California Bearing Ratio Test: (As Per IS 2720 (Part-16) )

Rehabilitation And Up-Gradation Of Existing 2 Lane With Paved Shoulder Configuration of Wardha-Arvi from Km.
0+000 (Wardha) to Km. 53+708 (Arvi) NH-647 in the State of Maharastra On Engineering Procurment & Construction
(EPC)Basic Contract.
Format No.:T/F 7 Rev no: 0
Client National Highways Public Work Department Of Maharashtra
Contractor RPP Infra Project's Ltd
Authority Engineer TPF ENGINEERING PVT LTD
CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO TEST
[As per IS 2720(Part-16)]
Laboratory job no. Date of Sampling 2/6/2019
Type of material Soil Date of Casting 2/13/2019
Source/Location OGL/17+600 Date of Testing 2/17/2019
MDD of Sample (gm/cc) 1.671 Sampled by Jointly
OMC of Sample (%) 19.37 Tested by Jointly
Proposed use Emb bottom
MOISTURE CONTENT AND UNIT WEIGHT OF TEST SAMPLES
S.No Description Mould No. 1 Mould No. 2 Mould No. 3
A. No.Of layers 5 5 5
B. No.Of blows per layer 56 56 56
C. Condition of sample while SOAKING Before After Before After Before After
D. Wt.of mould(gm) 7052 6663 6660
E. Wt.of wet sample+mould(gm) 11425 11485 11090 11167 11060 11124
F. Wt.of wet sample(E-D)(gm) 4373 4433 4427 4504 4400 4464
G. Volume of mould/sample (cc) 2250 2250 2250 2250 2250 2250
H. Wet density (F/G)(gm/cc) 1.944 1.970 1.968 2.002 1.956 1.984
J. Moisture determination
K. Container no. 16 17 18 19 20 21
L. Wt.of container(gm) 35.16 34.49 35.13 34.1 35.05 35.62
M. Wt.of wet sample+cont.(gm) 95.2 99.25 98 92.8 90.6 96.7
N. Wt.of dry sample+cont.(gm) 85.61 88.3 87.88 82.9 81.58 86.26
P. Wt.of water(M-N)(gm) 9.59 10.95 10.12 9.9 9.02 10.44
Q. Wt.of dry sample(N-L)(gm) 50.45 53.81 52.75 48.8 46.53 50.64
R. Water content[(P/Q)x100](%) 19.01 20.35 19.18 20.29 19.39 20.62
S. Dry density{H/[1+(R/100)]}(gm/cc) 1.633 1.637 1.651 1.664 1.638 1.645
LOAD PENETRATION TEST DATA
Penetratio Proving ring Proving ring Proving ring
GENERAL INFORMATION
n (mm) reading
Load(kgf)
reading
Load(kgf)
reading
Load(kgf)
0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Type of compaction used: Static/ Dynamic
0.5 2 12.94 1 6.47 2 12.94
1.0 3 19.41 2 12.94 4 25.88
Period of soaking : 04 days
1.5 5 32.35 4 25.88 6 38.82
2.0 6 38.82 5 32.35 7 45.29
Wt.of surcharge used (kg) : 5kg
2.5 7 45.29 6 38.82 8 51.76
4.0 8 51.76 7 45.29 9 58.23
Proving ring Number & capacity : 50KN
5.0 9 58.23 8 51.76 10 64.7
7.5 11 71.17 10 64.7 12 77.64
Proving Ring Load Factor 6.47
10.0
12.5
Corrected unit load from graph(kg) for 2.5mm 3.31 2.83 3.78
Corrected unit load from graph(kg) for 5.0mm 2.83 2.52 3.15
CBR at 2.5mm (%) 3.31 2.83 3.78
CBR at 5.0mm (%) 2.83 2.52 3.15
CBR reported (%) 3.31
For Contractor(RPP) For Authority Engineer For Client/NHPWD

Name: Name: Name:
Designation: Designation: Designation:
Date: Date: Date:
Rehabilitation And Up-Gradation Of Existing 2 Lane With Paved Shoulder Configuration of Wardha-Arvi from
Km. 0+000 (Wardha) to Km. 53+708 (Arvi) NH-647 in the State of Maharastra On Engineering Procurment &
Construction (EPC)Basic Contract.
Client National Highways Public Work Department
C B R TEST
Laboratory job no. Date of sampling 2/6/2019
Type of material Soil Sampled by Jointly

Source OGL Date of testing 2/17/2019
Location 17+600 Tested by Jointly
Proposed use EMB BOTTOM
LOAD vsLOAD
PENETRATION GRAPH
vs PENETRATION (56 Blows)
GRAPH
300
400
350
250
300
200
250
(Kg)
Load(Kg)
150
200
Load
150
100
100
50
50
00
12.5
13.0
14.5
0.5
1.0
2.0
2.5
3.5
4.0
5.0
5.5
6.5
7.0
8.0
8.5
9.5
10.0
10.5
11.0
11.5
12.0
13.5
14.0
15.0
0.0
1.5
3.0
4.5
6.0
7.5
9.0
0.5
1.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
7.5
9.0
9.5
10.0
12.5
0.0
1.5
2.0
4.0
4.5
6.5
7.0
8.0
8.5
10.5
11.0
11.5
12.0
13.0
13.5
14.0
14.5
15.0
Penetration
Penetration(mm)
(mm)
Results:-
Mould no. 1
CBR at 2.5mm Penetration
Corrected CBR at 2.5mm Penetration
CBR reported as (%)=
For Contractor(RPP) For Authority Engineer For Client/NHPWD

Name: Name: Name:
Date: Date: Date:
C B R TEST

LOAD vs PENETRATION GRAPH (56 Blows)

100
90
80
70
60
Load (Kg)
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.5
1.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
7.5
9.0
9.5
10.0
12.5
0.0
1.5
2.0
4.0
4.5
6.5
7.0
8.0
8.5
10.5
11.0
11.5
12.0
13.0
13.5
14.0
14.5
15.0
Penetration (mm)
Results:-
Mould no. 2
For Contractor(L&T) For Authority Engineer For Client/NHPWD

Name: Name: Name:
Date: Date: Date:
C B R TEST

LOAD vs PENETRATION GRAPH (56 Blows)

100
90
80
70
60
Load (Kg)
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.5
1.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
7.5
9.0
9.5
10.0
12.5
0.0
1.5
2.0
4.0
4.5
6.5
7.0
8.0
8.5
10.5
11.0
11.5
12.0
13.0
13.5
14.0
14.5
15.0
Penetration (mm)
Results:-
Mould no. 3
For Contractor(L&T) For Authority Engineer For Client/NHPWD

Name: Name: Name:
Date: Date: Date:
Dry Density Vs CBR Graph
15
10
CBR (%)
0
1.80 1.85 1.90 1.95
Dry Density (g/cc)
Maximum Dry Density (g/cc) 1.67

97% of MDD (g/cc) 1.62
CBR at 97% of MDD (%) 1.62

California Bearing Ratio Test: (As Per IS 2720 (Part-16) )

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

California Bearing Ratio Test: (As Per IS 2720 (Part-16) )

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Rehabilitation And Up-Gradation Of Existing 2 Lane With Paved Shoulder Configuration of Wardha-Arvi from Km.

For Contractor(RPP) For Authority Engineer For Client/NHPWD

Type of material Soil Sampled by Jointly

Location 17+600 Tested by Jointly

Proposed use EMB BOTTOM

For Contractor(RPP) For Authority Engineer For Client/NHPWD

Type of material Soil Sampled by Jointly

Location 17+600 Tested by Jointly

Proposed use EMB BOTTOM

LOAD vs PENETRATION GRAPH (56 Blows)

For Contractor(L&T) For Authority Engineer For Client/NHPWD

Type of material Soil Sampled by Jointly

Location 17+600 Tested by Jointly

Proposed use EMB BOTTOM

LOAD vs PENETRATION GRAPH (56 Blows)

For Contractor(L&T) For Authority Engineer For Client/NHPWD

Dry Density (g/cc)

Maximum Dry Density (g/cc) 1.67

CBR at 97% of MDD (%) 1.62

You might also like