report reviewed and
submitted to the DH, with out correction, 15 days
after the assessment and site validation 5 5 5 5.00
100% of Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for
livelihood beneficiaries reviewed, submitted and
accepted by the DH without correction, 4 days after
the approval of the assessment report
5 5 5 5.00
 100% of requests profiled and As they come
assesssed reviewed and
submitted to DH, with minor
corrections, within 3 working days
upon receipt

h.2 Implementation and Post Implementation Activity

 100% of proposals reviewed for As they come
special projects,and submitted to
DH with minor corrections, 5
working days upon received

j. Distressed CAEs rehabilitated

j.1 Preparatory Activity
100% activity designs reviewed, 100% activity designs reviewed, submitted and
submitted and approved by the approved by the DH with minor corrections, 3
DH with minor corrections, 3 months before the set schedule 4 5 5 4.67
months before the set schedule

100% coordination with (a)
resource speakers, (b)
prospective participants and (c)
venue reservation supervised,
one month before the scheduled
date of trainings
100% coordination with (a) resource speakers, (b)
prospective participants and (c) venue reservation
supervised, one month before the scheduled date
of trainings 5 5 5 5

j.2 Implementation
Conduct of Activties
j.3 Post Activity
100% activities supervised in the 100% activities supervised in the conduct of the
conduct of the activity with an activity with an Outstanding satisfactory client
Average of at least satisfactory satisfaction rating within the set schedule 5 5 5 5
client satisfaction rating within the
set schedule
100% Post Activty reports 100% Post Activty reports reviewed and submitted
reviewed and submitted to DH to DH with without corrections, 4-6 days after the
with without corrections, 8 days activity 5 5 4 4.67
after the activity

k. Balik Probinsiya Program (B2P)

k.1 Preparatory Activity
100% of B2P beneficiaries No balik probinsya beneficiary
supervised in the assessment,
validation and endorsement to
DH for proper interventions with
an Average of at least
satisfactory client satisfaction
rating, 6 days after the activity
k.2 Implementation
100% of B2P Beneficiaries No balik probinsya beneficiary
supervised in the assistance, with
an Average of at least
satisfactory client satisfaction
rating, within the set schedule

k.3 Post Implementation

100% Post Activty reports No balik probinsya beneficiary
reviewed and submitted to DH
with minor corrections, 8 days
after the activity

l. OTOP Hub Maintained

l.1 Preparatory Activty
Operation and Management
Action Plan reviewed and
submitted to DH with minor 1 Annual Marketing Plan reviewed and submitted to
corrections, 3 working days DH, without correction, more than 10 days after the 5 5 1 3.67
before the end of the ensuing end of ensuing quarter
quarter

l.2 Implementation
1 OTOP Hub maintained with 1 OTOP Hub maintained with a very satisfactory
average very satisfactory rating rating on plans implemented, within the set
on plans implemented, within the schedule 4 5 5 4.67
set schedule

l.3 Post Implementation Activity

100% OTOP Hub Reports 100% OTOP Hub Reports reviewed and submitted
reviewed and submitted to DH to DH without corrections, 3 days after the activity
with minor corrections, 8 days 5 5 5 5.00
after the activity
m. Business Recovery Program
m.1 Preparatory Activity
100% activity designs reviewed, 100% activity designs reviewed, submitted to the
submitted to the DH with minor DH with minor corrections, 3 months before the set
corrections, 3 months before the schedule 4 5 5 4.67
set schedule

100% coordination with (a)
resource speakers, (b)
prospective participants and (c)
venue reservation supervised,
one month before the scheduled
date of trainings
100% coordination with (a) resource speakers, (b)
prospective participants and (c) venue reservation
supervised, one month before the scheduled date
of trainings 5 5 5 5

m.2 Implementation
100% activities supervised during 100% activities supervised during the conduct of
the conduct of the activity with an the activity with an Outstanding client satisfaction
Average of at least satisfactory rating within the set schedule
client satisfaction rating within the 5 5 5 5
set schedule

m.3 Post Activity

Preparation of Post -Activty Report 100% Post Activty reports 100% Post Activty reports reviewed and submitted
reviewed and submitted to DC to DC without corrections, 4-6 days after the activity
without corrections, 8 days after 5 5 4 4.67
the activity

B. INVESTMENT PROMOTION PROGRAM

a. Municipalities complying wit ease of doing business provided with incentive
a.1 Preparatory Activity
 1 Action plan reviewed and As they come
submitted to DH in complying
with 100% of municipalities
complying with ease of doing
business provided with incentive
to DTI/DILG, without corrections,
within the first quarter of 2022

a.2 Implementation
100% of municipalities complying As they come
with ease of doing business
provided with incentive, 100%
meet standards at the end of 3rd
quarter
a.3 Post-Implementation Activity

1 Consolidated LGU compliance As they come

to EODB reviewed and submitted
to DH, with minor corrections,
within the 4th Quarter of 2022

b. Investor's facilitated
b.1 Preparatory Activty
100% of requests profiled and As they come
needs assessment reviewed and
submitted to DH, with minor
corrections, 3 working days upon
receipt

b.2 Implementation and Post Implementation Activity

100% investors assisted As they come
supervised with an average of
very satisfactory rating, within the
set schedule
c. Investment Promotions Participated
c.1 Preparatory Activity
 100% of investment promotions As they come
participated supervised with
average of 3 or satisfactory client
satisfaction survey rating at the
end of 3rd quarter

c.2 Implementation
100% of investment promotions As they come
participated with average of 3 or
satisfactory client satisfaction
rating at the end of 3rd quarter

c.3 Post Implementation Activity

 Prepared 100% of investment As they come
promotions participated with
minor corretions, 6 days after the
activity

d. Promotion Collateral Prepared

d.1 Preparatory Activity
20 MSMEs product shots
reviewed, submitted and
approved by the DH with minor Target for 2nd Semester
correction, within the set
schedule

d.2 Implementation and Post Implementation Activity

1 Promotional Collateral reviewed Target for 2nd Semester
and submitted to DH with minor
corrections, by end of 3rd qtr.

e. Investment Priority Plan Prepared and Submitted

e.1 Preparatory Activty
1 investment priority plan Target for 2nd Semester
reviewed and submittedto DH
with minor corrections before the
end of 3rd quarter

e.2 Implementation and Post Implementation Activity

1 investment ordinance updated Target for 2nd Semester
on the 3rd presentation within
end of the 4th Quarter
C. SUPPORT TO OPERATIONS
100% of meetings per
committee/task force (Climate
Change) attended, minutes of the
meeting prepared and submitted
to DC with minor corrections 3
days after the meeting
 100% of meetings per
committee/task force (NVIDC)
attended, minutes of the meeting
prepared and submitted to DH 1 NVIDC-TWG Meeting attended, minutes of
with minor corrections 3 days meeting reviewed and submitted to DH, beyond 5 5 5 3 4.33
after the meeting days after the meeting

D. SUBMISSION OF REQUIRED HR DOCUMENTS

a. Submission of DTR 100% of DTR submitted on set 100% of DTR submitted on set deadline, complete,
deadline, complete, accurate and accurate and neat 5 5 5 5
neat
b. IPCRs (target) prepared and IPCRs (target) prepared as to IPCRs (target) prepared as to prescribed format
submitted prescribed format and approved and approved subnitted to concerned official for
subnitted to concerned official for review on the set deadline 5 5 5 5
review on the set deadline

c. IPCRs (ratings) IPCRs (ratings) prepared as to

prescribed format and approved
subnitted to concerned official for
review on the set deadline

Attendance to meetings/seminars/trainings
a. General staff meeting/section 90% of scheduled 90% of scheduled general/section meetings
meetings attended general/section meetings attended in full as scheduled 5 5 5
attended in full as scheduled
Final Average Rating 4.77 5.00 4.63 4.80
Comments and Recommendation for Development Purposes
Discussed with Date Assessed by: Date Final Rating Date
I certify that I discussed my assessment of the performance with the
employee

ROEL P. DOLAYPAN JR. JUDITTE L. ASUNCION JUDITTE L. ASUNCION

Employee Supervisor Head of Office