Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Labanotator No - 73
Labanotator No - 73
73 October 1993
CONTENTS
1. Hand/Finger Fan
1.1 Judy Van Zile has sent interesting comments on Issues 70, 71 and 72:
'I very much appreciate Janos's "elbow rotation' analysis in issue 70 of the Labanotator. It occurs to
me that the situation is rather analogous to the notion of 'hand twist/finger fan' that I have had
problems with for so long. Writing a twist of the hand or fingers to describe the 'fanning' action is
really just a shorthand for describing some displacement that goes on in the 'bones of the hand' and
that is amplified by sagittal (within the hand) spreading of the fingers - which looks like a twisting
action because of the different lengths of the fingers and thek non-horizontal 'attachment' to the rest of
the hand. (This is not stated nearly as eloquently as Janos's argument, but I think the point is there.)"
1.2 When Knust first showed me his way of writing a finger fan he clearly stated that it was a shorthand
device, but very useful as a general statement. At that time (the 1960s) he demonstrated a full three-
dimensional fan making use of the metacarpals. As the fingers cannot rotate at all, nor twist, it seemed
to me a useful shorthand to provide a general statement of such hand positions.
1.3 In his 1979 Dictionary Knust makes no mention in his word explanations of its being a shorthand
device. He describes a twist in the hand, 372a and b), as a "fanning of the hand" and states that no
rotation should occur in the forearm. In addition he writes: "A twist of the fingers in which only the
fingers change their relationship to one another with a fan-like result but the metacarpal bones are not
involved, is written as a rotation of the five fingers", as in d) and f) here. This is a departure from
what he had originally demonstrated to me.
372a
2 The Labanotator, No. 73, October 1993
1.4 The LN text covers twists in the hand, Ex. 433, but not finger fans. (Oh, that
the book had not been restricted to a exactly 528 pages!) The sign for sagittal
spreading, Ex. la here, has come into use since 1979. This sign is useful for a
two-dimensional spreading; for three-dimensional spreading, a statement of
twisting is appropriate. Investigation into detailed hand and finger movements
are planned for an Advanced Textbook Chapter. The range of such movements
in Asian dance, the differences that appear, which ones are most commonly 433
used, etc. is a special study that is much needed. So far these simple notations
provide only a general statement. Detailed descriptions can be indicated by
writing movements and positions of the hand and the individual fingers. These
may be put in a glossary to state the performance of a simpler 'shorthand'
statement used in the score.
2.1 Our thanks to Judy for pointing out in Ex. 7c, issue 71, the missing dots for the tracks next to the
center line. Judy writes: "I have found it useful in some scores to set up a clear difference in meaning
between track and black pins - which I state in a glossary." It appears that many people are uncertain
how to use these pins correctly because there is some overlap where they mean exactly the same thing.
I had hoped that my piece on this topic in issue 71 would have clarified the usages. However, to
answer Judy's next need - she writes: "There are times when I want to simply say 'place the arms
forward middle, but move them in towards the center line of the body' - a broad statement in which
the point is to move them in, but with no precise destination."
2.2 Using a black pin for this need is less specific than using a track pin, but the pin will still be read as a
destination. It has been my practice in writing ballet arm positions to use black pins as a general
statement because the different 'schools' place the finger tips closer or farther apart; it is a destinational
statement. In a book on ballet technique the exact position can be spelled out in the glossary with the
specific track pins.
2.3 For the need Judy describes, why not use a displacement pin? In Ex. 2a the tack refers to the distal
center and produces displacement of the extremity of the arm toward the left. This is comparable to
2b in which each foot is displaced to the side, producing an open stance, feet slightly apart.
H
2a 2b 2c 2d
2.4 If it is a small shifting action which occurs, this can be shown by placing the equal sign = on the shaft
of the pin. In 2c, after the arm has arrived there is a slight shift to the left. According to the (rather
hasty) decision made at the 1979 ICKL conference, distal center reference, as in 2a, should have the
small single stroke across the shaft of the pin, 2d. In this case the reference is so obvious that this
added indication is not needed - except to be theoretically quite correct.
The Labanotator, No. 73, October 1993
3.1 Referring to the last issue, No. 72, Judy writes: "In item 4,1 do not see
why 41 and 4m do not produce essentially the same movement (with
only the 'feeling' of the performer being different). In 41, since the
movement is led by the back-of-the-hand surface of the lower arm, it
seems to me that the hand should trail behind, just as it does when the
base of the back of the hand leads."
3.3 How is 3a below to be performed? How to establish specific notation which would clearly spell out
the difference between 'leading' and 'guiding' for the palm. If it were the hand leading, the hand
would displace since it must go first into the stated direction. Combining the hand sign with the palm
indication could indicate that it is not only the front surface of the hand that is being described but a
body part (joint) as well. Note that in this discussion of part leading the term 'joint' is used in a
general way for parts that can be displaced.
3a 3d 3e
3.4 In view of what has been established, in 3a the arm rises to forward middle with palm guidance.
There should be no displacement, only an outward rotation. The palm surface will be energized,
'pressing' against the air. In 3b the hand as a 'joint' leads the movement How will this be
performed? Will it require wrist flexion toward the thumb side of the wrist? Will there be inward
rotation and backward folding of the wrist? Or the reverse, outward rotation and forward wrist
folding? Some further indication is needed.
3.5 In 3c the combined sign should mean that the palm will 'bulge' in leading the arm gesture. To avoid
this becoming the performance of 3d, (inside of the wrist leading), the arm will need to flex slightly, a
passive, unemphasized movement needed to allow the palm to go first. This slight flexion will
disappear at the end of the gesture. In 3e the outward rotation of the arm allows the leading action
(displacement) to disappear at the end of the gesture, but the rotation remains.
Claude Perrottet also wrote detailed comments on Issue No. 72. He pointed out the missing hold signs in the
left support column for Ex. 2b-g in that issue. The following are some of the points he brought up.
4.1 Claude questions if there is a confusion between modifying signs on the one hand and
relationship signs on the other. He sees the double X in Ex. 4a here as a relationship 4a
sign, expressing the relationship between the foot and the floor, in this case, very near,
almost touching. While that is true and the chosen description produces that result, the
X signs do not belong to the family of relationship signs. To express the same thing
using a relationship sign one should write 4b. This use of the dotted bow is not
popular because it is often hard to draw and hard to read. It is, of course, quite correct
and has the advantage of being more accurate in timing in that it gives the relationship 4b
at the end of the movement where it is needed.
I
5. Motif Indications?
5.1 Claude questions whether the arm examples on page 4, issue 72, are meant to be Motif.
One example, 4m, is repeated here. If it is Motif Writing, then carets should be used to
indicate that the writer is still referring to the arm. The reply to this is that very often
space (and time) is saved by not writing in the full staff; instead the particular body 4m
part is excerpted, usually with a starting position and a short double line to indicate the
start of movement. The shortness of the double line and the statement of body part in a discussion on
detailed structured movement makes it clear, we believe, that the indication is not one of Motif
Description. It would be interesting to hear from others on this.
6. Fact or Feeling?
6.1 Taking his discussion into a slightly different direction, Claude writes: "As teachers or scholars of
Kinetography/Labanotation we should be right in assuming that a feeling, or emotion, is always
inextricably linked to a motion, a human movement. If we are able to discern that such a movement
takes place (which includes its visibility) then we are also able to notate it. In the case of no motion
in the body being observable, nothing will be registered, i.e. notated on paper. Notwithstanding, a
feeling, an emotion or a thought is assumed to exist, or arise, at the onset of, during, or as an
immediate consequence of, a movement of the body, or a part of it, in the surrounding space - no
matter how large or how small the action is. If no spatial displacement takes place, we do not tend to
speak of movement, or action, happening, at least not in the kinetographical sense, but of a movement
pause." He continues:
6.2 "There is, indeed, the rare possibility of, for example,
strength increasing and then decreasing again, in an arm
which remains in its spatial direction throughout - clearly a
movement phrase too:" Claude's Ex. (5) and (6) here are >:> >
'more or less equal', as shown by the sign:«^. (Editor's
note: In KIN the strong accent sign in a bow shows strength, 0 o
or increase and decrease of strength, as indicated here. In LN r
•
x 6
, ~(Is /•„
Od
an accent sign is considered to have in-built timing, i.e.
suddenness. Hence use of the ordinary strength sign, Ex. 6a
here, is considered more appropriate.)
The Labanotator, No. 73, October 1993
7.1 First, a little background note to this item which appeared in issue no. 72. In reading scores written by
other people one comes across errors, usually of a slip-of-the-pen type. But occasionally there are
usages which the writer may think correct but which are questionable. Is this the way they learned it?
Did they make up this combination of signs? Is this a misunderstanding of what the indication ought to
be or ought to mean? Items in the Labanotator have often been based on such different usages, this
being a good forum for discussion. If everyone concerned read this periodical and responded to it we
would find out the origin of these different usages and no doubt benefit from the sharing. But these
discussions appear to come to the attention of very few, or certainly few find the time to take part in
such discussions. Each notator cannot study each score that is produced and write to every other
notator asking "Is this what you meant?" No. But why not send in examples you have come across?
Right here in the Labanotator we have the means to communicate, to find and discuss differences in
daily usages and thereby keep the general functioning of our system clear. These matters are not legal
ICKL discussions requiring official voting, though some items might lead to official presentation at a
conference. We need to toss ideas around, find ways of expressing a particular need - the kind of
thing which usually has nothing to do with official changes in the system as such.
7.2 What do you understand by Ex. 7a here? Do most of you use it? My
discussion in issue 72, sparked by seeing this notation in a score, was aimed at
pointing out that, because in LN we have established standard directions for
palm facing, we have no way of indicating that the standard palm facing
directions should not be used, that it should be open to what is natural for ~r j~
each individual person. We do not have a norm for leg rotations, the
rotational state has to be stated. For the arm it has been a different matter. Ex. ^a ?b
7b states rotational alignment, neither inward nor outward rotation/twist.
7.3 Standard palm facings have proved to be a very useful rule. Rather than throwing this usage out, its
value has been confirmed by the excellent ICKL 1989 paper by Janos Fuegedi which indicates how to
define palm facing directions for the various intermediate directions, a task which had not previously
The Labanotator, No. 73, October 1993
been tackled. My discussion in issue 72 sought to find an indication to state that the natural, personal
palm facing should be in effect. We do not usually check with each other what our natural stance is
regarding palm facing when the arms are in certain directions. To cite an example of such differences,
years ago I observed that, when my arms hang down, the palms face in toward the legs (toward each
other). Then I observed Knust's palms as he stood with his arms down. His palms habitually faced
backward. So people are different, and that difference needs to be allowed, to be catered to.
8.1 In Issue No. 43, which came out in 1986, the topic of revolving on a straight path was discussed.
Since then there has been further thought as to the most appropriate way to write this type of
movement. Discussions at ICKL were brief and inconclusive, no formal paper was presented. Bearing
in mind Ray Cook's often repeated comment "If we were starting now to design the system we would
probably do many things differently" does bring us face to face with the fact that to some extent the
system has 'grown like Topsy', and though over the years we have streamlined the system to meet the
demands of logic and practicality, we still have instances of a heritage from the past which is not
serving us to full advantage. It seemed, therefore, to be a good idea to give a cold calculating look at
how we would establish the writing rules, given the present choices in description. Because this matter
needs to be further discussed at ICKL, the presentation here is in the nature of a preliminary
investigation. Give it immediate thought and send in your comments right away!
8.2 What is the basic movement material being used in revolving while travelling? Obviously travelling is
basic, therefore the signs of 8a will be required. Turning (revolving around one's own axis) occurs,
therefore one or other sign of 8b will be needed. In Motif Description the combined form of travelling
on a straight path and revolving at the same time would be expressed as 8c.
8.3 Combining these signs as in 8d makes the path sign hard to see. It is close to Knust's original
cartwheel sign, 8e, a turn sign combined with a straight path sign, a cartwheel being a revolution while
travelling on a straight path. Because Knust's sign looked like a place high sign with too few stripes,
it was modified to the drawing of 8f in which the revolving is predominant. This sign was adopted for
unification and logicality to mean a cartwheel to the right. For revolving on a straight path, the
drawing of 8g is more serviceable as the path is seen to be dominant with the turn occurring within it.
8a 8b 8c 8d 8e
I
8g
8.4 Because no circular path occurs, writing 8h for the activity of 8g is unsuitable. Why then has it hung
on so long? The answer lies in the question of whether on each step the foot swivels or does not
swivel to achieve the change of Front.
8i 8j ^- 8k 81 8m
The Labanotator, No. 73, October 1993
8.5 In 8i 1/4 of a circle is walked with four steps. To keep on the circular path, each leg prepares by
rotating slightly in the direction of the circling. We do this instinctively; only occasionally does this
action need to be spelled out, as it is in 8j where each leg is rotated 1/16th on each step and is
followed by a non-swivel turn (blind turn). With four steps the same 1/4 circle as in 8i will be
achieved.
8.6 In 8k 1/4 circle is achieved with only two steps, therefore the degree of leg rotation and of blind turn
will be 1/8 to the right for each step. If a full circle is to be walked with four steps, as in 81, it is
very likely that quite a bit of swivel will have to occur. This sequence can be achieved completely
with non-swivel turning if each leg is markedly rotated a full 1/4 rotation to the right on each step.
This requires a bit of effort and if such performance is necessary it would need to be spelled out.
8.7 Ex. 8m states revolving on a straight path, but as no degree of turning is stated we do not know
whether swivelling or non-swivelling will occur. We see therefore that the number of steps and
amount of circling governs to a large degree whether the performer will naturally use swivel or non-
swivel turning. When nothing is stated, then the easy, comfortable, natural way should be expected.
8.8 In 8n four steps are taken on a straight path while revolving 1/4 to the right; no swivelling need occur.
But in 80 7/8 of a turn occurs during three steps; swivelling will happen naturally.
T
8 Pi Ik ^
8n 80 1. fln _L
8q >. W
8r 8s
8.9 But how to be specific about manner of performance when such
a statement is needed? Ex. 8p shows the space hold for the foot
next to the turn sign, thus designating blind turns. In 8q the foot
is stated with the indication for sliding support (to produce
swivelling); no part of foot to be used is designated. Ex. 8p
1
could be simplified to 8r and 8q reduced to 8s, the foot symbol
being understood, as it is in 8t which, if written fully should be
8t 8u
indicated as 8u.
T T
8v 8w 8x 1 »1 8y 8z
8.10 In the 1986 discussion on this topic, other solutions were put forward. While the logic is clear, the
description chosen is not so close to the information which the reader needs. In 8v the manner of
turning is shown to be through twisting, a twist within the body. This usage is taken from the Motif
sign for rotation within the body. In 8w the = sign within the turn sign states the reverse, the body
turns in one piece, i.e. there is no rotation within the body. While the logic behind this idea is clear, it
is one stage removed, so to speak, from the immediate concern. The reader wants to know what to do
8 The Labanotator, No. 73, October 1993
with the feet, how should the feet work during the turn? Therefore the statements of 8p and 8q are
preferable because they give the information directly.
8.11 The other 1986 suggestion for a solution also used the space hold sign, but placed on either side of the
turn sign, as in 8x, to indicate non-swivel turns. If the turning should be through swivelling, then the
angular release signs would be placed next to the turn sign, 8y. The significance here of the angular
release signs derives from their established usage in 8z in which the turn starts as a blind turn and then
releases so that from then on it pivots (swivels).
Please note that payment in Sterling is preferred. Payment in US Dollars is acceptable and the
rates are shown in parentheses.
Address all subscription applications and renewals to: Jean Johnson Jones, The Labanotation
Institute, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 5XH, England.
Send comments to Ann Hutchinson Guest, 17 Holland Park, London Wll 3TD, England.
Palm Facing; Body Key for 46, 51C, 53C Rotations), Attached, Placement of 45, 47C
-, Timing 45 -, for the Arms 54, 55C
Partnerwork/Floorwork; Simple Description 52 -, of Body Parts
Parts of Body 62 -, Cancellation of Body Twist 45
Part Leading, Use of Toe Hooks 72 -, Elbow 70
Pas de Chat Landing for 37 -, Indication of 34
Passing; Approximate Movement of 58 -, of Limbs; Back to Normal 72
'Passive'/'Resultant'/'Following' 48 -, Meaning of Symbols 45
'Passive', 'Resultant' Movement 54, 55C, 57C -, Turning 63
- Turns; Symbology 45, 47C -, White Pins for 29
Path(s), Foot Direction on Circular 30 Round Pins for Floor Plans, Advantage of 48
- for Gestures, Indication of 38 Runs, Ad Lib 27, 61
-, Retrace 35 -, a Simple 61
-, Revolving on a Straight 31
-, Length of Signs 59
-, Signs as Modified 56 'Same Spot' (Caret) 32
Pathway, Empty Direction Symbol for 37 Score Checking 49
-, Indication or Peripheral 37 - Details, Handling of 35
-, Quiz 27 Secret Turns 47, 52C, 56C
Pelvic Movements 65 Segment; Moving and Fixed 34
Pins for Floor Plans, Advantage of Round 48 Sequential Movement 28
-, for Crossed Arms 54, 55C Shift of Head 63
- for Head Rotations, White 29 Shift, Statement of in Addition Bracket 45
-, Placement of 29 - or Step 29, 37
-, - - Relationship 27, 71 Short Signs 56
-, Track 47, 71 Shorthand Devices 35
- in Turn Signs, White 29 - Ideas (S. Leeder) 35
Place, Where is? 31 Shoulder Flexion 34
Pointing 37 - Movements; Point of Reference 42, 44C
Points of Reference 42 Shoulder Blade, Movements of 34
Position(s), Moving from Open to Closed 45 Sissonne, Landing for 37
-, Slow Closing into Fifth 5O, 53C Sitting, Distance in 42, 44C
-, Starting 26 Sliding Steps 60
-, -, Off Stage 26 Sound, No Sound 46, 51C
-, Retire^ Exact Description 51 Space Measurement, Distance 69
Position Writing or Movement Writing? 32 Space Hold while Circling 28
Props, Handling of 70, 71 - -, Change of Key for a 58
- -, or Spot Hold 72
Specific Parts of the Body 64
Reference Point (State), Anatomical Description(s) 34 Spiral Paths on Floor Plans 59, 63, 61
- -, Hip Movements, Point of 42, 44C Spreading, Closing, Signs for 43, 45C
- -, Shoulder Movements, Point of 42, 44C Staccato, Timing 32
Relationship of Focal Point 27 Staffs, Change of 41
- Pins, Placement of 26 Stage Area Signs 68
- between Support and Leg Gesture Movements 48, Stance Key, Interpretation of 30
52C Standard Retention; Log Rolling, Carriage of Limbs,
- Sliding 61 Use of the 46, 5OC
- Touching Hands 62 Standard Rotation for the Arms, a Change of 54, 55C
Release Sign, Action Stroke; Timing 49, 52C, 53C, Standing, Level in 31
56C, 59, 61 Staple(s), Carets 32
- -, Existing Uses 49 52C, 53C Step(s), -, Distance of 35
- -, in Support Column 44, 46C, 49, 52C -, Fluent Change of Level in 45
- Weight in Support Column 44, 46C -, or Shift? 29, 37
Repeat(s) 48, 66 -, Undeviating 54
-, Indication of (Reprise) 29 Step Turn, Timing of level change in 59
-, Movement or Notation? 45, 47C Stepping; Change of level 45, 61
- of a Reprise 27 -, Simplification in Writing Patterns 32
-, Sectional for Group Scores; Restatement of Material Stopped Movements 29
33 Study by David McKituick, Jazz 29
Reprise, Indication of 29 Supports), Choice in Description of Levels in 45
-, Repeat of 27 - Column, Release Sign in 44, 46C, 49, 52C
'Resultant'/'Passive'/'Following' 43, 54, 55C, 59C, 57C Support Column, Release Weight Sign in 44, 46C, 49,
Retention/Adjustment of Grasping (Hands) 46 52C
-, Cancellation of Centre of Gravity 44, 46C -, Lines, Slanting 26
-, Standard Use of; Log Rolling; Carriage of Limbs 46, -, Placement of Hooks for 44
50C -, Relationship Between Leg Gesture and Movements
Retire Position; Exact Description 51 48, 52C
Revolving on a Straight Path 31 Supporting on Other Body Parts 49
- while Travelling 43 Surface, Design Drawing, Statement of Shape of 43,
Rhythm(s), Visualization of 32 45C
Rigidity, Body Hold Sign For? 52, 56C Swingflmpact/Impulse - Dynamics 45, 61
Ritardando, Accelerando (Time Signs) 28 Swivelling, Change of Level while 26
Rolling, Log; Carriage of Limbs; Use of Standard Systems of Reference 67
Retention 46, 5OC
The Labanotator Index of Contents, ed. 1994
Undeviating Steps 54
Unfolding 28, 42, 44C
Unit Statement 28
Upper Body Movements 64, 63
Verb or Adjective? 26