Chapter 3 Retaining Walls

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 20

Saint Mary’s University

School of Engineering, Architecture, and Information Technology

Retaining
Walls
CE 422b Foundation & Retaining Wall Design

Engr. Andres P. Gualon Jr., MSCE


Faculty of Civil Engineering – SEAIT

1
CE 422b Foundation & Retaining Wall Design

Introduction
In this Chapter, we will discuss
1. Lateral Earth Pressure (review
from Soil Mechanics)
2. Retaining Walls

2
SMU-SEAIT Retaining Wall
Lateral Earth
Pressures
(Review from Soil Mechanics)

3
CE 422b Foundation & Retaining Wall Design

1. Lateral Earth Pressure


• Conditions of Lateral Earth Pressure

Case 1: Case 2: Case 3:


Wall is at static equilibrium Wall tends to move away from Wall tends to move towards
the soil the soil
AT REST CONDITION ACTIVE CONDITION PASSIVE CONDITION

4
SMU-SEAIT Retaining Wall
CE 422b Foundation & Retaining Wall Design

At Rest Lateral Earth Pressure


𝜎ℎ′ = 𝐾𝑜 𝜎𝑜 ′
Emperical Relationships of Ko
1. For coarse-grained Soil (Jaky, 1944)

2. For overconsolidated soil, the at-rest earth


pressure coefficient may be expressed as
(Mayne and Kulhawy, 1982)

5
SMU-SEAIT Retaining Wall
CE 422b Foundation & Retaining Wall Design

Lateral Earth Pressures


ACTIVE STATE PASSIVE STATE

𝜎′𝑎 = 𝜎′𝑜 𝐾𝑎 − 2𝑐′ 𝐾𝑎


𝜎′𝑝 = 𝜎′𝑜 𝐾𝑝 + 2𝑐′ 𝐾𝑝

6
SMU-SEAIT Retaining Wall
CE 422b Foundation & Retaining Wall Design

2. Rankine’s Lateral Earth Pressure Coef.

Failure
Failure Wedge
Wedge
z z
θ

σ’o σ’o

σ’a σ’p
θ 𝜙′
𝜙′ 𝜃 = 45 +
𝜃 = 45 − 2
2
𝜎′𝑎 = 𝜎′𝑜 𝐾𝑎 − 2𝑐′ 𝐾𝑎 𝜎′𝑝 = 𝜎′𝑜 𝐾𝑝 + 2𝑐′ 𝐾𝑝
1 − sin 𝜙′ 𝜙′ 1 + sin 𝜙′ 𝜙′
𝐾𝑎 = = 𝑡𝑎𝑛2 45 − 𝐾𝑝 = = 𝑡𝑎𝑛2 45 +
1 + sin 𝜙′ 2 1 − sin 𝜙 2
7
SMU-SEAIT Retaining Wall
CE 422b Foundation & Retaining Wall Design

Rankine’s Generalized Case

ACTIVE STATE

PASSIVE STATE

8
SMU-SEAIT Retaining Wall
CE 422b Foundation & Retaining Wall Design

3. Coulomb’s Lateral Earth Pressure Coef.


ACTIVE STATE

9
SMU-SEAIT Retaining Wall
CE 422b Foundation & Retaining Wall Design

3. Coulomb’s Lateral Earth Pressure Coef.


PASSIVE STATE

10
SMU-SEAIT Retaining Wall
Retaining Walls

11
CE 422b Foundation & Retaining Wall Design

Introduction
Conventional retaining walls can generally be classified into four varieties:
1. Gravity retaining walls
2. Semigravity retaining walls
3. Cantilever retaining walls
4. Counterfort retaining walls
5. Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Walls

12
SMU-SEAIT Retaining Wall
CE 422b Foundation & Retaining Wall Design

Design Considerations
• To design retaining walls properly, an engineer
must know the basic parameters— the unit
weight, angle of friction, and cohesion - of the
soil retained behind the wall and the soil below
the base slab
• Phases in the Design
1. Stability Check
 Overturning
 Sliding
 Bearing Capacity
2. Structural Design
 Strength (Dimension, shear)
 Steel reinforcement (flexure)

13
SMU-SEAIT Retaining Wall
CE 422b Foundation & Retaining Wall Design

Proportioning of Retaining Walls


In designing retaining walls, an
engineer must assume some of
their dimensions, called
proportioning. Such assumptions
allow the engineer to check trial
sections of the walls for stability.
If the stability checks yield
undesirable results, the sections
can be changed and rechecked.

14
SMU-SEAIT Retaining Wall
CE 422b Foundation & Retaining Wall Design

Application of Lateral Earth Pressure Theories


to Design

Cantilever Ret. Gravity Ret. Wall Gravity Ret. Wall


Wall (Rankine) (Coulomb)
15
SMU-SEAIT Retaining Wall
CE 422b Foundation & Retaining Wall Design

Stability of Retaining Walls


A retaining wall may fail in any of the following ways:
1. It may overturn about its toe.
2. It may slide along its base.
3. It may fail due to the loss of bearing capacity of the
soil supporting the base.
4. It may undergo deep-seated shear failure. (1) (2)
5. It may go through excessive settlement.
6. Deep Shear Failure

(3) (4)
(6) 16
SMU-SEAIT Retaining Wall
CE 422b Foundation & Retaining Wall Design

Check for Overturning

17
SMU-SEAIT Retaining Wall
CE 422b Foundation & Retaining Wall Design

Check for Sliding

Alternatives of Increasing
the FS for Sliding

18
SMU-SEAIT Retaining Wall
CE 422b Foundation & Retaining Wall Design

Check for Bearing Capacity Failure

Soil Bearing Pressure

19
SMU-SEAIT Retaining Wall
CE 422b Foundation & Retaining Wall Design

Structural Design

For Cantilever Retaining Walls


1. Design of stem for flexure
2. Design of base for flexure

20
SMU-SEAIT Retaining Wall

You might also like