Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Skills Research Deficit
Skills Research Deficit
Skills Deficits:
Cross-Sectoral Perceptions and Experiences
2010
Foreword
During the last few years several diverse attempts have been made to establish the extent of the skills shortage in
Namibia. For a variety of reasons, no blame intended, these investigations have produced inconclusive results.
Constantly there are criticisms of the current allocation of work permits; too easy to obtain on the one hand and
sometimes impossible on the other. Why and where does the problem lie? Do we have critical skills shortages and if
so in which sectors?
After discussions with the Trade Union umbrella bodies, NUNW and TUCNA, and the Ministry of Labour & Social
Welfare, the NEF in collaboration with the social partners aforementioned decided to rapidly carry out a skills-
shortage survey in an endeavour to establish key facts.
It was realised during implementation of the survey that the limitations of the project, in terms of time and resources,
meant that a detailed breakdown of skills shortages in each industry would not be possible. Instead, the survey
establishes the seriousness of the problem and identifies the areas of expertise in which skills shortages are most
critical across all sectors. It is envisaged that a larger and more comprehensive skills census needs to be carried
out to gain detailed information on a sector-by-sector basis. This report sets out the case for such a survey to be
undertaken in the near future.
We wish to thank the IPPR and especially Frederico Links and Graham Hopwood for their work in executing this
survey, and the ILO Regional Office in Pretoria and the Global Compact Namibia Network for their financial support.
We acknowledge with sincere appreciation contributions from the trade unions and the Ministry of Labour and Social
Welfare without whose input this study would not have been as inclusive as it is.
We call upon all sectors of the Namibian economy to take note of the recommendations for “The way forward”, and to
join hands and together resolve the issues raised in the interests of Namibia, creating more jobs and overall building of
the economy.
Namibian Employers’ Federation in collaboration with the Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare, NUNW and TUCNA
20th November 2010.
November 2010
Executive Summary.......................................................................................... 2
1. Introduction............................................................................................. 3
2. Methodology............................................................................................ 5
3. The Findings............................................................................................ 6
4. Summary............................................................................................... 11
References............................................................................................ 12
Annexes:
Annex-1: Additional Charts & Tables..................................................... 13
Annex-2: 4.5 Identify challenges........................................................... 15
Annex-3: 5.1 Share your recommendations.......................................... 16
Annex-4: 5.2 Any other information...................................................... 18
Annex-5: Feeling the skills pinch.......................................................... 20
Annex-6: 2010 Skills Survey Questionnaire.......................................... 22
Annex-7: Terms of Reference................................................................ 29
1 See http://www.weforum.org/documents/GCR10/index.html
2010 3645 2142 -1503 A shortage indicates a situation in which there would be
2011 3948 2046 -1902 a large skills pool, with regard to a particular skill, but
that demand and potential growth, in terms of additional
2012 4297 1954 -2343
numbers on a regular basis, within that skills pool
does not correlate to growth in demand for individuals
While we do not know the sampling system or possessing the particular skill. Simply, supply does not
meet demand.
2 Namibia Human Capital and Knowledge Development for With this clarification in mind, the survey started with
Economic Growth with Equity, 2005
question 2.1 of the questionnaire which stated:
3 Technical Assistance to the National Planning Commission
(Namibia) for the updating of the human resources demand and Would you agree or disagree with the statement that
supply model, 2006 Namibia is experiencing a skills shortage/scarcity?
/scarcity?
As stated earlier, question 2.1 in the questionnaire was
aimed at testing the perception, within and across
various sectors of the economy, on whether, in a broad
Pa anc M ion
Ba tive
er er Che ing
& & u icals
tru ies
r & se ia
Go cka es
g
l m Ho thca t
an sp re
t y
su g
m Me e
eu ls
s
Tr mm hn ail
or nica gy
lo ns
ric tics
Ot re
rs
al en
al
ac lit
nc
ve gin
In urin
ac ta
he
pe ia ed
pa rvic
tu
t & tio
co ec Ret
o
ns lit
tic
uf ita
Ag gis
nk
He nm
ra
o
ol
in gy m
ul
co ti
m
r
to
u
Au
T
ar
sp
Ph
Fin
ne En
g
le
str
Te
du
In
En
Prof/trade
That said, there appears to be a slight disconnect These three categories (management, professionals and
between perception and reality, which is generally the technicians), which encompass the specialist levels in
case in surveys such as this, with only about 70% of both the organisation and broader economy, account for
respondents who had agreed with the control statement roughly 70% of responses under the acuteness indicator
and who had indicated that the skills deficit on the whole (Table 2). These responses probably correlate with the
was severe to very severe, stating that critical vacancies 70% admittance to the existence of specialist skills/
requiring specialist skills and/or expertise existed in their expertise vacancies (Chart 3) at individual organisational
organisation/company/industry (Chart 3). level.
Levels of acuteness
Specialist skills/expertise vacancies
Percentage
yes no
t ls ns in es rs s rs rs
en na vic ke or re he
cia m
or at ou
gem ssio hni Ad ser w per b Ot
a e c d l s a
an of Te la
n na le ry
o L
Pr rso Sa
M ica ne
ler pe chi
C & a
ity M
un
m
m
Co
Chart 3 Table 3
When considering this (Chart 3), the affirmative In addition, as experience is closely tied to specialisation
percentage largely reflects the responses of and expertise, with regard to which 55% of respondents
organisations/companies involved in trades/industries, or expressed a preference for appropriate qualifications
those engaged in diversified activities, heavily dependent and/or skills to be accompanied by 3 to 5 years relevant
on specialised skills and knowledge, such as engineering experience. The suggestion appears to be that the
and accounting, to name just two, which require a formal combination of an appropriate qualification and the
qualification and a number of years relevant on-the- desired number of years of relevant experience is hard
37%
organisation just meets basic requirements, while 23% Completely satisfied
Mostly satisfied
stated that the existing skills pool requires upgrade Partially satisfied
and 11% stated that existing skills do not meet basic Mostly dissatisfied
Completely dissatisfied
requirements.
Chart 4
Against this backdrop, when addressing the issue
of skills it would be remiss not to touch on the topic Satisfaction levels in this regard speak to the relevance
of education and training, particularly the perceived of the curricular offerings of tertiary sector education and
performance of tertiary education and sector specific training authorities. When asked how relevant the skills
training providers, which shall be discussed briefly in the training offered by tertiary sector education and training
next section in relation to the survey results. authorities in Namibia is to their industry, 55% indicated
in the range of partially relevant to mostly irrelevant, while
9% stated the skills training was completely irrelevant.
However, a sizeable 36% indicated in the range mostly
relevant to completely relevant (Chart 5).
yes no
20%
26%
Completely relevant
Mostly relevant
Partially relevant
Mostly irrelevant
36% Completely irrelevant
Chart 5 Chart 6
in Namibia, including the various vocational training skills development initiatives stated that such initiatives
institutions, are probably on the whole neither aligned to are only partially effective, while 35% stated that they are
local sectoral needs nor international standards. mostly effective, but only 9% found in-house efforts to
be completely effective (Chart 7).
With impressions and sentiments tending overwhelmingly
to the negative, as illustrated, it would appear that the
Effectiveness of in-house skills development
2005 World Bank assessment5 of the efficacy of training
authorities and institutions still holds true as of November
2010.
Furthermore, the average annual allocation to in-house Furthermore, a minority of organisations/companies (36%)
skills development initiatives appears to be between make bursaries available to outside parties (i.e. school-
0–5% of total annual expenditure. leavers) to gain qualifications and/or skills required by that
particular industry/organisation (Chart 8).
However, it should be borne in mind that existence of
in-house skills development initiatives and the spending What all this suggests is a sizable gap between individual
towards such initiatives do not mean success or organisation/company efforts and their expectations,
effectiveness. In this regard, more than half (53%) of compounded by the perceived limited and questionable
respondents who had indicated the existence of in-house delivery of tertiary sector education and training
authorities. This indicates a clear and urgent need for
5 See Namibia Human Capital and Knowledge Development for the Namibia Training Authority (NTA) to get the Industry
Economic Growth with Equity
yes no
Chart 8
Worsening
Improving
No change
Chart 9
Namibia Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Namibia Manufacturers Association. 2010. Namibian Business and
Investment Climate Survey 2009. (Windhoek, Namibia)
National Planning Commission. 2006. Technical Assistance to the National Planning Commission (Namibia) for the
updating of the human resources demand and supply model. (Windhoek, Namibia)
Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare. 2010. Training on Scarce Skills Profiling (Windhoek, Namibia)
Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare. 2010. Namibia Labour Force Survey 2008 (Windhoek, Namibia)
Namibia Training Authority. 2008. The Namibian labour market in brief. (Windhoek, Namibia)
Robin Sherbourne. 2010. Guide to the Namibian Economy 2010. Institute for Public Policy Research (Windhoek,
Namibia)
World Economic Forum. 2010. The Global Competitiveness Report 2010-2011. (Geneva, Switzerland)
For Namibia’s ranking on the WEF Global Competitiveness Index go to: http://www.weforum.org/documents/GCR10/
index.html
Lack of Lack of relevant Competition Lack of relevant Lack of Constraints Deficient Terms of All
relevant experience with from other training funding/ to education numeracy, employment
qualification qualification organisations institutions resources for opportunities literacy &
training language
“Time constraints; staff availability; basic education at “1. Adequate time and resources
secondary level; ambition and willingness to learn; time 2. Lack of certified trainers
constraints of trainers” 3. Literacy level of targeted employees”
“Cost, educational levels of employees and lack of “Time availability of experienced staff
experienced experts to mentor or to provide required Shortage of experienced staff
training. Local institutions have little capacity to provide Educational backlog of lower level staff”
technical and Management and Leadership training that
we require.” “Productivity, work ethics”
“Cannot always retain well qualified staff after he/she “To find people with the potential to be trained as
was developed, i.e. cannot compete with private sector supervisors”
on remuneration. Training costs are high.”
“Illiteracy
“Marine Training inefficient Time restraints – finding time in between work
Skills shortage impacts on skills transfer” responsibilities to train and be trained
Staff turnover”
“Time, availability, skills”
“1. Poor background knowledge
“Do not have enough experienced staff to do mentoring 2. Low educational level from school”
and work at the same time.”
“1. Skilled employees being head hunted
• It [training] is expensive 2. Time and workload constraints
• It takes a lot of time 3. In-house training not accredited
• Lack of basic education 4. Obtaining work permits for skilled employees to assist
• Lack of tertiary education with skills transfer remains a challenge”
• Language and cultural barriers
“The number of students to be trained at tertiary level “We need more Vocational Training Colleges.
must be increased with bursary support from the private Proper funding of existing Tertiary institutions is needed.
and public sectors. Students leaving our secondary schools are poorly
Thorough orientation and induction at the workplace with equipped to cope with the tertiary education level and
the support of qualified experienced mentors. this needs to be addressed.”
Basic training for all health professional disciplines must
be offered in Namibia” “Namibia should import international skills in order for
the local population to learn from them and grow. This
“A critical basic starting point is to get secondary can also be regulated by capping an amount of expats
education to an acceptable level. each company may have, for example only allowing
Then get more of the countless jobless youth into training each company to have 1% of its workforce being
opportunities like VTCs, NIMT etc. expats without government intervention. This will allow
Allow foreign skilled resources entry to impart their companies to better develop their own employees and
knowledge and experience to the graduates from such keep the required skills and experience of certain expats.
training centres.” Millers must undergo both theoretical training only
available in English, which appears to be a problem, and
“A dedicated Sector Institution to address all required practical “on-the-job” training. Training takes 3 years to
Electricity Supply Industry technical skills requirements. become a Maize miller, another 3 years for Wheat Milling,
A better coordination with other institutions in the sector thus 6 years for both.”
with regards to training.
Improved funding mechanisms for VET and Education “The lack of basic skills hampers the further development
Sector that equips learners with basic literacy and of the candidates and makes training very time
numeracy skills that allow them to benefit from work consuming. Not only does Namibia’s secondary
place training opportunities.” education sector need to be seriously upgraded with
regard to basic numerical and alphabetical skills,
“Human Resources audit for the country” teaching staff also needs to be better trained and
monitored.
“Adequate funding for skills development, both for formal In-House-Training becomes less efficient, because
and informal education” the mentors themselves are not properly trained. The
top personnel that could function as mentors have too
“Use qualified facilitators for skills development” much else on their plate. “Foreign” experts need to be
able to work inside Namibia so that overall skills can be
“Provide incentives/recognition to companies for skills improved and to allow for a comparison as regards ideal
development” skills levels.”
“Provide tax rebates to companies/individuals for skills “I would recommend also focusing on understanding
development” needs and expectations of our international guests.
Simply put: that good service in hospitality is vital for
“We need Unam and Polytech to provide world class our existence. If one looks at our fellow Zimbabweans’
degrees in Logistics, Transport & Supply Chain. It needs service level, it becomes clear that staff have been
to be up to standard. We are struggling to find young coached to understand this.
Namibians with Tertiary qualifications in Logistics.”
“There is a vast difference in quality among the various “Availability of adult literacy programmes.
VTCs within the country. Certain VTCs produce good More affordable training programmes for basic skills (in
skills on average, others produce average or below. A sales, computer literacy, business appreciation, etc)
general problem is, that people are not motivated and Shorter course duration – thereby not keeping
have a problem with entitlement.” employees away from work for more than a few hours a
day”
“a. Children should not be allowed to drop out of school
before age 16. Schools in communal areas should be “What is needed is a “Hospitality Training College” with
staffed by well trained teachers. If local teachers are not professional, skilled lecturers – we have a few hospitality
well trained, teachers should be brought in from outside. training centres in Namibia – unfortunately no skilled,
Children should learn basic hospitality skills in school. professional lecturers – the outcome is catastrophic”
b. Volunteers or government paid people should be
allowed to train hospitality personnel at lodges or an “Work permits to be issued to skilled workers from
affordable training organisation should be put in place to other countries to share knowledge and transfer skills to
visit lodges for in-house training. Namibians.
c. Small lodges, far away from Windhoek, cannot afford Quality of all tertiary training must be in line with global
to send personnel for training to Windhoek, especially as standards.
there is no accommodation for them. If there were cheap Skills development should start at pre-school level and
accommodation available in Windhoek, staff could be be a combined effort from all sectors in Namibia.”
sent for training to Windhoek.
d. NTB levies could be better employed for training rather
than marketing a small sector of the industry.”
The following are verbatim answers/comments obtained “Guests often comment of the reserved nature of our
with regard to question 5.2 of the questionnaire (refer to people/this is also sometimes interpreted as being
Annex-6), which asked: Any other information you would unfriendly/ although I see it as lack of self confidence/
like to share with regard to skills development in your Probably also due to our history/ Staff (In General) are
organisation/industry/the country? not at a level where they realize that the guests want to
be entertained and that personnel are as much a part of
“Currently it is difficult to use the expertise of foreigners the ‘African experience’ for tourists as the country itself.
in cases where Namibians are unavailable due to nature, game parks etc.”
problems to obtain work permits.”
“We should also be more open to import skills from
“Address the phlegmatism of the Namibian youth and the ‘Outside Namibia’; make it easier /lucrative for foreigners
general work ethic of efficiency and productivity. Inspire to transfer their skills. I know of many extremely
the working class through motivational drives (not costly competent Zimbabweans /other foreign nationals that
ineffective workshops)” are unemployed/underutilized and if done correctly (even
at the risk of temporarily replacing Namibians) they could
“Staff Development to acquire graduate and be offered a defined training contract and this in the
postgraduate qualifications, coupled with bonding of longrun will offer Namibia a broader skills repertoire to
staff member” make Namibia more lucrative for Tourism and potential
investors.”
“Regular group training in specific areas”
“To upgrade training material using latest technology
“We also experience a shortage in qualified drivers (e.g. distance and e-learning)”
for large trucks, seeing that we have such a large
unemployment % in Namibia I feel that this presents a “a. Lodges in remote areas attempt to employ locals, but
big opportunity for Namibia. All the transporters struggle most of the rural people will only work a short time and
to find good drivers. If there could be a [recognised then leave their job. They do not want to work, because
driver training] institution to develop good drivers it could their families and friends are not working and want a part
supply a lot of people with work.” of their money (eat with them). Another excuse is that
they are too hungry to work.
We need to import specific skills e.g. Engineers, b. Work ethics is a concept that does not exist in rural
Technicians and Accountants until we have developed areas. Unsupervised lodge personnel are inclined to
local capacity. steal or not do much, necessitating the employment of
supervisory staff at high salaries. Training in work ethics
“Without an international accredited University, Namibia is therefore important.
can not develop the necessary skills to compete in c. Government offices in rural areas are over-staffed
international markets. and employees mostly sit around idle and deliver bad
It is impossible for a country to compete and keep up service (I can give examples). This sets a bad example
with international standards when that country stops for employees in private businesses. “Why should I work
international knowledge from crossing their border.” if they don’t?” or “I have to work too much” or “The work
is too hard”, so I’d rather not work.”
“As a company we recognise our responsibility towards
improving the knowledge base of especially our less “1. The country needs specialized skills, but people are
privileged staff members. Already we are showing our job hopping a lot [for short term financial gain] and this
commitment by for example actively supporting the leads to a situation where skills are not properly honed.
Commercial Advancement Training Scheme (CATS) dual 2. Tertiary institutions need to involve relevant industries
training programme for the advancement of our staff. when setting up their curriculum
The main problem is that the training provided by In the experience of one firm, “This sourcing process
After completing this questionnaire, please submit to the following email address: researcher@ippr.org.na
Or fax to +264 61 240 516
Guidelines:
1. Please read the following before filling in the questionnaire.
2. Where applicable, the questions should be answered with a cross (X) in the required space.
Important Notes:
• This questionnaire should take you approximately 25 – 30 minutes to complete.
• The questionnaire is divided into five (5) Sections, namely:
Section I: Demographics of your organisation
Section II: Skills
Section III: Sector education and training authorities
Section IV: In-house skills development
Section V: Sector skills development
• All responses to this questionnaire will be treated with the strictest confidence and anonymity.
• Please complete this questionnaire as honestly and comprehensively as possible and submit it by Friday,
22 October 2010 to the identified contact person.
SECTION I: DEMOGRAPHICS
1.1 Name of company/organisation/institution:
2.1 Would you agree or disagree with the statement that Namibia is experiencing a skills
shortage/scarcity?
Agree__________________
Disagree_______________
2.2 If you agree, how severe would you say the skills shortage/scarcity is?
Very severe
Severe
2.3 If you agree, in your experience, at what level is the shortage/scarcity most acute?
[More than one category can be chosen]
Professionals (i.e. Arts and Media Prof.; Business, HR and Marketing Prof.;
Design, Engineering, Science and transport Prof.; Education Prof.; Health Prof.;
ICT Prof.; Legal, Social and Welfare Prof.)
Technicians and Trades Workers (i.e. Engineering, ICT and Science Tech.;
Automotive and Engineering Trade Workers; Construction Trade Workers; Electro
technology and Telecommunications Trades Workers; Food Trades Workers;
Skilled Animal and Horticultural Workers; Other tech. and Trades Workers)
Community and Personal Service Workers (i.e. Health and Welfare Support
Workers; Carers and Aides; Hospitality Workers; Protective Service Workers;
Sports and Personal Service Workers)
Sales Workers (i.e. Sales Representatives and Agents; Sales Assistants and
Salespersons; Sales Support Workers)
Machinery Operators and Drivers (i.e. Machine and Stationary Plant Operators;
Mobile Plant Operators; Road and Rail Drivers; Store persons)
2.4 Do you currently have vacancies in your company / organisation / industry for specialist
skills / expertise?
YES__________
NO___________
2.5 If yes, does the existence of such vacancies in your company / organisation mean that you
[choose the answer that is your most immediate concern]
Cannot expand your operations in the manner which you would like
Cannot undertake certain levels of contract work which you would like
2.6 How would you describe the existing skills pool in your organisation?
Underdeveloped
Requires upgrade
2.7 If you agreed with 2.1, how do you see this shortage/scarcity of skills over the next five
years?
2.8 Select reasons for shortage/scarcity of skills? [Select three answers & rank 1,2,3]
Completely satisfied
Mostly satisfied
Partially satisfied
Mostly dissatisfied
Completely dissatisfied
3.2 How relevant is the skills training offered by tertiary sector education and training authorities
in Namibia to your industry?
Completely relevant
Mostly relevant
Partially relevant
Mostly irrelevant
Completely irrelevant
3.3 Specify your preference for the acquisition of the required skills for your organisation /
industry?
Learnership / internship
Specific courses
Diploma
Degree
Knowledge sharing
4.1 Do you have a strategic skills development plan for your organisation?
YES________
NO_________
4.2 What percentage of your annual expenditure is allocated to skills development and training
programmes?
_________ (%)
4.3 What are the most important training needs of your organisation?
Technical training (i.e. training related to the practical aspects of the job.)
Coaching/mentoring
4.5 Identify challenges in terms of in-house skills development (list 3 most important)
4.6 Based on the above, how effective would you say your in-house skills development
and training programmes are?
Effective
Mostly effective
Partially effective
Mostly ineffective
Ineffective
1 – 3 years
3 – 5 years
5 years+
5.2 Any other information you would like to share with regard to skills development in
your organisation/industry/the country?
Thank you for sharing your time and effort in completing this questionnaire!
P.O. Box 90194, Windhoek, Namibia / Tel +264 61 244089 / Fax +264 61 244231
In partnership with:
Research by:
P.O.Box 6566, Ausspannplatz, Windhoek, Namibia / Tel +264 61 240514 / Fax +264 61 240516 / www.ippr.org.na