Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evan Darling Lab 1 Procedure Lab Report 5
Evan Darling Lab 1 Procedure Lab Report 5
Evan Darling Lab 1 Procedure Lab Report 5
Preston Olander
Evan Darling
Kai Pfeuffer
Mr. Keller
Honors Conceptual Physics Delta
9/26/2022
2. In the photograph above, the process of measuring direction and magnitude can be seen, as well as the division of tasks among the group members.
3. Above, our final vector’s direction and magnitude to the origin is being calculated with string.
4. In this image above, we are calculating our percent error from our final vector point to the accurate final vector point using a meter stick and marking
flags.
Data and Analysis
The following are our vectors graphed during our lab :
Inside parentheses are the cardinal directions, outside the parentheses are on a coordinate plane.
Final vector from Lab Experiment V=12.62 @185 degrees (5 degrees South of West/ 265
degrees)
Final vector (tip to tail method) V= 12.5 @ 202 degrees (22 south of west/ 268 degrees)
Final vector (Analytically) V=12.21 @201 degrees (21 degrees south of west/ 249
degrees)
Error Analysis
Because we measured 5 vectors, there were a lot of things that could’ve gone wrong to produce inaccurate data. The most likely things that would have skewed our
data specifically were inaccurate flag placing and bending/curving in the tape measure. We avoided inaccurate flag placing by measuring exactly where to put the flag
with meter sticks. Although more tricky, keeping the tape measure flat and straight was the solution we applied to our bending problem.
Conclusion
Our final vector we got during the procedure was V=12.62 @185 degrees (5 degrees South of West/ 265 degrees), which isn’t too far off from what we got using the
tip to tail method V= 12.5 @ 202 degrees (22 south of west/ 268 degrees), and adding the vectors analytically V=12.21 @201 degrees (21 degrees south of west/ 249
degrees). We hypothesized that we could accurately measure the vectors to a meter and 20 degrees because while we had solutions to our possible errors, nothing is
perfect, and so our hypothesis was correct.